Compliance Hub

AML Fraud Detection: The Hidden Threats Banks Miss in 2025

Site Logo
Tookitaki
28 Mar 2025
7 min
read

Financial institutions worldwide face a massive challenge as criminals launder an estimated $2 trillion annually through banks. Banks pour resources into compliance programs but still miss key threats. This failure has resulted in $342 billion worth of AML fines since 2019.

The digital world of financial crime changes rapidly. Regulators have already issued 80 AML fines worth $263 million in the first half of 2024. These numbers show a 31% jump from 2023's figures. Criminals actively exploit the gaps created by banks' separate approaches to AML and fraud detection.

Banks need to understand the hidden threats they might miss in 2025. Traditional systems often fail to catch sophisticated schemes. A more integrated approach could help financial institutions protect themselves better against new risks.

The Evolution of Money Laundering Techniques in 2025

Criminal organizations keep finding new ways to commit financial crimes. Their money laundering techniques have become more sophisticated in 2025. These criminals now use complex technology-based strategies because law enforcement targets conventional methods.

Traditional vs. modern laundering methods

Money launderers used to rely on cash-heavy businesses, physical assets, and offshore accounts. Today's criminals prefer digital methods that give them better anonymity and speed. The International Monetary Fund reports that money laundering makes up about 5% of the global GDP. These numbers show how massive this criminal enterprise has become.

Modern criminals now infiltrate legitimate businesses and use complex corporate structures across borders. German authorities reported their highest financial crime damage from organized groups in 10 years during 2023. This surge proves how effective these new methods have become.

{{cta-first}}

The rise of synthetic identity fraud

Synthetic identity fraud combines real and fake information to create "Frankenstein IDs" that look genuine. This crime has become the fastest-growing financial fraud in the United States. Banks lose an estimated PHP 353.63 billion to this scheme. Each fraudulent account costs about PHP 884,063.70 on average.

These fake identities target the most vulnerable people. Criminals use children's Social Security numbers 51 times more often than others. They also target elderly and homeless people who rarely check their credit reports.

Crypto-mixing and cross-chain transactions

Cross-chain crime leads the way in cryptocurrency laundering. This technique, also called "chain-hopping," swaps cryptocurrencies between different tokens or blockchains quickly to hide their criminal sources.

Criminals have laundered PHP 412.56 billion worth of illegal crypto through cross-chain services. They prefer privacy-focused bridges like Thorchain and Incognito that use zero-knowledge proofs to hide transaction details. RenBridge alone has helped launder at least PHP 31.83 billion in criminal proceeds.

AI-powered laundering schemes

AI has changed how criminals launder money. They now use AI algorithms to create realistic fake identities, automate complex transactions, and generate convincing business documents to make illegal money look legal.

AI helps create synthetic identities for financial crimes and bypass traditional verification methods. Criminals value this technology because it automates "structured" transactions. They split large amounts into smaller transfers across multiple accounts to avoid detection systems.

Why Traditional AML Systems Fail to Detect New Threats

Banks invest heavily in compliance but still struggle to catch sophisticated money laundering schemes. Their existing systems can't keep up with new criminal tactics. This creates dangerous blind spots that lead to billions in fines.

Rule-based limitations in complex scenarios

AML systems today depend too much on fixed rules and thresholds that criminals know how to bypass. These rigid systems flood analysts with false alarms, which makes real threats harder to spot. A Chief AML Officer at a financial institution learned they could turn off several detection rules without affecting the number of suspicious activity reports.

Rule-based monitoring has a basic flaw - it can't place transactions in context. The system doesn't know the difference between a pizza delivery worker getting drug money from another state and a student receiving help from family. This makes investigators tune out alerts and miss actual suspicious activity.

Data silos preventing holistic detection

Teams that don't share information make it harder to catch financial crimes. Research shows 55% of companies work in silos, and 54% of financial leaders say this blocks progress. The cost is staggering - Fortune 500 companies lose PHP 1856.53 billion each year by not sharing knowledge between teams.

The Danske Bank scandal shows what can go wrong. The bank couldn't combine its Estonian branch's systems with main operations, which left a gap where suspicious transactions went unnoticed for years. Important data stuck in separate systems or departments makes compliance work slow and prone to mistakes.

Outdated risk assessment models

Most banks still use basic customer risk profiles that quickly become stale. They collect information when accounts open but rarely update it. Banks expect customers to refresh their own details, which almost never happens.

Old-style risk tools built on spreadsheets and static reports can't handle large-scale data analysis. This limits their ability to spot patterns that could paint a better risk picture. Many banks only check risk once a year - a process that drags on for months. Criminals exploit this gap between their new methods and the bank's outdated models.

Hidden Threats Banks Are Missing Today

Financial institutions can't keep up with evolving money laundering tactics that exploit gaps between traditional AML and fraud detection systems. Criminals move billions undetected by using sophisticated threats that operate in detection blind spots.

Smurfing 2.0: Micro-transactions across multiple platforms

Traditional "smurfing" has grown beyond breaking large transactions into smaller ones. Criminals now spread tiny amounts across many digital channels in what experts call "micro-money laundering." They avoid suspicion by making hundreds of small transactions that look legitimate on their own.

This approach works well because:

  • Digital payment platforms enable quick, high-volume, small-value transactions
  • Alert systems miss these micro-transfers since they stay below reporting limits
  • Spreading transactions across platforms prevents banks from seeing the full picture

Legitimate business infiltration

Criminal networks in the EU have found a new way to hide their activities - 86% now use legal business structures as cover. Cash-heavy businesses make perfect fronts for laundering money and create unfair advantages that hurt honest companies.

Criminals naturally blend legal and illegal operations through high-level infiltration or direct ownership. Some companies exist purely as fronts for criminal activities, while bad actors buy others to achieve their long-term criminal goals.

Real-time payment exploitation

Real-time payments give fraudsters the perfect chance to strike. These transactions can't be reversed once started, which leaves banks no time to step in. Fraud losses jumped 164% in just two years after real-time payment services launched in the US and UK.

Banks struggle to keep pace with these systems that process transactions around the clock. The risk grows since delayed detection means criminals have already moved the money before anyone spots the fraud patterns.

Mule account networks

Modern money laundering operations rely heavily on sophisticated mule networks. Between January 2022 and September 2023, just 25 banks removed 194,084 money mules from their systems. The National Fraud Database only received reports for 37% of these accounts.

Mule handlers recruit people to move dirty money through personal accounts. This creates complex patterns that hide the money's true path. Many banks still can't detect customers who knowingly join these schemes, especially when transactions appear normal on the surface.

AML vs Fraud Detection: Bridging the Critical Gap

Financial institutions have managed to keep separate teams to fight fraud and money laundering. This setup creates dangerous gaps in their defensive armor. Criminal operations now blur the lines between fraud and laundering activities, which makes us think about these long-standing divisions.

Understanding the fundamental differences

AML and fraud detection work differently within financial institutions. Chief Compliance Officers watch over AML as a compliance-driven operation. Meanwhile, Chief Risk Officers handle fraud detection as a risk management function. The main difference shows in their focus. AML stops criminals from making illegal money look legitimate. Fraud prevention protects customers and institutions from losing money.

Their approaches work quite differently:

  • Fraud monitoring uses live detection to stop fraud before it hits customers
  • AML monitoring looks at detailed data analysis to spot suspicious patterns and meet legal requirements

Where traditional approaches create blind spots

Separate teams create major weak points in the system. Money laundering usually follows fraud, but most institutions look at these risks separately. This separation leads to:

  • Teams doing the same alert reviews and case investigations twice
  • Risk assessment models that can't see connected activities
  • Resources, systems and data management that don't work well together

Separate approaches miss a key point: fraudulent transactions often point to money laundering activity. This needs suspicious activity reports even without clear connections.

The FRAML approach: Integrated protection

FRAML (Fraud Risk Assessment and Management Lifecycle) brings together fraud management and AML principles into one framework. This integrated way shows that these financial crimes share common patterns and risk factors.

The benefits show up quickly:

  • Risk assessments that look at both fraud and money laundering threats
  • Teams share data analytics and investigations to spot suspicious transactions faster
  • Companies can save 20-30% through better systems and processes

Case study: How integration caught what siloed systems missed

A prominent North American Tier 1 bank tried a FRAML analytics approach. They fed data from multiple sources into one accessible interface. These sources included fraud detection, KYC, documentation, sanctions, and transaction monitoring. This change helped them catch 30% more mule accounts in just one year.

A mid-tier payments startup saw similar results. They improved their work output by 20% after bringing fraud and AML detection together. Their team projects that this number could reach 40% over the next year.

{{cta-whitepaper}}

Conclusion

Criminal money laundering methods have evolved beyond what traditional detection systems can handle. Banks that keep their AML and fraud detection systems separate create weak spots that criminals actively target.

Banks need complete solutions to connect fraud prevention with AML compliance. The FRAML approach works well - early users have seen their threat detection improve by 30%. Tookitaki's AFC Ecosystem and FinCense platform deliver this integrated protection. They merge up-to-the-minute intelligence sharing with complete compliance features.

Financial institutions can now better shield themselves from new threats like synthetic identity fraud, crypto-mixing, and complex mule account networks. Both large banks and payment startups have proven the worth of unified systems. Their success stories show better detection rates and budget-friendly results through optimized operations.

The battle against financial crime demands continuous adaptation and alertness. Traditional methods are not enough as criminals keep improving their tactics. Banks must accept new ideas that combine advanced analytics, live monitoring, and community-driven intelligence to remain competitive against evolving threats in 2025 and beyond.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
09 Oct 2025
6 min
read

The New Frontline: Choosing the Right Fraud Protection Solution in Singapore

Fraud is no longer an isolated threat. It’s a fast-moving, shape-shifting force — and your protection strategy needs to evolve.

Singapore’s financial institutions are under increasing pressure to stop fraud in its tracks. Whether it’s phishing scams, mule networks, deepfake impersonation, or account takeovers, fraud is growing smarter and faster. With rising consumer expectations and tighter regulations from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), choosing the right fraud protection solution is no longer optional. It’s essential.

In this blog, we break down what a modern fraud protection solution should look like, the challenges financial institutions face, and how the right tools can make a measurable difference.

Talk to an Expert

Why Fraud Protection Matters More Than Ever in Singapore

Singapore has become a target for regional and global fraud syndicates. In 2024 alone, scam-related cases surged across digital banking platforms, real-time payment systems, and investment apps.

Common fraud tactics in Singapore include:

  • Deepfake impersonation of executives to authorise fraudulent payments
  • Mule networks laundering scam proceeds through retail accounts
  • Social engineering schemes via SMS, messaging apps, and phishing sites
  • Abuse of fintech payment rails for layering illicit funds
  • QR-enabled payment fraud using fake invoices and utility bills

For banks, fintechs, and e-wallet providers, protecting customer trust while meeting compliance requirements means upgrading outdated defences and adopting smarter solutions.

What Is a Fraud Protection Solution?

A fraud protection solution is a set of technologies and processes designed to detect, prevent, and respond to unauthorised or suspicious financial activity. Unlike basic fraud filters or static rules engines, modern solutions offer real-time intelligence, behavioural analytics, and automated response mechanisms.

These systems work across:

  • Online and mobile banking platforms
  • Real-time payment gateways (FAST, PayNow)
  • ATM and POS systems
  • Digital wallets and peer-to-peer transfers
  • Corporate payment platforms

Core Features of a Modern Fraud Protection Solution

To be effective in Singapore’s environment, a fraud protection platform must offer the following capabilities:

1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

The system should detect anomalies instantly. With real-time payment rails, fraud can occur and complete within seconds.

Must-have abilities:

  • Flagging unusual transfer patterns
  • Monitoring high-risk transaction destinations
  • Identifying suspicious frequency or amount spikes

2. Behavioural Analytics

Every user has a pattern. The system should create a behavioural profile for each customer and flag deviations that could signal fraud.

Examples:

  • Logging in from a new location or device
  • Transferring funds to previously unseen beneficiaries
  • Unusual time-of-day activity

3. AI-Powered Detection Models

Static rules are easy to bypass. AI models continuously learn from past transactions to detect unknown fraud types.

Advantages include:

  • Lower false positive rates
  • Adaptability to new scam techniques
  • Dynamic scoring based on multiple factors

4. Cross-Channel Visibility

Fraudsters exploit the gaps between systems. A strong solution connects the dots across:

  • Digital banking
  • Payment cards
  • Contact centres
  • Third-party apps

This provides a 360-degree view of activity and risk.

5. Smart Case Management

Alerts should flow into a central case management system where investigators can access customer data, transaction history, and risk scores in one place.

Additional features:

  • Task assignment
  • Audit trails
  • Escalation workflows

6. Integration with AML Tools

Many fraudulent transactions are part of larger money laundering operations. Look for platforms that connect to AML systems or offer built-in anti-money laundering detection.

7. Rules and Machine Learning Hybrid

The best systems combine rules for known risks and machine learning for unknown threats. This provides flexibility and scalability without overburdening compliance teams.

8. Explainable Risk Scoring

Especially in Singapore, where MAS expects auditability and transparency, the system must show why a transaction was flagged.

Key benefits:

  • Clear decision logic for investigators
  • Better documentation for regulators
  • Trust in AI-driven decisions
ChatGPT Image Oct 8, 2025, 01_33_14 PM

Key Challenges Faced by Financial Institutions in Singapore

Even with fraud systems in place, many organisations struggle with:

❌ High False Positives

Excessive alert volumes make it harder to detect real threats and slow down response times.

❌ Siloed Systems

Fraud signals are often trapped in departmental or channel-specific platforms, limiting visibility.

❌ Lack of Local Typology Awareness

Many systems are built for global markets and miss region-specific scam patterns.

❌ Manual Investigations

Slow, manual case handling leads to backlogs and delayed STR filing.

❌ One-Size-Fits-All Solutions

Generic fraud platforms fail to meet the operational needs and compliance expectations in Singapore’s regulated environment.

How Tookitaki’s FinCense Offers an End-to-End Fraud Protection Solution

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is more than an AML tool. It’s a complete compliance and fraud protection solution built for the Asia-Pacific region, including Singapore.

Here’s how it delivers:

1. Scenario-Based Fraud Detection

Instead of relying on outdated rules, FinCense detects based on real-world fraud scenarios. These include:

  • Cross-border mule account layering
  • QR code-enabled laundering via fintechs
  • Deepfake impersonation of CFOs for corporate fund diversion

These scenarios are sourced and validated through the AFC Ecosystem, a collective intelligence network of compliance professionals.

2. Modular AI Agents

FinCense uses a modular Agentic AI framework. Each agent specialises in a core function:

  • Real-time detection
  • Alert prioritisation
  • Case investigation
  • Report generation

This structure allows for faster processing and more targeted improvements.

3. AI Copilot for Investigators

Tools like FinMate assist fraud teams by:

  • Highlighting high-risk transactions
  • Summarising red flags
  • Suggesting likely fraud types
  • Auto-generating investigation notes

This reduces investigation time and improves consistency.

4. Integration with AML and STR Filing

Fraud alerts that indicate laundering can be escalated directly to AML teams. FinCense also supports MAS-aligned STR reporting through GoAML-compatible outputs.

5. Simulation and Model Tuning

Before deploying new fraud rules or AI models, compliance teams can simulate impact, adjust thresholds, and optimise performance — without risking alert fatigue.

Real Results from Institutions Using FinCense

Banks and payment platforms using FinCense have reported:

  • Over 50 percent reduction in false positives
  • 3x faster investigation workflows
  • Higher STR acceptance rates
  • Stronger audit performance during MAS reviews
  • Improved team efficiency and satisfaction

By investing in smarter tools, these institutions are building real-time resilience against fraud.

How to Evaluate Fraud Protection Solutions for Singapore

Here’s a quick checklist to guide your vendor selection:

  • Can it detect fraud in real time?
  • Does it include AI models trained on local risk patterns?
  • Is there cross-channel monitoring and investigation?
  • Can investigators access case data in one dashboard?
  • Does it support both rules and machine learning?
  • Are decisions explainable and audit-ready?
  • Does it integrate with AML and STR filing tools?
  • Can it simulate new detection logic before going live?

If your current system cannot check most of these boxes, it may be time to rethink your fraud defence strategy.

Conclusion: Protecting Trust in a High-Risk World

In Singapore’s fast-evolving financial landscape, the cost of fraud goes beyond financial loss. It erodes customer trust, damages reputation, and exposes institutions to regulatory scrutiny.

A modern fraud protection solution should not only detect known risks but adapt to new threats as they emerge. With AI, behavioural analytics, and collective intelligence, solutions like FinCense empower compliance teams to stay ahead — not just stay compliant.

As fraud continues to evolve, so must your defence. The future belongs to institutions that can think faster, act smarter, and protect better.

The New Frontline: Choosing the Right Fraud Protection Solution in Singapore
Blogs
08 Oct 2025
6 min
read

BSA AML Monitoring Software: Building Malaysia’s Next Layer of Financial Defence

Global AML standards began with the Bank Secrecy Act. Today, they define how Malaysia builds trust in its financial system.

Malaysia’s Growing AML Challenge

Malaysia’s financial ecosystem is becoming more digital, interconnected, and fast-moving. From instant payments and QR-based transfers to cross-border remittances, financial institutions are managing enormous transaction volumes every second.

While this digital transformation fuels growth, it has also opened new pathways for financial crime. Money mule networks, investment scams, and cross-border laundering schemes are becoming more sophisticated. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) is responding by enforcing tighter compliance rules aligned with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards.

Yet, many financial institutions continue to rely on outdated monitoring systems that cannot detect evolving typologies or adapt to real-time risks. The answer lies in adopting BSA AML monitoring software that blends global best practices with regional relevance.

Talk to an Expert

Understanding the BSA: The Foundation of Modern AML Compliance

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), enacted in the United States in 1970, is considered the cornerstone of global anti-money laundering (AML) efforts. It requires financial institutions to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering by:

  • Keeping records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments
  • Filing reports for transactions above set thresholds
  • Reporting suspicious activities that might indicate laundering, fraud, or terrorist financing

Over the decades, BSA principles have evolved to form the foundation of international AML frameworks, influencing both FATF recommendations and national regulations worldwide.

While Malaysia operates under its own Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA), the core principles of the BSA— transparency, reporting, and risk-based monitoring— are deeply embedded in BNM’s compliance expectations.

What is BSA AML Monitoring Software?

BSA AML monitoring software refers to technology solutions designed to automate the detection, investigation, and reporting of suspicious financial activity.

These platforms are built to:

  • Monitor transactions in real time to detect unusual patterns or anomalies
  • Generate and prioritise alerts based on risk scoring models
  • Support Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) filing with comprehensive documentation
  • Ensure audit readiness through traceable decision-making and reporting history

In essence, this software embodies the operational heart of an AML program, empowering financial institutions to comply efficiently while staying one step ahead of criminals.

Lessons from the BSA Framework for Malaysian Institutions

The Bank Secrecy Act’s enduring success lies not in its age, but in its adaptability. Several lessons stand out for Malaysian financial institutions aiming to enhance their AML monitoring frameworks.

1. Embrace Risk-Based Monitoring

BSA compliance relies on understanding customer profiles, transaction patterns, and business risks. Malaysian banks must similarly tailor monitoring systems to focus on high-risk customers and jurisdictions.

2. Strengthen Suspicious Activity Reporting

Accurate and timely reporting is essential. Advanced software helps generate STRs supported by explainable data analytics and comprehensive case histories.

3. Encourage Collaboration and Data Sharing

BSA’s influence led to better information sharing between institutions and regulators. Malaysia’s AML community can benefit from the same collaboration through initiatives like Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem, where insights are shared anonymously across members.

4. Ensure Explainability and Transparency

Regulators expect every AML decision to be traceable. Explainable AI within AML monitoring software ensures that Malaysian compliance teams can justify every alert with clarity.

Challenges Facing Malaysian Financial Institutions

Despite progress, banks and fintechs across Malaysia still face major challenges in achieving BSA-grade AML compliance.

Fragmented Systems

Many institutions run separate platforms for fraud detection, AML monitoring, and transaction screening. This fragmentation limits visibility across customer touchpoints.

Siloed Data

Without integrated data, monitoring systems cannot detect complex layering or cross-channel laundering schemes.

False Positives and Alert Fatigue

Legacy systems often rely on rigid rule sets that generate thousands of unnecessary alerts, diverting resources from genuine threats.

Escalating Compliance Costs

Manual investigations, disjointed workflows, and frequent regulatory audits increase operational costs.

Evolving Crime Typologies

Criminals are now exploiting real-time payment channels, cryptocurrency gateways, and trade-based laundering methods, which static systems cannot detect.

How Advanced BSA AML Monitoring Software Solves These Gaps

BSA AML monitoring software introduces automation, intelligence, and adaptability.

1. Real-Time Monitoring

Modern solutions analyse transactions as they happen, identifying suspicious behaviour before criminals can move funds further.

2. AI and Machine Learning

Machine learning models continuously learn from data, adapting to new money laundering typologies and reducing false positives.

3. Automated Workflows

Automation streamlines alert triage, case management, and reporting, ensuring faster and more consistent responses.

4. Scalable Infrastructure

BSA-grade software supports millions of daily transactions while maintaining performance and accuracy.

5. Regulator Alignment

Explainable AI and audit-ready reporting ensure full transparency with regulators such as BNM and regional counterparts.

By applying these principles, Malaysian banks can achieve compliance standards that meet and even exceed international expectations.

ChatGPT Image Oct 7, 2025, 03_50_20 PM

Tookitaki’s FinCense: BSA-Grade AML Monitoring for Malaysia

Tookitaki’s FinCense represents the next generation of BSA-grade AML monitoring technology designed for the realities of Malaysia’s financial sector. It combines AI innovation with a deep understanding of regional compliance landscapes.

Agentic AI Workflows

FinCense leverages Agentic AI, where intelligent agents automate investigation workflows, triage alerts, and generate case summaries in natural language. This drastically reduces investigation time and ensures consistency across teams.

Federated Learning with the AFC Ecosystem

Through the AFC Ecosystem, FinCense connects financial institutions, regulators, and compliance experts in a privacy-preserving framework. This collaborative approach enables shared learning without compromising data security.

For Malaysia, this means gaining early detection capabilities for laundering typologies first observed in neighbouring ASEAN markets.

Explainable AI and Audit Readiness

FinCense’s AI is fully transparent, providing a clear rationale for every flagged transaction. Regulators can trace decisions end-to-end, improving trust and audit efficiency.

Unified AML and Fraud Coverage

Instead of managing multiple disjointed systems, FinCense delivers a single, integrated platform for transaction monitoring, name screening, and fraud detection. This unified view of risk prevents duplication and blind spots.

ASEAN Localisation

FinCense’s AML scenarios and typologies are fine-tuned for regional realities such as QR payment misuse, cross-border remittances, and mule networks — giving Malaysian institutions unmatched accuracy.

Step-by-Step: Implementing a BSA-Grade AML Monitoring Framework in Malaysia

For Malaysian financial institutions aiming to align with global best practices, the roadmap is clear.

Step 1: Assess Existing Risk Frameworks

Conduct a gap analysis to identify weak points in transaction monitoring, risk scoring, and reporting mechanisms.

Step 2: Integrate Data Across Channels

Unify data from customer onboarding, transactions, and external watchlists into one ecosystem. Comprehensive data is the foundation for effective ML models.

Step 3: Deploy Machine Learning Models

Adopt ML-driven monitoring to detect new typologies dynamically rather than relying solely on rules.

Step 4: Build Explainability and Regulator Trust

Choose systems that can explain every alert clearly, aligning with BNM’s expectations for transparency and accountability.

Step 5: Foster Collaborative Intelligence

Participate in networks like the AFC Ecosystem to share anonymised typologies and red flags across the region.

Scenario Example: Cross-Border Laundering through Remittance Channels

Consider a scenario where a criminal syndicate uses remittance services to layer illicit funds.

  • Dozens of small remittances are sent from different accounts within Malaysia to beneficiaries in multiple ASEAN countries.
  • Funds are quickly consolidated into shell company accounts and reinvested as “clean” capital.

A traditional monitoring system might flag only large transactions, missing the broader layering pattern.

With FinCense’s BSA-grade AML monitoring capabilities:

  • Federated learning detects unusual transaction clustering across institutions.
  • Agentic AI prioritises the alert based on network-level intelligence.
  • Explainable AI generates a clear narrative, enabling compliance officers to take swift action.

The result is real-time detection, faster intervention, and stronger regulator confidence.

The Strategic Advantage for Malaysian Banks and Fintechs

Adopting BSA-grade AML monitoring software offers Malaysian institutions several long-term benefits:

  • Global Compliance Readiness: Systems designed to meet international standards like BSA and FATF prepare institutions for regional expansion.
  • Lower Compliance Costs: Automation and reduced false positives free resources for strategic initiatives.
  • Enhanced Regulator Trust: Transparent and auditable AI builds confidence with BNM.
  • Customer Protection: Real-time detection protects customers from scams and fraud.
  • Stronger Reputation: Demonstrating advanced compliance capabilities attracts partners and investors.

The Future of AML Monitoring in Malaysia

AML monitoring is entering a new era. What began as a local regulatory requirement under the BSA in 1970 has become a global standard for financial integrity.

The future of AML monitoring in Malaysia will be defined by:

  • Integration of AI and federated learning to detect threats faster.
  • Convergence of AML and fraud detection into unified trust layers.
  • Regulator-led collaboration networks to share typologies and red flags.
  • Explainable AI frameworks that balance innovation with accountability.

Malaysia is already moving in this direction, and solutions like Tookitaki’s FinCense are enabling that progress.

Conclusion

The Bank Secrecy Act revolutionised financial crime compliance by emphasising transparency, accountability, and proactive detection. Those same principles now guide Malaysia’s AML transformation.

BSA AML monitoring software represents more than a regulatory tool. It is the foundation for building a resilient and trusted financial ecosystem.

With Tookitaki’s FinCense, Malaysian banks and fintechs can achieve BSA-level compliance through a platform built for their unique challenges. Combining machine learning, federated intelligence, and regulator-grade explainability, FinCense delivers what every compliance leader needs — a trust layer that turns vigilance into resilience.

The next chapter of Malaysia’s AML journey is not about catching up to global standards. It is about setting them.

BSA AML Monitoring Software: Building Malaysia’s Next Layer of Financial Defence
Blogs
08 Oct 2025
6 min
read

How Australian Banks Can Detect and Prevent Money Mule Networks

Money mule networks are spreading fast across Australia’s banking system. Smarter detection, collaboration, and AI-driven monitoring are key to stopping them.

Introduction

Money mules are the hidden enablers of financial crime. They move illicit funds through legitimate bank accounts, helping criminals disguise their origins and integrate them into the financial system.
In 2024, AUSTRAC warned that mule activity in Australia had surged, often linked to scams, cyber-enabled fraud, and international crime syndicates. Many mules are recruited through fake job ads or romance scams and may not even realise they are committing a crime.

For Australian banks, identifying and stopping these mule networks has become a top priority. The challenge lies in detecting subtle, fast-moving transactions across real-time payment channels without overwhelming compliance teams with false alerts.

Talk to an Expert


What Are Money Mule Networks?

A money mule is an individual who transfers illegally obtained funds on behalf of others.
A money mule network is a coordinated system of such accounts used to layer and move criminal proceeds through multiple institutions.

These networks:

  • Receive illicit funds from scams, drug trafficking, or cybercrime.
  • Split them into smaller amounts.
  • Move them through multiple accounts (often across borders).
  • Withdraw or convert them into crypto, cash, or goods.

Even when a single transaction looks legitimate, the pattern across the network exposes the laundering operation.

Why Mule Activity Is Rising in Australia

1. Growth of Real-Time Payments

The New Payments Platform (NPP) and PayTo enable funds to move instantly, giving criminals the same speed advantage as legitimate users.

2. Recruitment Through Scams

Fraudsters lure victims with fake job offers, “work-from-home” schemes, or online relationships. Many mules think they are processing payments for a company or partner.

3. Economic Pressure

Cost-of-living stress makes people more vulnerable to quick-cash scams.

4. Cross-Border Links

Australia’s ties to Southeast Asia make it a hub for layered transactions and remittance-based laundering.

5. Digital Platforms

Social media, messaging apps, and online job boards simplify mule recruitment at scale.

Red Flags for Money Mule Activity

Transaction-Level Indicators

  • Multiple small incoming payments followed by rapid outgoing transfers.
  • Transactions just below AUSTRAC’s reporting threshold.
  • High-volume transfers with minimal account balances.
  • Frequent transfers to or from unrelated individuals.
  • Accounts with activity outside the customer’s usual pattern.

Customer Behaviour Indicators

  • Customers unable to explain transaction purposes.
  • Reluctance to meet bank officers or verify source of funds.
  • Use of newly opened accounts for high-value transactions.
  • Employment information inconsistent with income level.

Digital Activity Indicators

  • Logins from multiple IP addresses or devices.
  • Accounts accessed from different regions within short timeframes.
  • Repeated changes in beneficiary details or payment descriptions.

How Money Mule Networks Operate

1. Recruitment

Criminals post fake job ads (“payment processing agent”), or build trust through romance or investment scams.

2. Onboarding and Account Opening

Victims share personal information or allow access to their accounts. Some networks use synthetic identities to open new accounts.

3. Layering

Funds are broken into small amounts and transferred across several mule accounts domestically and abroad.

4. Extraction

Funds are withdrawn as cash, used to buy goods, or sent to offshore accounts, completing the laundering cycle.

AUSTRAC’s Expectations

Under the AML/CTF Act 2006, Australian banks must:

  • Monitor transactions continuously for suspicious patterns.
  • Submit Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) when mule activity is detected.
  • Implement risk-based controls to identify high-risk customers.
  • Maintain strong Know Your Customer (KYC) and Ongoing Customer Due Diligence (OCDD) frameworks.
  • Cooperate with other institutions and regulators through information-sharing partnerships.

AUSTRAC’s 2025 priorities highlight the need for cross-institution collaboration and the use of data analytics to identify mule networks early.

Detection Strategies for Australian Banks

1. AI-Powered Transaction Monitoring

AI models can analyse behaviour across millions of transactions, identifying patterns that humans might miss. Machine learning enables detection of both known and emerging mule typologies.

2. Network Analytics

By mapping relationships between accounts, banks can uncover clusters of activity typical of mule rings — such as shared beneficiaries, IP addresses, or transaction corridors.

3. Behavioural Profiling

Advanced systems create dynamic profiles for each customer, flagging deviations in behaviour such as sudden increases in international transfers or use of new devices.

4. Cross-Channel Integration

Connecting AML, fraud, and onboarding systems allows compliance teams to view the full risk picture instead of siloed alerts.

5. Collaboration Through Intelligence-Sharing

Industry-wide data collaboration, such as AUSTRAC’s Fintel Alliance or federated learning networks, helps institutions detect mule rings operating across multiple banks.

6. Customer Education

Awareness campaigns discourage customers from unknowingly becoming mules and encourage reporting of suspicious requests.

ChatGPT Image Oct 7, 2025, 02_38_21 PM

Operational Challenges

  • Data Silos: Different departments or systems tracking separate data streams make it difficult to see the full mule trail.
  • Alert Fatigue: High false positives strain compliance resources.
  • Limited Visibility into Other Banks: Mule networks often operate across multiple institutions, requiring external collaboration.
  • Evolving Typologies: Criminals continually change patterns to bypass detection models.
  • Regulatory Complexity: Keeping up with evolving AUSTRAC guidance adds compliance burden.

Case Example: Regional Australia Bank

Regional Australia Bank, a leading community-owned institution, has strengthened its fraud and AML operations using advanced technology to detect mule behaviour early. By combining AI-driven monitoring with strong customer education initiatives, the bank has achieved faster identification of suspicious networks and greater compliance efficiency.

This approach demonstrates how even mid-sized institutions can protect customers and meet AUSTRAC standards through innovation and agility.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

FinCense, Tookitaki’s end-to-end compliance platform, helps Australian banks detect and prevent mule networks with unprecedented accuracy.

  • Real-Time Detection: Monitors transactions across NPP, PayTo, remittances, and cards instantly.
  • Agentic AI: Learns from evolving mule typologies and explains outcomes transparently for regulators.
  • Federated Intelligence: Leverages typologies from the AFC Ecosystem to detect cross-institutional mule patterns.
  • Integrated Case Management: Combines fraud, AML, and sanctions alerts in one unified workflow.
  • Regulator-Ready Reporting: Automates SMRs and audit trails aligned with AUSTRAC’s standards.
  • Customer Behaviour Analysis: Flags anomalies using transaction and digital-footprint data.

FinCense transforms detection from reactive to predictive, giving compliance teams the insight and control to dismantle mule networks before funds vanish.

Best Practices for Banks

  1. Integrate AML and Fraud Systems: Unified risk data improves mule detection accuracy.
  2. Leverage AI and Network Analytics: Identify clusters and shared behaviours across accounts.
  3. Adopt Federated Intelligence Frameworks: Collaborate securely with other banks to uncover shared typologies.
  4. Conduct Periodic Model Validation: Ensure detection models remain accurate and unbiased.
  5. Educate Customers and Staff: Awareness reduces mule recruitment success.
  6. Maintain Continuous Dialogue with AUSTRAC: Early engagement builds trust and improves compliance outcomes.

Future of Mule Detection in Australia

  1. AI-First Compliance: AI copilots will support investigators with insights and summarised analysis.
  2. Industry-Wide Data Collaboration: Federated learning will allow collective defence without sharing raw data.
  3. Advanced Device Intelligence: Linking device IDs, biometrics, and behavioural analytics will expose mule control.
  4. Proactive Prevention: Systems will predict mule activity before the first suspicious transfer occurs.
  5. Greater Consumer Protection Regulation: AUSTRAC and the ACCC will push for stronger restitution mechanisms for scam victims.

Conclusion

Money mule networks threaten the integrity of Australia’s financial system by enabling fraudsters and organised crime to move funds undetected. With real-time payments and digital platforms expanding, mule detection must become faster, smarter, and more collaborative.

Regional Australia Bank and other forward-looking institutions demonstrate that even smaller players can lead in compliance by embracing intelligent automation and shared intelligence. Platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense combine AI, federated learning, and integrated case management to give banks the visibility and agility they need to stay ahead of criminals.

Pro tip: The fight against mule networks is not just about technology. It is about collaboration, education, and continuous vigilance across the entire financial ecosystem.

How Australian Banks Can Detect and Prevent Money Mule Networks