Compliance Hub

Managing Politically Exposed Person Risks: Insights from FATF Guidance

Site Logo
Jerin Mathew
10 min
read

Managing the risks associated with Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) is a critical aspect of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance for financial institutions. PEPs, by virtue of their influential positions, pose unique risks for money laundering, corruption, and terrorist financing. Given the significant potential for abuse, effective PEP management is essential to safeguard the integrity of financial systems worldwide.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has established comprehensive guidelines to address these risks, particularly through Recommendations 12 and 22. These recommendations provide a framework for identifying, monitoring, and managing PEPs to prevent the misuse of financial systems. This blog explores the challenges and solutions in managing PEP risks, offering insights based on FATF guidance to help AML compliance professionals navigate this complex landscape.

Understanding PEP Risks

Definition and Categories of PEPs

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is an individual who holds, or has held, a prominent public function. The FATF classifies PEPs into three main categories:

  • Foreign PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held significant public positions in foreign governments, such as heads of state, senior politicians, senior government, judicial or military officials, senior executives of state-owned corporations, and important political party officials.
  • Domestic PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held significant public positions within their own country, similar to the roles described for foreign PEPs.
  • International Organization PEPs: Individuals who hold or have held prominent roles in international organizations, including senior management positions such as directors, deputy directors, and members of the board.
HOW FATF CLASSIFIES PEPs

The Unique Risks PEPs Pose

PEPs are inherently risky for financial institutions due to their potential involvement in corruption, bribery, and money laundering. Their access to state resources and decision-making power increases the likelihood that they could misuse their positions for personal gain or to facilitate illicit activities. These risks are further compounded by the potential for PEPs to engage in terrorist financing, making robust PEP management a cornerstone of effective AML compliance.

Overview of FATF Recommendations 12 and 22

FATF Recommendation 12 mandates that financial institutions implement measures to identify and manage risks associated with PEPs. This includes:

  • Establishing appropriate risk management systems to determine whether a customer or beneficial owner is a PEP.
  • Obtaining senior management approval before establishing or continuing business relationships with PEPs.
  • Taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds for PEPs.
  • Conducting enhanced ongoing monitoring of business relationships with PEPs.

Recommendation 22 extends these requirements to designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs), ensuring comprehensive coverage across various sectors.

By adhering to these recommendations, financial institutions can better mitigate the risks posed by PEPs, protecting their operations and contributing to the broader goal of financial system integrity.

Common Challenges in Managing PEP Risks

Identifying PEPs

Difficulty in Determining PEP Status Due to Variations in Definitions and Lists

One of the primary challenges in managing PEP risks is the variability in definitions and lists of PEPs across different jurisdictions. While the FATF provides a standardized definition, the implementation and interpretation can vary significantly. For instance, some countries might include middle-ranking officials or those in specific sectors, while others may have more restrictive criteria. This inconsistency complicates the identification process for financial institutions operating globally, as they must navigate a patchwork of definitions and maintain compliance across multiple jurisdictions.

Challenges with Identifying Family Members and Close Associates

Another layer of complexity arises from the need to identify not only the PEPs themselves but also their family members and close associates. These individuals can also be conduits for illicit activities, leveraging their relationship with the PEP to facilitate money laundering or corruption. However, determining who qualifies as a family member or close associate is not always straightforward. Cultural differences can influence the breadth of familial ties, and information on close associates may not be readily available or easily verifiable, adding to the difficulty.

Dealing with Incomplete or Outdated Information

Limitations of Commercial Databases and Government-Issued PEP Lists

Financial institutions often rely on commercial databases and government-issued PEP lists to identify PEPs. While these resources are valuable, they come with limitations. Commercial databases may not always be comprehensive or up-to-date, leading to potential gaps in information. Government-issued lists can also be problematic as they may not cover all relevant individuals or may quickly become outdated due to frequent changes in public officeholders. Additionally, these lists might not include family members and close associates, further complicating the identification process.

Issues with Maintaining Up-to-Date Client Information and Monitoring Changes in PEP Status

Keeping client information current is a continuous challenge. Clients may not proactively update their status, and changes in PEP status can occur frequently due to elections, appointments, or other political shifts. Financial institutions must implement robust systems to regularly review and update client information. This requires significant resources and effective monitoring tools to ensure timely identification of any changes in PEP status.

{{cta-first}}

Balancing Compliance with Customer Relationships

The Impact of Strict Compliance Measures on Customer Experience

Strict compliance measures, while necessary for managing PEP risks, can adversely impact customer experience. Rigorous due diligence processes and enhanced scrutiny can lead to delays, increased documentation requirements, and potential discomfort for clients. This can strain customer relationships, particularly if clients feel unduly burdened or stigmatized by the PEP designation. Financial institutions must balance the need for compliance with maintaining positive customer experiences, which is no small feat.

Potential Reputational Risks and Regulatory Penalties for Non-Compliance

Failure to manage PEP risks effectively can result in severe reputational damage and regulatory penalties. Non-compliance with AML regulations, including inadequate PEP management, can lead to hefty fines, legal actions, and loss of trust from stakeholders. Financial institutions must navigate these risks carefully, ensuring that their AML programs are robust and compliant with regulatory expectations while also managing the operational and reputational implications of their actions.

Solutions and Best Practices

Identifying PEPs

Implementing Robust Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Processes

To effectively identify PEPs, financial institutions must implement robust Customer Due Diligence (CDD) processes. This involves collecting comprehensive information at the onboarding stage, including details about the client's occupation, sources of income, and potential connections to PEPs. Enhanced due diligence should be applied to high-risk clients, requiring additional verification and scrutiny.

Utilizing Multiple Information Sources

Relying on a single source for PEP identification is inadequate. Financial institutions should utilize a combination of information sources to ensure comprehensive coverage:

  • Internet and Media Searches: Regular internet and media searches can provide up-to-date information on individuals' public roles and activities. Specialized search tools and databases focusing on AML can help streamline this process.
  • Asset Disclosure Systems: Accessing asset disclosure systems where available can provide valuable insights into a PEP's wealth and financial activities.
  • Commercial Databases: While not infallible, commercial databases are a useful tool for identifying PEPs and their associates. These should be used in conjunction with other sources to cross-verify information.
  • Government-Issued Lists: Keeping abreast of government-issued PEP lists can aid in the identification process, though these should be regularly updated and cross-referenced with other sources.

Regularly Updating and Cross-Referencing Client Information

Maintaining up-to-date client information is crucial. Financial institutions should establish protocols for regularly reviewing and updating client records, particularly for high-risk individuals. Automated monitoring systems can help track changes in PEP status, ensuring that institutions remain compliant with regulatory requirements. Regular audits and reviews of client information can identify discrepancies or outdated information that need to be addressed.

Enhancing Information Accuracy

Conducting Periodic Reviews and Updates of Client Information

Periodic reviews of client information are essential for ensuring accuracy and relevance. Financial institutions should establish a schedule for these reviews, focusing on high-risk clients and those with potential connections to PEPs. This proactive approach helps identify any changes in client status, such as new political appointments or changes in familial connections that might affect their risk profile.

Training Employees to Recognize and Report PEP-Related Red Flags

Effective PEP management requires well-trained staff who can recognize and respond to red flags associated with PEPs. Training programs should cover the identification of PEPs, understanding the associated risks, and the appropriate steps to take when a PEP is identified. Case studies and real-world examples can enhance understanding and provide practical insights into managing PEP risks.

Implementing Automated Monitoring Systems for Real-Time Updates

Leveraging technology for real-time monitoring is a best practice in PEP management. Automated systems can continuously scan for updates and changes in client information, flagging any new risks or changes in status. These systems can integrate with existing AML software, providing a seamless and efficient way to maintain up-to-date records and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Balancing Compliance and Customer Relationships

Adopting a Risk-Based Approach to PEP Management

A risk-based approach to PEP management allows financial institutions to allocate resources effectively, focusing on the highest-risk individuals and transactions. This approach involves assessing the risk associated with each PEP relationship based on factors such as the individual's position, the country of origin, and the nature of the business relationship. By prioritizing high-risk clients, institutions can manage PEP risks more effectively without overburdening low-risk clients.

Communicating Clearly with Customers About Compliance Requirements

Transparent communication with clients about compliance requirements is essential. Financial institutions should explain the necessity of due diligence measures, the reasons for additional information requests, and the importance of compliance for both the institution and the client. Clear communication helps build trust and understanding, reducing the potential for frustration or resistance from clients.

Implementing Policies that Balance Regulatory Obligations with Customer Service

Policies should be designed to meet regulatory obligations while maintaining a high standard of customer service. This includes streamlining compliance processes to minimize delays, providing clear instructions and assistance to clients, and ensuring that staff are trained to handle PEP-related inquiries with professionalism and sensitivity. By balancing these elements, financial institutions can achieve compliance without compromising on customer satisfaction.

Leveraging Technology for Effective PEP Management

Overview of Advanced AML Software Solutions and Their Benefits

The rapid advancement of technology has significantly enhanced the ability of financial institutions to manage PEP risks effectively. Advanced AML software solutions offer a range of benefits, including improved accuracy, efficiency, and compliance. These solutions typically incorporate machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate and streamline the PEP screening and monitoring process.

Key Benefits of Advanced AML Software:

  • Enhanced Accuracy: By leveraging AI and machine learning, AML software can more accurately identify PEPs and related risks. These technologies can analyze vast amounts of data quickly, reducing the likelihood of human error and ensuring more precise identification of PEPs.
  • Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the manual workload for compliance teams, allowing them to focus on higher-level analysis and decision-making. This leads to faster processing times and more efficient resource allocation.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Advanced AML systems provide real-time monitoring capabilities, ensuring that any changes in PEP status are detected immediately. This continuous vigilance is crucial for maintaining up-to-date client information and mitigating risks promptly.
  • Comprehensive Data Integration: These systems can integrate data from multiple sources, including commercial databases, government lists, and internal records. This comprehensive approach ensures that institutions have access to the most complete and current information available.
  • Regulatory Compliance: By automating compliance processes and maintaining thorough records, AML software helps institutions meet regulatory requirements more effectively. This reduces the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties.

{{cta-ebook}}

How Technology Can Streamline PEP Identification, Monitoring, and Reporting

PEP Identification

Advanced AML software solutions enhance the identification of PEPs by employing sophisticated algorithms that cross-reference multiple data points. These systems can:

  • Analyze Structured and Unstructured Data: AML software can process both structured data (e.g., government lists, commercial databases) and unstructured data (e.g., news articles, social media posts) to identify potential PEPs.
  • Pattern Recognition: Machine learning algorithms can identify patterns and anomalies that may indicate a PEP, even if the individual is not explicitly listed in databases. This includes identifying indirect connections through family members and close associates.
  • Global Reach: Technology enables institutions to access global data sources, ensuring comprehensive coverage of PEPs from different jurisdictions.

PEP Monitoring

Once PEPs are identified, continuous monitoring is essential to detect any changes in their status or activities. Technology facilitates this through:

  • Automated Alerts: AML systems can generate real-time alerts for any significant changes in a PEP’s profile, such as new political appointments, changes in financial behavior, or public allegations of corruption.
  • Behavioral Analysis: Advanced analytics can monitor transaction patterns and flag unusual activities that may indicate potential money laundering or other illicit activities.
  • Risk Scoring: Systems can assign risk scores to PEPs based on various factors, allowing institutions to prioritize monitoring efforts on high-risk individuals.

PEP Reporting

Effective reporting is crucial for regulatory compliance and internal decision-making. AML software enhances reporting capabilities by:

  • Automated Report Generation: Systems can automatically generate detailed reports on PEP-related activities, ensuring consistency and accuracy. These reports can be customized to meet regulatory requirements and internal standards.
  • Data Visualization: Advanced tools provide data visualization options, making it easier for compliance teams to interpret complex data and identify trends or anomalies.
  • Audit Trails: Comprehensive audit trails ensure that all actions and decisions related to PEP management are documented, providing transparency and accountability.

Effectively Manage PEP Risks

Managing PEP risks is a complex but essential component of AML compliance. PEPs, by virtue of their positions and influence, pose significant risks related to money laundering, corruption, and terrorist financing. Understanding and addressing these risks is crucial for financial institutions to maintain the integrity of their operations and comply with regulatory requirements.

In addition, leveraging advanced AML software solutions can streamline the identification, monitoring, and reporting processes. These technologies enhance accuracy, efficiency, and compliance, providing real-time monitoring and comprehensive data integration. A case study of a global bank demonstrated the transformative impact of implementing a tech-driven PEP management system, highlighting the benefits of increased accuracy, enhanced efficiency, real-time monitoring, and regulatory compliance.

For financial institutions looking to enhance their AML compliance and PEP management, Tookitaki's Smart Screening solution offers a comprehensive and effective approach. By talking to Tookitaki's experts, institutions can learn more about how this innovative solution can help them navigate the complexities of PEP management and achieve their compliance goals.

By understanding the challenges and implementing these best practices and solutions, AML compliance professionals can better manage PEP risks, protect their institutions, and contribute to the broader goal of financial system integrity.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
12 Dec 2025
6 min
read

How AML Software is Evolving: Smarter, Faster, Stronger Compliance

In today’s financial world, the rules of the game have changed — and so must the tools we use to play it.

As criminals become more sophisticated, regulatory pressures intensify, and digital finance explodes, banks and fintechs in Singapore are upgrading their anti-money laundering (AML) tech stacks. At the heart of this transformation is AML software: smarter, faster, and more integrated than ever before.

Talk to an Expert

What is AML Software?

AML software is a suite of technology solutions designed to help financial institutions detect, investigate, and report suspicious activities linked to money laundering, terrorism financing, and other financial crimes.

A typical AML software system includes:

  • Transaction Monitoring
  • Name Screening (Sanctions, PEPs, Adverse Media)
  • Case Management
  • Customer Risk Scoring
  • Regulatory Reporting (STR/SAR filing)

Modern AML platforms go even further, offering AI-powered features, real-time analytics, and community-driven intelligence to stay ahead of criminals.

Why AML Software Matters in Singapore

Singapore is a global finance hub — but that makes it a prime target for illicit activity.

With the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) raising expectations, banks and digital payment providers face increasing pressure to:

  • Detect new fraud and laundering patterns
  • Reduce false positives
  • File timely Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs)
  • Demonstrate effectiveness of controls

In this context, AML software is no longer a back-office utility. It’s a frontline defence mechanism.

Key Features of Next-Gen AML Software

Let’s explore what separates industry-leading AML software:

1. AI-Powered Detection

Legacy rule-based systems struggle to detect evolving threats. The best AML software today combines rules with AI and machine learning to:

  • Identify complex typologies
  • Spot previously unseen patterns
  • Continuously improve based on feedback

2. Scenario-Based Monitoring

Rather than flagging single rules, scenario-based systems simulate real-world laundering behaviour — such as layering via wallets or round-tripping via shell firms.

This reduces alert fatigue and increases true positive rates.

3. Federated Learning

Privacy is a key challenge in AML. Federated learning models allow multiple institutions to share intelligence without exposing data. Tookitaki’s FinCense platform, for example, uses federated AI to learn from over 1,200 community-contributed typologies.

4. GenAI for Investigations

Modern platforms come equipped with AI copilots that assist analysts by:

  • Narrating alerts in natural language
  • Summarising key case data
  • Suggesting investigation paths

This cuts investigation time and boosts consistency.

5. Modular and Scalable Design

Top AML software platforms are API-first and cloud-native, allowing financial institutions to:

  • Integrate seamlessly with existing systems
  • Scale as business grows
  • Tailor features to compliance needs

6. Smart Disposition and Automation

Another game-changing innovation is the use of smart disposition tools that automatically close low-risk alerts while flagging high-risk cases for review. This not only reduces manual workload but also ensures investigators focus on what truly matters.

7. Risk-Based Customer Segmentation

Risk isn’t one-size-fits-all. Better AML software supports adaptive customer risk models, enabling banks to assign varying levels of monitoring and documentation based on actual behaviour, not just profiles.

ChatGPT Image Dec 11, 2025, 04_11_11 PM

The Tookitaki Difference

Tookitaki’s AML software — FinCense — is designed for Asia’s fast-evolving financial crime landscape. It offers:

  • End-to-end AML coverage: Screening, Monitoring, Risk Scoring, and Reporting
  • Scenario-based typology library built by the AFC Ecosystem
  • Auto-Narration and Alert Clustering features for faster reviews
  • Real-time insights through graph-based risk visualisation
  • Compliance-ready reports for MAS and other regulators

It’s no surprise that leading banks and fintechs across Singapore trust Tookitaki as their AML technology partner.

Benefits of Implementing the Right AML Software

The right software delivers value across the board:

  • Efficiency: Faster investigations, fewer false positives
  • Effectiveness: Better risk detection and STR quality
  • Auditability: Full traceability and audit logs
  • Regulatory Alignment: Easier compliance with MAS TRM and AML guidelines
  • Future-Readiness: Rapid response to emerging crime trends

Beyond the basics, AML software today also plays a strategic role. By enabling early detection of syndicated frauds and emerging typologies, it gives financial institutions a first-mover advantage in safeguarding assets and reputation.

Local Trends to Watch

1. Real-Time Payment Risks

As Singapore expands FAST and PayNow, AML software must handle real-time transaction flows. Features like instant alerting and risk scoring are crucial.

2. Cross-Border Mule Networks

Organised crime groups are using Singapore as a pass-through hub. AML platforms must detect smurfing, layering, and proxy-controlled accounts across borders.

3. Digital Payment Platforms

With the rise of e-wallets, BNPL apps, and alternative lenders, AML software needs to adapt to newer transaction types and user behaviours.

4. Crypto and DeFi Threats

Even as regulations for digital assets evolve, AML tools must evolve faster — especially to monitor wallets, mixers, and anonymised chains. Platforms with crypto intelligence capabilities are emerging as essential components of a future-proof AML stack.

Common Challenges in Choosing AML Software

Even with a growing vendor landscape, not all AML software is created equal. Watch out for:

  • Poor integration support
  • Lack of local compliance features (e.g., MAS STR formats)
  • Over-reliance on manual rule tuning
  • No support for typology simulation

Some institutions also face challenges with legacy tech debt or internal resistance to automation. That’s why vendor support, training, and ongoing upgrades are just as critical as features.

How to Evaluate AML Software Providers

When assessing an AML solution, ask these questions:

  • Can the platform simulate real-life financial crime scenarios?
  • Does it offer intelligence beyond just transaction data?
  • How accurate and explainable are its AI models?
  • Is it MAS-compliant and audit-ready?
  • Does it reduce false positives while boosting true positives?

The best platforms will demonstrate value in both detection capabilities and operational impact.

Conclusion: Don’t Just Comply — Compete

AML compliance is no longer just about ticking boxes. With regulators watching, criminals evolving, and reputational risks soaring — smart AML software is a competitive advantage.

Banks and fintechs that invest in intelligent, adaptable platforms will not only stay safe, but also move faster, serve better, and scale stronger.

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is helping make that future a reality — through AI, collaboration, and real-world detection.

How AML Software is Evolving: Smarter, Faster, Stronger Compliance
Blogs
11 Dec 2025
6 min
read

AML Onboarding Software: How Malaysia’s Banks Can Verify Faster and Smarter Without Compromising Compliance

In Malaysia’s fast-growing digital economy, AML onboarding software now defines how trust begins.

Malaysia’s Digital Banking Boom Has Redefined Customer Onboarding

Malaysia is experiencing one of the fastest digital transformations in Southeast Asia. Digital banks, e-wallets, instant payments, QR-based transactions, gig-economy monetisation, and borderless fintech services have become the new normal.

As financial access increases, so does exposure to financial crime. What used to happen inside branches now occurs across mobile apps, remote verification tools, and high-speed onboarding journeys.

Criminals have evolved alongside the system. Scam syndicates, mule recruiters, and identity fraud networks are exploiting digital onboarding loopholes to create accounts that eventually funnel illicit funds.

Today, the battle against money laundering does not start with monitoring transactions.
It starts the moment a customer is onboarded.

This is where AML onboarding software becomes essential. It protects institutions from bad actors from the first touchpoint, ensuring that customers who enter the ecosystem are legitimate, verified, and accurately risk assessed.

Talk to an Expert

What Is AML Onboarding Software?

AML onboarding software is a specialised system that helps financial institutions verify, risk score, screen, and approve customers during account opening. It ensures that new customers do not pose hidden AML or fraud risks.

Unlike simple KYC tools, AML onboarding software integrates deeply into the institution’s broader compliance lifecycle.

Core capabilities typically include:

  • Identity verification
  • Document verification
  • Sanctions and PEP screening
  • Customer risk scoring
  • Automated CDD and EDD workflows
  • Detecting mule and synthetic identities
  • Entity resolution
  • Integration with ongoing monitoring

The goal is to give institutions accurate and real-time intelligence about who they are onboarding and whether that individual poses a laundering or fraud threat.

Modern AML onboarding solutions focus not just on identity, but on intent.

Why AML Onboarding Matters More Than Ever in Malaysia

Malaysia is at a critical juncture. Digital onboarding volumes are rising, and with them, the risk of onboarding high-risk or illicit customers.

1. Mule Account Proliferation

A significant portion of money laundering cases in Malaysia involve mule accounts. These accounts begin as “clean looking” onboarding events but later become channels for illegal funds.

Traditional onboarding checks cannot detect mule intent.

2. Synthetic and Stolen Identity Fraud

Scam syndicates increasingly use stolen IDs, manipulated documents, and synthetic identities to create accounts across banks and fintechs.

Without behavioural checks and AI intelligence, these identities slip through verification.

3. Rise of Digital Banks and Fintechs

Competition pushes institutions to onboard customers fast. But speed introduces risk if verification is not intelligent and robust.

BNM expects digital players to balance speed with compliance integrity.

4. FATF and BNM Pressure on Early Controls

Malaysia’s regulators emphasise early detection.
Onboarding is the first defence, not the last.

5. Fraud Becomes AML Quickly

Most modern AML events start as fraud:

These crimes feed mule accounts, which then support laundering.

AML onboarding software must detect these risks before the account is opened.

How AML Onboarding Software Works

AML onboarding involves more than collecting documents. It is a multi-layered intelligence process.

1. Data Capture

Customers submit their information through digital channels or branches. This includes ID documents, selfies, and personal details.

2. Identity and Document Verification

The software checks document authenticity, matches faces to IDs, and validates personal details.

3. Device and Behavioural Intelligence

Fraudulent applicants often show unusual patterns, such as:

  • Multiple sign-up attempts from the same device
  • Abnormal typing speed
  • VPN or proxy IP addresses
  • Suspicious geolocations

AI models analyse this behind the scenes.

4. Sanctions and PEP Screening

Names and entities are screened against:

  • Global sanctions lists
  • Politically exposed person lists
  • Adverse media

5. Risk Scoring

The system assigns a risk score based on:

  • Geography
  • Document risk
  • Device fingerprint
  • Behaviour
  • Identity verification outcome
  • Screening results

6. Automated CDD and EDD

Low-risk customers proceed automatically.
High-risk applicants trigger enhanced due diligence.

7. Decision and Onboarding

Approved customers enter the system with a complete risk profile that feeds future AML monitoring.

Every step is automated, traceable, and auditable.

The Limitations of Traditional Onboarding and KYC Systems

Malaysia’s financial institutions have historically relied on onboarding systems focused on identity verification alone. These systems now fall short because:

  • They cannot detect mule intent
  • They rely on manual CDD reviews
  • They generate high false positives
  • They lack behavioural intelligence
  • They do not learn from past patterns
  • They are not connected to AML transaction monitoring
  • They cannot detect synthetic identities
  • They cannot adapt to new scam trends

Modern laundering begins at onboarding.
Systems built 10 years ago cannot protect banks today.

ChatGPT Image Dec 10, 2025, 07_00_19 PM

The Rise of AI-Powered AML Onboarding Software

AI has become a game changer for early-stage AML detection.

1. Predictive Mule Detection

AI learns from historical mule patterns to detect similar profiles even before account opening.

2. Behavioural Biometrics

Typing patterns, device behaviour, and navigation flow reveal intent.

3. Entity Resolution

AI identifies hidden links between applicants that manual systems cannot see.

4. Automated CDD and EDD

Risk-based workflows reduce human effort while improving accuracy.

5. Explainable AI

Institutions and regulators receive full transparency into why an applicant was flagged.

6. Continuous Learning

Models improve as investigators provide feedback.

AI onboarding systems stop criminals at the front door.

Tookitaki’s FinCense: Malaysia’s Most Advanced AML Onboarding Intelligence Layer

While most onboarding tools focus on identity, Tookitaki’s FinCense focuses on risk and intent.

FinCense provides a true AML onboarding engine that is deeply integrated into the institution’s full compliance lifecycle.

It stands apart through four capabilities.

1. Agentic AI That Automates Onboarding Investigations

FinCense uses autonomous AI agents that:

  • Analyse onboarding patterns
  • Generate risk narratives
  • Recommend decisions
  • Highlight anomalies in device and behaviour
  • Flag applicants resembling known mule patterns

Agentic AI reduces manual workload and ensures consistent decision-making across all onboarding cases.

2. Federated Intelligence Through the AFC Ecosystem

FinCense is powered by insights from the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, a collaborative network of over 200 institutions across ASEAN.

This allows FinCense to detect onboarding risks based on intelligence gathered from other markets, including:

  • Mule recruitment patterns in Indonesia
  • Synthetic identity techniques in Singapore
  • Device-level anomalies in regional scams
  • Onboarding patterns used by transnational syndicates

This regional visibility is extremely valuable for Malaysian institutions.

3. Explainable AI that Regulators Prefer

FinCense provides complete transparency for every onboarding decision.

Each risk outcome includes:

  • A clear explanation
  • Supporting data
  • Key behavioural signals
  • Pattern matches
  • Why the customer was high or low risk

This supports strong governance and regulator communication.

4. Integrated AML and Fraud Lifecycle

FinCense connects onboarding intelligence with:

  • Screening
  • Fraud detection
  • Transaction monitoring
  • Case investigations
  • STR filing

This creates a seamless risk view.
If an account looks suspicious at onboarding, the system tracks its behaviour throughout its lifecycle.

This integrated approach is far stronger than fragmented KYC tools.

Scenario Example: Preventing a Mule Account at Onboarding

A university student in Malaysia is offered easy cash to open a bank account. He is instructed by scammers to submit legitimate documents but the intent is laundering.

Here is how FinCense detects it:

  1. Device fingerprint shows the applicant’s phone was previously used by multiple unrelated onboarding attempts.
  2. Behavioural analysis detects unusually fast form completion, suggesting coached onboarding.
  3. Risk scoring identifies inconsistencies between declared occupation and expected financial behaviour.
  4. Federated intelligence finds a similarity to mule recruitment patterns observed in neighbouring countries.
  5. Agentic AI produces a summary for compliance teams explaining the full risk picture.
  6. The onboarding is halted or escalated for further verification.

FinCense stops the mule account before it becomes a channel for laundering.

Benefits of AML Onboarding Software for Malaysian Financial Institutions

Strong onboarding intelligence leads to stronger AML performance across the entire organisation.

Benefits include:

  • Lower onboarding fraud
  • Early detection of mule accounts
  • Reduced compliance costs
  • Faster verification without sacrificing safety
  • Automated CDD and EDD workflows
  • Improved customer experience
  • Better regulator alignment
  • Higher accuracy and fewer false positives

AML onboarding software builds trust at the very first interaction.

What Financial Institutions Should Look for in AML Onboarding Software

When evaluating AML onboarding tools, institutions should prioritise:

1. Intelligence
Systems must detect intent, not just identity.

2. Explainability
Every decision requires clear justification.

3. Integration
Onboarding must connect with AML, screening, and fraud.

4. Regional Relevance
ASEAN typologies must be incorporated.

5. Behavioural Analysis
Identity alone cannot detect mule activity.

6. Real-Time Performance
Instant banking requires instant risk scoring.

7. Scalability
Systems must support high onboarding volumes with no slowdown.

FinCense excels across all these dimensions.

The Future of AML Onboarding in Malaysia

Malaysia’s onboarding landscape will evolve significantly over the next five years.

Key developments will include:

  • Responsible AI integrated into onboarding decisions
  • Cross-border onboarding intelligence
  • Instant onboarding with real-time AML guardrails
  • Collaboration between banks and fintechs
  • A unified risk graph that tracks customers across their lifecycle
  • Better identity proofing through open banking APIs

AML onboarding software will become the core of financial crime prevention in Malaysia’s digital future.

Conclusion

Onboarding is no longer a simple verification step. It is the first line of defence in Malaysia’s fight against financial crime. As criminals innovate, institutions must protect the entry point of the financial ecosystem with intelligence, automation, and regional awareness.

Tookitaki’s FinCense is the AML onboarding intelligence Malaysia needs.
With Agentic AI, federated learning, explainable reasoning, and seamless lifecycle integration, FinCense enables financial institutions to onboard customers faster, detect risks earlier, and strengthen compliance at scale.

FinCense ensures that trust begins at the first click.

AML Onboarding Software: How Malaysia’s Banks Can Verify Faster and Smarter Without Compromising Compliance
Blogs
10 Dec 2025
6 min
read

Rethinking Risk: How AML Risk Assessment Software Is Transforming Compliance in the Philippines

Every strong AML programme begins with one thing — understanding risk with clarity.

Introduction

Risk is the foundation of every compliance decision. It determines how customers are classified, which products require enhancement, how controls are deployed, and how regulators evaluate governance standards. For financial institutions in the Philippines, the stakes have never been higher. Rapid digital adoption, increased cross-border flows, and more complex financial crime typologies have reshaped the risk landscape entirely.

Yet many institutions still rely on annual, manual AML risk assessments built on spreadsheets and subjective scoring. These assessments often lag behind fast-changing threats, leaving institutions exposed.

This is where AML risk assessment software is reshaping the future. Instead of treating risk assessment as a once-a-year compliance exercise, modern platforms transform it into a dynamic intelligence function that evolves with customer behaviour, regulatory requirements, and emerging threats. Institutions that modernise their approach today gain not only stronger compliance outcomes but a significantly deeper understanding of where real risk resides.

Talk to an Expert

Why the Old Approach to AML Risk Assessment No Longer Works

Traditional AML risk assessments were designed for a different era — one where risks remained relatively stable and criminal techniques evolved slowly. Today, that world no longer exists.

1. Annual assessments are too slow for modern financial crime

A risk assessment completed in January may already be outdated by March. Threats evolve weekly, and institutions must adapt just as quickly. Static reports cannot keep up.

2. Manual scoring leads to inconsistency and blind spots

Spreadsheets and fragmented documentation create errors and subjectivity. Scoring decisions vary between analysts, and critical risk factors may be overlooked or misinterpreted.

3. Siloed teams distort the risk picture

AML, fraud, operational risk, and cybersecurity teams often use different tools and frameworks. Without a unified risk view, the institution’s overall risk posture becomes fragmented, leading to inaccurate enterprise risk ratings.

4. Behavioural indicators are often ignored

Customer risk classifications frequently rely on attributes such as occupation, geography, and product usage. However, behavioural patterns — the strongest indicators of emerging risk — are rarely incorporated. This results in outdated segmentation.

5. New typologies rarely make it into assessments on time

Scams, mule networks, deepfake-enabled fraud, and cyber-enabled laundering evolve rapidly. In manual systems, these insights take months to reflect in formal assessments, leaving institutions exposed.

The conclusion is clear: modern risk assessment requires a shift from static documentation to dynamic, data-driven risk intelligence.

What Modern AML Risk Assessment Software Really Does

Modern AML risk assessment software transforms risk assessment into a continuous, intelligence-driven capability rather than a periodic exercise. The focus is not on filling in templates but on orchestrating risk in real time.

1. Comprehensive Risk Factor Mapping

The software maps risk across products, customer segments, delivery channels, geographies, and intermediaries — aligning each with inherent and residual risk scores supported by data rather than subjective interpretation.

2. Control Effectiveness Evaluation

Instead of simply checking whether controls exist, modern systems assess how well they perform and whether they are reducing risk as intended. This gives management accurate visibility into control gaps.

3. Automated Evidence Collection

Data such as transaction patterns, alert trends, screening results, customer behaviours, and exposure shifts are automatically collected and incorporated into the assessment. This eliminates manual consolidation and ensures consistency.

4. Dynamic Risk Scoring

Risk scores evolve continuously based on live data. Behavioural anomalies, new scenarios, changes in customer profiles, or shifts in typologies automatically update institutional and customer risk levels.

5. Scenario and Typology Alignment

Emerging threats are automatically mapped to relevant risk factors. This ensures assessments reflect real and current risks, not outdated assumptions.

6. Regulator-Ready Reporting

The system generates complete, structured reports — including risk matrices, heatmaps, inherent and residual risk comparisons, and documented control effectiveness — all aligned with BSP and AMLC expectations.

Modern AML risk assessment is no longer about compiling data; it is about interpreting it with precision.

What BSP and AMLC Expect Today

Supervisory expectations in the Philippines have evolved significantly. Institutions must now demonstrate maturity in their risk-based approach rather than simply complying with documentation requirements.

1. A more mature risk-based approach

Regulators now assess how institutions identify, quantify, and manage risk — not just whether they have a risk assessment document.

2. Continuous monitoring of risk

Annual assessments alone are not sufficient. Institutions must show ongoing risk evaluation as conditions change.

3. Integration of AML, fraud, and operational risk

A holistic view of risk is now expected. Siloed assessments no longer meet supervisory standards.

4. Strong documentation and traceability

Regulators expect evidence-based scoring and clear justification for risk classifications. Statements such as “risk increased” must be supported by real data.

5. Explainability in AI-driven methodologies

If risk scoring involves AI or ML logic, institutions must explain how the model works, what data influences decisions, and how outcomes are validated.

AML risk assessment software directly supports these expectations by enabling transparency, accuracy, and continuous monitoring.

ChatGPT Image Dec 10, 2025, 11_43_26 AM

Core Capabilities of Next-Generation AML Risk Assessment Software

Next-generation platforms bring capabilities that fundamentally change how institutions understand and manage risk.

1. Dynamic Enterprise Risk Modelling

Instead of producing one assessment per year, the software updates institutional risk levels continuously based on activity, behaviours, alerts, and environmental factors. Management sees a real-time risk picture, not a historical snapshot.

2. Behavioural Risk Intelligence

Behavioural analysis helps detect risk that traditional frameworks miss. Sudden changes in customer velocity, counterparties, or financial patterns directly influence risk ratings.

3. Federated Typology Intelligence

Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem provides emerging red flags, typologies, and expert insights from across the region. These insights feed directly into risk scoring, allowing institutions to adapt faster than criminals.

4. Unified Customer and Entity Risk

The system aggregates data from onboarding, monitoring, screening, and case investigations to provide a single, accurate risk score for each customer or entity. This prevents fragmented risk classification across products or channels.

5. Real-Time Dashboards and Heatmaps

Boards and compliance leaders can instantly visualise risk exposure by customer segment, product type, geography, or threat category. This strengthens governance and strategic decision-making.

6. Embedded Explainability

Every risk score is supported by traceable logic, contributing data sources, and documented rationale. This level of transparency is essential for audit and regulatory review.

7. Automated Documentation

Risk assessments — which once required months of manual effort — can now be generated quickly with consistent formatting, reliable inputs, and complete audit trails.

Tookitaki’s Approach to AML Risk Assessment: Building the Trust Layer

Tookitaki approaches risk assessment as a holistic intelligence function that underpins the institution’s ability to build and maintain trust.

FinCense as a Continuous Risk Intelligence Engine

FinCense collects and interprets data from monitoring alerts, screening hits, customer behaviour changes, typology matches, and control effectiveness indicators. It builds a constantly updated picture of institutional and customer-level risk.

FinMate — The Agentic AI Copilot for Risk Teams

FinMate enhances risk assessments by providing context, explanations, and insights. It can summarise enterprise risk posture, identify control gaps, recommend mitigations, and answer natural-language questions such as:

“Which areas are driving our increase in residual risk this quarter?”

FinMate turns risk interpretation from a manual task into an assisted analytical process.

AFC Ecosystem as a Living Source of Emerging Risk Intelligence

Scenarios, red flags, and typologies contributed by experts across Asia feed directly into FinCense. This gives institutions real-world, regional intelligence that continuously enhances risk scoring.

Together, these capabilities form a trust layer that strengthens governance and regulatory confidence.

Case Scenario: A Philippine Bank Reinvents Its Risk Framework

A Philippine mid-sized bank faced several challenges:

  • risk assessments performed once a year
  • highly subjective customer and product risk scoring
  • inconsistent documentation
  • difficulty linking typologies to inherent risk
  • limited visibility into behavioural indicators

After adopting Tookitaki’s AML risk assessment capabilities, the bank redesigned its entire risk approach.

Results included:

  • dynamic risk scoring replaced subjective manual ratings
  • enterprise risk heatmaps updated automatically
  • new typologies integrated seamlessly from the AFC Ecosystem
  • board reporting improved significantly
  • FinMate summarised risk insights and identified emerging patterns
  • supervisory inspections improved due to stronger documentation and traceability

Risk assessment shifted from a compliance reporting exercise into a continuous intelligence function.

Benefits of Advanced AML Risk Assessment Software

1. Stronger Risk-Based Decision-Making

Teams allocate resources based on real-time exposure rather than outdated reports.

2. Faster and More Accurate Reporting

Documents that previously required weeks of consolidation are now generated in minutes.

3. Better Audit and Regulatory Outcomes

Explainability and traceability build regulator confidence.

4. Proactive Improvement of Controls

Institutions identify control weaknesses early and implement remediation faster.

5. Clear Visibility for Senior Management

Boards gain clarity on institutional risk without sifting through hundreds of pages of documentation.

6. Lower Compliance Costs

Automation reduces manual effort and human error.

7. Real-Time Enterprise Risk View

Institutions stay ahead of emerging risks rather than reacting to them after the fact.

The Future of AML Risk Assessment in the Philippines

Risk assessment will continue evolving in several important ways:

1. Continuous Risk Monitoring as the Standard

Annual assessments will become obsolete.

2. Predictive Risk Intelligence

AI models will forecast future threats and risk trends before they materialise.

3. Integrated Fraud and AML Risk Frameworks

Institutions will adopt unified enterprise risk scoring models.

4. Automated Governance Dashboards

Executives will receive real-time updates on risk drivers and exposure.

5. National-Level Typology Sharing

Federated intelligence sharing across institutions will strengthen the overall ecosystem.

6. AI Copilots Supporting Risk Analysts

Agentic AI will interpret risk drivers, highlight vulnerabilities, and provide decision support.

Institutions that adopt these capabilities early will be well positioned to lead the next generation of compliant and resilient financial operations.

Conclusion

AML risk assessment is no longer merely a regulatory requirement; it is the intelligence engine that shapes how financial institutions operate and protect their customers.
Modern AML risk assessment software transforms outdated, manual processes into continuous, data-driven governance frameworks that deliver clarity, precision, and resilience.

With Tookitaki’s FinCense, FinMate, and the AFC Ecosystem, institutions gain a dynamic, transparent, and explainable risk capability that aligns with the complexity of today’s financial landscape.

The future of risk management belongs to institutions that treat risk assessment not as paperwork — but as a continuous strategic advantage.

Rethinking Risk: How AML Risk Assessment Software Is Transforming Compliance in the Philippines