What is correspondent banking AML risk?
.svg)
In order to understand what correspondent banking AML risk is, let’s break it down.
What are correspondent banks?
The definition of correspondent banking is: Banks in a country that are set up to provide services for another bank or financial institution in a foreign country. The services provided by a correspondent bank include money transfers, currency exchange, trade documentation and business transactions. Typically, in a correspondent banking relation, two banks in two different countries enter into an agreement to open a correspondent account (Nostro or Vostro account), which enables a domestic bank to make payments or do money transfers in local currency on behalf of a foreign bank. An example of a correspondent banking transaction is given below.
- A corporate customer of a bank in one country wants to pay for products purchased from a foreign supplier.
- The customer approaches its domestic bank and instructs to make the payment (in foreign currency).
- The domestic bank determines the local currency value of the foreign products purchased and deducts the same from its customer’s account.
- The domestic bank then instructs its correspondent bank in the supplier’s country to pay the supplier in the local currency from the domestic bank’s correspondent account.
Correspondent banks are most likely to be used by domestic banks to service transactions that either originate or are completed in foreign countries. Domestic banks generally use correspondent banks to gain access to foreign financial markets and to serve international clients without having to open branches abroad.
What is an example of this?
For example, let’s say you live in the U.S. and go to your local bank to wire funds to a friend in Spain. An employee at the bank simply searches the SWIFT network to find a correspondent bank that has an agreement in place with the financial institution in Spain. Then, the correspondent bank facilitates the transaction.
Money laundering through correspondent banking
Money laundering, the act of concealing the illegal nature of ill-gotten money, is an international problem. According to the UNODC, the amount of money being laundered across the globe every year is equivalent to 2-5% of global GDP, or USD800 billion – USD2 trillion. Financial crime impacts the economies and communities of all countries, irrespective of their financial health and stage of development.
Money laundering has a global nature as many criminals make use of international transaction options in the layering or integration stages. Correspondent banks play an important role in facilitating cross-border money laundering transactions. Criminals make use of the services of correspondent banks without proper anti-money laundering (AML) controls to pass on their criminal proceeds to jurisdictions where they can use them in a hassle-free manner. Here, we are trying to understand correspondent banking AML risk in detail and national and international regulations to mitigate correspondent banking AML risk.
Correspondent banking AML risk
Correspondent banking is an essential part of the global payment system and international trade depends largely on it. However, these facilities are often abused to facilitate money laundering and terrorist financing. Mitigation of correspondent banking AML is often a difficult task as the domestic bank carrying out the transaction on behalf of a foreign bank has to rely on the foreign bank’s abilities in identifying the customer, determining the real owners, and monitoring correspondent banking transactions for risks. Often, a foreign bank’s AML compliance programs may not be sufficient to meet the AML requirements of a domestic bank.
There have been reports that foreign correspondent accounts have been used by drug traffickers and other bad actors to launder money. Further, shell companies have often been used in the layering process to hide the actual ownership of accounts at foreign correspondent financial institutions. Due to a large amount of funds, many transactions, many AML fraud schemes, and a domestic bank’s unfamiliarity with the foreign correspondent bank’s customers, it is easy for criminals to conceal the source and use of ill-gotten funds. Therefore, governments in a correspondent banking relationship must ensure complementary and robust anti-money laundering / counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) measures to safeguard their financial systems.
The KYC challenges for correspondent banks
Know-your-customer (KYC) due diligence is an essential element of banking, including correspondent banking. Banks that enter into correspondent banking relationships need to be sure that banks in the chain have correct controls and governance in place, and that their KYC, AML and other due diligence procedures are strong.
Customer due diligence requires that correspondent banks identify and understand their respondents’ banking activities and know if the respondents maintain additional correspondent banking relationships.
FATF guidelines on correspondent banking AML risk
FATF, the international AML/CFT watchdog, recommended various measures to counter money laundering via correspondent banking. FATF noted that “financial institutions have increasingly decided to avoid, rather than to manage, possible money laundering or terrorist financing risks, by terminating business relationships with entire regions or classes of customers”. This so-called ‘de-risking’ practice “can result in financial exclusion, less transparency and greater exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing risks”, according to the watchdog.
FATF advocates the application of the risk-based approach to correspondent banking relationships. It recommended the following measures to counter money laundering via correspondent banking.
- Due diligence on the respondent institution: FATF recommends additional due diligence measures to be applied to cross-border correspondent banking relationships. Such additional measures are appropriate because cross-border correspondent banking relationships are seen to be inherently higher risk than domestic correspondent customer relationships.
- Developing an understanding of the respondent institution’s business: The correspondent institution should also gather sufficient information to understand the nature of the respondent institution’s business in line with the risks identified.
- Verifying respondent institution’s information and assessing/documenting higher risks: When establishing new correspondent banking relationships, the correspondent institution may obtain information directly from the respondent institution. However, this information needs to be verified with independent sources of information such as corporate registries, registries maintained by competent authorities on the creation or licensing of respondent institutions, and registries of beneficial ownership.
- Ongoing due diligence on the respondent institution: Correspondent institutions are required to conduct ongoing due diligence of the correspondent banking relationship, including periodical reviews of the CDD information on the respondent institution.
- Ongoing transaction monitoring: Ongoing AML monitoring of the correspondent banking account activity is needed for compliance with targeted financial sanctions and to detect any changes in the respondent institution’s transaction pattern that may indicate unusual activity, or any potential deviations from the correspondent relationship.
- Request for information about transactions: Where the monitoring system of the correspondent institution flags a transaction, which could signal unusual activity, the correspondent institution should have internal processes to further review the activity, which may involve requesting transaction information of the respondent institution in order to clarify the situation and possibly clear the alert.
- Clear terms governing the correspondent banking relationship: Correspondent institutions can manage their risks more effectively from the outset by entering into a written agreement with the respondent institution before correspondent services are provided.
- Ongoing communication and dialogue: It is important for correspondent institutions to maintain an ongoing and open dialogue with the respondent institution(s) including helping them understand the correspondent’s AML/CFT policy and expectations, and when needed, engaging with them to improve their AML/CFT controls and processes.
- Adjusting the mitigation measures to the evolution of risks: The level and nature of AML/CFT risk may fluctuate over the course of any relationship and adjustments should be made in the correspondent institution’s risk management strategy to reflect these changes.
While correspondent banking is important for the smooth functioning of international trade and transactions, both respondent banks and correspondent banks should have strong AML/CFT compliance programs to mitigate risks. The use of efficient and effective anti-money laundering software is crucial for the success of any AML/CFT compliance program.
The Tookitaki Anti-Money Laundering Suite, an end-to-end, AI-powered AML/CFT solution, is helping financial institutions comply with many regional and international AML compliance regulations and build scalable and sustainable compliance programs that effectively counter AML risk, including correspondent banking AML risk.
To know more about our AML compliance solution and book a demo, please contact us.
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Top AML Scenarios in ASEAN
The Role of AML Software in Compliance
The Role of AML Software in Compliance
We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.
Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?
Our Thought Leadership Guides
Bank AML Compliance: What It Really Looks Like Inside a Bank
AML compliance is not a policy document. It is the sum of thousands of decisions made every day inside a bank.
Introduction
Ask most people what bank AML compliance looks like, and they will describe policies, procedures, regulatory obligations, and reporting timelines. They will talk about AUSTRAC, risk assessments, transaction monitoring, and suspicious matter reports.
All of that is true.
And yet, it misses the point.
Inside a bank, AML compliance is not experienced as a framework. It is experienced as work. It lives in daily trade-offs, judgement calls, time pressure, alert queues, imperfect data, and the constant need to balance risk, customer impact, and regulatory expectations.
This blog looks beyond the formal definition of bank AML compliance and into how it actually functions inside Australian banks. Not how it is meant to work on paper, but how it works in practice, and what separates strong AML compliance programs from those that quietly struggle.
AML Compliance Is a Living System, Not a Static Requirement
In theory, AML compliance is straightforward.
Banks assess risk, monitor activity, investigate suspicious behaviour, and report where required.
In reality, compliance operates as a living system made up of people, processes, data, and technology. Each component affects the others.
When one part weakens, the entire system feels the strain.
Strong AML compliance is not about having the longest policy manual. It is about whether the system holds together under real operational pressure.
The Daily Reality of AML Compliance Teams
To understand bank AML compliance, it helps to look at what teams deal with every day.
Alert volume never stands still
Transaction monitoring systems generate alerts continuously. Some are meaningful. Many are not. Analysts must quickly decide which deserve deeper investigation and which can be cleared.
The quality of AML compliance often depends less on how many alerts are generated and more on how well teams can prioritise and resolve them.
Data is rarely perfect
Customer profiles change. Transaction descriptions are inconsistent. External data arrives late or incomplete. Behaviour does not always fit neat patterns.
Compliance teams work with imperfect information and are expected to reach defensible conclusions anyway.
Time pressure is constant
Reporting timelines are fixed. Regulatory expectations do not flex when volumes spike. Teams must deliver consistent quality even during scam waves, system upgrades, or staff shortages.
Judgement matters
Despite automation, AML compliance still relies heavily on human judgement. Analysts decide whether behaviour is suspicious, whether context explains an anomaly, and whether escalation is necessary.
Strong compliance programs support judgement. Weak ones overwhelm it.
Where AML Compliance Most Often Breaks Down
In Australian banks, AML compliance failures rarely happen because teams do not care or policies do not exist. They happen because the system does not support the work.
1. Weak risk foundations
If customer risk assessment at onboarding is simplistic or outdated, monitoring becomes noisy and unfocused. Low risk customers are over monitored, while genuine risk hides in plain sight.
2. Fragmented workflows
When detection, investigation, and reporting tools are disconnected, analysts spend more time navigating systems than analysing risk. Context is lost and decisions become inconsistent.
3. Excessive false positives
Rules designed to be safe often trigger too broadly. Analysts clear large volumes of benign alerts, which increases fatigue and reduces sensitivity to genuine risk.
4. Inconsistent investigation quality
Without clear structure, two analysts may investigate the same pattern differently. This inconsistency creates audit exposure and weakens confidence in the compliance program.
5. Reactive compliance posture
Some programs operate in constant response mode, reacting to regulatory feedback or incidents rather than proactively strengthening controls.
What Strong Bank AML Compliance Actually Looks Like
When AML compliance works well, it feels different inside the organisation.
Risk is clearly understood
Customer risk profiles are meaningful and influence monitoring behaviour. Analysts know why a customer is considered high, medium, or low risk.
Alerts are prioritised intelligently
Not all alerts are treated equally. Systems surface what matters most, allowing teams to focus their attention where risk is highest.
Investigations are structured
Cases follow consistent workflows. Evidence is organised. Rationales are clear. Decisions can be explained months or years later.
Technology supports judgement
Systems reduce noise, surface context, and assist analysts rather than overwhelming them with raw data.
Compliance and business teams communicate
AML compliance does not operate in isolation. Product teams, operations, and customer service understand why controls exist and how to support them.
Regulatory interactions are confident
When regulators ask questions, teams can explain decisions clearly, trace actions, and demonstrate how controls align with risk.
AUSTRAC Expectations and the Reality on the Ground
AUSTRAC expects banks to take a risk based approach to AML compliance. This means controls should be proportionate, explainable, and aligned with actual risk exposure.
In practice, this requires banks to show:
- How customer risk is assessed
- How that risk influences monitoring
- How alerts are investigated
- How decisions are documented
- How suspicious matters are escalated and reported
The strongest programs embed these expectations into daily operations, not just into policy documents.
The Human Side of AML Compliance
AML compliance is often discussed in technical terms, but it is deeply human work.
Analysts:
- Review sensitive information
- Make decisions that affect customers
- Work under regulatory scrutiny
- Manage high workloads
- Balance caution with practicality
Programs that ignore this reality tend to struggle. Programs that design processes and technology around how people actually work tend to perform better.
Supporting AML teams means:
- Reducing unnecessary noise
- Providing clear context
- Offering structured guidance
- Investing in training and consistency
- Using technology to amplify judgement, not replace it
Technology’s Role in Modern Bank AML Compliance
Technology does not define compliance, but it shapes what is possible.
Modern AML platforms help banks by:
- Improving risk segmentation
- Reducing false positives
- Providing behavioural insights
- Supporting consistent investigations
- Maintaining strong audit trails
- Enabling timely regulatory reporting
The key is alignment. Technology must reflect how compliance operates, not force teams into unnatural workflows.
How Banks Mature Their AML Compliance Without Burning Out Teams
Banks that successfully strengthen AML compliance tend to focus on gradual, sustainable improvements.
1. Start with risk clarity
Refine customer risk assessment and onboarding logic. Better foundations improve everything downstream.
2. Focus on alert quality, not quantity
Reducing false positives has a bigger impact than adding new rules.
3. Standardise investigations
Clear workflows and narratives improve consistency and defensibility.
4. Invest in explainability
Systems that clearly explain why alerts were triggered reduce friction with regulators and auditors.
5. Treat compliance as a capability
Strong AML compliance is built over time through learning, refinement, and collaboration.
Where Tookitaki Fits Into the AML Compliance Picture
Tookitaki supports bank AML compliance by focusing on the parts of the system that most affect daily operations.
Through the FinCense platform, banks can:
- Apply behaviour driven risk detection
- Reduce noise and prioritise meaningful alerts
- Support consistent, explainable investigations
- Maintain strong audit trails
- Align controls with evolving typologies
This approach helps Australian institutions, including community owned banks such as Regional Australia Bank, strengthen AML compliance without overloading teams or relying solely on rigid rules.
The Direction Bank AML Compliance Is Heading
Bank AML compliance in Australia is moving toward:
- More intelligence and less volume
- Stronger integration across the AML lifecycle
- Better support for human judgement
- Clearer accountability and governance
- Continuous adaptation to emerging risks
The most effective programs recognise that compliance is not something a bank finishes building. It is something a bank continually improves.
Conclusion
Bank AML compliance is often described in frameworks and obligations, but it is lived through daily decisions made by people working with imperfect information under real pressure.
Strong AML compliance is not about perfection. It is about resilience, clarity, and consistency. It is about building systems that support judgement, reduce noise, and stand up to scrutiny.
Australian banks that understand this reality and design their AML programs accordingly are better positioned to manage risk, protect customers, and maintain regulatory confidence.
Because in the end, AML compliance is not just about meeting requirements.
It is about how well a bank operates when it matters most.
Singapore’s Smart Defence Against Financial Crime: The Rise of Anti-Fraud Solutions
Think fraud’s a distant threat? In Singapore’s digital-first economy, it’s already at your doorstep.
From phishing scams to real-time payment fraud and mule accounts, the financial sector in Singapore is facing increasingly sophisticated fraud risks. As a global financial hub and one of Asia’s most digitised economies, Singapore’s banks and fintechs must stay ahead of threat actors with faster, smarter, and more adaptive anti-fraud solutions.
This blog explores how modern anti-fraud solutions are transforming detection and response strategies—making Singapore’s compliance systems more agile and effective.
What is an Anti-Fraud Solution?
An anti-fraud solution is a set of tools, systems, and techniques designed to detect, prevent, and respond to fraudulent activities across financial transactions and operations. These solutions can be deployed across:
- Digital banking platforms
- E-wallets and payment gateways
- Core banking systems
- Credit card processing and loan disbursement workflows
Modern anti-fraud solutions combine real-time monitoring, AI/ML algorithms, behavioural analytics, and automated investigation tools to proactively identify fraud before damage occurs.
Why Singapore Needs Smarter Fraud Prevention
Singapore’s fraud environment is evolving quickly:
- Real-time payments (PayNow, FAST) have accelerated attack windows
- Cross-border mule networks are getting more organised
- Fake investment scams and impersonation fraud are rampant
- Businesses are falling victim to supplier payment fraud
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the police’s Anti-Scam Command have highlighted that collaboration, data sharing, and better tech adoption are critical to protect consumers and businesses.
Common Types of Financial Fraud in Singapore
Understanding the landscape is the first step in creating a solid defence. Some of the most prevalent types of fraud in Singapore include:
1. Social Engineering & Impersonation Scams
Fraudsters pose as bank officials, family members, or law enforcement to manipulate victims into transferring funds.
2. Account Takeover (ATO)
Cybercriminals gain unauthorised access to user accounts, especially e-wallets or mobile banking apps, and initiate transactions.
3. Business Email Compromise (BEC)
Emails from fake suppliers or internal staff trick finance teams into approving fraudulent transfers.
4. Fake Investment Platforms
Syndicates set up websites offering high returns and launder proceeds through a network of bank accounts.
5. Payment Fraud & Stolen Credentials
Fraudulent card-not-present transactions and misuse of stored payment details.
Anatomy of a Modern Anti-Fraud Solution
An effective anti-fraud solution isn’t just about flagging suspicious activity. It should work holistically across:
Real-Time Transaction Monitoring
- Screens transactions in milliseconds
- Flags anomalies using behavioural analytics
- Supports instant payment rails like PayNow/FAST
Identity and Device Risk Profiling
- Analyses login locations, device fingerprinting, and user behaviour
- Detects deviations from known patterns
Network Analysis and Mule Detection
- Flags accounts connected to known mule rings or suspicious transaction clusters
- Uses graph analysis to detect unusual fund flow patterns
Automated Case Management
- Creates alerts with enriched context
- Prioritises high-risk cases using AI
- Enables fast collaboration between investigation teams
AI Narration & Investigator Assistants
- Summarises complex case histories automatically
- Surfaces relevant risk indicators
- Helps junior analysts work like seasoned investigators
Key Features to Look For
When evaluating anti-fraud software, look for solutions that offer:
- Real-time analytics with low-latency response times
- Behavioural and contextual scoring to reduce false positives
- Federated learning to learn from fraud patterns across institutions
- Explainable AI to ensure compliance with audit and regulatory expectations
- Modular design that integrates with AML, screening, and case management systems
How Tookitaki Strengthens Fraud Defences
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform delivers an enterprise-grade fraud management system built to meet the demands of Singapore’s digital economy.
Key highlights:
- Unified platform for AML and fraud—no more siloed alerts
- Federated learning across banks to detect new fraud typologies
- Smart Disposition engine that automates investigation summaries
- Real-time transaction surveillance with customisable rules and AI models
FinCense is already helping banks in Singapore reduce false positives by up to 72% and improve investigator productivity by over 3x.
Local Trends Shaping Anti-Fraud Strategy
Singapore’s financial institutions are rapidly adopting fraud-first strategies, driven by:
- FATF recommendations to improve fraud risk management
- Growing consumer demand for real-time, secure payments
- Regulatory push for stronger surveillance of mule accounts
- Cloud migration allowing greater scalability and detection power
Challenges in Implementing Anti-Fraud Tools
Despite the urgency, some challenges remain:
- High false positives from legacy rules-based systems
- Siloed systems that separate AML from fraud monitoring
- Lack of collaboration between institutions to share intelligence
- Shortage of skilled fraud analysts to manage growing alert volumes
Future of Anti-Fraud in Singapore
The future will be defined by:
- AI co-pilots that guide investigations with context-aware insights
- Self-learning systems that adapt to new scam typologies
- Cross-border collaboration between ASEAN countries
- RegTech ecosystems like the AFC Ecosystem to crowdsource fraud intelligence
Conclusion: Time to Think Proactively
In an environment where scams evolve faster than regulations, banks and fintechs can’t afford to be reactive. Anti-fraud solutions must move from passive alert generators to proactive fraud stoppers—powered by AI, designed for real-time action, and connected to collective intelligence networks.
Don’t wait for the fraud to hit. Build your defence today.
AML Check Software: Strengthening Malaysia’s First Line of Financial Crime Defence
In a digital-first financial system, AML check software has become the gatekeeper that protects trust before risk enters the system.
Why AML Checks Are Under Pressure in Malaysia
Malaysia’s financial ecosystem is moving faster than ever. Digital banks, fintech platforms, instant payments, QR transactions, and cross-border remittances have transformed how people open accounts and move money.
But speed brings risk.
Criminal networks now exploit onboarding gaps, weak screening processes, and fragmented compliance systems to introduce illicit actors into the financial system. Once these actors pass initial checks, laundering becomes significantly harder to stop.
Money mule recruitment, scam-linked accounts, shell company misuse, and sanctioned entity exposure often begin with one failure point: inadequate checks at the entry stage.
This is why AML check software has become a critical control layer for Malaysian banks and fintechs. It ensures that customers, counterparties, and transactions are assessed accurately, consistently, and in real time before risk escalates.
What Is AML Check Software?
AML check software is a compliance technology that enables financial institutions to screen, verify, and risk assess customers and entities against money laundering and financial crime indicators.
It supports institutions by performing checks such as:
- Name screening against sanctions and watchlists
- Politically exposed person identification
- Adverse media checks
- Risk scoring based on customer attributes
- Ongoing rechecks triggered by behavioural changes
- Counterparty and beneficiary checks
Unlike manual or basic screening tools, modern AML check software combines data, intelligence, and automation to deliver reliable outcomes at scale.
The purpose of AML checks is simple but critical. Prevent high-risk individuals or entities from entering or misusing the financial system.
Why AML Check Software Matters in Malaysia
Malaysia’s exposure to financial crime is shaped by both domestic and regional dynamics.
Several factors make strong AML checks essential.
1. Cross-Border Connectivity
Malaysia shares close financial links with Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Criminal networks exploit these corridors to move funds and obscure origins.
2. Rising Scam Activity
Investment scams, impersonation fraud, and social engineering attacks often rely on mule accounts that pass weak onboarding checks.
3. Digital Onboarding at Scale
As onboarding volumes grow, manual checks become inconsistent and error prone.
4. Regulatory Expectations
Bank Negara Malaysia expects financial institutions to apply risk-based checks, demonstrate consistency, and maintain strong audit trails.
5. Reputational Risk
Failing AML checks can expose institutions to enforcement action, reputational damage, and customer trust erosion.
AML check software ensures that checks are not only performed, but performed well.
How AML Check Software Works
Modern AML check software operates as part of an integrated compliance workflow.
1. Data Capture
Customer or entity information is captured during onboarding or transaction processing.
2. Screening Against Risk Lists
Names are screened against sanctions lists, PEP databases, adverse media sources, and internal watchlists.
3. Fuzzy Matching and Linguistic Analysis
Advanced systems account for name variations, transliteration differences, spelling errors, and aliases.
4. Risk Scoring
Each match is assessed based on risk indicators such as geography, role, transaction context, and historical behaviour.
5. Alert Generation
High-risk matches generate alerts for further review.
6. Investigation and Resolution
Investigators review alerts within a case management system and document outcomes.
7. Continuous Monitoring
Checks are repeated when customer behaviour changes or new risk information becomes available.
This lifecycle ensures that checks remain effective beyond the initial onboarding stage.
Limitations of Traditional AML Check Processes
Many Malaysian institutions still rely on legacy screening tools or manual processes. These approaches struggle in today’s environment.
Common limitations include:
- High false positives due to poor matching logic
- Manual review of low-risk alerts
- Inconsistent decision-making across teams
- Limited context during alert review
- Poor integration with transaction monitoring
- Weak audit trails
As transaction volumes grow, these weaknesses lead to investigator fatigue and increased compliance risk.
AML check software must evolve from a simple screening tool into an intelligent risk assessment system.
The Role of AI in Modern AML Check Software
Artificial intelligence has dramatically improved the effectiveness of AML checks.
1. Smarter Name Matching
AI-powered linguistic models reduce false positives by understanding context, language, and name structure.
2. Risk-Based Prioritisation
Instead of treating all matches equally, AI scores alerts based on actual risk.
3. Behavioural Context
AI considers transaction behaviour and customer history when assessing matches.
4. Automated Narratives
Systems generate clear explanations for why a match was flagged, supporting audit and regulatory review.
5. Continuous Learning
Models improve as investigators confirm or dismiss alerts.
AI enables AML check software to scale without sacrificing accuracy.
Tookitaki’s FinCense: AML Check Software Built for Malaysia
While many solutions focus only on screening, Tookitaki’s FinCense delivers AML check software as part of a unified financial crime prevention platform.
FinCense does not treat AML checks as isolated tasks. It embeds them into a broader intelligence framework that spans onboarding, transaction monitoring, fraud detection, and case management.
This approach delivers stronger outcomes for Malaysian institutions.
Agentic AI for Intelligent Screening Decisions
FinCense uses Agentic AI to automate and enhance AML checks.
The system:
- Analyses screening matches in context
- Highlights truly risky alerts
- Generates clear investigation summaries
- Recommends actions based on risk patterns
This reduces manual workload while improving consistency.
Federated Intelligence Through the AFC Ecosystem
FinCense connects to the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, a collaborative network of financial institutions across ASEAN.
This allows AML checks to benefit from:
- Emerging risk profiles
- Regional sanctioned entity patterns
- New scam-related mule indicators
- Cross-border laundering typologies
For Malaysian institutions, this shared intelligence significantly strengthens screening effectiveness.
Explainable AI for Regulatory Confidence
Every AML check decision in FinCense is transparent.
Investigators and regulators can see:
- Why a match was considered high or low risk
- Which attributes influenced the decision
- How the system reached its conclusion
This aligns with Bank Negara Malaysia’s emphasis on explainability and governance.
Seamless Integration with AML and Fraud Workflows
AML checks in FinCense are fully integrated with:
- Customer onboarding
- Transaction monitoring
- Fraud detection
- Case management
- STR preparation
This ensures that screening outcomes inform downstream monitoring and investigation activities.
Scenario Example: Preventing a High-Risk Entity from Entering the System
A Malaysian fintech receives an application from a newly incorporated company seeking payment services.
Here is how FinCense AML check software responds:
- The company name triggers a partial match against adverse media.
- AI-powered matching determines that the entity shares directors with previously flagged shell companies.
- Federated intelligence highlights similar structures seen in recent regional investigations.
- Agentic AI generates a summary explaining the risk indicators.
- The application is escalated for enhanced due diligence before onboarding.
This prevents exposure to a high-risk entity without delaying low-risk customers.
Benefits of AML Check Software for Malaysian Institutions
Strong AML check software delivers tangible benefits.
- Reduced false positives
- Faster onboarding decisions
- Improved investigator productivity
- Stronger regulatory alignment
- Better audit readiness
- Early detection of regional risks
- Lower compliance costs over time
- Enhanced customer trust
AML checks become a value driver rather than a bottleneck.
What to Look for in AML Check Software
When evaluating AML check software, Malaysian institutions should prioritise:
Accuracy
Advanced matching that reduces false positives.
Contextual Intelligence
Risk assessment that considers behaviour and relationships.
Explainability
Clear reasoning behind every alert.
Integration
Seamless connection to AML and fraud systems.
Regional Relevance
ASEAN-specific intelligence and typologies.
Scalability
Ability to handle high volumes without degradation.
FinCense delivers all of these capabilities within a single platform.
The Future of AML Checks in Malaysia
AML checks will continue to evolve as financial crime becomes more sophisticated.
Key trends include:
- Continuous screening instead of periodic checks
- Greater use of behavioural intelligence
- Deeper integration with transaction monitoring
- Cross-border intelligence sharing
- Responsible AI governance
- Increased automation in low-risk decisions
Malaysia is well positioned to adopt these innovations while maintaining strong regulatory oversight.
Conclusion
AML check software is no longer a simple compliance tool. It is the first and most critical line of defence against financial crime.
In Malaysia’s fast-moving digital economy, institutions must rely on intelligent systems that deliver accuracy, transparency, and speed.
Tookitaki’s FinCense provides AML check software that goes beyond screening. By combining Agentic AI, federated intelligence, explainable decision-making, and end-to-end integration, FinCense enables Malaysian institutions to protect their ecosystem from the very first check.
Strong AML checks build strong trust. And trust is the foundation of sustainable digital finance.
Bank AML Compliance: What It Really Looks Like Inside a Bank
AML compliance is not a policy document. It is the sum of thousands of decisions made every day inside a bank.
Introduction
Ask most people what bank AML compliance looks like, and they will describe policies, procedures, regulatory obligations, and reporting timelines. They will talk about AUSTRAC, risk assessments, transaction monitoring, and suspicious matter reports.
All of that is true.
And yet, it misses the point.
Inside a bank, AML compliance is not experienced as a framework. It is experienced as work. It lives in daily trade-offs, judgement calls, time pressure, alert queues, imperfect data, and the constant need to balance risk, customer impact, and regulatory expectations.
This blog looks beyond the formal definition of bank AML compliance and into how it actually functions inside Australian banks. Not how it is meant to work on paper, but how it works in practice, and what separates strong AML compliance programs from those that quietly struggle.
AML Compliance Is a Living System, Not a Static Requirement
In theory, AML compliance is straightforward.
Banks assess risk, monitor activity, investigate suspicious behaviour, and report where required.
In reality, compliance operates as a living system made up of people, processes, data, and technology. Each component affects the others.
When one part weakens, the entire system feels the strain.
Strong AML compliance is not about having the longest policy manual. It is about whether the system holds together under real operational pressure.
The Daily Reality of AML Compliance Teams
To understand bank AML compliance, it helps to look at what teams deal with every day.
Alert volume never stands still
Transaction monitoring systems generate alerts continuously. Some are meaningful. Many are not. Analysts must quickly decide which deserve deeper investigation and which can be cleared.
The quality of AML compliance often depends less on how many alerts are generated and more on how well teams can prioritise and resolve them.
Data is rarely perfect
Customer profiles change. Transaction descriptions are inconsistent. External data arrives late or incomplete. Behaviour does not always fit neat patterns.
Compliance teams work with imperfect information and are expected to reach defensible conclusions anyway.
Time pressure is constant
Reporting timelines are fixed. Regulatory expectations do not flex when volumes spike. Teams must deliver consistent quality even during scam waves, system upgrades, or staff shortages.
Judgement matters
Despite automation, AML compliance still relies heavily on human judgement. Analysts decide whether behaviour is suspicious, whether context explains an anomaly, and whether escalation is necessary.
Strong compliance programs support judgement. Weak ones overwhelm it.
Where AML Compliance Most Often Breaks Down
In Australian banks, AML compliance failures rarely happen because teams do not care or policies do not exist. They happen because the system does not support the work.
1. Weak risk foundations
If customer risk assessment at onboarding is simplistic or outdated, monitoring becomes noisy and unfocused. Low risk customers are over monitored, while genuine risk hides in plain sight.
2. Fragmented workflows
When detection, investigation, and reporting tools are disconnected, analysts spend more time navigating systems than analysing risk. Context is lost and decisions become inconsistent.
3. Excessive false positives
Rules designed to be safe often trigger too broadly. Analysts clear large volumes of benign alerts, which increases fatigue and reduces sensitivity to genuine risk.
4. Inconsistent investigation quality
Without clear structure, two analysts may investigate the same pattern differently. This inconsistency creates audit exposure and weakens confidence in the compliance program.
5. Reactive compliance posture
Some programs operate in constant response mode, reacting to regulatory feedback or incidents rather than proactively strengthening controls.
What Strong Bank AML Compliance Actually Looks Like
When AML compliance works well, it feels different inside the organisation.
Risk is clearly understood
Customer risk profiles are meaningful and influence monitoring behaviour. Analysts know why a customer is considered high, medium, or low risk.
Alerts are prioritised intelligently
Not all alerts are treated equally. Systems surface what matters most, allowing teams to focus their attention where risk is highest.
Investigations are structured
Cases follow consistent workflows. Evidence is organised. Rationales are clear. Decisions can be explained months or years later.
Technology supports judgement
Systems reduce noise, surface context, and assist analysts rather than overwhelming them with raw data.
Compliance and business teams communicate
AML compliance does not operate in isolation. Product teams, operations, and customer service understand why controls exist and how to support them.
Regulatory interactions are confident
When regulators ask questions, teams can explain decisions clearly, trace actions, and demonstrate how controls align with risk.
AUSTRAC Expectations and the Reality on the Ground
AUSTRAC expects banks to take a risk based approach to AML compliance. This means controls should be proportionate, explainable, and aligned with actual risk exposure.
In practice, this requires banks to show:
- How customer risk is assessed
- How that risk influences monitoring
- How alerts are investigated
- How decisions are documented
- How suspicious matters are escalated and reported
The strongest programs embed these expectations into daily operations, not just into policy documents.
The Human Side of AML Compliance
AML compliance is often discussed in technical terms, but it is deeply human work.
Analysts:
- Review sensitive information
- Make decisions that affect customers
- Work under regulatory scrutiny
- Manage high workloads
- Balance caution with practicality
Programs that ignore this reality tend to struggle. Programs that design processes and technology around how people actually work tend to perform better.
Supporting AML teams means:
- Reducing unnecessary noise
- Providing clear context
- Offering structured guidance
- Investing in training and consistency
- Using technology to amplify judgement, not replace it
Technology’s Role in Modern Bank AML Compliance
Technology does not define compliance, but it shapes what is possible.
Modern AML platforms help banks by:
- Improving risk segmentation
- Reducing false positives
- Providing behavioural insights
- Supporting consistent investigations
- Maintaining strong audit trails
- Enabling timely regulatory reporting
The key is alignment. Technology must reflect how compliance operates, not force teams into unnatural workflows.
How Banks Mature Their AML Compliance Without Burning Out Teams
Banks that successfully strengthen AML compliance tend to focus on gradual, sustainable improvements.
1. Start with risk clarity
Refine customer risk assessment and onboarding logic. Better foundations improve everything downstream.
2. Focus on alert quality, not quantity
Reducing false positives has a bigger impact than adding new rules.
3. Standardise investigations
Clear workflows and narratives improve consistency and defensibility.
4. Invest in explainability
Systems that clearly explain why alerts were triggered reduce friction with regulators and auditors.
5. Treat compliance as a capability
Strong AML compliance is built over time through learning, refinement, and collaboration.
Where Tookitaki Fits Into the AML Compliance Picture
Tookitaki supports bank AML compliance by focusing on the parts of the system that most affect daily operations.
Through the FinCense platform, banks can:
- Apply behaviour driven risk detection
- Reduce noise and prioritise meaningful alerts
- Support consistent, explainable investigations
- Maintain strong audit trails
- Align controls with evolving typologies
This approach helps Australian institutions, including community owned banks such as Regional Australia Bank, strengthen AML compliance without overloading teams or relying solely on rigid rules.
The Direction Bank AML Compliance Is Heading
Bank AML compliance in Australia is moving toward:
- More intelligence and less volume
- Stronger integration across the AML lifecycle
- Better support for human judgement
- Clearer accountability and governance
- Continuous adaptation to emerging risks
The most effective programs recognise that compliance is not something a bank finishes building. It is something a bank continually improves.
Conclusion
Bank AML compliance is often described in frameworks and obligations, but it is lived through daily decisions made by people working with imperfect information under real pressure.
Strong AML compliance is not about perfection. It is about resilience, clarity, and consistency. It is about building systems that support judgement, reduce noise, and stand up to scrutiny.
Australian banks that understand this reality and design their AML programs accordingly are better positioned to manage risk, protect customers, and maintain regulatory confidence.
Because in the end, AML compliance is not just about meeting requirements.
It is about how well a bank operates when it matters most.
Singapore’s Smart Defence Against Financial Crime: The Rise of Anti-Fraud Solutions
Think fraud’s a distant threat? In Singapore’s digital-first economy, it’s already at your doorstep.
From phishing scams to real-time payment fraud and mule accounts, the financial sector in Singapore is facing increasingly sophisticated fraud risks. As a global financial hub and one of Asia’s most digitised economies, Singapore’s banks and fintechs must stay ahead of threat actors with faster, smarter, and more adaptive anti-fraud solutions.
This blog explores how modern anti-fraud solutions are transforming detection and response strategies—making Singapore’s compliance systems more agile and effective.
What is an Anti-Fraud Solution?
An anti-fraud solution is a set of tools, systems, and techniques designed to detect, prevent, and respond to fraudulent activities across financial transactions and operations. These solutions can be deployed across:
- Digital banking platforms
- E-wallets and payment gateways
- Core banking systems
- Credit card processing and loan disbursement workflows
Modern anti-fraud solutions combine real-time monitoring, AI/ML algorithms, behavioural analytics, and automated investigation tools to proactively identify fraud before damage occurs.
Why Singapore Needs Smarter Fraud Prevention
Singapore’s fraud environment is evolving quickly:
- Real-time payments (PayNow, FAST) have accelerated attack windows
- Cross-border mule networks are getting more organised
- Fake investment scams and impersonation fraud are rampant
- Businesses are falling victim to supplier payment fraud
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the police’s Anti-Scam Command have highlighted that collaboration, data sharing, and better tech adoption are critical to protect consumers and businesses.
Common Types of Financial Fraud in Singapore
Understanding the landscape is the first step in creating a solid defence. Some of the most prevalent types of fraud in Singapore include:
1. Social Engineering & Impersonation Scams
Fraudsters pose as bank officials, family members, or law enforcement to manipulate victims into transferring funds.
2. Account Takeover (ATO)
Cybercriminals gain unauthorised access to user accounts, especially e-wallets or mobile banking apps, and initiate transactions.
3. Business Email Compromise (BEC)
Emails from fake suppliers or internal staff trick finance teams into approving fraudulent transfers.
4. Fake Investment Platforms
Syndicates set up websites offering high returns and launder proceeds through a network of bank accounts.
5. Payment Fraud & Stolen Credentials
Fraudulent card-not-present transactions and misuse of stored payment details.
Anatomy of a Modern Anti-Fraud Solution
An effective anti-fraud solution isn’t just about flagging suspicious activity. It should work holistically across:
Real-Time Transaction Monitoring
- Screens transactions in milliseconds
- Flags anomalies using behavioural analytics
- Supports instant payment rails like PayNow/FAST
Identity and Device Risk Profiling
- Analyses login locations, device fingerprinting, and user behaviour
- Detects deviations from known patterns
Network Analysis and Mule Detection
- Flags accounts connected to known mule rings or suspicious transaction clusters
- Uses graph analysis to detect unusual fund flow patterns
Automated Case Management
- Creates alerts with enriched context
- Prioritises high-risk cases using AI
- Enables fast collaboration between investigation teams
AI Narration & Investigator Assistants
- Summarises complex case histories automatically
- Surfaces relevant risk indicators
- Helps junior analysts work like seasoned investigators
Key Features to Look For
When evaluating anti-fraud software, look for solutions that offer:
- Real-time analytics with low-latency response times
- Behavioural and contextual scoring to reduce false positives
- Federated learning to learn from fraud patterns across institutions
- Explainable AI to ensure compliance with audit and regulatory expectations
- Modular design that integrates with AML, screening, and case management systems
How Tookitaki Strengthens Fraud Defences
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform delivers an enterprise-grade fraud management system built to meet the demands of Singapore’s digital economy.
Key highlights:
- Unified platform for AML and fraud—no more siloed alerts
- Federated learning across banks to detect new fraud typologies
- Smart Disposition engine that automates investigation summaries
- Real-time transaction surveillance with customisable rules and AI models
FinCense is already helping banks in Singapore reduce false positives by up to 72% and improve investigator productivity by over 3x.
Local Trends Shaping Anti-Fraud Strategy
Singapore’s financial institutions are rapidly adopting fraud-first strategies, driven by:
- FATF recommendations to improve fraud risk management
- Growing consumer demand for real-time, secure payments
- Regulatory push for stronger surveillance of mule accounts
- Cloud migration allowing greater scalability and detection power
Challenges in Implementing Anti-Fraud Tools
Despite the urgency, some challenges remain:
- High false positives from legacy rules-based systems
- Siloed systems that separate AML from fraud monitoring
- Lack of collaboration between institutions to share intelligence
- Shortage of skilled fraud analysts to manage growing alert volumes
Future of Anti-Fraud in Singapore
The future will be defined by:
- AI co-pilots that guide investigations with context-aware insights
- Self-learning systems that adapt to new scam typologies
- Cross-border collaboration between ASEAN countries
- RegTech ecosystems like the AFC Ecosystem to crowdsource fraud intelligence
Conclusion: Time to Think Proactively
In an environment where scams evolve faster than regulations, banks and fintechs can’t afford to be reactive. Anti-fraud solutions must move from passive alert generators to proactive fraud stoppers—powered by AI, designed for real-time action, and connected to collective intelligence networks.
Don’t wait for the fraud to hit. Build your defence today.
AML Check Software: Strengthening Malaysia’s First Line of Financial Crime Defence
In a digital-first financial system, AML check software has become the gatekeeper that protects trust before risk enters the system.
Why AML Checks Are Under Pressure in Malaysia
Malaysia’s financial ecosystem is moving faster than ever. Digital banks, fintech platforms, instant payments, QR transactions, and cross-border remittances have transformed how people open accounts and move money.
But speed brings risk.
Criminal networks now exploit onboarding gaps, weak screening processes, and fragmented compliance systems to introduce illicit actors into the financial system. Once these actors pass initial checks, laundering becomes significantly harder to stop.
Money mule recruitment, scam-linked accounts, shell company misuse, and sanctioned entity exposure often begin with one failure point: inadequate checks at the entry stage.
This is why AML check software has become a critical control layer for Malaysian banks and fintechs. It ensures that customers, counterparties, and transactions are assessed accurately, consistently, and in real time before risk escalates.
What Is AML Check Software?
AML check software is a compliance technology that enables financial institutions to screen, verify, and risk assess customers and entities against money laundering and financial crime indicators.
It supports institutions by performing checks such as:
- Name screening against sanctions and watchlists
- Politically exposed person identification
- Adverse media checks
- Risk scoring based on customer attributes
- Ongoing rechecks triggered by behavioural changes
- Counterparty and beneficiary checks
Unlike manual or basic screening tools, modern AML check software combines data, intelligence, and automation to deliver reliable outcomes at scale.
The purpose of AML checks is simple but critical. Prevent high-risk individuals or entities from entering or misusing the financial system.
Why AML Check Software Matters in Malaysia
Malaysia’s exposure to financial crime is shaped by both domestic and regional dynamics.
Several factors make strong AML checks essential.
1. Cross-Border Connectivity
Malaysia shares close financial links with Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Criminal networks exploit these corridors to move funds and obscure origins.
2. Rising Scam Activity
Investment scams, impersonation fraud, and social engineering attacks often rely on mule accounts that pass weak onboarding checks.
3. Digital Onboarding at Scale
As onboarding volumes grow, manual checks become inconsistent and error prone.
4. Regulatory Expectations
Bank Negara Malaysia expects financial institutions to apply risk-based checks, demonstrate consistency, and maintain strong audit trails.
5. Reputational Risk
Failing AML checks can expose institutions to enforcement action, reputational damage, and customer trust erosion.
AML check software ensures that checks are not only performed, but performed well.
How AML Check Software Works
Modern AML check software operates as part of an integrated compliance workflow.
1. Data Capture
Customer or entity information is captured during onboarding or transaction processing.
2. Screening Against Risk Lists
Names are screened against sanctions lists, PEP databases, adverse media sources, and internal watchlists.
3. Fuzzy Matching and Linguistic Analysis
Advanced systems account for name variations, transliteration differences, spelling errors, and aliases.
4. Risk Scoring
Each match is assessed based on risk indicators such as geography, role, transaction context, and historical behaviour.
5. Alert Generation
High-risk matches generate alerts for further review.
6. Investigation and Resolution
Investigators review alerts within a case management system and document outcomes.
7. Continuous Monitoring
Checks are repeated when customer behaviour changes or new risk information becomes available.
This lifecycle ensures that checks remain effective beyond the initial onboarding stage.
Limitations of Traditional AML Check Processes
Many Malaysian institutions still rely on legacy screening tools or manual processes. These approaches struggle in today’s environment.
Common limitations include:
- High false positives due to poor matching logic
- Manual review of low-risk alerts
- Inconsistent decision-making across teams
- Limited context during alert review
- Poor integration with transaction monitoring
- Weak audit trails
As transaction volumes grow, these weaknesses lead to investigator fatigue and increased compliance risk.
AML check software must evolve from a simple screening tool into an intelligent risk assessment system.
The Role of AI in Modern AML Check Software
Artificial intelligence has dramatically improved the effectiveness of AML checks.
1. Smarter Name Matching
AI-powered linguistic models reduce false positives by understanding context, language, and name structure.
2. Risk-Based Prioritisation
Instead of treating all matches equally, AI scores alerts based on actual risk.
3. Behavioural Context
AI considers transaction behaviour and customer history when assessing matches.
4. Automated Narratives
Systems generate clear explanations for why a match was flagged, supporting audit and regulatory review.
5. Continuous Learning
Models improve as investigators confirm or dismiss alerts.
AI enables AML check software to scale without sacrificing accuracy.
Tookitaki’s FinCense: AML Check Software Built for Malaysia
While many solutions focus only on screening, Tookitaki’s FinCense delivers AML check software as part of a unified financial crime prevention platform.
FinCense does not treat AML checks as isolated tasks. It embeds them into a broader intelligence framework that spans onboarding, transaction monitoring, fraud detection, and case management.
This approach delivers stronger outcomes for Malaysian institutions.
Agentic AI for Intelligent Screening Decisions
FinCense uses Agentic AI to automate and enhance AML checks.
The system:
- Analyses screening matches in context
- Highlights truly risky alerts
- Generates clear investigation summaries
- Recommends actions based on risk patterns
This reduces manual workload while improving consistency.
Federated Intelligence Through the AFC Ecosystem
FinCense connects to the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, a collaborative network of financial institutions across ASEAN.
This allows AML checks to benefit from:
- Emerging risk profiles
- Regional sanctioned entity patterns
- New scam-related mule indicators
- Cross-border laundering typologies
For Malaysian institutions, this shared intelligence significantly strengthens screening effectiveness.
Explainable AI for Regulatory Confidence
Every AML check decision in FinCense is transparent.
Investigators and regulators can see:
- Why a match was considered high or low risk
- Which attributes influenced the decision
- How the system reached its conclusion
This aligns with Bank Negara Malaysia’s emphasis on explainability and governance.
Seamless Integration with AML and Fraud Workflows
AML checks in FinCense are fully integrated with:
- Customer onboarding
- Transaction monitoring
- Fraud detection
- Case management
- STR preparation
This ensures that screening outcomes inform downstream monitoring and investigation activities.
Scenario Example: Preventing a High-Risk Entity from Entering the System
A Malaysian fintech receives an application from a newly incorporated company seeking payment services.
Here is how FinCense AML check software responds:
- The company name triggers a partial match against adverse media.
- AI-powered matching determines that the entity shares directors with previously flagged shell companies.
- Federated intelligence highlights similar structures seen in recent regional investigations.
- Agentic AI generates a summary explaining the risk indicators.
- The application is escalated for enhanced due diligence before onboarding.
This prevents exposure to a high-risk entity without delaying low-risk customers.
Benefits of AML Check Software for Malaysian Institutions
Strong AML check software delivers tangible benefits.
- Reduced false positives
- Faster onboarding decisions
- Improved investigator productivity
- Stronger regulatory alignment
- Better audit readiness
- Early detection of regional risks
- Lower compliance costs over time
- Enhanced customer trust
AML checks become a value driver rather than a bottleneck.
What to Look for in AML Check Software
When evaluating AML check software, Malaysian institutions should prioritise:
Accuracy
Advanced matching that reduces false positives.
Contextual Intelligence
Risk assessment that considers behaviour and relationships.
Explainability
Clear reasoning behind every alert.
Integration
Seamless connection to AML and fraud systems.
Regional Relevance
ASEAN-specific intelligence and typologies.
Scalability
Ability to handle high volumes without degradation.
FinCense delivers all of these capabilities within a single platform.
The Future of AML Checks in Malaysia
AML checks will continue to evolve as financial crime becomes more sophisticated.
Key trends include:
- Continuous screening instead of periodic checks
- Greater use of behavioural intelligence
- Deeper integration with transaction monitoring
- Cross-border intelligence sharing
- Responsible AI governance
- Increased automation in low-risk decisions
Malaysia is well positioned to adopt these innovations while maintaining strong regulatory oversight.
Conclusion
AML check software is no longer a simple compliance tool. It is the first and most critical line of defence against financial crime.
In Malaysia’s fast-moving digital economy, institutions must rely on intelligent systems that deliver accuracy, transparency, and speed.
Tookitaki’s FinCense provides AML check software that goes beyond screening. By combining Agentic AI, federated intelligence, explainable decision-making, and end-to-end integration, FinCense enables Malaysian institutions to protect their ecosystem from the very first check.
Strong AML checks build strong trust. And trust is the foundation of sustainable digital finance.