Artificial intelligence isn’t the future of AML. It’s already here — and Singapore is leading the way.

As financial crime becomes more sophisticated, traditional compliance systems are falling behind. The rise of faster payments, cross-border laundering, synthetic identities, and deepfake-driven fraud has exposed the limitations of static rules and legacy software. In response, banks and fintechs in Singapore are turning to AML AI solutions that detect risks earlier, reduce false positives, and streamline investigations.

In this blog, we explore what an AML AI solution really looks like, how it works, and why institutions in Singapore are embracing it to stay ahead of both criminals and regulators.

Why AI Is a Game Changer for AML in Singapore

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has made it clear — technology is a core part of the country’s fight against financial crime. Through initiatives like the AML/CFT Industry Partnership (ACIP) and the MAS Veritas framework for explainable AI, Singapore is building a regulatory environment that encourages innovation without compromising accountability.

At the same time, Singapore’s financial institutions are facing more complex challenges than ever:

• Mule accounts used in investment and job scams
• Layering of funds through e-wallets and remittance providers
• Abuse of shell companies in trade-based laundering
• Fraudulent fund flows enabled by deepfake impersonation
• Real-time payment risks with little recovery time

In this environment, artificial intelligence is not just helpful — it’s essential.

What Is an AML AI Solution?

An AML AI solution is a software platform that uses artificial intelligence to improve how financial institutions detect, investigate, and report suspicious activity.

It typically includes:

• Machine learning models for pattern detection
• Behavioural analytics to understand customer activity
• Natural language generation to summarise case findings
• Risk scoring algorithms that learn from historical decisions
• Automated decision support for analysts

Unlike rule-only systems, AI-powered solutions continuously learn and adapt, improving detection accuracy and operational efficiency over time.

Key Benefits of AML AI Solutions

1. Reduced False Positives

Traditional systems often generate too many alerts for low-risk behaviour. AI learns from past cases and analyst decisions to reduce noise and focus attention on true risk.

2. Faster Detection of New Threats

AI can identify suspicious patterns even if they haven’t been explicitly programmed into the system. This is especially valuable for emerging typologies like:

• Layering through multiple fintech apps
• Round-tripping via shell firms
• Structuring disguised as utility bill payments

3. Real-Time Risk Scoring

AI models assign risk scores to customers and transactions based on hundreds of variables. This allows institutions to prioritise alerts and allocate resources effectively.

4. Smarter Case Investigation

AI copilots can assist analysts by:

• Highlighting key transactions
• Surfacing related customer behaviour
• Drafting STR narratives in plain language

This reduces the time to close cases and improves consistency in reporting.

5. Continuous Learning

As more cases are resolved, AI models can learn what fraud and laundering look like in your specific environment, increasing precision with each iteration.

How AML AI Solutions Align with MAS Expectations

Singapore’s regulatory landscape encourages the use of AI — as long as it is transparent and explainable.

The MAS Veritas initiative provides a framework for:

• Fairness: Avoiding bias in AI decision-making
• Ethics: Using data responsibly
• Accountability: Ensuring decisions can be explained and audited

An effective AML AI solution must therefore include:

• Decision traceability for every alert
• Human override capabilities
• Clear documentation of how models work
• Regular testing and validation of AI accuracy

Platforms that follow these principles are more likely to meet MAS standards and earn regulator trust.

Core Capabilities to Look For in an AML AI Solution

1. AI-Driven Transaction Monitoring

The system should use machine learning models to detect anomalies across:

• Transaction amounts
• Frequency and velocity
• Device and location changes
• Peer comparison against similar customers

2. Scenario-Based Typology Detection

The best systems include real-world money laundering scenarios contributed by experts, such as:

• Placement via retail accounts
• Layering through shell companies
• Integration via fake invoicing or loan repayments

This context improves both alert accuracy and investigation clarity.

3. Investigation Copilots

Tools like FinMate from Tookitaki act as intelligent assistants that:

• Help analysts understand alert context
• Suggest next investigative steps
• Auto-generate draft narratives for STRs
• Surface links to previous related cases

4. Risk-Based Alert Prioritisation

AI should rank alerts based on impact, urgency, and regulatory relevance, ensuring that investigators spend their time where it matters most.

5. Simulation and Model Tuning

Institutions should be able to simulate how a new AI model or detection rule will perform before going live. This helps fine-tune thresholds and manage alert volumes.

6. Federated Learning for Shared Intelligence

AI systems that learn from shared typologies — without sharing customer data — offer the best of both worlds. This collaborative approach strengthens industry resilience.

How Tookitaki’s FinCense Delivers an AML AI Solution Built for Singapore

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is a leading AML AI solution used by financial institutions across Asia, including Singapore. It’s built with local compliance, risk, and operational challenges in mind.

Here’s what makes it stand out:

Agentic AI Framework

FinCense uses modular AI agents that specialise in:

• Transaction monitoring
• Alert prioritisation
• Case investigation
• Regulatory reporting

Each agent is trained and validated independently, allowing institutions to scale features as needed.

Access to the AFC Ecosystem

The AFC Ecosystem is a community-driven repository of AML typologies. FinCense connects directly to this ecosystem, enabling institutions to:

• Download new scenarios
• Adapt quickly to regional threats
• Stay ahead of typologies involving mule accounts, trade flows, and fintech misuse

Smart Disposition and FinMate Investigation Copilot

These tools help analysts reduce investigation time by:

• Auto-summarising case data
• Providing contextual insights
• Offering explainable decision paths
• Supporting audit-ready workflows

MAS-Aligned Design and Veritas Readiness

FinCense is built for compliance with Singapore’s regulatory expectations, including:

• Integration with GoAML for STR filing
• Full decision traceability
• Regular model audits and validation reports
• Explainable AI components

Results Achieved by Institutions Using AML AI Solutions

Singapore-based banks and fintechs using FinCense have reported:

• Over 60 percent reduction in false positives
• Investigation turnaround times cut by half
• Stronger regulatory outcomes during audits
• Higher-quality STRs with better supporting documentation
• Improved morale and productivity in compliance teams

These outcomes demonstrate the power of combining local context, intelligent automation, and human decision support in a single solution.

When Should a Financial Institution Consider an AML AI Solution?

If you answer “yes” to more than two of the questions below, your organisation may be ready for an upgrade.

• Are you overwhelmed by false positives?
• Are you slow to detect emerging typologies?
• Is your investigation process mostly manual?
• Do STRs take hours to compile and submit?
• Are your current tools siloed or difficult to scale?
• Do regulators require more explainability than your system provides?

If these issues sound familiar, an AML AI solution could transform your compliance operations.

Conclusion: The Future of AML in Singapore Is Powered by AI

In Singapore’s fast-paced financial ecosystem, compliance teams face mounting pressure to do more with less — and to do it faster, smarter, and more transparently.

AML AI solutions offer a new way forward. By using intelligent automation, shared typologies, and explainable decisioning, institutions can move from reactive monitoring to proactive crime prevention.

Tookitaki’s FinCense shows what’s possible when AI is built for local regulators, regional threats, and real-world operations. The result is not just better compliance — it’s a smarter, stronger financial system.

Now is the time to stop relying on outdated rules and start trusting intelligent systems that learn, adapt, and protect.

As scams surge and payments move faster, Australian banks must modernise fraud prevention to stay compliant, efficient, and trusted.

Introduction

Fraud is reshaping Australia’s banking landscape. In 2024, Australians lost more than AUD 3 billion to scams, according to the ACCC’s Scamwatch, with many losses involving bank transfers and digital payments. From authorised push payment (APP) scams and account takeovers to insider threats, criminals are exploiting every weakness in the system.

Banks now sit at the front line of defence. Customers expect them to protect every dollar, while AUSTRAC expects them to detect, report, and prevent illicit activity in real time. The challenge is clear: how can banks strengthen fraud prevention without slowing down legitimate transactions or frustrating customers?

The State of Banking Fraud in Australia

1. Real-Time Payments, Real-Time Risks

The New Payments Platform (NPP) and PayTo have transformed how Australians move money. Funds can travel between institutions in seconds, but the same speed benefits fraudsters. Once a fraudulent transfer is complete, recovery is difficult.

2. Scam Epidemic

Authorised push payment scams remain the biggest contributor to consumer losses. Investment scams and romance fraud are increasing year-on-year, while small business owners are being targeted through fake invoices and business email compromise (BEC).

3. Regulatory Pressure from AUSTRAC

AUSTRAC continues to raise expectations for fraud and AML controls. Institutions must report suspicious activity promptly and prove that their systems can detect emerging typologies.

4. Technology Gaps

Legacy systems are struggling to manage today’s fraud risks. Batch-based monitoring cannot keep up with real-time transactions, and manual investigations slow down responses.

5. Customer Trust at Stake

When fraud hits, reputation suffers. Restoring trust after a major incident can take years and millions of dollars in remediation.

Common Fraud Typologies in Australian Banking

1. Authorised Push Payment (APP) Scams: Victims are deceived into sending funds to criminals.
2. Account Takeover (ATO): Fraudsters gain control of legitimate accounts using stolen credentials.
3. Money Mule Networks: Recruited individuals move illicit funds through legitimate accounts.
4. Business Email Compromise (BEC): Attackers impersonate company executives or suppliers.
5. Synthetic Identities: Fraudsters blend real and fake data to open new accounts.
6. Insider Threats: Employees or third parties abuse access privileges.

Red Flags for Banking Fraud

• Multiple transactions just below AUSTRAC reporting thresholds.
• New beneficiaries added immediately before high-value transfers.
• Rapid fund movements through newly opened accounts.
• Unusual logins from unfamiliar devices or geographies.
• Repeated transaction reversals or complaints.
• Sudden activity inconsistent with customer history.

Why Fraud Prevention Needs a Rethink

Traditional fraud prevention relied on static rules and manual reviews. While effective a decade ago, this approach cannot handle today’s transaction speed or volume. Criminals now use automation, AI, and cross-channel tactics. Banks must respond with equal sophistication.

Modern fraud prevention depends on:

• Real-time analytics instead of post-event reviews.
• Machine learning models that adapt to new patterns.
• Integrated AML-fraud systems for holistic risk detection.
• Federated intelligence that shares insights across institutions.

Regulatory Expectations from AUSTRAC

Under the AML/CTF Act 2006, banks are required to:

• Conduct customer due diligence (CDD) and ongoing monitoring.
• Report Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs), Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs), and International Funds Transfer Instructions (IFTIs).
• Maintain risk-based AML/CTF programs reviewed regularly.
• Keep accurate records of alerts and investigations.
• Ensure systems are fit for purpose and scalable for real-time environments.

AUSTRAC’s focus for 2025 includes data quality, real-time monitoring, and stronger collaboration across the banking ecosystem.

Core Components of an Effective Fraud Prevention Framework

1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Banks must detect suspicious activity at the same speed it occurs. Real-time engines analyse patterns, behavioural changes, and anomaly scores within milliseconds.

2. AI-Driven Risk Models

Machine learning enables systems to recognise emerging typologies without human retraining. It also minimises false positives that overwhelm investigators.

3. Behavioural Biometrics

By tracking keystrokes, device usage, and navigation patterns, banks can distinguish legitimate customers from impostors.

4. Sanctions and PEP Screening

Every transaction must be checked against global and AUSTRAC watchlists to ensure no prohibited entities are involved.

5. Integrated Case Management

Alerts should automatically route to investigators with all contextual data attached. Efficient workflows shorten investigation cycles.

6. Regulatory Reporting Automation

Tools should generate regulator-ready SMRs and TTRs instantly, complete with full audit trails.

Challenges Facing Australian Banks

• Data Silos: Fragmented systems prevent unified risk visibility.
• False Positives: Poorly tuned models waste resources.
• Legacy Infrastructure: On-premise tools lag behind cloud-native innovation.
• Talent Shortages: Skilled AML and fraud professionals are in short supply.
• Rising Costs: Compliance budgets continue to climb as regulations tighten.

Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Leading by Example

Community-owned institutions like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank show that effective fraud prevention is achievable without Tier-1 budgets. By adopting AI-powered compliance platforms, they have reduced false positives, improved fraud detection, and ensured consistent AUSTRAC reporting while maintaining customer satisfaction.

These banks demonstrate that proactive investment in modern fraud prevention tools builds both regulatory confidence and community trust.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

FinCense, Tookitaki’s end-to-end compliance platform, is redefining fraud prevention for Australian banks.

• Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious transactions instantly across NPP, PayTo, cards, and remittances.
• Agentic AI: Learns from new fraud patterns and explains decisions transparently to regulators.
• Federated Intelligence: Shares anonymised typologies contributed by global experts in the AFC Ecosystem.
• FinMate AI Copilot: Assists investigators with summarised cases and regulator-ready reports.
• Cross-Channel Coverage: Connects AML, fraud, and onboarding data for a 360-degree risk view.
• AUSTRAC Alignment: Automates SMRs, TTRs, and IFTIs with full audit trails.

FinCense helps institutions move from reactive monitoring to predictive protection.

Best Practices for Banks Strengthening Fraud Prevention

1. Invest in Explainable AI: Ensure models are transparent and auditable.
2. Integrate AML and Fraud Functions: A unified risk approach reduces duplication.
3. Adopt a Risk-Based Approach: Focus resources on higher-risk customers and transactions.
4. Enhance Data Quality: Clean, standardised data improves model accuracy.
5. Train Teams Continuously: Keep investigators informed of emerging typologies.
6. Engage with Regulators Early: Open dialogue with AUSTRAC ensures compliance confidence.
7. Collaborate Across the Industry: Join federated intelligence networks to identify threats early.

The Future of Fraud Prevention in Australian Banking

1. AI-Native Compliance Systems
   Next-generation platforms will use large-language-model agents and adaptive learning to handle investigations autonomously.
2. Deeper PayTo Integration
   Fraud prevention tools will expand to cover payment agreements and consent-based authorisations.
3. Industry-Wide Data Collaboration
   Banks will share anonymised typologies through federated learning frameworks.
4. Focus on Digital Identity
   Biometric and behavioural identity verification will become mandatory safeguards.
5. Customer-Centric Security
   Future systems will prioritise frictionless protection that enhances user experience.
6. Regulatory Co-Creation
   Regulators and banks will work together to design adaptable compliance frameworks that encourage innovation.

Conclusion

Fraud prevention in the Australian banking industry is entering a new era. As instant payments, digital identities, and cross-border transactions expand, banks must move beyond legacy systems to intelligent, adaptive solutions.

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank prove that innovation and compliance can coexist. Platforms such as Tookitaki’s FinCense combine real-time analytics, Agentic AI, and federated intelligence to help institutions outsmart criminals, reduce costs, and build trust.

Pro tip: In modern banking, fraud prevention is not just about stopping scams. It is about preserving the trust that underpins every financial relationship.

The right vendor is not just selling software, they are safeguarding your institution’s future.

In the Philippines, the pressure to fight financial crime is mounting. The exit from the FATF grey list in 2024 signaled progress, but also raised expectations for financial institutions. Banks, fintechs, and remittance companies are now required to show that they can identify suspicious activity quickly and accurately. At the heart of this challenge is transaction monitoring software. And choosing the right vendor is as important as the technology itself.

Why Transaction Monitoring Matters More Than Ever

Transaction monitoring enables financial institutions to detect unusual or suspicious activity in real time or through batch analysis. It flags patterns such as structuring, round-tripping, or high-risk cross-border flows that may signal money laundering or fraud.

In the Philippines, several factors make monitoring critical:

• Large remittance inflows vulnerable to structuring and layering.
• High fintech adoption with e-wallets and digital banks processing instant payments.
• Cross-border risks as syndicates exploit correspondent banking channels.
• Heightened regulatory oversight from the BSP and AMLC.

For institutions, the right transaction monitoring system can be the difference between meeting compliance standards and facing regulatory penalties.

The Role of Transaction Monitoring Software Vendors

Software alone is not enough. Vendors provide the platforms, expertise, and ongoing support that make monitoring effective. A vendor is not just a provider, they are a partner in compliance. Their responsibilities include:

• Developing adaptive monitoring technology.
• Ensuring local regulatory alignment.
• Offering integration with core banking systems.
• Providing training and customer support.
• Continuously updating typologies and detection rules.

The choice of vendor directly impacts both compliance outcomes and operational efficiency.

What to Look For in Transaction Monitoring Software Vendors

When evaluating vendors in the Philippines, institutions should consider several factors:

1. Regulatory Alignment

Vendors must demonstrate familiarity with BSP and AMLC requirements, including STR filing standards, risk-based monitoring, and audit readiness.

2. Technology and Innovation

Modern systems should offer AI-driven monitoring, machine learning for anomaly detection, and explainability to satisfy regulators.

3. Local and Regional Expertise

Vendors should understand the Philippine market as well as regional risks such as cross-border laundering and remittance abuse.

4. Integration Capabilities

Seamless integration with legacy banking infrastructure is essential to ensure a single view of customer activity.

5. Scalability

Solutions should support institutions of different sizes, from rural banks to major commercial players.

6. Customer Support and Training

Strong after-sales support ensures that compliance teams can use the software effectively.

7. Collaborative Intelligence

The ability to share typologies and scenarios across banks without compromising data privacy enhances overall industry defences.

How Vendors Help Address Philippine Money Laundering Typologies

Top vendors ensure their systems detect common schemes in the Philippines:

• Remittance Structuring detected through repeated small-value transfers.
• Shell Companies exposed via unusual business-to-business transactions.
• Casino Laundering flagged through inconsistent deposit and withdrawal patterns.
• Trade-Based Laundering identified through mismatched invoices and payments.
• Terror Financing uncovered through frequent low-value transfers to high-risk geographies.

Challenges in Choosing Transaction Monitoring Vendors

Selecting the right vendor is not straightforward. Institutions face obstacles such as:

• Vendor Lock-In: Some vendors limit flexibility by tying institutions to proprietary technology.
• High Implementation Costs: Advanced solutions can strain budgets of smaller institutions.
• Complex Integration: Connecting to legacy core banking systems can delay deployment.
• Skill Gaps: Compliance teams may lack experience with sophisticated monitoring platforms.
• Evolving Threats: Vendors that fail to update systems regularly leave institutions exposed.

Best Practices for Selecting a Vendor

1. Conduct a Needs Assessment
   Identify specific risks, regulatory requirements, and resource constraints before shortlisting vendors.
2. Evaluate Proof of Concept (POC)
   Run test cases with vendors to see how their systems perform against real scenarios.
3. Prioritise Explainability
   Choose vendors that offer systems with clear reasoning behind flagged alerts.
4. Check Industry References
   Look for testimonials or case studies from other Philippine or ASEAN banks.
5. Focus on Partnership, Not Just Product
   A strong vendor offers training, updates, and support that extend beyond installation.

Global vs Local Vendors: Which Is Better?

Philippine institutions often face a choice between global and local vendors. Each has strengths:

• Global Vendors bring advanced AI, scalability, and a track record across markets. However, they may lack local context or flexibility.
• Local Vendors understand BSP and AMLC regulations and the Philippine market intimately, but may lack the resources or innovation speed of global players.

The best choice often depends on institution size, complexity, and risk appetite. Hybrid approaches, such as global technology with local implementation support, are increasingly popular.

The Tookitaki Advantage: A Vendor with a Difference

Tookitaki’s FinCense is more than just a transaction monitoring solution. It is built as a trust layer for financial institutions in the Philippines.

Why Tookitaki stands out among vendors:

• Agentic AI-Powered Detection that adapts to new laundering and fraud typologies.
• Federated Intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem, offering insights contributed by global compliance experts.
• False Positive Reduction through behavioural analytics and adaptive thresholds.
• Smart Disposition Engine that automates investigation summaries for STR filing.
• Explainable Outputs aligned with BSP and AMLC expectations.
• Proven Regional Experience with banks and fintechs across Asia-Pacific.

As a vendor, Tookitaki does not just deliver software. It partners with institutions to build resilient compliance frameworks that evolve with threats.

Conclusion: Choosing Vendors as Compliance Allies

In the Philippines, the stakes for compliance have never been higher. Choosing the right transaction monitoring software vendor is not just a procurement decision, it is a strategic move that defines an institution’s ability to fight financial crime.

The best vendors combine advanced technology with local expertise, strong support, and a collaborative mindset. They help banks move beyond compliance checklists to build trust, resilience, and growth.

Philippine institutions that partner with the right vendor today will not only meet regulatory requirements but also set the foundation for sustainable, secure, and customer-centric banking in the digital age.