Compliance Hub

Money Laundering Acts: Money Laundering Regulations and Guidelines

Site Logo
Tookitaki
09 Sep 2020
4 min
read

Money laundering refers to the act of sneaking “dirty” money obtained through criminal activities through seemingly legitimate channels, as a way of disguising the true source of the funds.  Money laundering has a few key sources, including organized crime, white-collar offences, terrorist activities, and drug smuggling.

Since money laundering poses a massive risk to the global economy, such as draining a large number of funds in addition to funding criminal activities, combatting it is essential to the international community. That’s the reason why there are several national, international, and regional bodies that monitor and regulate money laundering.

These organizations, such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), draft and implement money laundering acts and guidelines that financial institutions must comply with. These refer to a set of processes and procedures institutions must implement in order to prevent and promptly catch financial crime or any illegal fiscal activity. If companies do not follow these regulations, they must pay hefty non-compliance fines.

Every country around the world has clearly outlined regulations pertaining to money laundering.  Money Laundering Acts, such as the Money Laundering (Prevention) Act (1996), as amended by the Money Laundering (Prevention) (Amendment) Act (1999), and the Money Laundering (Prevention) (Amendment) Act (2001) in Antigua and Barbuda, are good examples.

The digital age provides the perfect environment for money launderers to keep innovating new methods to commit financial crimes. That is why money laundering acts and regulations are subject to constant change and updates. This is especially applicable in 2020, where the AML risk due to the COVID-19 era is both new and challenging.

History of Anti-Money Laundering Acts

Numerous laws and legislations have been passed with the intention to prevent money laundering and punish the perpetrators of this illegal activity. Initially, these laws were drafted to combat the mafia and other elements of organized crime, though, over time, the focus shifted to curbing drug smuggling and, later, anti-terrorism.

In the USA, the first such law was the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), which was passed in the 1970s. The Act refers to a collection of laws that require financial institutions to report suspicious transactions to the USA Department of Treasury. Financial institutions could either have reason to believe that the money is related to criminal activity through their client risk assessments, or could track clients who appear to avoid BSA reporting requirements.

The Money Laundering Control Act (1986) restricts people from engaging in financial transactions with funds obtained through criminal activities. This includes the transferring of money from one private individual to another. The Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act (1992) strengthened penalties for non-compliance. Review, training, and examination procedures were boosted through the Money Laundering Suppression Act (1994) and the Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Strategy Act (1998).

The Patriot Act

The Patriot Act resulted from the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA. This Act seeks to strengthen and expand the regulation of financial transactions and the financial market as a whole. Title II of the Patriot Act is referred to as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act (2001). It focuses almost exclusively on money laundering and related issues.

The Patriot Act explains in detail some of the questions regarding the BSA’s applicability, as well as introducing fresh requirements. Financial institutions can often try and be “willfully blind” to illegal financial transactions taking place right within their organizations. So, the Patriot Act requires the creation and implementation of new and improved anti-money laundering programs that hold financial institutions accountable if money laundering does occur. The Act further mandates companies to appoint a compliance officer, draft an internal compliance policy, regularly train staff, and conduct independent audits.

It also necessitates that financial institutions implement proper Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures to verify the identity of their clients and also check them against lists of known terrorists and other criminals. These are called “forthcoming requirements,” and strengthen the BSA’s need for KC.

The Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act provide a layer of protection to the USA’s economy and financial institutions against money laundering and other financial crimes. These laws encompass the procedure to recognize suspicious activity, flag off concerned authorities, and trigger the necessary legal action required to charge the criminals. These laws have the power to have suspicious financial institutions investigated by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of Currency.

There is one loophole, however. The definition of “financial institution” under both of these Acts excludes investment advisors and transfer agents. Hence, these companies are treading a thin, unregulated line of profits at the moment. Generally, though, these companies must be registered under the Investment Company Act (1940) to carry out operations.

Other National Money Laundering Regulations

As mentioned earlier, all countries across the globe have regulations and laws pertaining to money laundering. They also have internal bodies to govern the finance industry, such as the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Center, the Honk Kong Monetary Authority, and the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK, all of which pass acts and laws regarding financial crimes within their respective jurisdiction. India passed the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in 2002 as an attempt to curb the rampant money laundering and corruption being carried out within the country. The European Union, too, passed two directives, EU 5AMLD and 6AMLD, in an attempt to harmonize transactions between all the member states. All of these organizations aim to regulate, track, monitor, and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, or any other illegal activity involving money in their regions.

These bodies change and update regulations often. Indeed, the financial market and industry are in flux due to the advent of technology. So, they need to be on their toes and think one step ahead of criminals in order to outsmart them and prevent financial crimes from being committed. By doing so, they begin the process of drafting and designing AML compliance regulations and policies.

 

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
18 Aug 2025
4 min
read

Top AML Software Vendors in Australia: What to Look For in 2025

With AUSTRAC raising the bar, choosing the right AML software vendor has never been more critical for Australian institutions.

As money laundering risks intensify and AUSTRAC tightens its enforcement grip, financial institutions across Australia are rethinking their compliance technology. But with so many AML software vendors in the market, how do you know which one truly delivers on detection, efficiency, and regulatory alignment? Choosing wisely isn’t just about avoiding penalties — it’s about building trust, cutting compliance costs, and staying one step ahead of criminals.

Talk to an Expert

Why Vendor Choice Matters More Than Ever in Australia

1. AUSTRAC’s No-Nonsense Approach

Record-breaking penalties against banks and casinos highlight the risks of weak AML controls. Regulators now expect proactive monitoring and transparent reporting.

2. Instant Payment Risks

With the New Payments Platform (NPP), funds move in seconds — and so can launderers. Vendors must support real-time transaction monitoring.

3. The Cost of Compliance

AML compliance spending in Australia is rising rapidly. Vendors must provide tools that reduce false positives and investigative workload.

4. Complex Laundering Typologies

From trade-based money laundering to digital mule networks, criminals are exploiting new channels. Vendors must offer adaptive, AI-powered solutions.

What to Look for in Top AML Software Vendors

1. Proven AUSTRAC Compliance

The vendor should align with Australian AML/CTF Act obligations, including support for:

  • Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs)
  • Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs)
  • Complete audit trails

2. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Vendors must provide millisecond-level detection for:

  • Instant payments (NPP)
  • Cross-border corridors
  • Crypto-to-fiat transfers

3. AI and Machine Learning Capabilities

The best vendors go beyond rules, offering:

  • Adaptive anomaly detection
  • False positive reduction
  • Continuous model learning

4. Flexibility and Scalability

Solutions should fit both Tier-1 banks and scaling fintechs. Cloud-ready platforms with modular features are a must.

5. Explainability and Transparency

Glass-box AI ensures regulators and internal teams understand why an alert was generated.

6. Strong Vendor Support

Top vendors provide implementation guidance, typology updates, and local compliance expertise — not just software.

Common Pitfalls When Choosing an AML Vendor

  • Focusing on cost alone: Cheaper vendors often lack the sophistication to detect modern threats.
  • Ignoring integration needs: Some platforms don’t work seamlessly with existing case management systems.
  • Overlooking updates: Vendors that don’t regularly refresh typologies leave institutions vulnerable.
ChatGPT Image Aug 17, 2025, 09_25_47 PM

Trends Among Top AML Vendors in 2025

Federated Intelligence

Leading vendors now share anonymised typologies across institutions to detect emerging risks faster.

Agentic AI

Adaptive agents that handle specific compliance tasks, from risk scoring to case narration.

Simulation Engines

The ability to test new detection scenarios before live deployment.

Cross-Channel Visibility

Unified monitoring across core banking, remittance, wallets, cards, and crypto.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

Among the top AML software vendors, Tookitaki is recognised for reimagining compliance through FinCense, its end-to-end AML and fraud prevention platform.

  • Agentic AI: Detects evolving threats in real time with minimal false positives.
  • Federated Learning: Accesses insights from the AFC Ecosystem — a global compliance network.
  • FinMate AI Copilot: Helps investigators summarise cases, suggest next steps, and generate regulator-ready reports.
  • Full AUSTRAC Compliance: Covers SMRs, TTRs, and explainable audit trails.
  • Real-World Typologies: Continuously updated from actual laundering and fraud scenarios worldwide.

FinCense helps Australian banks, fintechs, and remittance providers meet AUSTRAC’s standards while operating more efficiently and transparently.

Conclusion: Vendor Choice = Competitive Advantage

In Australia, AML software is no longer just about compliance — it’s about resilience, trust, and future-readiness. Choosing from the top AML software vendors means prioritising real-time detection, AI adaptability, and regulatory transparency.

Pro tip: Don’t just buy software. Invest in a vendor that evolves with you — and with the criminals you’re fighting.

Top AML Software Vendors in Australia: What to Look For in 2025
Blogs
18 Aug 2025
3 min
read

AML Compliance for Banks in Hong Kong: Challenges & How Tookitaki Can Help

AML compliance in Hong Kong has become a top priority as financial institutions face growing regulatory pressure and increasingly complex financial crime threats.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), in alignment with FATF standards, continues to tighten anti-money laundering (AML) expectations—pushing banks to adopt stronger, more adaptive compliance frameworks. Yet, many institutions still grapple with key challenges: high volumes of false positives, outdated monitoring systems, and the rapid evolution of money laundering techniques.

This blog explores the most pressing AML compliance challenges facing banks in Hong Kong today and how Tookitaki’s AI-powered AML solutions offer a smarter path forward—reducing operational costs, boosting detection accuracy, and future-proofing compliance.

{{cta-first}}

AML Compliance for Banks in Hong Kong

AML Compliance Challenges for Banks in Hong Kong

1️⃣ Increasing Regulatory Pressure & Evolving Compliance Standards
The HKMA and FATF continue to tighten AML compliance requirements, with banks expected to enhance due diligence, adopt a risk-based approach, and report suspicious activities with greater accuracy. Failure to comply results in severe penalties and reputational damage.

2️⃣ High False Positives & Compliance Costs
Traditional rules-based AML systems generate excessive false positives, leading to inefficient case handling and higher compliance costs. Banks must shift toward AI-powered AML compliance solutions to reduce manual workload and improve detection accuracy.

3️⃣ Cross-Border Transaction Risks & Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML)
Hong Kong’s status as a global financial hub makes it a prime target for cross-border money laundering networks. Banks must enhance real-time transaction monitoring to detect complex trade-based money laundering (TBML) schemes and prevent illicit financial flows.

4️⃣ Adapting to Digital Banking & Virtual Assets
With the rise of virtual banks, fintechs, and cryptocurrency transactions, banks need scalable AML compliance frameworks that integrate seamlessly with digital banking systems and virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

5️⃣ Emerging Financial Crime Scenarios
Money launderers continuously evolve their tactics, using shell companies, multi-layered transactions, and AI-driven fraud techniques. Banks must deploy AML solutions that can adapt in real-time to emerging threats.

How Tookitaki Helps Banks Strengthen AML Compliance

Tookitaki’s AI-powered AML compliance solutions provide Hong Kong banks with a future-ready approach to financial crime prevention.

Comprehensive AML Transaction Monitoring
✔️ Real-time monitoring of billions of transactions to detect money laundering risks.
✔️ AI-driven anomaly detection to reduce false positives by up to 90%.
✔️ Automated sandbox testing to fine-tune detection models for better regulatory alignment.

Smart Screening for Sanctions & PEP Compliance
✔️ Identify high-risk entities with real-time screening against global sanctions & PEP lists.
✔️ Reduce false alerts using 50+ advanced AI name-matching techniques across 25+ languages.

AI-Driven Customer Risk Scoring
✔️ Generate 360-degree customer risk profiles based on transactions, counterparty data, and behaviour analytics.
✔️ Detect hidden financial crime networks with graph-based risk visualization.

Smart Alert Management & Case Handling
✔️ Reduce false positives by up to 70% using self-learning AI models.
✔️ Automate Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) generation for faster compliance reporting.

AFC Ecosystem: A Collaborative AML Compliance Solution
Tookitaki’s AFC (Anti-Financial Crime) Ecosystem enables banks to:
✔️ Access 100% risk coverage with community-driven AML scenarios.
✔️ Utilize a global scenario repository, constantly updated with real-world financial crime scenarios.

{{cta-whitepaper}}

Why Banks in Hong Kong Choose Tookitaki for AML Compliance

With Tookitaki’s AI-powered AML compliance platform FinCense, banks in Hong Kong can:
✅ Meet HKMA and FATF compliance requirements effortlessly.
✅ Reduce compliance costs by 50% through automated risk detection.
✅ Enhance fraud detection with 90%+ accuracy in identifying suspicious activities.

AML Compliance for Banks in Hong Kong: Challenges & How Tookitaki Can Help
Blogs
14 Aug 2025
5 min
read

Smarter Investigations: The Rise of AML Investigation Tools in Australia

In the battle against financial crime, the right AML investigation tools turn data overload into actionable intelligence.

Australian compliance teams face a constant challenge — growing transaction volumes, increasingly sophisticated money laundering techniques, and tighter AUSTRAC scrutiny. In this environment, AML investigation tools aren’t just nice-to-have — they’re essential for turning endless alerts into fast, confident decisions.

Talk to an Expert

Why AML Investigations Are Getting Harder in Australia

1. Explosion of Transaction Data

With the New Payments Platform (NPP) and cross-border corridors, institutions must monitor millions of transactions daily.

2. More Complex Typologies

From mule networks to shell companies, layering techniques are harder to detect with static rules alone.

3. Regulatory Expectations

AUSTRAC demands timely and accurate Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs). Delays or incomplete investigations can lead to penalties and reputational damage.

4. Resource Constraints

Skilled AML investigators are in short supply. Teams must do more with fewer people — making efficiency critical.

What Are AML Investigation Tools?

AML investigation tools are specialised software platforms that help compliance teams analyse suspicious activity, prioritise cases, and document findings for regulators.

They typically include features such as:

  • Alert triage and prioritisation
  • Transaction visualisation
  • Entity and relationship mapping
  • Case management workflows
  • Automated reporting capabilities

Key Features of Effective AML Investigation Tools

1. Integrated Case Management

Centralise all alerts, documents, and investigator notes in one platform.

2. Entity Resolution & Network Analysis

Link accounts, devices, and counterparties to uncover hidden connections in laundering networks.

3. Transaction Visualisation

Graph-based displays make it easier to trace fund flows and identify suspicious patterns.

4. AI-Powered Insights

Machine learning models suggest likely outcomes, surface overlooked anomalies, and flag high-risk entities faster.

5. Workflow Automation

Automate repetitive steps like KYC refresh requests, sanctions re-checks, and document retrieval.

6. Regulator-Ready Reporting

Generate Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) and audit logs that meet AUSTRAC’s requirements.

ChatGPT Image Aug 13, 2025, 12_27_28 PM

Why These Tools Matter in Australia’s Compliance Landscape

  • Speed: Fraud and laundering through NPP happen in seconds — investigations need to move just as fast.
  • Accuracy: AI-driven tools reduce false positives, ensuring analysts focus on real threats.
  • Compliance Assurance: Detailed audit trails prove that due diligence was carried out thoroughly.

Use Cases in Australia

Case 1: Cross-Border Layering Detection

An Australian bank flagged multiple small transfers to different ASEAN countries. The AML investigation tool mapped the network, revealing links to a known mule syndicate.

Case 2: Crypto Exchange Investigations

AML tools traced a high-value Bitcoin-to-fiat conversion back to an account flagged in a sanctions database, enabling rapid SMR submission.

Advanced Capabilities to Look For

Federated Intelligence

Access anonymised typologies and red flags from a network of institutions to spot emerging threats faster.

Embedded AI Copilot

Assist investigators in summarising cases, recommending next steps, and even drafting SMRs.

Scenario Simulation

Test detection scenarios against historical data before deploying them live.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense and FinMate

FinCense integrates investigation workflows directly into its AML platform, while FinMate, Tookitaki’s AI investigation copilot, supercharges analyst productivity.

  • Automated Summaries: Generates natural language case narratives for internal and regulatory reporting.
  • Risk Prioritisation: Highlights the highest-risk cases first.
  • Real-Time Intelligence: Pulls in global typology updates from the AFC Ecosystem.
  • Full Transparency: Glass-box AI explains every decision, satisfying AUSTRAC’s audit requirements.

With FinCense and FinMate, Australian institutions can cut investigation times by up to 50% — without compromising quality.

Conclusion: From Data to Decisions — Faster

The volume and complexity of alerts in modern AML programmes make manual investigation unsustainable. The right AML investigation tools transform scattered data into actionable insights, helping compliance teams stay ahead of both criminals and regulators.

Pro tip: Choose tools that not only investigate faster, but also learn from every case — making your compliance programme smarter over time.

Smarter Investigations: The Rise of AML Investigation Tools in Australia