Compliance Hub

Managing Politically Exposed Person Risks: Insights from FATF Guidance

Site Logo
Jerin Mathew
10 min
read

Managing the risks associated with Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) is a critical aspect of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance for financial institutions. PEPs, by virtue of their influential positions, pose unique risks for money laundering, corruption, and terrorist financing. Given the significant potential for abuse, effective PEP management is essential to safeguard the integrity of financial systems worldwide.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has established comprehensive guidelines to address these risks, particularly through Recommendations 12 and 22. These recommendations provide a framework for identifying, monitoring, and managing PEPs to prevent the misuse of financial systems. This blog explores the challenges and solutions in managing PEP risks, offering insights based on FATF guidance to help AML compliance professionals navigate this complex landscape.

Understanding PEP Risks

Definition and Categories of PEPs

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is an individual who holds, or has held, a prominent public function. The FATF classifies PEPs into three main categories:

  • Foreign PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held significant public positions in foreign governments, such as heads of state, senior politicians, senior government, judicial or military officials, senior executives of state-owned corporations, and important political party officials.
  • Domestic PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held significant public positions within their own country, similar to the roles described for foreign PEPs.
  • International Organization PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held prominent roles in international organizations, including senior management positions such as directors, deputy directors, and members of the board.
HOW FATF CLASSIFIES PEPs

The Unique Risks PEPs Pose

PEPs are inherently risky for financial institutions due to their potential involvement in corruption, bribery, and money laundering. Their access to state resources and decision-making power increases the likelihood that they could misuse their positions for personal gain or to facilitate illicit activities. These risks are further compounded by the potential for PEPs to engage in terrorist financing, making robust PEP management a cornerstone of effective AML compliance.

Overview of FATF Recommendations 12 and 22

FATF Recommendation 12 mandates that financial institutions implement measures to identify and manage risks associated with PEPs. This includes:

  • Establishing appropriate risk management systems to determine whether a customer or beneficial owner is a PEP.
  • Obtaining senior management approval before establishing or continuing business relationships with PEPs.
  • Taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds for PEPs.
  • Conducting enhanced ongoing monitoring of business relationships with PEPs.

Recommendation 22 extends these requirements to designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs), ensuring comprehensive coverage across various sectors.

By adhering to these recommendations, financial institutions can better mitigate the risks posed by PEPs, protecting their operations and contributing to the broader goal of financial system integrity.

Common Challenges in Managing PEP Risks

Identifying PEPs

Difficulty in Determining PEP Status Due to Variations in Definitions and Lists

One of the primary challenges in managing PEP risks is the variability in definitions and lists of PEPs across different jurisdictions. While the FATF provides a standardized definition, the implementation and interpretation can vary significantly. For instance, some countries might include middle-ranking officials or those in specific sectors, while others may have more restrictive criteria. This inconsistency complicates the identification process for financial institutions operating globally, as they must navigate a patchwork of definitions and maintain compliance across multiple jurisdictions.

Challenges with Identifying Family Members and Close Associates

Another layer of complexity arises from the need to identify not only the PEPs themselves but also their family members and close associates. These individuals can also be conduits for illicit activities, leveraging their relationship with the PEP to facilitate money laundering or corruption. However, determining who qualifies as a family member or close associate is not always straightforward. Cultural differences can influence the breadth of familial ties, and information on close associates may not be readily available or easily verifiable, adding to the difficulty.

Dealing with Incomplete or Outdated Information

Limitations of Commercial Databases and Government-Issued PEP Lists

Financial institutions often rely on commercial databases and government-issued PEP lists to identify PEPs. While these resources are valuable, they come with limitations. Commercial databases may not always be comprehensive or up-to-date, leading to potential gaps in information. Government-issued lists can also be problematic as they may not cover all relevant individuals or may quickly become outdated due to frequent changes in public officeholders. Additionally, these lists might not include family members and close associates, further complicating the identification process.

Issues with Maintaining Up-to-Date Client Information and Monitoring Changes in PEP Status

Keeping client information current is a continuous challenge. Clients may not proactively update their status, and changes in PEP status can occur frequently due to elections, appointments, or other political shifts. Financial institutions must implement robust systems to regularly review and update client information. This requires significant resources and effective monitoring tools to ensure timely identification of any changes in PEP status.

{{cta-first}}

Balancing Compliance with Customer Relationships

The Impact of Strict Compliance Measures on Customer Experience

Strict compliance measures, while necessary for managing PEP risks, can adversely impact customer experience. Rigorous due diligence processes and enhanced scrutiny can lead to delays, increased documentation requirements, and potential discomfort for clients. This can strain customer relationships, particularly if clients feel unduly burdened or stigmatized by the PEP designation. Financial institutions must balance the need for compliance with maintaining positive customer experiences, which is no small feat.

Potential Reputational Risks and Regulatory Penalties for Non-Compliance

Failure to manage PEP risks effectively can result in severe reputational damage and regulatory penalties. Non-compliance with AML regulations, including inadequate PEP management, can lead to hefty fines, legal actions, and loss of trust from stakeholders. Financial institutions must navigate these risks carefully, ensuring that their AML programs are robust and compliant with regulatory expectations while also managing the operational and reputational implications of their actions.

Solutions and Best Practices

Identifying PEPs

Implementing Robust Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Processes

To effectively identify PEPs, financial institutions must implement robust Customer Due Diligence (CDD) processes. This involves collecting comprehensive information at the onboarding stage, including details about the client's occupation, sources of income, and potential connections to PEPs. Enhanced due diligence should be applied to high-risk clients, requiring additional verification and scrutiny.

Utilizing Multiple Information Sources

Relying on a single source for PEP identification is inadequate. Financial institutions should utilize a combination of information sources to ensure comprehensive coverage:

  • Internet and Media Searches: Regular internet and media searches can provide up-to-date information on individuals' public roles and activities. Specialized search tools and databases focusing on AML can help streamline this process.
  • Asset Disclosure Systems: Accessing asset disclosure systems where available can provide valuable insights into a PEP's wealth and financial activities.
  • Commercial Databases: While not infallible, commercial databases are a useful tool for identifying PEPs and their associates. These should be used in conjunction with other sources to cross-verify information.
  • Government-Issued Lists: Keeping abreast of government-issued PEP lists can aid in the identification process, though these should be regularly updated and cross-referenced with other sources.

Regularly Updating and Cross-Referencing Client Information

Maintaining up-to-date client information is crucial. Financial institutions should establish protocols for regularly reviewing and updating client records, particularly for high-risk individuals. Automated monitoring systems can help track changes in PEP status, ensuring that institutions remain compliant with regulatory requirements. Regular audits and reviews of client information can identify discrepancies or outdated information that need to be addressed.

Enhancing Information Accuracy

Conducting Periodic Reviews and Updates of Client Information

Periodic reviews of client information are essential for ensuring accuracy and relevance. Financial institutions should establish a schedule for these reviews, focusing on high-risk clients and those with potential connections to PEPs. This proactive approach helps identify any changes in client status, such as new political appointments or changes in familial connections that might affect their risk profile.

Training Employees to Recognize and Report PEP-Related Red Flags

Effective PEP management requires well-trained staff who can recognize and respond to red flags associated with PEPs. Training programs should cover the identification of PEPs, understanding the associated risks, and the appropriate steps to take when a PEP is identified. Case studies and real-world examples can enhance understanding and provide practical insights into managing PEP risks.

Implementing Automated Monitoring Systems for Real-Time Updates

Leveraging technology for real-time monitoring is a best practice in PEP management. Automated systems can continuously scan for updates and changes in client information, flagging any new risks or changes in status. These systems can integrate with existing AML software, providing a seamless and efficient way to maintain up-to-date records and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Balancing Compliance and Customer Relationships

Adopting a Risk-Based Approach to PEP Management

A risk-based approach to PEP management allows financial institutions to allocate resources effectively, focusing on the highest-risk individuals and transactions. This approach involves assessing the risk associated with each PEP relationship based on factors such as the individual's position, the country of origin, and the nature of the business relationship. By prioritizing high-risk clients, institutions can manage PEP risks more effectively without overburdening low-risk clients.

Communicating Clearly with Customers About Compliance Requirements

Transparent communication with clients about compliance requirements is essential. Financial institutions should explain the necessity of due diligence measures, the reasons for additional information requests, and the importance of compliance for both the institution and the client. Clear communication helps build trust and understanding, reducing the potential for frustration or resistance from clients.

Implementing Policies that Balance Regulatory Obligations with Customer Service

Policies should be designed to meet regulatory obligations while maintaining a high standard of customer service. This includes streamlining compliance processes to minimize delays, providing clear instructions and assistance to clients, and ensuring that staff are trained to handle PEP-related inquiries with professionalism and sensitivity. By balancing these elements, financial institutions can achieve compliance without compromising on customer satisfaction.

Leveraging Technology for Effective PEP Management

Overview of Advanced AML Software Solutions and Their Benefits

The rapid advancement of technology has significantly enhanced the ability of financial institutions to manage PEP risks effectively. Advanced AML software solutions offer a range of benefits, including improved accuracy, efficiency, and compliance. These solutions typically incorporate machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate and streamline the PEP screening and monitoring process.

Key Benefits of Advanced AML Software:

  • Enhanced Accuracy: By leveraging AI and machine learning, AML software can more accurately identify PEPs and related risks. These technologies can analyze vast amounts of data quickly, reducing the likelihood of human error and ensuring more precise identification of PEPs.
  • Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the manual workload for compliance teams, allowing them to focus on higher-level analysis and decision-making. This leads to faster processing times and more efficient resource allocation.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Advanced AML systems provide real-time monitoring capabilities, ensuring that any changes in PEP status are detected immediately. This continuous vigilance is crucial for maintaining up-to-date client information and mitigating risks promptly.
  • Comprehensive Data Integration: These systems can integrate data from multiple sources, including commercial databases, government lists, and internal records. This comprehensive approach ensures that institutions have access to the most complete and current information available.
  • Regulatory Compliance: By automating compliance processes and maintaining thorough records, AML software helps institutions meet regulatory requirements more effectively. This reduces the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties.

{{cta-ebook}}

How Technology Can Streamline PEP Identification, Monitoring, and Reporting

PEP Identification

Advanced AML software solutions enhance the identification of PEPs by employing sophisticated algorithms that cross-reference multiple data points. These systems can:

  • Analyze Structured and Unstructured Data: AML software can process both structured data (e.g., government lists, commercial databases) and unstructured data (e.g., news articles, social media posts) to identify potential PEPs.
  • Pattern Recognition: Machine learning algorithms can identify patterns and anomalies that may indicate a PEP, even if the individual is not explicitly listed in databases. This includes identifying indirect connections through family members and close associates.
  • Global Reach: Technology enables institutions to access global data sources, ensuring comprehensive coverage of PEPs from different jurisdictions.

PEP Monitoring

Once PEPs are identified, continuous monitoring is essential to detect any changes in their status or activities. Technology facilitates this through:

  • Automated Alerts: AML systems can generate real-time alerts for any significant changes in a PEP’s profile, such as new political appointments, changes in financial behavior, or public allegations of corruption.
  • Behavioral Analysis: Advanced analytics can monitor transaction patterns and flag unusual activities that may indicate potential money laundering or other illicit activities.
  • Risk Scoring: Systems can assign risk scores to PEPs based on various factors, allowing institutions to prioritize monitoring efforts on high-risk individuals.

PEP Reporting

Effective reporting is crucial for regulatory compliance and internal decision-making. AML software enhances reporting capabilities by:

  • Automated Report Generation: Systems can automatically generate detailed reports on PEP-related activities, ensuring consistency and accuracy. These reports can be customized to meet regulatory requirements and internal standards.
  • Data Visualization: Advanced tools provide data visualization options, making it easier for compliance teams to interpret complex data and identify trends or anomalies.
  • Audit Trails: Comprehensive audit trails ensure that all actions and decisions related to PEP management are documented, providing transparency and accountability.

Effectively Manage PEP Risks

Managing PEP risks is a complex but essential component of AML compliance. PEPs, by virtue of their positions and influence, pose significant risks related to money laundering, corruption, and terrorist financing. Understanding and addressing these risks is crucial for financial institutions to maintain the integrity of their operations and comply with regulatory requirements.

In addition, leveraging advanced AML software solutions can streamline the identification, monitoring, and reporting processes. These technologies enhance accuracy, efficiency, and compliance, providing real-time monitoring and comprehensive data integration. A case study of a global bank demonstrated the transformative impact of implementing a tech-driven PEP management system, highlighting the benefits of increased accuracy, enhanced efficiency, real-time monitoring, and regulatory compliance.

For financial institutions looking to enhance their AML compliance and PEP management, Tookitaki's Smart Screening solution offers a comprehensive and effective approach. By talking to Tookitaki's experts, institutions can learn more about how this innovative solution can help them navigate the complexities of PEP management and achieve their compliance goals.

By understanding the challenges and implementing these best practices and solutions, AML compliance professionals can better manage PEP risks, protect their institutions, and contribute to the broader goal of financial system integrity.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
17 Sep 2025
6 min
read

The Investigator’s Edge: Why AML Investigation Software Is a Must-Have for Singapore’s Banks

In the fight against financial crime, detection is only half the battle. The real work starts with the investigation.

Singapore’s financial institutions are facing unprecedented scrutiny when it comes to anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. As regulators raise the bar and criminals get smarter, the ability to investigate suspicious transactions swiftly and accurately is now a non-negotiable requirement. This is where AML investigation software plays a critical role.

In this blog, we explore why AML investigation software matters more than ever in Singapore, what features banks should look for, and how next-generation tools are transforming compliance teams from reactive units into proactive intelligence hubs.

Talk to an Expert

Why Investigation Capabilities Matter in AML Compliance

When a transaction monitoring system flags an alert, it kicks off an entire chain of actions. Analysts must determine whether it's a false positive or a genuine case of money laundering. This requires gathering context, cross-referencing multiple systems, documenting findings, and preparing reports for auditors or regulators.

Doing all of this manually is not only time-consuming, but also increases the risk of human error and compliance gaps. For banks operating in Singapore's high-stakes environment, where MAS expects prompt and well-documented responses, this is a risk few can afford.

Key Challenges Faced by AML Investigators in Singapore

1. Alert Overload

Analysts are often overwhelmed by a high volume of alerts, many of which turn out to be false positives. This slows down investigations and increases backlogs.

2. Fragmented Data Sources

Information needed for a single investigation is typically spread across customer databases, transaction logs, sanctions lists, and case notes, making it difficult to form a complete picture quickly.

3. Manual Documentation

Writing investigation summaries and preparing Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) can take hours, reducing the time available for deeper analysis.

4. Audit and Regulatory Pressure

MAS and other regulators expect detailed, traceable justifications for every action taken. Missing documentation or inconsistent processes can lead to penalties.

What AML Investigation Software Does

AML investigation software is designed to streamline, standardise, and enhance the process of investigating suspicious activities. It bridges the gap between alert and action.

Core Functions Include:

  • Case creation and automated alert ingestion
  • Intelligent data aggregation from multiple systems
  • Risk scoring and prioritisation
  • Investigation checklists and audit trails
  • Natural language summaries for STR filing
  • Collaborative case review and escalation tools

Must-Have Features in AML Investigation Software

When evaluating solutions, Singaporean banks should look for these critical capabilities:

1. Smart Alert Triage

The system should help investigators prioritise high-risk alerts by assigning risk scores based on factors such as transaction patterns, customer profile, and historical activity.

2. Contextual Data Aggregation

A strong tool pulls in data from across the bank — including core banking systems, transaction logs, KYC platforms, and screening tools — to provide investigators with a consolidated view.

3. Natural Language Summarisation

Leading software uses AI to generate readable, regulator-friendly narratives that summarise key findings, reducing manual work and improving consistency.

4. Audit-Ready Case Management

Every step taken during an investigation should be logged and traceable, including decision-making, reviewer notes, and attached evidence.

5. Integration with STR Reporting Systems

The software should support direct integration with platforms such as GoAML, used in Singapore for suspicious transaction reporting.

ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 11_47_45 AM

How Tookitaki's FinCense Platform Elevates AML Investigations

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is designed with Singapore’s regulatory expectations in mind and includes a specialised Smart Disposition Engine for AML investigations.

Key Features:

  • AI Copilot (FinMate)
    Acts as an intelligent assistant that helps compliance teams assess red flags, suggest investigative steps, and provide context for alerts.
  • Smart Narration Engine
    Automatically generates STR-ready summaries, saving hours of manual writing while ensuring consistency and auditability.
  • Unified View of Risk
    Investigators can see customer profiles, transaction history, typologies triggered, and sanction screening results in one interface.
  • Scenario-Based Insight
    Through integration with the AFC Ecosystem, the system maps alerts to real-world money laundering typologies relevant to the region.
  • Workflow Customisation
    Investigation steps, user roles, and escalation logic can be tailored to the bank’s internal policies and team structure.

Benefits for Compliance Teams

By implementing AML investigation software like FinCense, banks in Singapore can achieve:

  • Up to 50 percent reduction in investigation time
  • Enhanced quality and consistency of STRs
  • Faster closure of true positives
  • Lower regulatory risk and better audit outcomes
  • Improved collaboration across compliance, risk, and operations

Checklist: Is Your Investigation Process Ready for 2025?

Ask these questions to evaluate your current system:

  • Are investigators manually pulling data from multiple systems?
  • Is there a standard template for documenting cases?
  • How long does it take to prepare an STR?
  • Can you trace every decision made during an investigation?
  • Are your analysts spending more time writing than investigating?

If any of these answers raise red flags, it may be time to upgrade.

Conclusion: Better Tools Build Stronger Compliance

AML investigation software is no longer a nice-to-have. It is a strategic enabler for banks to stay ahead of financial crime while meeting the rising expectations of regulators, auditors, and customers.

In Singapore's rapidly evolving compliance landscape, banks that invest in smart, AI-powered investigation tools will not only keep up. They will lead the way.

Ready to take your AML investigations to the next level? The future is intelligent, integrated, and investigator-first.

The Investigator’s Edge: Why AML Investigation Software Is a Must-Have for Singapore’s Banks
Blogs
17 Sep 2025
6 min
read

Agentic AI in Compliance: The Secret Weapon Against Financial Crime

Agentic AI is reshaping compliance in Australian banking, delivering real-time intelligence and smarter investigations.

Introduction

Compliance has always been a balancing act. Banks and fintechs must detect suspicious activity, meet regulatory requirements, and protect customers, all while keeping costs under control. In Australia, where AUSTRAC has stepped up enforcement and the New Payments Platform (NPP) enables real-time transfers, the pressure on compliance teams has never been greater.

Enter Agentic AI in compliance. Unlike traditional machine learning, Agentic AI operates as intelligent agents that perform specialised tasks within compliance workflows. It is transparent, explainable, and adaptive, making it a powerful tool for anti-money laundering (AML) and fraud prevention. For Australian institutions, Agentic AI is not just the future — it is fast becoming a necessity.

Talk to an Expert

What is Agentic AI in Compliance?

Agentic AI refers to artificial intelligence models designed to act autonomously as agents within a broader system. In compliance, this means AI tools that:

  • Detect suspicious activity in real time.
  • Adapt to new typologies and fraud schemes.
  • Support investigators with case summaries and recommendations.
  • Automate reporting in regulator-ready formats.

Unlike black-box AI, Agentic AI is explainable, meaning every decision can be justified to regulators such as AUSTRAC.

Why Compliance Needs Agentic AI

1. Real-Time Payment Risks

With NPP and PayTo, funds can move across accounts in seconds. Legacy systems cannot keep up. Agentic AI enables millisecond-level monitoring.

2. Alert Overload

Traditional systems produce high false positives. Agentic AI reduces noise, allowing compliance teams to focus on genuine risks.

3. Evolving Typologies

From mule accounts to deepfake scams, criminals are innovating constantly. Agentic AI learns from new patterns and adapts automatically.

4. AUSTRAC Expectations

Regulators require transparency and effectiveness. Agentic AI provides explainable alerts, audit trails, and regulator-ready reports.

5. Rising Compliance Costs

Staffing costs are high in Australia’s compliance sector. AI reduces manual workload and increases investigator efficiency.

How Agentic AI Works in Compliance

1. Transaction Monitoring

Agentic AI reviews transactions in real time, assigning risk scores and flagging anomalies.

2. Behavioural Analytics

Tracks customer behaviour across logins, devices, and transactions to detect unusual activity.

3. Case Investigation

AI copilots summarise cases, suggest next steps, and draft Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs).

4. Continuous Learning

Agentic AI adapts from investigator feedback and new data, improving accuracy over time.

5. Federated Intelligence

Through networks like the AFC Ecosystem, Agentic AI incorporates insights from global compliance experts without exposing sensitive data.

ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 11_09_43 AM

Use Cases of Agentic AI in Compliance

  1. Account Takeover Fraud: Detects unusual login and transaction activity in real time.
  2. Authorised Push Payment (APP) Scams: Identifies high-risk transfers initiated under duress.
  3. Mule Networks: Maps hidden links between accounts, devices, and transactions.
  4. Sanctions Screening: Flags high-risk names or entities with contextual intelligence.
  5. KYC/CDD Monitoring: Automates risk scoring of new and existing customers.
  6. Regulatory Reporting: Auto-generates SMRs, TTRs, and IFTIs in AUSTRAC-compliant formats.

Benefits of Agentic AI in Compliance

  • Real-Time Detection: Protects institutions from losses and reputational damage.
  • Reduced False Positives: Saves investigators time and reduces operational costs.
  • Explainability: Provides regulators with clear reasoning for alerts.
  • Efficiency: Automates routine investigation tasks.
  • Scalability: Works for both Tier-1 banks and smaller institutions.
  • Customer Trust: Demonstrates proactive protection against fraud.

Challenges in Deploying Agentic AI

  • Data Quality Issues: Poor data reduces AI accuracy.
  • Integration Complexity: Legacy systems make implementation difficult.
  • Skills Gap: Few compliance teams have in-house AI expertise.
  • Cost of Adoption: Smaller institutions may struggle with upfront costs.
  • Change Management: Teams need training to trust and use AI effectively.

Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Adopting Agentic AI

Community-owned banks such as Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are showing how Agentic AI can be deployed effectively. By adopting advanced compliance platforms, they have reduced false positives, improved reporting, and enhanced their ability to detect mule networks in real time.

These banks prove that Agentic AI is not only for Tier-1 players. With the right platform, even mid-sized institutions can benefit from AI-driven compliance innovation.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

FinCense, Tookitaki’s compliance platform, integrates Agentic AI to deliver end-to-end compliance and fraud prevention.

  • Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity across NPP, PayTo, remittance corridors, and crypto.
  • Agentic AI Models: Continuously adapt to new money laundering and fraud patterns.
  • Federated Intelligence: Draws from typologies contributed by the AFC Ecosystem.
  • FinMate AI Copilot: Summarises alerts, recommends next steps, and drafts regulator-ready reports.
  • AUSTRAC Compliance: Automates SMRs, TTRs, and IFTIs with complete audit trails.
  • Cross-Channel Coverage: Banking, wallets, cards, remittances, and crypto monitored under one system.

FinCense helps Australian institutions reduce compliance costs, meet AUSTRAC requirements, and strengthen customer trust.

Best Practices for Implementing Agentic AI

  1. Start with Data Quality: Clean, reliable data ensures accurate AI outputs.
  2. Adopt Explainable Models: Transparency is essential for AUSTRAC and internal stakeholders.
  3. Integrate Across Channels: Cover NPP, cards, wallets, and crypto under one platform.
  4. Pilot First: Begin with a small use case before scaling across the institution.
  5. Train Investigators: Ensure teams are equipped to work with AI copilots.
  6. Engage Regulators Early: Keep AUSTRAC informed about how AI is being used.

The Future of Agentic AI in Compliance

  1. Deeper Integration with Real-Time Payments: PayTo and other overlay services will require millisecond-level monitoring.
  2. Countering AI-Powered Fraud: Criminals will use deepfakes and synthetic identities, making Agentic AI even more critical.
  3. Shared Compliance Networks: Banks will collaborate more closely through federated learning.
  4. AI-First Compliance Teams: Investigations will be led by AI copilots, with human oversight.
  5. Sustainability of Compliance: Automation will help reduce the rising cost of compliance.

Conclusion

Agentic AI is not just a buzzword. It is redefining compliance in Australia by making fraud detection faster, investigations smarter, and reporting more transparent. For banks and fintechs facing AUSTRAC’s high expectations, Agentic AI offers a path to resilience and trust.

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank demonstrate that adoption is possible for institutions of all sizes. Platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense integrate Agentic AI to deliver compliance outcomes that go beyond regulatory checkboxes.

Pro tip: The future of compliance will belong to institutions that combine real-time monitoring, adaptive AI, and explainable reporting. Agentic AI is the foundation of that future.

Agentic AI in Compliance: The Secret Weapon Against Financial Crime
Blogs
16 Sep 2025
6 min
read

AI in Fraud Detection in Banking: Transforming Australia’s Fight Against Financial Crime

With fraud moving faster than ever, Australian banks are turning to AI to detect and prevent scams in real time.

Fraud is one of the biggest challenges facing banks today. In Australia, losses to scams exceeded AUD 3 billion in 2024, with criminals exploiting digital banking, instant payments, and cross-border channels. Legacy systems, built for batch monitoring, cannot keep up with the scale and speed of these threats.

This is why AI in fraud detection in banking is rapidly becoming a necessity. Artificial intelligence allows institutions to detect suspicious activity in real time, adapt to new fraud typologies, and reduce the burden on compliance teams. In this blog, we explore how AI is reshaping fraud detection in Australia, the benefits it brings, and how banks can implement it effectively.

Talk to an Expert

Why Fraud Detection Needs AI

1. Speed of Real-Time Payments

The New Payments Platform (NPP) has transformed banking in Australia by enabling instant transfers. Unfortunately, it also allows fraudsters to move stolen funds before they can be recalled. AI is essential for monitoring and scoring transactions within milliseconds.

2. Evolving Typologies

From account takeover fraud to deepfake scams, criminals are constantly innovating. Static rules cannot keep up. AI models can detect unusual patterns that indicate new fraud techniques.

3. Rising Alert Volumes

Traditional systems flood investigators with false positives. AI reduces noise by distinguishing genuine risks from harmless anomalies.

4. AUSTRAC Expectations

Regulators demand effective monitoring and reporting under the AML/CTF Act 2006. AI provides transparency and scalability to meet these expectations.

How AI Works in Fraud Detection

1. Machine Learning Models

AI systems are trained on historical transaction data to identify suspicious behaviour. Unlike static rules, machine learning adapts over time.

2. Behavioural Analytics

AI monitors customer behaviour, such as login times, device usage, and transaction patterns, to flag unusual activity.

3. Anomaly Detection

AI identifies deviations from normal behaviour, such as sudden large transfers or new device access.

4. Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Used in screening communications or transaction details for suspicious intent.

5. Federated Learning

Allows banks to share insights on fraud patterns without exposing sensitive customer data.

Common Fraud Typologies Detected by AI

  1. Account Takeover (ATO): AI detects unusual login behaviour, device changes, and suspicious transfers.
  2. Authorised Push Payment (APP) Scams: Analyses transaction context and behavioural cues to flag high-risk payments.
  3. Mule Account Networks: Identifies linked accounts moving funds in rapid succession.
  4. Card-Not-Present Fraud: Flags unusual online purchase behaviour.
  5. Business Email Compromise (BEC): Detects unusual payment instructions and new beneficiary activity.
  6. Crypto Laundering: Monitors conversions between fiat and digital assets for anomalies.

Red Flags AI Helps Detect in Real Time

  • High-value transfers to new or suspicious beneficiaries.
  • Transactions inconsistent with customer profiles.
  • Multiple failed login attempts followed by success.
  • Rapid inflows and outflows with no account balance retention.
  • Sudden changes in customer details followed by large transfers.
  • Transfers to high-risk jurisdictions or exchanges.

Benefits of AI in Fraud Detection

1. Real-Time Monitoring

AI processes data instantly, essential for NPP and PayTo transactions.

2. Reduction in False Positives

Adaptive models cut down on irrelevant alerts, saving investigators’ time.

3. Faster Investigations

AI copilots summarise cases and recommend next steps, reducing investigation times.

4. Scalability

AI can handle increasing transaction volumes without needing large compliance teams.

5. Improved Regulatory Alignment

Explainable AI ensures alerts can be justified to AUSTRAC and other regulators.

6. Enhanced Customer Trust

Customers are more likely to trust banks that prevent fraud proactively.

ChatGPT Image Sep 15, 2025, 07_40_34 PM

Challenges in Deploying AI

  • Data Quality Issues: AI is only as good as the data it learns from.
  • Integration with Legacy Systems: Many banks still rely on outdated infrastructure.
  • Skills Shortages: Australia faces a lack of experienced data scientists and AML specialists.
  • Explainability Concerns: Black-box models may not meet AUSTRAC’s transparency expectations.
  • Cost of Implementation: High initial investment can be a barrier for smaller institutions.

Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Using AI

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are adopting AI-powered compliance platforms to strengthen fraud detection. These institutions demonstrate that advanced fraud prevention is not only for Tier-1 banks. By leveraging AI, they reduce false positives, detect mule networks, and meet AUSTRAC’s expectations, all while operating efficiently.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense

FinCense, Tookitaki’s compliance platform, integrates AI at its core to deliver advanced fraud detection capabilities for Australian institutions.

  • Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity across NPP, PayTo, and cross-border corridors.
  • Agentic AI: Learns from evolving fraud patterns and continuously improves accuracy.
  • Federated Intelligence: Accesses real-world typologies from the AFC Ecosystem.
  • FinMate AI Copilot: Summarises cases, recommends next steps, and drafts regulator-ready reports.
  • AUSTRAC Compliance: Generates Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs) and maintains audit trails.
  • Cross-Channel Protection: Covers banking, cards, wallets, remittances, and crypto.

FinCense empowers banks to fight fraud proactively, cut compliance costs, and build customer trust.

Best Practices for Implementing AI in Fraud Detection

  1. Start with Data Quality: Clean, structured data is the foundation of effective AI.
  2. Adopt Explainable AI: Ensure every alert can be justified to regulators.
  3. Integrate Across Channels: Cover all payment types, from NPP to crypto.
  4. Train Staff on AI Tools: Empower investigators to use AI effectively.
  5. Pilot and Scale Gradually: Start small, refine models, then scale across the enterprise.
  6. Collaborate with Peers: Share insights through federated learning for stronger defences.

The Future of AI in Fraud Detection in Australia

  1. Deeper PayTo Integration: AI will play a critical role in monitoring new overlay services.
  2. Detection of Deepfake Scams: AI will need to counter AI-driven fraud tactics such as synthetic voice and video.
  3. Shared Fraud Databases: Industry-wide collaboration will improve real-time detection.
  4. AI-First Compliance Teams: Copilots like FinMate will become standard tools for investigators.
  5. Balance Between Security and Experience: AI will enable strong fraud prevention with minimal customer friction.

Conclusion

AI is transforming fraud detection in banking, particularly in Australia where real-time payments and evolving scams create unprecedented risks. By adopting AI-powered platforms, banks can detect threats earlier, reduce false positives, and ensure AUSTRAC compliance.

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank prove that even mid-sized institutions can lead in AI-driven compliance innovation. For all financial institutions, the path forward is clear: embrace AI not just as a tool, but as a cornerstone of fraud detection and customer trust.

Pro tip: The most effective AI in fraud detection is transparent, adaptive, and integrated into the entire compliance workflow. Anything less leaves banks one step behind fraudsters.

AI in Fraud Detection in Banking: Transforming Australia’s Fight Against Financial Crime