What is Intercompany Accounting?
.svg)
What is Intercompany Accounting?
Intercompany accounting stands for the processing and accounting of inter-company/internal financial activities and events that cross legal entities, branches, or national borders. This may include (but is not limited to) the sales of products and services, fee sharing, royalties, cost allocations, and financing activities. Intercompany accounting is a broader segment than accounting – it extends into various functions, which include finance, tax, and treasury. According to the accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, intercompany transactions account for 30-40% of the global economy, which amounts to almost $40 trillion annually, and is further ranked as the ‘5th most common cause of corporate financial restatements’.
A 3-Step Approach to Intercompany Accounting
The transactions are important for many reasons, such as compliance with local tax codes, accurate reporting, regulations, good governance in general, and accounting rules. Financial institutions that need to improve their intercompany accounting can use this 3-step approach to intercompany accounting to improve their performance:
- Establish Standards, Policies, and Procedures: The foremost step to improve intercompany accounting is to establish a consistent process that can help identify, authorize, and clear the intercompany transactions. Although it would be easier to go with automation as the initial step, since the manual processes serve as an issue (they do not have consistent standards), chances are that attempting to automate the intercompany accounting will turn into a failure.
The policies and procedures are meant to include a list of what products and services are supposed to be provided between subsidiaries, along with transfer pricing for each, and the level of authorization needed for any transaction. Some other specifications may include a list of designated intercompany accounts, rules to identify and complete transactions, and a schedule that has specific deadlines to clear the balances every month.
- Automate the processes: According to a survey by Deloitte on ‘Intercompany Accounting & Process Management’, 54% of the companies still rely on manual intercompany processing, 47% only have ad hoc netting capabilities, while 30% report a significant out-of-balance position. After the policies and procedures are integrated and followed, the next step is to go for automation. The reason behind this is that keeping up with thousands of transactions by using spreadsheets is an inefficient method – one that only increases the risk of having errors. Further, in the case of companies that have subsidiaries in various countries, it becomes even more challenging to keep track. Alongside this, dealing with the currency exchange rates, the local tax codes, and the different rules for accounting can make it impossible to complete the process on time.
Yet, not all accounting solutions can manage intercompany transactions. There is software designed for emerging companies, which does not typically support multiple business entities. This can be a critical limitation, as it makes identifying and matching the transactions between various subsidiaries a manual process.
The minimum requirement from the software is that it should be able to tag intercompany purchase orders and sales orders when they are created, and link them automatically. This will help the accounting team, as they will no longer have to search amongst thousands of transaction entries to find the matching pairs. The revenue and expenses of intercompany transactions should be removed automatically from consolidated financial statements, specifically during the closing process. Another requirement from the software system is that it should also include intercompany netting functionality, which not only saves time and effort during the settlement process, but also saves money by reducing the number of invoices that need to be generated, plus payments that have to be processed every month.
- Centralize: It is mainly the corporate accounting staff’s job to manage intercompany accounting, which means that most things get done as part of the closing procedure. Yet, as the accounting team has other responsibilities, it isn’t ideal to wait until the end of the month, as it would extend the close cycle. On its own, the intercompany elimination can add days to the procedure if it’s not automated, which has an impact on the timings of the reports. The added pressure to close the books at the earliest may also increase the risk of errors.
So, centralizing the intercompany accounting serves as one of the best practices, either under a select person, or, in case there is a larger volume of people, a group of individuals under the supervision of the corporate controller. While dedicating resources to manage an activity that isn’t categorized as strategic could be a bit hard to explain, the efficiencies that companies gain, along with the improved supervision of this process, eventually pays its dividends. Managing the process centrally requires visibility into all intercompany transactions, which is difficult for companies that rely on multiple, differing accounting systems. So, in case one truly wants to control the process, it’s difficult to manage the business with different subsidiaries on a single accounting platform.
Types of Intercompany Transactions
The three main types of intercompany transactions include: downstream, upstream, and lateral. Let’s understand how each of these intercompany transactions is recorded in the respective unit’s books. Also, their impact, and how to adjust the financials that are consolidated.
- Downstream Transaction: This type of transaction flows from the parent company, down to a subsidiary. With this transaction, the parent company records it with the applicable profit or loss. The transaction is made transparent and can be viewed by the parent company and its stakeholders, but not to the subsidiaries. For example, a downstream transaction would be the parent company selling an asset or inventory to a subsidiary.
- Upstream Transaction: This type of transaction is the reverse of downstream and flows from the subsidiary to the parent entity. For an upstream transaction, the subsidiary will record the transaction along with related profit or loss. An example would be when a subsidiary might transfer an executive to the parent company for a time period, charging the parent company by the hour for the executive’s services. For such a case, the majority and minority interest stakeholders can share the profit/loss, as they share ownership of the subsidiary.
- Lateral Transaction: This transaction occurs between two subsidiaries within the same parent organization. The subsidiary/subsidiaries record their lateral transaction along with profit and loss, which is similar to accounting for an upstream transaction. For example, when one subsidiary provides IT services to another, with a fee.
Intercompany Transactions Accounting Importance
Intercompany transactions are of great importance, as they can help to greatly improve the flow of finances and assets. Studies on transfer pricing help to ensure that the intercompany transfer pricing falls within reach of total pricing in order to avoid any unnecessary audits.
Such intercompany transactions accounting can help with keeping records for resolving tax disputes, mainly in the countries/jurisdictions where the markets are upcoming and new, and where there is little to no regulation governing the related parties’ transactions. The following are a few areas that are affected by the use of intercompany transactions accounting:
- Loan participation
- Sales and transfer of assets
- Dividends
- Insurance policies
- Transactions that have member banks and affiliates
- The management and service fees
What is an Intercompany Transaction?
Intercompany transactions happen when the unit of a legal entity makes a transaction with another unit of the same entity. There are many international companies that take advantage of intercompany transfer pricing or other related party transactions. This is to influence IC-DISC, promote improved transaction taxes, and, effectively, enhance efficiency within the financial institution. The transactions are essential to maximizing the allocation of income and deduction. Here are a few examples of such transactions:
- Between two departments
- Between two subsidiaries
- Between the parent company and subsidiary
- Between two divisions
There are two basic categories of intercompany transactions: direct and indirect intercompany transactions.
- Direct Intercompany Transactions: These transactions may happen from intercompany transactions between two different units within the same company entity. They can aid in notes payable and receivable, and also interest expense and revenues.
- Indirect Intercompany Transactions: These transactions occur when the unit of an entity obtains the debt/assets issued to another company that is unrelated, with the help of another unit in the original parent company. Such transactions can help various economic factors, including the elimination of interest expense on the retired debt, create gain or loss for early debt retirement, or remove the investment in interest and bond revenue.
Intercompany Accounting Best Practices
In a survey conducted in 2016 by Deloitte, which included over 4,000 accounting professionals, nearly 80% experienced challenges related to intercompany accounting. The issue was around differing software systems within and across financial institute units and divisions, intercompany settlement processes, management of complex legal agreements, transfer pricing compliance, and FX exposure. With issues such as multiple stakeholders, large transaction volumes, complicated entity agreements, and increased regulatory scrutiny, it’s clear that intercompany accounting requires a structured, end-to-end process. Here are some of the intercompany accounting best practices:
Streamline and Optimize the Process with Technology
It is counted as intercompany accounting best practices to have technology-enabled coordination and orchestration streamline intercompany accounting across the entire financial institution. Automation removes the burden of having to identify counterparties across various ERP systems. The integrated workflows ensure that tasks are completed in the correct order and in the most efficient timeframes, with the removal of any additional managers, who would waste their time chasing the completion of this task.
With automation, users can collaborate more easily and resources are deployed more efficiently. The employees who were previously occupied by keeping the data moving are freed to perform tasks of higher-value. With this, the result is faster resolution, along with timely and accurate elimination of intercompany transactions, cost savings, reduced cycle times, and an accelerated closing.
Streamline the Intercompany Process with a Single View
The elimination of intercompany transactions as a collaborative process requires the counterparties to have full visibility of their respective balances, along with the differences between them, and the underlying transactions. In an intragroup trade, too, counterparties need shared access to a common view of their intercompany positions.
With KPI monitoring, there is an overview of intercompany accounting status, which highlights potential delays in real-time and in a visual manner. The dashboards and alerts allow for companies to manage their progress in real-time, giving accounting professionals an overview of tasks that haven’t yet started or finished. With this visibility, team leaders can review bottlenecks by task, individual, cost center, as well as entity.
Eliminate Intercompany Mismatches Early on in the Process
In order to minimize delays around the agreement of intercompany differences, one needs to start the process prior to usual in the reporting cycle. By viewing intercompany mismatches this early on in the reporting cycle, individual companies can take remedial action and correct their positions before the consolidation is attempted.
The direct integration with the ERP systems allows financial institutes to extract invoice details to help reconcile differences in a more detailed manner. After resolving the differences, adjustments can be posted directly into ERP systems through the process, without manually posting reconciling journal entries. This is why automation effectively turns the intercompany process into a preliminary close, well in advance of the normal reporting cycle, every month.
Manage Intercompany Risk
One can eliminate endless standalone spreadsheets, which are typically used by individuals to manage intercompany accounting, by using an automated system that gives companies one version of the truth, along with an audit trail of activities detailing when and by whom they were completed. The workflows give the company employees ownership of every activity and eliminate the interdependencies of these tasks.
Financial institutes are able to orchestrate and monitor intercompany accounting as a fundamental part of their internal controls. The role-based security, aligned with the company’s underlying applications, maintains the integrity of roles and access. At the same time, one can attach or store procedures and policy documents in task list items, which are made immediately available to the people performing the intercompany tasks.
Devise Bullet-Proof Centralized Governance and Policies
For effective intercompany accounting, standard global policies are required to govern critical areas, such as data or charts of accounts, transfer pricing, and allocation methods. Companies may establish a center of excellence with joint supervision from accounting, tax, and treasury. It serves as a resource to address global process standardization and issues related to intercompany accounting. Having a single company-wide process would mean that companies adhere to best practices and give all finance stakeholders immediate visibility of issues, tasks, and bottlenecks that need escalation or remediation. This can help financial institutes benchmark their performance, address underlying issues, and facilitate post-close reviews. Further, it would help them to subsequently streamline activities in order to encourage a continuous process improvement and accelerate the close.
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Experience the most intelligent AML and fraud prevention platform
Top AML Scenarios in ASEAN
The Role of AML Software in Compliance
The Role of AML Software in Compliance
We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.
Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?
Our Thought Leadership Guides
Cracking the Code: How Money Laundering Investigation Software Empowers Philippine Banks
Every suspicious transaction is a clue — and the right software helps connect the dots.
In the Philippines, banks and financial institutions are under intensifying pressure to investigate suspicious activities swiftly and accurately. The country’s exit from the FATF grey list in 2024 has raised expectations: financial institutions must now prove that their money laundering investigation software is not just ticking compliance boxes but truly effective in detecting, tracing, and reporting illicit flows.
What Is Money Laundering Investigation Software?
Money laundering investigation software is a specialised technology platform that enables banks and other covered entities to:
- Trace suspicious transactions across accounts, products, and channels.
- Investigate customer profiles and uncover hidden relationships.
- Automate case management for Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs).
- Collaborate securely with compliance teams and regulators.
The goal is to turn raw transactional data into actionable intelligence that helps compliance officers identify real risks while reducing wasted effort on false positives.
Why It Matters for the Philippines
The Philippine financial system is highly exposed to money laundering threats due to:
- Large remittance inflows from overseas workers.
- Cross-border risks from porous regional payment networks.
- High cash usage still prevalent in many sectors.
- Digital transformation of banks and fintechs, increasing the attack surface.
With stricter Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) oversight, institutions need tools that deliver both accuracy and transparency in investigations.
Limitations of Manual or Legacy Investigations
Traditionally, investigations have relied on manual processes or outdated case management tools. These approaches struggle with:
- Overwhelming volumes of alerts — compliance teams drowning in cases triggered by rigid rules.
- Siloed data — transaction, KYC, and external intelligence scattered across systems.
- Limited forensic capability — difficulty connecting patterns across multiple institutions or geographies.
- Slow turnaround times — risking regulatory penalties for delayed STR filing.
Key Features of Modern Money Laundering Investigation Software
1. Advanced Case Management
Centralised dashboards consolidate alerts, supporting documentation, and investigator notes in one secure interface.
2. AI-Powered Alert Triage
Machine learning reduces false positives and prioritises high-risk cases, helping teams focus on genuine threats.
3. Network and Relationship Analysis
Software visualises connections between accounts, entities, and transactions, uncovering hidden links in laundering networks.
4. Integrated KYC/CDD Data
Seamless integration with KYC data helps validate customer profiles and identify inconsistencies.
5. Regulatory Reporting Automation
Streamlined generation and submission of STRs and CTRs ensures timeliness and accuracy in compliance reporting.
How It Helps Detect Common Money Laundering Typologies in the Philippines
- Layering through Remittance Channels – Detecting unusual fund flows structured across multiple remittance outlets.
- Use of Shell Companies – Linking transactions to front businesses with no legitimate operations.
- Casino Laundering – Identifying large buy-ins followed by minimal play and rapid cash-outs.
- Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) – Flagging mismatched invoices and payments tied to cross-border shipments.
- Terror Financing Risks – Tracing small but frequent transfers tied to high-risk geographies or individuals.
Regulatory Expectations for Investigation Tools
The BSP and AMLC require that institutions’ investigation processes are:
- Risk-based and proportionate to customer and product profiles.
- Documented and auditable for regulatory inspection.
- Efficient in STR filing, avoiding delays and inaccuracies.
- Transparent — investigators must explain why a case was escalated or closed.
Here, software with explainable AI capabilities provides the critical balance between automation and accountability.
Challenges in Adopting Investigation Software in the Philippines
- Integration with legacy core banking systems remains a technical hurdle.
- Shortage of skilled investigators who can interpret complex analytics outputs.
- Budget constraints for rural banks and smaller fintechs.
- Cultural resistance to shifting from manual investigations to AI-assisted tools.
Best Practices for Effective Deployment
1. Combine Human Expertise with AI
Investigators should use AI to enhance decision-making, not replace human judgment.
2. Invest in Training
Equip compliance officers with the skills to interpret AI outputs and relationship graphs.
3. Prioritise Explainability
Adopt platforms that clearly explain the rationale behind flagged transactions.
4. Collaborate Across Institutions
Leverage industry-wide typologies to strengthen investigations against cross-bank laundering.
5. Align with BSP’s Risk-Based Supervision
Ensure investigation workflows adapt to customer risk profiles and sector-specific risks.
The Tookitaki Advantage: Smarter Investigations with FinCense
Tookitaki’s FinCense is designed as a trust layer for financial institutions in the Philippines, delivering next-generation investigation capabilities.
Key differentiators:
- Agentic AI-powered investigations that guide compliance officers step by step.
- Smart Disposition engine that auto-generates investigation summaries for STRs.
- Federated intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem — giving access to 200+ expert-contributed scenarios and typologies.
- Explainable outputs to satisfy BSP and global regulators.
By automating repetitive tasks and providing deep forensic insight, FinCense helps Philippine banks reduce investigation time, cut costs, and strengthen compliance.
Conclusion: Investigations as a Strategic Advantage
Money laundering investigation software is no longer a luxury — it’s essential for Philippine banks navigating a fast-evolving financial crime landscape. By embracing AI-powered platforms, institutions can investigate smarter, report faster, and stay compliant with confidence.
In a digital-first future, the banks that treat investigations not just as a regulatory burden but as a strategic advantage will be the ones that win lasting customer trust.
AML CFT Software in Australia: Building Stronger Defences Against Financial Crime
With financial crime on the rise, Australian institutions need AML CFT software that combines real-time detection, regulatory compliance, and adaptability.
Financial crime is evolving rapidly in Australia. Fraudsters are exploiting the New Payments Platform (NPP), cross-border remittances, and digital banking to move illicit funds faster than ever. At the same time, terrorism financing threats remain a concern, particularly as criminals seek to disguise transactions in complex layers across jurisdictions.
To address these risks, Australian financial institutions are increasingly investing in AML CFT software. These platforms help detect and prevent money laundering and terrorism financing while keeping institutions aligned with AUSTRAC’s expectations. But not all software is created equal. The right solution can reduce costs, improve detection accuracy, and build trust, while the wrong choice can leave institutions exposed to penalties and reputational damage.
What is AML CFT Software?
AML CFT software is technology designed to help financial institutions comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CFT) regulations. It integrates processes across customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, investigations, and reporting.
Key functions include:
- KYC and Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verifying and risk-scoring customers.
- Transaction Monitoring: Detecting suspicious or unusual activity.
- Sanctions and PEP Screening: Checking customers and transactions against lists.
- Case Management: Investigating and resolving alerts.
- Regulatory Reporting: Generating Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) and Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs).
Why AML CFT Software Matters in Australia
1. AUSTRAC’s Strict Expectations
AUSTRAC enforces the AML/CTF Act 2006, which applies to all reporting entities, from major banks to remittance providers. Institutions must not only have controls in place but also prove that those controls are effective.
2. Real-Time Payments Challenge
With NPP enabling instant transactions, legacy batch monitoring systems are no longer sufficient. AML CFT software must work in real time.
3. Complex Laundering Typologies
Criminals use shell companies, trade-based money laundering, and mule networks to disguise illicit funds. Advanced detection capabilities are needed to uncover these patterns.
4. Reputational Risk
Non-compliance does not only result in penalties but also erodes customer trust. High-profile cases in Australia have shown how reputational damage can be long-lasting.
5. Cost of Compliance
Compliance costs are rising across the industry. Institutions need software that reduces false positives, automates investigations, and improves efficiency.
Core Features of Effective AML CFT Software
1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring
- Detects suspicious activity in milliseconds.
- Includes velocity checks, location-based alerts, and anomaly detection.
2. AI and Machine Learning Models
- Identify unknown patterns beyond static rules.
- Reduce false positives by distinguishing unusual but legitimate behaviour.
3. Integrated KYC/CDD
- Automates onboarding checks.
- Screens for politically exposed persons (PEPs), sanctions, and adverse media.
4. Case Management
- Centralises investigations.
- Allows analysts to track, escalate, and resolve alerts efficiently.
5. Regulatory Reporting Tools
- Generates SMRs and TTRs in AUSTRAC-compliant formats.
- Maintains audit trails for regulator reviews.
6. Explainability
- Provides clear reason codes for each alert.
- Ensures transparency for regulators and internal stakeholders.
Challenges in Deploying AML CFT Software
- High False Positives: Legacy systems often generate alerts that waste investigator time.
- Integration Issues: Complex core banking systems may not integrate smoothly.
- Lack of Local Expertise: Global vendors without knowledge of AUSTRAC standards may fall short.
- Evolving Criminal Methods: Criminals innovate constantly, requiring frequent updates to detection typologies.
Best Practices for Choosing AML CFT Software
- Assess Real-Time Capabilities: Ensure the software can handle NPP transaction speed.
- Evaluate AI Strength: Look for adaptive models that reduce false positives.
- Check AUSTRAC Alignment: Confirm local compliance support and reporting tools.
- Demand Transparency: Avoid black-box AI. Choose software with explainable decision-making.
- Prioritise Scalability: Make sure the solution can grow with your institution.
- Ask for Local References: Vendors proven in Australia are safer bets.
Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Taking the Lead
Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank have adopted modern AML CFT platforms to strengthen compliance and fraud prevention. Their experiences show that even mid-sized institutions can implement advanced technology to stay ahead of criminals and regulators. These banks demonstrate that AML CFT software is not just for Tier-1 players but for any institution that values trust and resilience.
Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense
Among AML CFT software providers, Tookitaki stands out for its innovative approach. Its flagship platform, FinCense, offers end-to-end compliance and fraud prevention capabilities.
- Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity instantly across NPP and cross-border corridors.
- Agentic AI: Continuously adapts to new money laundering and terrorism financing typologies while keeping false positives low.
- Federated Learning: Accesses real-world scenarios contributed by global experts through the AFC Ecosystem.
- FinMate AI Copilot: Assists investigators with case summaries and regulator-ready reports.
- Full AUSTRAC Compliance: SMRs, TTRs, and detailed audit trails built into the system.
- Cross-Channel Coverage: Monitors transactions across banking, remittance, wallets, and crypto.
With FinCense, institutions in Australia can stay ahead of evolving threats while managing compliance costs effectively.
The Future of AML CFT Software in Australia
1. PayTo and Overlay Services
As NPP expands with PayTo, new fraud and money laundering typologies will emerge. Software must adapt quickly.
2. Deepfake and AI-Powered Scams
Criminals are already using deepfakes to commit fraud. Future AML software will need to incorporate the detection of synthetic identities and manipulated media.
3. Cross-Border Intelligence Sharing
Closer coordination with ASEAN markets will be key, given Australia’s financial links to the region.
4. Collaborative Compliance Models
Federated learning and shared fraud databases will become standard, enabling institutions to collectively fight financial crime.
5. Cost Efficiency Focus
As compliance costs rise, automation and AI will play an even greater role in reducing investigator workload.
Conclusion
In Australia’s fast-moving financial environment, AML CFT software is no longer optional. It is the backbone of compliance and a critical shield against money laundering and terrorism financing. Institutions that rely on outdated systems risk falling behind criminals and regulators alike.
The right AML CFT platform delivers more than compliance. It strengthens customer trust, reduces costs, and future-proofs institutions for the risks ahead. Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are showing the way, proving that with the right technology, even mid-sized players can lead in compliance innovation.
Pro tip: When evaluating AML CFT software, prioritise real-time monitoring, AI adaptability, and AUSTRAC alignment. These are the non-negotiables for resilience in the NPP era.
Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore: Building a Smarter Line of Defence
Fraud may wear many faces. But for enterprises, the cost of not catching it is always the same: reputation, revenue, and regulatory risk.
In Singapore’s fast-paced, high-trust economy, enterprise fraud has evolved far beyond simple scams. Whether it's internal collusion, digital payment abuse, cross-border laundering, or supplier impersonation, organisations need to rethink how they detect and prevent fraud at scale.
This blog explores how enterprise fraud detection is transforming in Singapore, what makes it different from consumer-level security, and what leading firms are doing to stay ahead.
What Is Enterprise Fraud Detection?
Unlike individual-focused fraud detection (such as stolen credit cards), enterprise fraud detection is designed to uncover multi-layered, systemic, and often high-value fraud schemes that target businesses, financial institutions, or governments.
It includes threats such as:
- Internal fraud (for example, expense abuse or payroll manipulation)
- Business email compromise (BEC)
- Procurement fraud and supplier collusion
- Cross-channel transaction fraud
- Laundering via corporate accounts or trade platforms
In Singapore, where enterprises increasingly operate across borders and digital channels, the attack surface for fraud is broader than ever.
Why It’s a Priority in Singapore’s Enterprise Landscape
1. High Volume, High Velocity
Singaporean enterprises operate in sectors like banking, logistics, trade, and technology. These sectors are prone to complex, high-volume transactions that make detecting fraud challenging.
2. Cross-Border Risks
As a regional hub, many Singaporean businesses handle payments, contracts, and supply chains that cross jurisdictions. This creates blind spots that fraudsters exploit.
3. Regulatory Pressure
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has increased scrutiny on fraud resilience, cyber threats, and risk controls. This is especially true after high-profile scams and laundering cases.
4. Digital Transformation
Digital acceleration has outpaced many legacy risk controls. Fraudsters take advantage of the gaps between systems, departments, or verification processes.
Key Features of a Strong Enterprise Fraud Detection System
1. Multi-Channel Monitoring
From bank transfers to invoices, card payments, and internal logs, enterprise systems must analyse all channels in one place.
2. Real-Time Detection and Response
Enterprise fraud does not wait. Real-time flagging, blocking, and escalation are critical, especially for high-value transactions.
3. Risk-Based Scoring
Modern platforms use behavioural analytics and contextual data to assign risk scores. This allows teams to prioritise the most dangerous threats.
4. Cross-Entity Link Analysis
Detecting hidden relationships between users, accounts, suppliers, or geographies is key to uncovering organised schemes.
5. Case Management and Forensics
Built-in case tracking, audit logs, and investigator dashboards are vital for compliance, audit defence, and root cause analysis.
Challenges Faced by Enterprises in Singapore
Despite growing awareness, many Singaporean enterprises struggle with:
1. Siloed Systems
Fraud signals are spread across payment, HR, ERP, and CRM systems. This makes unified detection difficult.
2. Limited Intelligence Sharing
Few enterprises share typologies, even within the same sector. This limits collective defence.
3. Outdated Rule Engines
Many systems still rely on static thresholds or manual checks. These systems miss complex or new fraud patterns.
4. Overworked Compliance Teams
High alert volumes and false positives lead to fatigue and longer investigation times.
How AI Is Reshaping Enterprise Fraud Detection
The rise of AI-powered, scenario-based systems is helping Singaporean enterprises go from reactive to predictive fraud defence.
✅ Behavioural Anomaly Detection
Rather than just flagging large transactions, AI looks for subtle deviations like login location mismatches or unusual approval flows.
✅ Federated Learning
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform allows enterprises to learn from other organisations’ fraud patterns without sharing sensitive data.
✅ AI Copilots for Investigators
Tools such as FinMate assist human teams by surfacing key evidence, suggesting next steps, and reducing investigation time.
✅ End-to-End Visibility
Modern systems integrate with finance, HR, procurement, and customer systems to give a complete fraud view.
How Singaporean Enterprises Are Using Tookitaki for Fraud Detection
Leading organisations across banking, fintech, and commerce are turning to Tookitaki to future-proof their fraud defence. Here’s why:
- Scenario-Based Detection Engine
FinCense uses over 200 expert-curated typologies to identify real-world fraud, including invoice layering and ghost vendor networks. - Real-Time, AI-Augmented Monitoring
Transactions are scored instantly, and high-risk cases are escalated before damage is done. - Modular Agents for Each Risk Type
Enterprises can plug in relevant AI agents such as those for trade fraud, ATO, or BEC without overhauling legacy systems. - Audit-Ready Case Trails
Every flagged transaction is supported by AI-generated narratives and documentation, simplifying compliance reviews.
Best Practices for Implementing Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore
- Start with a Risk Map
Identify your fraud-prone workflows. These might include procurement, payments, or expense claims. - Break Down Silos
Integrate risk signals across departments to build a unified fraud view. - Use Real-World Scenarios
Rely on fraud typologies tailored to Singapore and Southeast Asia rather than generic patterns. - Enable Human and AI Collaboration
Let your systems detect, but your people decide, with AI assistance to speed up decisions. - Continuously Improve with Feedback Loops
Use resolved cases to train your models and refine detection rules.
Conclusion: Enterprise Fraud Requires Enterprise-Grade Solutions
Enterprise fraud is growing smarter. Your defences should too.
In Singapore’s complex and high-stakes business environment, fraud detection cannot be piecemeal or reactive. Enterprises that invest in AI-powered, real-time, collaborative solutions are not just protecting their bottom line. They are building operational resilience and stakeholder trust.
The future of enterprise fraud detection lies in intelligence-led, ecosystem-connected platforms. Now is the time to upgrade.
Cracking the Code: How Money Laundering Investigation Software Empowers Philippine Banks
Every suspicious transaction is a clue — and the right software helps connect the dots.
In the Philippines, banks and financial institutions are under intensifying pressure to investigate suspicious activities swiftly and accurately. The country’s exit from the FATF grey list in 2024 has raised expectations: financial institutions must now prove that their money laundering investigation software is not just ticking compliance boxes but truly effective in detecting, tracing, and reporting illicit flows.
What Is Money Laundering Investigation Software?
Money laundering investigation software is a specialised technology platform that enables banks and other covered entities to:
- Trace suspicious transactions across accounts, products, and channels.
- Investigate customer profiles and uncover hidden relationships.
- Automate case management for Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs).
- Collaborate securely with compliance teams and regulators.
The goal is to turn raw transactional data into actionable intelligence that helps compliance officers identify real risks while reducing wasted effort on false positives.
Why It Matters for the Philippines
The Philippine financial system is highly exposed to money laundering threats due to:
- Large remittance inflows from overseas workers.
- Cross-border risks from porous regional payment networks.
- High cash usage still prevalent in many sectors.
- Digital transformation of banks and fintechs, increasing the attack surface.
With stricter Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) oversight, institutions need tools that deliver both accuracy and transparency in investigations.
Limitations of Manual or Legacy Investigations
Traditionally, investigations have relied on manual processes or outdated case management tools. These approaches struggle with:
- Overwhelming volumes of alerts — compliance teams drowning in cases triggered by rigid rules.
- Siloed data — transaction, KYC, and external intelligence scattered across systems.
- Limited forensic capability — difficulty connecting patterns across multiple institutions or geographies.
- Slow turnaround times — risking regulatory penalties for delayed STR filing.
Key Features of Modern Money Laundering Investigation Software
1. Advanced Case Management
Centralised dashboards consolidate alerts, supporting documentation, and investigator notes in one secure interface.
2. AI-Powered Alert Triage
Machine learning reduces false positives and prioritises high-risk cases, helping teams focus on genuine threats.
3. Network and Relationship Analysis
Software visualises connections between accounts, entities, and transactions, uncovering hidden links in laundering networks.
4. Integrated KYC/CDD Data
Seamless integration with KYC data helps validate customer profiles and identify inconsistencies.
5. Regulatory Reporting Automation
Streamlined generation and submission of STRs and CTRs ensures timeliness and accuracy in compliance reporting.
How It Helps Detect Common Money Laundering Typologies in the Philippines
- Layering through Remittance Channels – Detecting unusual fund flows structured across multiple remittance outlets.
- Use of Shell Companies – Linking transactions to front businesses with no legitimate operations.
- Casino Laundering – Identifying large buy-ins followed by minimal play and rapid cash-outs.
- Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) – Flagging mismatched invoices and payments tied to cross-border shipments.
- Terror Financing Risks – Tracing small but frequent transfers tied to high-risk geographies or individuals.
Regulatory Expectations for Investigation Tools
The BSP and AMLC require that institutions’ investigation processes are:
- Risk-based and proportionate to customer and product profiles.
- Documented and auditable for regulatory inspection.
- Efficient in STR filing, avoiding delays and inaccuracies.
- Transparent — investigators must explain why a case was escalated or closed.
Here, software with explainable AI capabilities provides the critical balance between automation and accountability.
Challenges in Adopting Investigation Software in the Philippines
- Integration with legacy core banking systems remains a technical hurdle.
- Shortage of skilled investigators who can interpret complex analytics outputs.
- Budget constraints for rural banks and smaller fintechs.
- Cultural resistance to shifting from manual investigations to AI-assisted tools.
Best Practices for Effective Deployment
1. Combine Human Expertise with AI
Investigators should use AI to enhance decision-making, not replace human judgment.
2. Invest in Training
Equip compliance officers with the skills to interpret AI outputs and relationship graphs.
3. Prioritise Explainability
Adopt platforms that clearly explain the rationale behind flagged transactions.
4. Collaborate Across Institutions
Leverage industry-wide typologies to strengthen investigations against cross-bank laundering.
5. Align with BSP’s Risk-Based Supervision
Ensure investigation workflows adapt to customer risk profiles and sector-specific risks.
The Tookitaki Advantage: Smarter Investigations with FinCense
Tookitaki’s FinCense is designed as a trust layer for financial institutions in the Philippines, delivering next-generation investigation capabilities.
Key differentiators:
- Agentic AI-powered investigations that guide compliance officers step by step.
- Smart Disposition engine that auto-generates investigation summaries for STRs.
- Federated intelligence from the AFC Ecosystem — giving access to 200+ expert-contributed scenarios and typologies.
- Explainable outputs to satisfy BSP and global regulators.
By automating repetitive tasks and providing deep forensic insight, FinCense helps Philippine banks reduce investigation time, cut costs, and strengthen compliance.
Conclusion: Investigations as a Strategic Advantage
Money laundering investigation software is no longer a luxury — it’s essential for Philippine banks navigating a fast-evolving financial crime landscape. By embracing AI-powered platforms, institutions can investigate smarter, report faster, and stay compliant with confidence.
In a digital-first future, the banks that treat investigations not just as a regulatory burden but as a strategic advantage will be the ones that win lasting customer trust.
AML CFT Software in Australia: Building Stronger Defences Against Financial Crime
With financial crime on the rise, Australian institutions need AML CFT software that combines real-time detection, regulatory compliance, and adaptability.
Financial crime is evolving rapidly in Australia. Fraudsters are exploiting the New Payments Platform (NPP), cross-border remittances, and digital banking to move illicit funds faster than ever. At the same time, terrorism financing threats remain a concern, particularly as criminals seek to disguise transactions in complex layers across jurisdictions.
To address these risks, Australian financial institutions are increasingly investing in AML CFT software. These platforms help detect and prevent money laundering and terrorism financing while keeping institutions aligned with AUSTRAC’s expectations. But not all software is created equal. The right solution can reduce costs, improve detection accuracy, and build trust, while the wrong choice can leave institutions exposed to penalties and reputational damage.
What is AML CFT Software?
AML CFT software is technology designed to help financial institutions comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CFT) regulations. It integrates processes across customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, investigations, and reporting.
Key functions include:
- KYC and Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verifying and risk-scoring customers.
- Transaction Monitoring: Detecting suspicious or unusual activity.
- Sanctions and PEP Screening: Checking customers and transactions against lists.
- Case Management: Investigating and resolving alerts.
- Regulatory Reporting: Generating Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) and Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs).
Why AML CFT Software Matters in Australia
1. AUSTRAC’s Strict Expectations
AUSTRAC enforces the AML/CTF Act 2006, which applies to all reporting entities, from major banks to remittance providers. Institutions must not only have controls in place but also prove that those controls are effective.
2. Real-Time Payments Challenge
With NPP enabling instant transactions, legacy batch monitoring systems are no longer sufficient. AML CFT software must work in real time.
3. Complex Laundering Typologies
Criminals use shell companies, trade-based money laundering, and mule networks to disguise illicit funds. Advanced detection capabilities are needed to uncover these patterns.
4. Reputational Risk
Non-compliance does not only result in penalties but also erodes customer trust. High-profile cases in Australia have shown how reputational damage can be long-lasting.
5. Cost of Compliance
Compliance costs are rising across the industry. Institutions need software that reduces false positives, automates investigations, and improves efficiency.
Core Features of Effective AML CFT Software
1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring
- Detects suspicious activity in milliseconds.
- Includes velocity checks, location-based alerts, and anomaly detection.
2. AI and Machine Learning Models
- Identify unknown patterns beyond static rules.
- Reduce false positives by distinguishing unusual but legitimate behaviour.
3. Integrated KYC/CDD
- Automates onboarding checks.
- Screens for politically exposed persons (PEPs), sanctions, and adverse media.
4. Case Management
- Centralises investigations.
- Allows analysts to track, escalate, and resolve alerts efficiently.
5. Regulatory Reporting Tools
- Generates SMRs and TTRs in AUSTRAC-compliant formats.
- Maintains audit trails for regulator reviews.
6. Explainability
- Provides clear reason codes for each alert.
- Ensures transparency for regulators and internal stakeholders.
Challenges in Deploying AML CFT Software
- High False Positives: Legacy systems often generate alerts that waste investigator time.
- Integration Issues: Complex core banking systems may not integrate smoothly.
- Lack of Local Expertise: Global vendors without knowledge of AUSTRAC standards may fall short.
- Evolving Criminal Methods: Criminals innovate constantly, requiring frequent updates to detection typologies.
Best Practices for Choosing AML CFT Software
- Assess Real-Time Capabilities: Ensure the software can handle NPP transaction speed.
- Evaluate AI Strength: Look for adaptive models that reduce false positives.
- Check AUSTRAC Alignment: Confirm local compliance support and reporting tools.
- Demand Transparency: Avoid black-box AI. Choose software with explainable decision-making.
- Prioritise Scalability: Make sure the solution can grow with your institution.
- Ask for Local References: Vendors proven in Australia are safer bets.
Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Taking the Lead
Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank have adopted modern AML CFT platforms to strengthen compliance and fraud prevention. Their experiences show that even mid-sized institutions can implement advanced technology to stay ahead of criminals and regulators. These banks demonstrate that AML CFT software is not just for Tier-1 players but for any institution that values trust and resilience.
Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense
Among AML CFT software providers, Tookitaki stands out for its innovative approach. Its flagship platform, FinCense, offers end-to-end compliance and fraud prevention capabilities.
- Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity instantly across NPP and cross-border corridors.
- Agentic AI: Continuously adapts to new money laundering and terrorism financing typologies while keeping false positives low.
- Federated Learning: Accesses real-world scenarios contributed by global experts through the AFC Ecosystem.
- FinMate AI Copilot: Assists investigators with case summaries and regulator-ready reports.
- Full AUSTRAC Compliance: SMRs, TTRs, and detailed audit trails built into the system.
- Cross-Channel Coverage: Monitors transactions across banking, remittance, wallets, and crypto.
With FinCense, institutions in Australia can stay ahead of evolving threats while managing compliance costs effectively.
The Future of AML CFT Software in Australia
1. PayTo and Overlay Services
As NPP expands with PayTo, new fraud and money laundering typologies will emerge. Software must adapt quickly.
2. Deepfake and AI-Powered Scams
Criminals are already using deepfakes to commit fraud. Future AML software will need to incorporate the detection of synthetic identities and manipulated media.
3. Cross-Border Intelligence Sharing
Closer coordination with ASEAN markets will be key, given Australia’s financial links to the region.
4. Collaborative Compliance Models
Federated learning and shared fraud databases will become standard, enabling institutions to collectively fight financial crime.
5. Cost Efficiency Focus
As compliance costs rise, automation and AI will play an even greater role in reducing investigator workload.
Conclusion
In Australia’s fast-moving financial environment, AML CFT software is no longer optional. It is the backbone of compliance and a critical shield against money laundering and terrorism financing. Institutions that rely on outdated systems risk falling behind criminals and regulators alike.
The right AML CFT platform delivers more than compliance. It strengthens customer trust, reduces costs, and future-proofs institutions for the risks ahead. Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are showing the way, proving that with the right technology, even mid-sized players can lead in compliance innovation.
Pro tip: When evaluating AML CFT software, prioritise real-time monitoring, AI adaptability, and AUSTRAC alignment. These are the non-negotiables for resilience in the NPP era.
Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore: Building a Smarter Line of Defence
Fraud may wear many faces. But for enterprises, the cost of not catching it is always the same: reputation, revenue, and regulatory risk.
In Singapore’s fast-paced, high-trust economy, enterprise fraud has evolved far beyond simple scams. Whether it's internal collusion, digital payment abuse, cross-border laundering, or supplier impersonation, organisations need to rethink how they detect and prevent fraud at scale.
This blog explores how enterprise fraud detection is transforming in Singapore, what makes it different from consumer-level security, and what leading firms are doing to stay ahead.
What Is Enterprise Fraud Detection?
Unlike individual-focused fraud detection (such as stolen credit cards), enterprise fraud detection is designed to uncover multi-layered, systemic, and often high-value fraud schemes that target businesses, financial institutions, or governments.
It includes threats such as:
- Internal fraud (for example, expense abuse or payroll manipulation)
- Business email compromise (BEC)
- Procurement fraud and supplier collusion
- Cross-channel transaction fraud
- Laundering via corporate accounts or trade platforms
In Singapore, where enterprises increasingly operate across borders and digital channels, the attack surface for fraud is broader than ever.
Why It’s a Priority in Singapore’s Enterprise Landscape
1. High Volume, High Velocity
Singaporean enterprises operate in sectors like banking, logistics, trade, and technology. These sectors are prone to complex, high-volume transactions that make detecting fraud challenging.
2. Cross-Border Risks
As a regional hub, many Singaporean businesses handle payments, contracts, and supply chains that cross jurisdictions. This creates blind spots that fraudsters exploit.
3. Regulatory Pressure
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has increased scrutiny on fraud resilience, cyber threats, and risk controls. This is especially true after high-profile scams and laundering cases.
4. Digital Transformation
Digital acceleration has outpaced many legacy risk controls. Fraudsters take advantage of the gaps between systems, departments, or verification processes.
Key Features of a Strong Enterprise Fraud Detection System
1. Multi-Channel Monitoring
From bank transfers to invoices, card payments, and internal logs, enterprise systems must analyse all channels in one place.
2. Real-Time Detection and Response
Enterprise fraud does not wait. Real-time flagging, blocking, and escalation are critical, especially for high-value transactions.
3. Risk-Based Scoring
Modern platforms use behavioural analytics and contextual data to assign risk scores. This allows teams to prioritise the most dangerous threats.
4. Cross-Entity Link Analysis
Detecting hidden relationships between users, accounts, suppliers, or geographies is key to uncovering organised schemes.
5. Case Management and Forensics
Built-in case tracking, audit logs, and investigator dashboards are vital for compliance, audit defence, and root cause analysis.
Challenges Faced by Enterprises in Singapore
Despite growing awareness, many Singaporean enterprises struggle with:
1. Siloed Systems
Fraud signals are spread across payment, HR, ERP, and CRM systems. This makes unified detection difficult.
2. Limited Intelligence Sharing
Few enterprises share typologies, even within the same sector. This limits collective defence.
3. Outdated Rule Engines
Many systems still rely on static thresholds or manual checks. These systems miss complex or new fraud patterns.
4. Overworked Compliance Teams
High alert volumes and false positives lead to fatigue and longer investigation times.
How AI Is Reshaping Enterprise Fraud Detection
The rise of AI-powered, scenario-based systems is helping Singaporean enterprises go from reactive to predictive fraud defence.
✅ Behavioural Anomaly Detection
Rather than just flagging large transactions, AI looks for subtle deviations like login location mismatches or unusual approval flows.
✅ Federated Learning
Tookitaki’s FinCense platform allows enterprises to learn from other organisations’ fraud patterns without sharing sensitive data.
✅ AI Copilots for Investigators
Tools such as FinMate assist human teams by surfacing key evidence, suggesting next steps, and reducing investigation time.
✅ End-to-End Visibility
Modern systems integrate with finance, HR, procurement, and customer systems to give a complete fraud view.
How Singaporean Enterprises Are Using Tookitaki for Fraud Detection
Leading organisations across banking, fintech, and commerce are turning to Tookitaki to future-proof their fraud defence. Here’s why:
- Scenario-Based Detection Engine
FinCense uses over 200 expert-curated typologies to identify real-world fraud, including invoice layering and ghost vendor networks. - Real-Time, AI-Augmented Monitoring
Transactions are scored instantly, and high-risk cases are escalated before damage is done. - Modular Agents for Each Risk Type
Enterprises can plug in relevant AI agents such as those for trade fraud, ATO, or BEC without overhauling legacy systems. - Audit-Ready Case Trails
Every flagged transaction is supported by AI-generated narratives and documentation, simplifying compliance reviews.
Best Practices for Implementing Enterprise Fraud Detection in Singapore
- Start with a Risk Map
Identify your fraud-prone workflows. These might include procurement, payments, or expense claims. - Break Down Silos
Integrate risk signals across departments to build a unified fraud view. - Use Real-World Scenarios
Rely on fraud typologies tailored to Singapore and Southeast Asia rather than generic patterns. - Enable Human and AI Collaboration
Let your systems detect, but your people decide, with AI assistance to speed up decisions. - Continuously Improve with Feedback Loops
Use resolved cases to train your models and refine detection rules.
Conclusion: Enterprise Fraud Requires Enterprise-Grade Solutions
Enterprise fraud is growing smarter. Your defences should too.
In Singapore’s complex and high-stakes business environment, fraud detection cannot be piecemeal or reactive. Enterprises that invest in AI-powered, real-time, collaborative solutions are not just protecting their bottom line. They are building operational resilience and stakeholder trust.
The future of enterprise fraud detection lies in intelligence-led, ecosystem-connected platforms. Now is the time to upgrade.