A Money Services Business (MSB) is a transaction that involves currency exchange and money transfer. Checks, foreign currency transactions, and money order transactions are examples of MSB, which can take numerous forms ranging from individuals to multinational enterprises, payment firms to investments. ‘Money Services Business’ refers to financial institutions that transport or convert money (MSB). MSBs are not banks, despite the fact that they provide some of the same services: because of the vast selection of cheaper, more diverse commercial product options available to anyone seeking to convert or transmit money, the term ‘MSB’ now encompasses a wide range of organisations, including those that provide crowdfunding, e-commerce, and cryptocurrency services.
Money services businesses account for a large part of an economy: in the U.S, for example, MSBs processed over $1 trillion in transactions in 2017. With that in mind, employees of financial institutions should aim to understand how MSBs work, and the relevant legislation which may apply when doing business with them.
Learn More: Understanding Money Laundering
What does a Money Services Business do?
Money services businesses range from small niche-market start-ups to large multinational corporations with worldwide reach. MSBs might range from traditional bureau de changes and post offices to the most cutting-edge smartphone payment app, due to the ever-changing commercial currency exchange and transfer scene.
Although the definition of a ‘MSB’ varies by geographical jurisdiction, it typically refers to any company that provides the following financial services:
- Bill payment services, such as gas and electricity, as well as tax payment services
- Money transmission (or representation of money)
- Customer-payable checks are cashed.
- Performing the functions of a bureau de change or a currency exchange office
- Using telecommunications, digital, and IT equipment to facilitate payments between a payer and a provider.
What compliance laws do MSBs have to follow?
Due to the high levels of criminal risk connected with currency conversion and money transfer, MSBs are expected to follow strict compliance rules applicable to the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist legislation of the region in which they operate.
They are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, much like other regulated financial organisations including MSBs, banks, and credit unions (BSA). The BSA requires money service organisations to comply with its registration, reporting, record-keeping, and anti-money laundering programme requirements.
MSBs are a catch-all phrase used by financial regulators who represent the bulk of the economy to refer to a variety of enterprises that deal with money conversion or transfer. A person must make more than $1,000 in one or more transactions on any given day to qualify as a money service. A non-bank financial institution or a non-deposit supplier of non-financial services is also known as a money service company compliance. Money service businesses are widely traded all over the world. In 2016, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) updated its risk assessment of money service and remittance companies. A money transfer business is any financial service that distributes money to recipients in cash or in some other form. MSB can contain a good digital platform or a range of non-traditional remittance modes, according to the FATF.
What are the AML risks for MSBs?
Money laundering of money services makes it particularly vulnerable. They are a danger because of the nature of their dealings, which involve cash and one-off transactions that are frequently untraceable.
Anti-money laundering compliance is required of MSBs. The company’s Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing (AML / CFT) compliance programme should allow it to determine the transaction’s underlying purpose and verify specific facts about the persons involved. There are different ways for money services businesses to identify risky customers and transactions. High-risk nations, for example, adhere to the Financial Action Task Force (TAFT) guidelines, which establish worldwide AML/CFT compliance criteria. MBSs in high-risk nations should also conduct screening checks at Know Your Customer (KYC).
Another example is large transactions; MBSs should use greater caution in deals involving significant sums of money. As part of their suspicious transaction reporting obligations, MBSs must look after their customers in order to detect risks or report concerns to a regulatory body. Regulatory bodies will impose varying rules on MBSs based on their jurisdiction.
With AML solutions, Tookitaki assists money services businesses in detecting and preventing financial crimes. You can identify money laundering and increase your anti-money laundering compliance across all stages, from client interaction through customer transactions.
For additional information, please contact us or request a demo.
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Top AML Scenarios in ASEAN

The Role of AML Software in Compliance

The Role of AML Software in Compliance


We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.
Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?
Our Thought Leadership Guides
Beyond the Rules: Why AML Transaction Monitoring is the Backbone of Philippine Banking Compliance
Every peso that moves tells a story — and transaction monitoring ensures it’s the right one.
In the Philippines, financial institutions are under increasing pressure from regulators, investors, and customers to detect and prevent financial crime. With cross-border payments growing, remittance inflows ranking among the world’s largest, and the country’s recent removal from the FATF grey list, the importance of AML transaction monitoring has never been more urgent.

What Is AML Transaction Monitoring?
At its core, AML transaction monitoring is the process by which banks and financial institutions screen customer transactions in real time or batch mode to identify potentially suspicious activities.
This includes:
- Monitoring cash deposits and withdrawals
- Analysing wire transfers and remittance flows
- Detecting unusual transaction sizes, frequencies, or destinations
- Flagging activity linked to high-risk geographies or sectors
The aim isn’t just to detect — it’s to protect: ensuring compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), safeguarding institutional trust, and shielding the financial system from criminal abuse.
Why It Matters in the Philippines
The Philippines is one of the world’s top remittance-receiving countries, with over USD 36 billion flowing in annually from overseas workers. While this drives economic growth, it also increases exposure to money laundering and terror financing risks.
Key factors making AML transaction monitoring critical:
- High remittance flows: Vulnerable to structuring, layering, and mule accounts.
- Growing fintech adoption: New digital banks and e-wallets accelerate real-time transfers.
- Cross-border vulnerabilities: Syndicates exploit correspondent banking and payment service providers.
- Regulatory scrutiny: The BSP and AMLC have intensified enforcement following the FATF grey-list exit.
Without robust monitoring, financial institutions risk both reputational and regulatory damage.
How Traditional Monitoring Falls Short
Rule-based monitoring has been the norm for decades. For example: flagging all transactions over PHP 500,000, or those involving specific countries. While useful, this approach has major gaps:
- Excessive false positives: Investigators spend too much time on non-risky alerts.
- Blind spots in layering: Sophisticated laundering schemes remain undetected.
- Limited adaptability: Static rules can’t keep up with rapidly evolving fraud tactics.
This inefficiency creates higher compliance costs while still leaving banks exposed.
Modern AML Transaction Monitoring: Smarter, Faster, More Adaptive
Today’s compliance environment requires more than “if-this-then-that” rules. Advanced AML transaction monitoring combines machine learning, big data, and collaborative intelligence to outpace bad actors.
1. Real-Time Monitoring
Transactions are screened instantly, blocking suspicious activity before funds exit the system.
2. Behavioural Analytics
Instead of relying only on thresholds, models analyse customer behaviour over time, flagging unusual deviations.
3. Adaptive Machine Learning Models
ML reduces false positives by recognising normal but unusual behaviour, while still catching genuine threats.
4. Federated Intelligence Sharing
Banks collaborate by sharing typologies and red flags without exposing sensitive data, enhancing cross-institution protection.

Common Money Laundering Techniques Detected by Transaction Monitoring
In the Philippine banking sector, monitoring systems are particularly focused on these red-flagged methods:
- Structuring (Smurfing): Breaking down large deposits into smaller amounts to avoid reporting thresholds.
- Rapid Movement of Funds: Quick inflows and outflows with no clear economic purpose.
- Use of Mule Accounts: Exploiting everyday citizens’ accounts to launder illicit money.
- Round-Tripping: Sending money abroad and bringing it back disguised as legitimate investment.
- Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML): Misreporting invoices to shift value across borders.
Regulatory Expectations in the Philippines
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) require banks and covered persons to:
- Monitor transactions continuously and in real time
- File Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) promptly
- Ensure monitoring tools are risk-based and proportionate
- Apply stricter controls for high-risk customers, such as PEPs or cross-border remittance operators
With the FATF grey-list exit in 2024, expectations are higher than ever — Philippine banks must prove that AML monitoring systems are both effective and future-ready.
Challenges in AML Transaction Monitoring
Despite its importance, Philippine financial institutions face hurdles:
- Data silos: Fragmented data across multiple banking systems limits visibility.
- Legacy infrastructure: Older systems struggle to handle real-time monitoring.
- Resource constraints: Smaller rural banks and fintechs often lack skilled AML analysts.
- Evolving fraud landscape: Criminals use AI, crypto, and shell firms to bypass detection.
Best Practices for Stronger Monitoring Systems
1. Risk-Based Approach
Prioritise high-risk transactions and customers, rather than applying generic thresholds.
2. Integrate Machine Learning and AI
Leverage adaptive systems to improve detection accuracy and reduce investigator fatigue.
3. Ensure Explainability
Adopt explainable AI (XAI) frameworks that regulators and investigators can trust.
4. Cross-Border Collaboration
Work with industry peers and regulators to share intelligence on emerging fraud typologies.
5. Continuous Training and Governance
Regularly retrain monitoring models and ensure governance is aligned with BSP and global best practices.
The Tookitaki Advantage: The Trust Layer in AML Monitoring
Tookitaki’s FinCense offers Philippine banks a next-gen compliance platform that transforms AML transaction monitoring into a proactive, intelligent, and regulator-aligned system.
What sets FinCense apart:
- Agentic AI-powered monitoring that adapts in real time to evolving threats.
- Federated intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem, giving access to scenarios and typologies contributed by global experts.
- Significant false positive reduction through behavioural analytics and adaptive thresholds.
- AI Verify-certified explainability, ensuring every flagged transaction is clear to regulators and investigators.
For banks in the Philippines, FinCense acts as a trust layer — protecting institutions from reputational risk while building consumer trust in a digital-first economy.
Conclusion: From Compliance Burden to Competitive Advantage
AML transaction monitoring in the Philippines is no longer just a compliance checkbox. Done right, it’s a strategic advantage: strengthening customer trust, satisfying regulators, and keeping ahead of criminals.
As the country cements its post–grey list reputation, banks that invest in smart, ML-driven monitoring tools will be best positioned to grow sustainably, innovate safely, and protect both their customers and the financial system.

The Best Fraud Prevention Solution for Australia’s Real-Time Economy
In a world where scams move at the speed of a click, the best fraud prevention solution is the one that keeps up.
Fraud in Australia has hit record levels — with scam losses topping AUD 3 billion in 2024, according to national reports. From account takeovers and business email compromise to deepfake-driven scams, financial crime is becoming faster, smarter, and harder to detect. That’s why finding the best fraud prevention solution has become a top priority for banks, fintechs, remittance providers, and payment platforms across the country.

Why Fraud Prevention Needs a Rethink in Australia
1. Real-Time Payments = Real-Time Fraud
The New Payments Platform (NPP) has made payments seamless for consumers but also gives fraudsters the ability to move stolen funds instantly.
2. Sophisticated Social Engineering Scams
Australians are increasingly targeted by romance scams, investment fraud, and voice deepfakes — often convincing victims to authorise transfers themselves.
3. Regulatory Pressure
ASIC and AUSTRAC are tightening expectations on fraud prevention, making proactive detection and prevention critical for compliance.
4. Rising Customer Expectations
Consumers demand safe, frictionless experiences. Institutions that fail to protect users risk losing trust and market share.
What Makes the Best Fraud Prevention Solution?
1. Real-Time Detection
Every transaction must be monitored as it happens, with the ability to flag and stop fraud in milliseconds.
2. AI-Powered Analytics
Machine learning models that adapt to new fraud tactics, detect anomalies, and reduce false positives.
3. Cross-Channel Visibility
Fraudsters don’t limit themselves to one platform. The best solutions cover:
- Bank transfers
- Credit/debit card payments
- E-wallets and remittances
- Crypto exchanges
4. Identity & Behavioural Intelligence
Tools that combine KYC data, device fingerprinting, and behavioural biometrics to spot anomalies early.
5. Seamless Integration
The best solutions integrate smoothly with existing core banking, onboarding, and AML systems.
6. Regulatory Compliance Support
Built-in capabilities for generating reports, maintaining audit trails, and aligning with AUSTRAC’s fraud and AML expectations.
Key Use Cases in Australia
- Account Takeover Fraud: Detects unusual login and transfer behaviour in digital banking platforms.
- Romance & Investment Scams: Identifies red flags in repeated small transfers or unusual beneficiary accounts.
- Invoice & Payroll Redirection: Flags last-minute beneficiary changes or mismatched account details.
- Crypto Laundering: Detects patterns of fiat-to-crypto conversion linked to high-risk wallets.
Red Flags the Best Fraud Prevention Solution Should Catch
- Sudden spike in transaction volume on dormant accounts
- Login from a new device or geography followed by high-value transfers
- Unusual customer behaviour (late-night transactions, altered IPs, rapid multiple payments)
- Frequent transfers to newly opened accounts in high-risk jurisdictions
- Beneficiary details inconsistent with historical patterns

Evaluating Vendors: How to Spot the Best Fraud Prevention Solution
Ask these questions:
- Does it provide real-time detection across NPP and cross-border payments?
- Is it powered by adaptive AI that learns from new fraud typologies?
- Can it reduce false positives significantly?
- Does it support regulatory compliance with AUSTRAC and ASIC?
- Is there local market expertise built into the platform?
- Does it integrate seamlessly with AML systems for holistic compliance?
Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense — A Leading Fraud Prevention Solution
Among fraud solutions in the market, FinCense stands out as one of the best fraud prevention solutions for Australian institutions.
- Agentic AI-powered detection: Real-time monitoring across banking, payments, and remittance.
- Federated learning: Access to fraud typologies contributed by global compliance experts in the AFC Ecosystem.
- FinMate AI Copilot: Guides investigators with smart recommendations and auto-generated case summaries.
- Cross-channel coverage: From cards to crypto, fraud is flagged wherever it hides.
- Explainability: Transparent AI ensures regulators can understand every alert.
By combining speed, intelligence, and transparency, FinCense helps Australian institutions prevent fraud without disrupting customer experience.
Conclusion: The Best Fraud Prevention Solution Builds Trust
In Australia’s high-speed, high-risk payment environment, the best fraud prevention solution is one that adapts as fast as fraud evolves. It’s not about flashy dashboards — it’s about real-time intelligence, seamless compliance, and customer trust.
Pro tip: Evaluate fraud solutions not just on detection rates but on how well they reduce investigator workload and integrate with your AML programme.

Inside the Toolbox: The Anti-Money Laundering Tools Banks in Singapore Actually Use
Fighting money laundering isn’t about catching criminals — it’s about outsmarting them before they strike.
Banks in Singapore are under mounting pressure to detect, prevent, and report suspicious financial activity. With increasingly complex laundering techniques and heightened regulatory scrutiny, having the right anti-money laundering (AML) tools is no longer optional — it’s mission-critical.
In this blog, we’ll break down the key anti-money laundering tools used by banks in Singapore today, why they matter, and what separates outdated systems from modern AML innovation.

Why AML Tools Matter More Than Ever in Singapore
Singapore’s financial ecosystem is high-volume, high-trust, and globally connected. While that makes it a premier banking hub, it also exposes it to unique money laundering risks — from trade-based laundering and shell companies to cyber-enabled fraud and terror financing.
In 2024, Singapore’s central bank, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), emphasised the need for proactive, risk-based AML controls — particularly around cross-border transactions, digital payment rails, and corporate structures like shell firms.
For banks, this means building a technology stack that enables:
- Early detection of suspicious patterns
- Scalable due diligence processes
- Timely and transparent reporting
- Adaptive defences against emerging typologies
Core Anti-Money Laundering Tools Used by Banks
1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) & KYC Platforms
At the heart of any AML programme is knowing your customer.
What it does:
- Verifies identity documents
- Checks customers against watchlists (e.g., UN, OFAC, INTERPOL)
- Assesses customer risk levels based on nationality, occupation, transaction type, etc.
- Monitors for changes in customer risk over time (ongoing due diligence)
Why it matters:
Singaporean banks must comply with MAS Notice 626 and other CDD/KYC obligations, including enhanced due diligence for high-risk clients.
2. Transaction Monitoring Systems (TMS)
This is the frontline tool for catching money laundering in real time.
What it does:
- Monitors transaction behaviour across accounts
- Detects anomalies like rapid fund movement, structuring, or sudden volume spikes
- Flags suspicious patterns based on predefined rules or machine learning
Why it matters:
TMS tools must balance sensitivity (catching risk) with specificity (reducing false positives). Delays or inaccuracies here can lead to both regulatory fines and financial loss.
3. Sanctions and Watchlist Screening Tools
These tools scan customer records and transactions against global sanctions, PEP (politically exposed persons), and adverse media databases.
What it does:
- Automates screening against thousands of global and local lists
- Supports fuzzy logic to catch misspelt names or aliases
- Allows for real-time and batch screening
Why it matters:
In Singapore, failure to screen adequately can lead to breaches of international compliance, particularly when dealing with correspondent banking relationships.
4. Case Management and Investigation Platforms
Once a suspicious activity alert is generated, it needs a structured investigation.
What it does:
- Aggregates data from CDD, transaction monitoring, and screening
- Allows compliance teams to investigate alerts, upload documentation, and maintain audit trails
- Supports decision tracking and escalation workflows
Why it matters:
A strong case management system reduces manual work and ensures timely, defensible decisions — especially under audit or regulator review.
5. Regulatory Reporting Solutions
Banks are required to file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) with the Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office (STRO) via GoAML.
What it does:
- Automates report generation and formatting
- Integrates with internal AML systems for data consistency
- Supports bulk reporting and status tracking
Why it matters:
Singaporean regulators expect accurate and timely filings. Delays or errors in reporting can impact the institution’s standing and credibility.

The New Wave: AI-Powered AML Tools for the Singapore Market
While traditional AML tools are still necessary, they’re often reactive and siloed. Banks in Singapore are increasingly embracing next-gen platforms that offer:
AI-Driven Detection
Machine learning models identify subtle, emerging typologies — including layering, mule accounts, or deepfake-driven fraud.
Federated Intelligence
Tools like Tookitaki’s FinCense tap into collective insights from other banks (via the AFC Ecosystem), enabling users to spot real-world threats faster.
Smart Disposition and Narration
AI-generated case summaries help analysts understand the full context quickly, speeding up investigations.
Simulation and Optimisation Engines
Before deploying new rules or thresholds, banks can simulate their effectiveness to reduce false positives and operational load.
Real-Time Processing
No delays. Events are flagged the moment they happen — essential in Singapore’s fast-paced payment environment.
Top Priorities for Banks Choosing AML Tools in Singapore
When evaluating AML software, Singaporean banks should prioritise:
✅ MAS and FATF compliance: Is the tool aligned with Singapore’s regulatory framework?
✅ Explainability: Can the AI decisions be explained to auditors or regulators?
✅ Modularity: Does the solution integrate easily with existing systems (core banking, digital channels)?
✅ Scalability: Can it grow with your business and keep up with rising transaction volumes?
✅ Collaboration and intelligence-sharing: Can the tool leverage insights from a wider financial crime ecosystem?
Case in Point: How Tookitaki’s AML Tools Help Banks in Singapore
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform has been designed to solve Singapore-specific AML challenges. Here’s how it helps:
- Integrated End-to-End Suite: From CDD to case investigation and reporting, all tools work together.
- AI + Rule Hybrid Models: Combines human judgment with machine learning to flag complex typologies.
- Federated Learning: Banks gain intelligence from regional crime patterns without compromising customer data.
- Smart Agent Framework: Modular agents (like FinMate, Smart Disposition) bring real-time insights into investigations.
- Regulatory Ready: Built to align with MAS guidelines and explainable under Singapore’s AI Verify framework.
Banks like UOB, Maya, PayMongo, and GXS have already turned to Tookitaki to future-proof their compliance and AML operations.
Conclusion: The Right Tools Make the Difference
Anti-money laundering tools used by banks today are not just about ticking compliance boxes — they’re about building resilience. In Singapore’s dynamic financial landscape, staying ahead of money launderers requires technology that is smart, scalable, and strategic.
💡 Whether you’re a digital-first bank or a legacy institution modernising its stack, the right AML tools can turn compliance into a competitive advantage.

Beyond the Rules: Why AML Transaction Monitoring is the Backbone of Philippine Banking Compliance
Every peso that moves tells a story — and transaction monitoring ensures it’s the right one.
In the Philippines, financial institutions are under increasing pressure from regulators, investors, and customers to detect and prevent financial crime. With cross-border payments growing, remittance inflows ranking among the world’s largest, and the country’s recent removal from the FATF grey list, the importance of AML transaction monitoring has never been more urgent.

What Is AML Transaction Monitoring?
At its core, AML transaction monitoring is the process by which banks and financial institutions screen customer transactions in real time or batch mode to identify potentially suspicious activities.
This includes:
- Monitoring cash deposits and withdrawals
- Analysing wire transfers and remittance flows
- Detecting unusual transaction sizes, frequencies, or destinations
- Flagging activity linked to high-risk geographies or sectors
The aim isn’t just to detect — it’s to protect: ensuring compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), safeguarding institutional trust, and shielding the financial system from criminal abuse.
Why It Matters in the Philippines
The Philippines is one of the world’s top remittance-receiving countries, with over USD 36 billion flowing in annually from overseas workers. While this drives economic growth, it also increases exposure to money laundering and terror financing risks.
Key factors making AML transaction monitoring critical:
- High remittance flows: Vulnerable to structuring, layering, and mule accounts.
- Growing fintech adoption: New digital banks and e-wallets accelerate real-time transfers.
- Cross-border vulnerabilities: Syndicates exploit correspondent banking and payment service providers.
- Regulatory scrutiny: The BSP and AMLC have intensified enforcement following the FATF grey-list exit.
Without robust monitoring, financial institutions risk both reputational and regulatory damage.
How Traditional Monitoring Falls Short
Rule-based monitoring has been the norm for decades. For example: flagging all transactions over PHP 500,000, or those involving specific countries. While useful, this approach has major gaps:
- Excessive false positives: Investigators spend too much time on non-risky alerts.
- Blind spots in layering: Sophisticated laundering schemes remain undetected.
- Limited adaptability: Static rules can’t keep up with rapidly evolving fraud tactics.
This inefficiency creates higher compliance costs while still leaving banks exposed.
Modern AML Transaction Monitoring: Smarter, Faster, More Adaptive
Today’s compliance environment requires more than “if-this-then-that” rules. Advanced AML transaction monitoring combines machine learning, big data, and collaborative intelligence to outpace bad actors.
1. Real-Time Monitoring
Transactions are screened instantly, blocking suspicious activity before funds exit the system.
2. Behavioural Analytics
Instead of relying only on thresholds, models analyse customer behaviour over time, flagging unusual deviations.
3. Adaptive Machine Learning Models
ML reduces false positives by recognising normal but unusual behaviour, while still catching genuine threats.
4. Federated Intelligence Sharing
Banks collaborate by sharing typologies and red flags without exposing sensitive data, enhancing cross-institution protection.

Common Money Laundering Techniques Detected by Transaction Monitoring
In the Philippine banking sector, monitoring systems are particularly focused on these red-flagged methods:
- Structuring (Smurfing): Breaking down large deposits into smaller amounts to avoid reporting thresholds.
- Rapid Movement of Funds: Quick inflows and outflows with no clear economic purpose.
- Use of Mule Accounts: Exploiting everyday citizens’ accounts to launder illicit money.
- Round-Tripping: Sending money abroad and bringing it back disguised as legitimate investment.
- Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML): Misreporting invoices to shift value across borders.
Regulatory Expectations in the Philippines
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) require banks and covered persons to:
- Monitor transactions continuously and in real time
- File Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) promptly
- Ensure monitoring tools are risk-based and proportionate
- Apply stricter controls for high-risk customers, such as PEPs or cross-border remittance operators
With the FATF grey-list exit in 2024, expectations are higher than ever — Philippine banks must prove that AML monitoring systems are both effective and future-ready.
Challenges in AML Transaction Monitoring
Despite its importance, Philippine financial institutions face hurdles:
- Data silos: Fragmented data across multiple banking systems limits visibility.
- Legacy infrastructure: Older systems struggle to handle real-time monitoring.
- Resource constraints: Smaller rural banks and fintechs often lack skilled AML analysts.
- Evolving fraud landscape: Criminals use AI, crypto, and shell firms to bypass detection.
Best Practices for Stronger Monitoring Systems
1. Risk-Based Approach
Prioritise high-risk transactions and customers, rather than applying generic thresholds.
2. Integrate Machine Learning and AI
Leverage adaptive systems to improve detection accuracy and reduce investigator fatigue.
3. Ensure Explainability
Adopt explainable AI (XAI) frameworks that regulators and investigators can trust.
4. Cross-Border Collaboration
Work with industry peers and regulators to share intelligence on emerging fraud typologies.
5. Continuous Training and Governance
Regularly retrain monitoring models and ensure governance is aligned with BSP and global best practices.
The Tookitaki Advantage: The Trust Layer in AML Monitoring
Tookitaki’s FinCense offers Philippine banks a next-gen compliance platform that transforms AML transaction monitoring into a proactive, intelligent, and regulator-aligned system.
What sets FinCense apart:
- Agentic AI-powered monitoring that adapts in real time to evolving threats.
- Federated intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem, giving access to scenarios and typologies contributed by global experts.
- Significant false positive reduction through behavioural analytics and adaptive thresholds.
- AI Verify-certified explainability, ensuring every flagged transaction is clear to regulators and investigators.
For banks in the Philippines, FinCense acts as a trust layer — protecting institutions from reputational risk while building consumer trust in a digital-first economy.
Conclusion: From Compliance Burden to Competitive Advantage
AML transaction monitoring in the Philippines is no longer just a compliance checkbox. Done right, it’s a strategic advantage: strengthening customer trust, satisfying regulators, and keeping ahead of criminals.
As the country cements its post–grey list reputation, banks that invest in smart, ML-driven monitoring tools will be best positioned to grow sustainably, innovate safely, and protect both their customers and the financial system.

The Best Fraud Prevention Solution for Australia’s Real-Time Economy
In a world where scams move at the speed of a click, the best fraud prevention solution is the one that keeps up.
Fraud in Australia has hit record levels — with scam losses topping AUD 3 billion in 2024, according to national reports. From account takeovers and business email compromise to deepfake-driven scams, financial crime is becoming faster, smarter, and harder to detect. That’s why finding the best fraud prevention solution has become a top priority for banks, fintechs, remittance providers, and payment platforms across the country.

Why Fraud Prevention Needs a Rethink in Australia
1. Real-Time Payments = Real-Time Fraud
The New Payments Platform (NPP) has made payments seamless for consumers but also gives fraudsters the ability to move stolen funds instantly.
2. Sophisticated Social Engineering Scams
Australians are increasingly targeted by romance scams, investment fraud, and voice deepfakes — often convincing victims to authorise transfers themselves.
3. Regulatory Pressure
ASIC and AUSTRAC are tightening expectations on fraud prevention, making proactive detection and prevention critical for compliance.
4. Rising Customer Expectations
Consumers demand safe, frictionless experiences. Institutions that fail to protect users risk losing trust and market share.
What Makes the Best Fraud Prevention Solution?
1. Real-Time Detection
Every transaction must be monitored as it happens, with the ability to flag and stop fraud in milliseconds.
2. AI-Powered Analytics
Machine learning models that adapt to new fraud tactics, detect anomalies, and reduce false positives.
3. Cross-Channel Visibility
Fraudsters don’t limit themselves to one platform. The best solutions cover:
- Bank transfers
- Credit/debit card payments
- E-wallets and remittances
- Crypto exchanges
4. Identity & Behavioural Intelligence
Tools that combine KYC data, device fingerprinting, and behavioural biometrics to spot anomalies early.
5. Seamless Integration
The best solutions integrate smoothly with existing core banking, onboarding, and AML systems.
6. Regulatory Compliance Support
Built-in capabilities for generating reports, maintaining audit trails, and aligning with AUSTRAC’s fraud and AML expectations.
Key Use Cases in Australia
- Account Takeover Fraud: Detects unusual login and transfer behaviour in digital banking platforms.
- Romance & Investment Scams: Identifies red flags in repeated small transfers or unusual beneficiary accounts.
- Invoice & Payroll Redirection: Flags last-minute beneficiary changes or mismatched account details.
- Crypto Laundering: Detects patterns of fiat-to-crypto conversion linked to high-risk wallets.
Red Flags the Best Fraud Prevention Solution Should Catch
- Sudden spike in transaction volume on dormant accounts
- Login from a new device or geography followed by high-value transfers
- Unusual customer behaviour (late-night transactions, altered IPs, rapid multiple payments)
- Frequent transfers to newly opened accounts in high-risk jurisdictions
- Beneficiary details inconsistent with historical patterns

Evaluating Vendors: How to Spot the Best Fraud Prevention Solution
Ask these questions:
- Does it provide real-time detection across NPP and cross-border payments?
- Is it powered by adaptive AI that learns from new fraud typologies?
- Can it reduce false positives significantly?
- Does it support regulatory compliance with AUSTRAC and ASIC?
- Is there local market expertise built into the platform?
- Does it integrate seamlessly with AML systems for holistic compliance?
Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense — A Leading Fraud Prevention Solution
Among fraud solutions in the market, FinCense stands out as one of the best fraud prevention solutions for Australian institutions.
- Agentic AI-powered detection: Real-time monitoring across banking, payments, and remittance.
- Federated learning: Access to fraud typologies contributed by global compliance experts in the AFC Ecosystem.
- FinMate AI Copilot: Guides investigators with smart recommendations and auto-generated case summaries.
- Cross-channel coverage: From cards to crypto, fraud is flagged wherever it hides.
- Explainability: Transparent AI ensures regulators can understand every alert.
By combining speed, intelligence, and transparency, FinCense helps Australian institutions prevent fraud without disrupting customer experience.
Conclusion: The Best Fraud Prevention Solution Builds Trust
In Australia’s high-speed, high-risk payment environment, the best fraud prevention solution is one that adapts as fast as fraud evolves. It’s not about flashy dashboards — it’s about real-time intelligence, seamless compliance, and customer trust.
Pro tip: Evaluate fraud solutions not just on detection rates but on how well they reduce investigator workload and integrate with your AML programme.

Inside the Toolbox: The Anti-Money Laundering Tools Banks in Singapore Actually Use
Fighting money laundering isn’t about catching criminals — it’s about outsmarting them before they strike.
Banks in Singapore are under mounting pressure to detect, prevent, and report suspicious financial activity. With increasingly complex laundering techniques and heightened regulatory scrutiny, having the right anti-money laundering (AML) tools is no longer optional — it’s mission-critical.
In this blog, we’ll break down the key anti-money laundering tools used by banks in Singapore today, why they matter, and what separates outdated systems from modern AML innovation.

Why AML Tools Matter More Than Ever in Singapore
Singapore’s financial ecosystem is high-volume, high-trust, and globally connected. While that makes it a premier banking hub, it also exposes it to unique money laundering risks — from trade-based laundering and shell companies to cyber-enabled fraud and terror financing.
In 2024, Singapore’s central bank, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), emphasised the need for proactive, risk-based AML controls — particularly around cross-border transactions, digital payment rails, and corporate structures like shell firms.
For banks, this means building a technology stack that enables:
- Early detection of suspicious patterns
- Scalable due diligence processes
- Timely and transparent reporting
- Adaptive defences against emerging typologies
Core Anti-Money Laundering Tools Used by Banks
1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) & KYC Platforms
At the heart of any AML programme is knowing your customer.
What it does:
- Verifies identity documents
- Checks customers against watchlists (e.g., UN, OFAC, INTERPOL)
- Assesses customer risk levels based on nationality, occupation, transaction type, etc.
- Monitors for changes in customer risk over time (ongoing due diligence)
Why it matters:
Singaporean banks must comply with MAS Notice 626 and other CDD/KYC obligations, including enhanced due diligence for high-risk clients.
2. Transaction Monitoring Systems (TMS)
This is the frontline tool for catching money laundering in real time.
What it does:
- Monitors transaction behaviour across accounts
- Detects anomalies like rapid fund movement, structuring, or sudden volume spikes
- Flags suspicious patterns based on predefined rules or machine learning
Why it matters:
TMS tools must balance sensitivity (catching risk) with specificity (reducing false positives). Delays or inaccuracies here can lead to both regulatory fines and financial loss.
3. Sanctions and Watchlist Screening Tools
These tools scan customer records and transactions against global sanctions, PEP (politically exposed persons), and adverse media databases.
What it does:
- Automates screening against thousands of global and local lists
- Supports fuzzy logic to catch misspelt names or aliases
- Allows for real-time and batch screening
Why it matters:
In Singapore, failure to screen adequately can lead to breaches of international compliance, particularly when dealing with correspondent banking relationships.
4. Case Management and Investigation Platforms
Once a suspicious activity alert is generated, it needs a structured investigation.
What it does:
- Aggregates data from CDD, transaction monitoring, and screening
- Allows compliance teams to investigate alerts, upload documentation, and maintain audit trails
- Supports decision tracking and escalation workflows
Why it matters:
A strong case management system reduces manual work and ensures timely, defensible decisions — especially under audit or regulator review.
5. Regulatory Reporting Solutions
Banks are required to file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) with the Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office (STRO) via GoAML.
What it does:
- Automates report generation and formatting
- Integrates with internal AML systems for data consistency
- Supports bulk reporting and status tracking
Why it matters:
Singaporean regulators expect accurate and timely filings. Delays or errors in reporting can impact the institution’s standing and credibility.

The New Wave: AI-Powered AML Tools for the Singapore Market
While traditional AML tools are still necessary, they’re often reactive and siloed. Banks in Singapore are increasingly embracing next-gen platforms that offer:
AI-Driven Detection
Machine learning models identify subtle, emerging typologies — including layering, mule accounts, or deepfake-driven fraud.
Federated Intelligence
Tools like Tookitaki’s FinCense tap into collective insights from other banks (via the AFC Ecosystem), enabling users to spot real-world threats faster.
Smart Disposition and Narration
AI-generated case summaries help analysts understand the full context quickly, speeding up investigations.
Simulation and Optimisation Engines
Before deploying new rules or thresholds, banks can simulate their effectiveness to reduce false positives and operational load.
Real-Time Processing
No delays. Events are flagged the moment they happen — essential in Singapore’s fast-paced payment environment.
Top Priorities for Banks Choosing AML Tools in Singapore
When evaluating AML software, Singaporean banks should prioritise:
✅ MAS and FATF compliance: Is the tool aligned with Singapore’s regulatory framework?
✅ Explainability: Can the AI decisions be explained to auditors or regulators?
✅ Modularity: Does the solution integrate easily with existing systems (core banking, digital channels)?
✅ Scalability: Can it grow with your business and keep up with rising transaction volumes?
✅ Collaboration and intelligence-sharing: Can the tool leverage insights from a wider financial crime ecosystem?
Case in Point: How Tookitaki’s AML Tools Help Banks in Singapore
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform has been designed to solve Singapore-specific AML challenges. Here’s how it helps:
- Integrated End-to-End Suite: From CDD to case investigation and reporting, all tools work together.
- AI + Rule Hybrid Models: Combines human judgment with machine learning to flag complex typologies.
- Federated Learning: Banks gain intelligence from regional crime patterns without compromising customer data.
- Smart Agent Framework: Modular agents (like FinMate, Smart Disposition) bring real-time insights into investigations.
- Regulatory Ready: Built to align with MAS guidelines and explainable under Singapore’s AI Verify framework.
Banks like UOB, Maya, PayMongo, and GXS have already turned to Tookitaki to future-proof their compliance and AML operations.
Conclusion: The Right Tools Make the Difference
Anti-money laundering tools used by banks today are not just about ticking compliance boxes — they’re about building resilience. In Singapore’s dynamic financial landscape, staying ahead of money launderers requires technology that is smart, scalable, and strategic.
💡 Whether you’re a digital-first bank or a legacy institution modernising its stack, the right AML tools can turn compliance into a competitive advantage.
