Compliance Hub

What is the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA)?

Site Logo
Tookitaki
31 Mar 2021
5 min
read

What is the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA)?  

The Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) is the regulatory authority responsible for supervising the regulation of financial institutes. The financial institutes include banks, insurance companies, and credit firms. Originally, the FSA was known as the Financial Supervisory Agency, which was founded back in 1998 and later became the Financial Services Agency (FSA) in 2000. In Japan, after the Financial Reconstruction Act (FRA) was enacted in 1998, the Financial Reconstruction Commission (FRC) was created under it during the same year, in December. It was part of FRC’s duty to guide the Financial Supervisory Agency. Further, by July 2000, the old FSA reinstated into the new Financial Services Agency (FSA) and took over the FRC’s old functions during the following year. The FSA acts as the principal regulator, which means it is in charge of supervising Japan’s financial sector, including both large and small financial institutions.

What are the Main Functions of the FSA in Japan?

The Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA), as dictated by the Prime Minister, has supervisory and regulatory authority over the financial firms, which also includes banks. It is part of FSA’s responsibility to ensure the stability of Japan’s financial system and that the bank’s depositors, investors, and policyholders are well protected from any kind of financial fraud. The job of FSA as an agency is to add order to the Japanese firm’s financial operations.

These functions are carried out by completing the following: strategic planning, framing policies for the financial sector, and inspecting and monitoring the private-sector FIs and banks. The planning and decision-making include rules that should be followed by FIs through legislation, such as the Banking Act, or the amendment of statutes and other regulations for businesses. Another establishment should be made for a steady financial system and the development of efficient markets so that the investors can conduct asset management and firms can raise better funds and capital.

Under the Banking Act, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) requires financial institutes to report their status of business activities and improve upon their management. Along with this, it can also ask the firms to suspend their businesses - partly or wholly, as a necessary action that ensures supervision. A set of guidelines have been published by the FSA to ensure the supervision of financial institutes, including banks. The guidelines are separate for banks smaller in size or regional FIs.

What are the FSA Regulations for Japan AML?

In Japan, the firms need to ensure the soundness of the financial system for which each entity or FI is required to establish and maintain solid risk management which is appropriate to the firm’s operations and standards. The FIs are required to implement certain measures to combat ML/TF, which is relevant to the changing global affairs and the evolving actions of the FIs against their external conditions. The firms are supposed to maintain effective risk management for ML/TF. This means that they need to identify and assess any potential risks instantly and effectively. This includes the risks related to customer’s operations and mitigates the risk with an appropriate risk-based approach. The ML/TF risk management process is a central function of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) 40 Recommendations, which for some time, has been a part of different countries’ AML regulatory procedures. The financial institutes of Japan must establish a risk-based approach as a minimum standard for having effective procedures. The following are the certain measures that firms need to abide by in order to eradicate ML/TF:

 

  • Risk Mitigation: The firms are required to collect their customer’s information and verify it (based on their profile and account activity) so that the same data can be compared with the results of the risk assessment conducted on the select customer. The firm also needs to define and implement necessary and effective mitigation measures to reduce the identified risks. The firm will collect information about the customer, including their transactions and account activity, to compare it with the results of risk assessment and later implement measures to mitigate those risks. The firm shall also use enhanced measures of mitigation in cases of high ML/TF in order to be both sufficient to the risk levels posed by the customer and appropriate for the firm’s policies and standards

 

  • Customer Due Diligence: Under the AML/CTF measures, it is important that before building any business relationship with a client, the firm collects their information for verification and identification. The information can be related to who they are, what businesses they operate, who their beneficial owners are, what type of transactions are they willing to do, and the source of their funds. Following this, the firm will implement appropriate measures to mitigate any risks based on the collected and verified data. The CDD processes with a customer can be distributed into three different stages: the start, the continuation period, and the end of a business relationship. The firm needs to determine and establish the mitigation measures for each of these stages, based on the level of risk that the customer or their financial transaction poses. Based on all of the gathered information, the firm must then conduct an appropriate risk assessment of their customers

 

  • Transaction Monitoring and Screening: Under the AML/CTF measures, firms need to do transaction monitoring and screening of their customer’s transactions which can help to identify any unusual/suspicious transactions or else, any transactions that are subject to other sanctions. The unusual transactions would include the results of risk assessment for specific transactions of the select customer

 

  • Record-keeping: The firm needs to maintain all the necessary records that are needed for establishing appropriate AML/CTF standards, which also includes any evidence that is relevant to customers, information pertaining to their beneficial owner, and any transactional or communication-based records with the firm’s customers

 

  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (SAR): Firms need to establish certain measures that can help to review any potential suspicious financial transactions. Also, if it can help determine whether Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) is required for that financial transaction. This process of reviewing and analysing is followed by taking the customer’s necessary data that is available to the bank. The information may include the customer’s profile, the nature of their business or financial transaction. This will ensure that the firm’s risk-management is strong and that it meets all of the regulatory obligations

About Japan’s Financial Regulator - In Conclusion

The Japanese financial regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), helps to monitor financial institutes, including banks, insurance firms, and other financial industries. Apart from the FSA, the central bank is known as the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and is like the lender of the last resort, is not a financial regulator on its own but its function includes maintaining the order of Japan’s financial system. The different global regulators want the financial regulations to fulfil three main goals in the financial sector: firstly, protect the firm’s customers; secondly, ensure the integrity and fairness of the financial markets; and thirdly, ensure the financial institute’s stability. In order to fulfil the above mentioned goals, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) has instigated four main pillars which can help financial institutions to instil better regulation:

  1. To make an appropriate combination of the supervisory approach, which is both rules-based and principles-based
  2. To respond effectively and instantly to any high-priority issues
  3. To encourage the voluntary efforts made by FIs and give a greater emphasis on their incentives
  4. To work on regulatory transparency and predictability of procedures

 

Read More: About the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) organization.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
02 Sep 2025
5 min
read

Cracking the Code: How Money Laundering Investigation Software Empowers Philippine Banks

Every suspicious transaction is a clue — and the right software helps connect the dots.

In the Philippines, banks and financial institutions are under intensifying pressure to investigate suspicious activities swiftly and accurately. The country’s exit from the FATF grey list in 2024 has raised expectations: financial institutions must now prove that their money laundering investigation software is not just ticking compliance boxes but truly effective in detecting, tracing, and reporting illicit flows.

What Is Money Laundering Investigation Software?

Money laundering investigation software is a specialised technology platform that enables banks and other covered entities to:

  • Trace suspicious transactions across accounts, products, and channels.
  • Investigate customer profiles and uncover hidden relationships.
  • Automate case management for Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs).
  • Collaborate securely with compliance teams and regulators.

The goal is to turn raw transactional data into actionable intelligence that helps compliance officers identify real risks while reducing wasted effort on false positives.

Talk to an Expert

Why It Matters for the Philippines

The Philippine financial system is highly exposed to money laundering threats due to:

  • Large remittance inflows from overseas workers.
  • Cross-border risks from porous regional payment networks.
  • High cash usage still prevalent in many sectors.
  • Digital transformation of banks and fintechs, increasing the attack surface.

With stricter Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) oversight, institutions need tools that deliver both accuracy and transparency in investigations.

Limitations of Manual or Legacy Investigations

Traditionally, investigations have relied on manual processes or outdated case management tools. These approaches struggle with:

  • Overwhelming volumes of alerts — compliance teams drowning in cases triggered by rigid rules.
  • Siloed data — transaction, KYC, and external intelligence scattered across systems.
  • Limited forensic capability — difficulty connecting patterns across multiple institutions or geographies.
  • Slow turnaround times — risking regulatory penalties for delayed STR filing.

Key Features of Modern Money Laundering Investigation Software

1. Advanced Case Management

Centralised dashboards consolidate alerts, supporting documentation, and investigator notes in one secure interface.

2. AI-Powered Alert Triage

Machine learning reduces false positives and prioritises high-risk cases, helping teams focus on genuine threats.

3. Network and Relationship Analysis

Software visualises connections between accounts, entities, and transactions, uncovering hidden links in laundering networks.

4. Integrated KYC/CDD Data

Seamless integration with KYC data helps validate customer profiles and identify inconsistencies.

5. Regulatory Reporting Automation

Streamlined generation and submission of STRs and CTRs ensures timeliness and accuracy in compliance reporting.

ChatGPT Image Sep 1, 2025, 10_29_49 PM

How It Helps Detect Common Money Laundering Typologies in the Philippines

  1. Layering through Remittance Channels – Detecting unusual fund flows structured across multiple remittance outlets.
  2. Use of Shell Companies – Linking transactions to front businesses with no legitimate operations.
  3. Casino Laundering – Identifying large buy-ins followed by minimal play and rapid cash-outs.
  4. Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) – Flagging mismatched invoices and payments tied to cross-border shipments.
  5. Terror Financing Risks – Tracing small but frequent transfers tied to high-risk geographies or individuals.

Regulatory Expectations for Investigation Tools

The BSP and AMLC require that institutions’ investigation processes are:

  • Risk-based and proportionate to customer and product profiles.
  • Documented and auditable for regulatory inspection.
  • Efficient in STR filing, avoiding delays and inaccuracies.
  • Transparent — investigators must explain why a case was escalated or closed.

Here, software with explainable AI capabilities provides the critical balance between automation and accountability.

Challenges in Adopting Investigation Software in the Philippines

  • Integration with legacy core banking systems remains a technical hurdle.
  • Shortage of skilled investigators who can interpret complex analytics outputs.
  • Budget constraints for rural banks and smaller fintechs.
  • Cultural resistance to shifting from manual investigations to AI-assisted tools.

Best Practices for Effective Deployment

1. Combine Human Expertise with AI

Investigators should use AI to enhance decision-making, not replace human judgment.

2. Invest in Training

Equip compliance officers with the skills to interpret AI outputs and relationship graphs.

3. Prioritise Explainability

Adopt platforms that clearly explain the rationale behind flagged transactions.

4. Collaborate Across Institutions

Leverage industry-wide typologies to strengthen investigations against cross-bank laundering.

5. Align with BSP’s Risk-Based Supervision

Ensure investigation workflows adapt to customer risk profiles and sector-specific risks.

The Tookitaki Advantage: Smarter Investigations with FinCense

Tookitaki’s FinCense is designed as a trust layer for financial institutions in the Philippines, delivering next-generation investigation capabilities.

Key differentiators:

  • Agentic AI-powered investigations that guide compliance officers step by step.
  • Smart Disposition engine that auto-generates investigation summaries for STRs.
  • Federated intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem — giving access to 200+ expert-contributed scenarios and typologies.
  • Explainable outputs to satisfy BSP and global regulators.

By automating repetitive tasks and providing deep forensic insight, FinCense helps Philippine banks reduce investigation time, cut costs, and strengthen compliance.

Conclusion: Investigations as a Strategic Advantage

Money laundering investigation software is no longer a luxury — it’s essential for Philippine banks navigating a fast-evolving financial crime landscape. By embracing AI-powered platforms, institutions can investigate smarter, report faster, and stay compliant with confidence.

In a digital-first future, the banks that treat investigations not just as a regulatory burden but as a strategic advantage will be the ones that win lasting customer trust.

Cracking the Code: How Money Laundering Investigation Software Empowers Philippine Banks
Blogs
02 Sep 2025
5 min
read

AML CFT Software in Australia: Building Stronger Defences Against Financial Crime

With financial crime on the rise, Australian institutions need AML CFT software that combines real-time detection, regulatory compliance, and adaptability.

Financial crime is evolving rapidly in Australia. Fraudsters are exploiting the New Payments Platform (NPP), cross-border remittances, and digital banking to move illicit funds faster than ever. At the same time, terrorism financing threats remain a concern, particularly as criminals seek to disguise transactions in complex layers across jurisdictions.

To address these risks, Australian financial institutions are increasingly investing in AML CFT software. These platforms help detect and prevent money laundering and terrorism financing while keeping institutions aligned with AUSTRAC’s expectations. But not all software is created equal. The right solution can reduce costs, improve detection accuracy, and build trust, while the wrong choice can leave institutions exposed to penalties and reputational damage.

Talk to an Expert

What is AML CFT Software?

AML CFT software is technology designed to help financial institutions comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CFT) regulations. It integrates processes across customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, investigations, and reporting.

Key functions include:

  • KYC and Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verifying and risk-scoring customers.
  • Transaction Monitoring: Detecting suspicious or unusual activity.
  • Sanctions and PEP Screening: Checking customers and transactions against lists.
  • Case Management: Investigating and resolving alerts.
  • Regulatory Reporting: Generating Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) and Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs).

Why AML CFT Software Matters in Australia

1. AUSTRAC’s Strict Expectations

AUSTRAC enforces the AML/CTF Act 2006, which applies to all reporting entities, from major banks to remittance providers. Institutions must not only have controls in place but also prove that those controls are effective.

2. Real-Time Payments Challenge

With NPP enabling instant transactions, legacy batch monitoring systems are no longer sufficient. AML CFT software must work in real time.

3. Complex Laundering Typologies

Criminals use shell companies, trade-based money laundering, and mule networks to disguise illicit funds. Advanced detection capabilities are needed to uncover these patterns.

4. Reputational Risk

Non-compliance does not only result in penalties but also erodes customer trust. High-profile cases in Australia have shown how reputational damage can be long-lasting.

5. Cost of Compliance

Compliance costs are rising across the industry. Institutions need software that reduces false positives, automates investigations, and improves efficiency.

ChatGPT Image Sep 1, 2025, 05_46_30 PM

Core Features of Effective AML CFT Software

1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

  • Detects suspicious activity in milliseconds.
  • Includes velocity checks, location-based alerts, and anomaly detection.

2. AI and Machine Learning Models

  • Identify unknown patterns beyond static rules.
  • Reduce false positives by distinguishing unusual but legitimate behaviour.

3. Integrated KYC/CDD

  • Automates onboarding checks.
  • Screens for politically exposed persons (PEPs), sanctions, and adverse media.

4. Case Management

  • Centralises investigations.
  • Allows analysts to track, escalate, and resolve alerts efficiently.

5. Regulatory Reporting Tools

  • Generates SMRs and TTRs in AUSTRAC-compliant formats.
  • Maintains audit trails for regulator reviews.

6. Explainability

  • Provides clear reason codes for each alert.
  • Ensures transparency for regulators and internal stakeholders.

Challenges in Deploying AML CFT Software

  • High False Positives: Legacy systems often generate alerts that waste investigator time.
  • Integration Issues: Complex core banking systems may not integrate smoothly.
  • Lack of Local Expertise: Global vendors without knowledge of AUSTRAC standards may fall short.
  • Evolving Criminal Methods: Criminals innovate constantly, requiring frequent updates to detection typologies.

Best Practices for Choosing AML CFT Software

  1. Assess Real-Time Capabilities: Ensure the software can handle NPP transaction speed.
  2. Evaluate AI Strength: Look for adaptive models that reduce false positives.
  3. Check AUSTRAC Alignment: Confirm local compliance support and reporting tools.
  4. Demand Transparency: Avoid black-box AI. Choose software with explainable decision-making.
  5. Prioritise Scalability: Make sure the solution can grow with your institution.
  6. Ask for Local References: Vendors proven in Australia are safer bets.

Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Taking the Lead

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank have adopted modern AML CFT platforms to strengthen compliance and fraud prevention. Their experiences show that even mid-sized institutions can implement advanced technology to stay ahead of criminals and regulators. These banks demonstrate that AML CFT software is not just for Tier-1 players but for any institution that values trust and resilience.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

Among AML CFT software providers, Tookitaki stands out for its innovative approach. Its flagship platform, FinCense, offers end-to-end compliance and fraud prevention capabilities.

  • Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity instantly across NPP and cross-border corridors.
  • Agentic AI: Continuously adapts to new money laundering and terrorism financing typologies while keeping false positives low.
  • Federated Learning: Accesses real-world scenarios contributed by global experts through the AFC Ecosystem.
  • FinMate AI Copilot: Assists investigators with case summaries and regulator-ready reports.
  • Full AUSTRAC Compliance: SMRs, TTRs, and detailed audit trails built into the system.
  • Cross-Channel Coverage: Monitors transactions across banking, remittance, wallets, and crypto.

With FinCense, institutions in Australia can stay ahead of evolving threats while managing compliance costs effectively.

The Future of AML CFT Software in Australia

1. PayTo and Overlay Services

As NPP expands with PayTo, new fraud and money laundering typologies will emerge. Software must adapt quickly.

2. Deepfake and AI-Powered Scams

Criminals are already using deepfakes to commit fraud. Future AML software will need to incorporate the detection of synthetic identities and manipulated media.

3. Cross-Border Intelligence Sharing

Closer coordination with ASEAN markets will be key, given Australia’s financial links to the region.

4. Collaborative Compliance Models

Federated learning and shared fraud databases will become standard, enabling institutions to collectively fight financial crime.

5. Cost Efficiency Focus

As compliance costs rise, automation and AI will play an even greater role in reducing investigator workload.

Conclusion

In Australia’s fast-moving financial environment, AML CFT software is no longer optional. It is the backbone of compliance and a critical shield against money laundering and terrorism financing. Institutions that rely on outdated systems risk falling behind criminals and regulators alike.

The right AML CFT platform delivers more than compliance. It strengthens customer trust, reduces costs, and future-proofs institutions for the risks ahead. Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are showing the way, proving that with the right technology, even mid-sized players can lead in compliance innovation.

Pro tip: When evaluating AML CFT software, prioritise real-time monitoring, AI adaptability, and AUSTRAC alignment. These are the non-negotiables for resilience in the NPP era.

AML CFT Software in Australia: Building Stronger Defences Against Financial Crime
Blogs
01 Sep 2025
5 min
read

Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore: Building a Smarter Line of Defence

Fraud may wear many faces. But for enterprises, the cost of not catching it is always the same: reputation, revenue, and regulatory risk.

In Singapore’s fast-paced, high-trust economy, enterprise fraud has evolved far beyond simple scams. Whether it's internal collusion, digital payment abuse, cross-border laundering, or supplier impersonation, organisations need to rethink how they detect and prevent fraud at scale.

This blog explores how enterprise fraud detection is transforming in Singapore, what makes it different from consumer-level security, and what leading firms are doing to stay ahead.

Talk to an Expert

What Is Enterprise Fraud Detection?

Unlike individual-focused fraud detection (such as stolen credit cards), enterprise fraud detection is designed to uncover multi-layered, systemic, and often high-value fraud schemes that target businesses, financial institutions, or governments.

It includes threats such as:

  • Internal fraud (for example, expense abuse or payroll manipulation)
  • Business email compromise (BEC)
  • Procurement fraud and supplier collusion
  • Cross-channel transaction fraud
  • Laundering via corporate accounts or trade platforms

In Singapore, where enterprises increasingly operate across borders and digital channels, the attack surface for fraud is broader than ever.

Why It’s a Priority in Singapore’s Enterprise Landscape

1. High Volume, High Velocity

Singaporean enterprises operate in sectors like banking, logistics, trade, and technology. These sectors are prone to complex, high-volume transactions that make detecting fraud challenging.

2. Cross-Border Risks

As a regional hub, many Singaporean businesses handle payments, contracts, and supply chains that cross jurisdictions. This creates blind spots that fraudsters exploit.

3. Regulatory Pressure

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has increased scrutiny on fraud resilience, cyber threats, and risk controls. This is especially true after high-profile scams and laundering cases.

4. Digital Transformation

Digital acceleration has outpaced many legacy risk controls. Fraudsters take advantage of the gaps between systems, departments, or verification processes.

Key Features of a Strong Enterprise Fraud Detection System

1. Multi-Channel Monitoring

From bank transfers to invoices, card payments, and internal logs, enterprise systems must analyse all channels in one place.

2. Real-Time Detection and Response

Enterprise fraud does not wait. Real-time flagging, blocking, and escalation are critical, especially for high-value transactions.

3. Risk-Based Scoring

Modern platforms use behavioural analytics and contextual data to assign risk scores. This allows teams to prioritise the most dangerous threats.

4. Cross-Entity Link Analysis

Detecting hidden relationships between users, accounts, suppliers, or geographies is key to uncovering organised schemes.

5. Case Management and Forensics

Built-in case tracking, audit logs, and investigator dashboards are vital for compliance, audit defence, and root cause analysis.

Challenges Faced by Enterprises in Singapore

Despite growing awareness, many Singaporean enterprises struggle with:

1. Siloed Systems

Fraud signals are spread across payment, HR, ERP, and CRM systems. This makes unified detection difficult.

2. Limited Intelligence Sharing

Few enterprises share typologies, even within the same sector. This limits collective defence.

3. Outdated Rule Engines

Many systems still rely on static thresholds or manual checks. These systems miss complex or new fraud patterns.

4. Overworked Compliance Teams

High alert volumes and false positives lead to fatigue and longer investigation times.

ChatGPT Image Aug 31, 2025, 03_45_20 PM

How AI Is Reshaping Enterprise Fraud Detection

The rise of AI-powered, scenario-based systems is helping Singaporean enterprises go from reactive to predictive fraud defence.

✅ Behavioural Anomaly Detection

Rather than just flagging large transactions, AI looks for subtle deviations like login location mismatches or unusual approval flows.

✅ Federated Learning

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform allows enterprises to learn from other organisations’ fraud patterns without sharing sensitive data.

✅ AI Copilots for Investigators

Tools such as FinMate assist human teams by surfacing key evidence, suggesting next steps, and reducing investigation time.

✅ End-to-End Visibility

Modern systems integrate with finance, HR, procurement, and customer systems to give a complete fraud view.

How Singaporean Enterprises Are Using Tookitaki for Fraud Detection

Leading organisations across banking, fintech, and commerce are turning to Tookitaki to future-proof their fraud defence. Here’s why:

  • Scenario-Based Detection Engine
    FinCense uses over 200 expert-curated typologies to identify real-world fraud, including invoice layering and ghost vendor networks.
  • Real-Time, AI-Augmented Monitoring
    Transactions are scored instantly, and high-risk cases are escalated before damage is done.
  • Modular Agents for Each Risk Type
    Enterprises can plug in relevant AI agents such as those for trade fraud, ATO, or BEC without overhauling legacy systems.
  • Audit-Ready Case Trails
    Every flagged transaction is supported by AI-generated narratives and documentation, simplifying compliance reviews.

Best Practices for Implementing Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore

  1. Start with a Risk Map
    Identify your fraud-prone workflows. These might include procurement, payments, or expense claims.
  2. Break Down Silos
    Integrate risk signals across departments to build a unified fraud view.
  3. Use Real-World Scenarios
    Rely on fraud typologies tailored to Singapore and Southeast Asia rather than generic patterns.
  4. Enable Human and AI Collaboration
    Let your systems detect, but your people decide, with AI assistance to speed up decisions.
  5. Continuously Improve with Feedback Loops
    Use resolved cases to train your models and refine detection rules.

Conclusion: Enterprise Fraud Requires Enterprise-Grade Solutions

Enterprise fraud is growing smarter. Your defences should too.

In Singapore’s complex and high-stakes business environment, fraud detection cannot be piecemeal or reactive. Enterprises that invest in AI-powered, real-time, collaborative solutions are not just protecting their bottom line. They are building operational resilience and stakeholder trust.

The future of enterprise fraud detection lies in intelligence-led, ecosystem-connected platforms. Now is the time to upgrade.

Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore: Building a Smarter Line of Defence