Blog

The Evolution of Anti-Money Laundering Regulations in South Africa

Site Logo
Tookitaki
17 Apr 2023
8 min
read

Money laundering is the process by which criminals attempt to conceal the origins and true ownership of their ill-gotten gains. It typically involves a series of complex financial transactions and manipulations designed to make the funds appear legitimate and untraceable to their original source. The process can be divided into three stages: placement, where the money enters the financial system; layering, where the money is moved through multiple transactions to obscure its origin; and integration, where the funds are reintroduced into the economy as legitimate assets.

Anti-money laundering (AML) regulations are essential in combating financial crime and maintaining the financial system's integrity. By implementing robust AML policies and procedures, governments and financial institutions can detect and deter criminal activities such as drug trafficking, terrorist financing, and tax evasion. Effective AML regulations protect the reputation and stability of financial institutions and contribute to society's overall safety and security.

This blog aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of AML regulations in South Africa. We will explore the key milestones in the country's AML framework, discuss its alignment with international standards, and highlight the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. By tracing the history of AML regulations in South Africa, we aim to provide valuable insights into the progress that has been made and the ongoing efforts to strengthen the country's response to financial crime.

Early Stages of AML Regulations in South Africa

The first significant step towards establishing a robust AML framework in South Africa was the enactment of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) in 1998. This landmark legislation aimed to combat organized crime, money laundering, and criminal gang activities. POCA provided a legal foundation for confiscating proceeds from unlawful activities and established reporting obligations for financial institutions regarding suspicious transactions. It also introduced various criminal offences related to money laundering, effectively laying the groundwork for more comprehensive AML regulations.

The Early 2000s: Strengthening the AML Framework

Building on the foundation laid by POCA, the South African government enacted the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA) in 2001 to strengthen its AML framework further. FICA established the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) as the country's primary authority responsible for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating financial intelligence to law enforcement agencies and other relevant authorities.

FICA expanded the scope of reporting entities to include various financial and non-financial institutions, such as banks, insurers, attorneys, and casinos. These entities are required to implement customer identification and verification measures, maintain records of transactions, and report suspicious activities to the FIC.

Furthermore, FICA introduced the concept of accountable institutions, which are obliged to develop and maintain AML and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) compliance programs. Through the enactment of FICA, South Africa took a significant step towards establishing a more comprehensive and effective AML framework that addressed domestic and international concerns.

Collaboration with International Bodies

South Africa's Engagement with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

To effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing, it is crucial for countries to collaborate with international bodies and align their AML regulations with global standards. South Africa has been an active participant in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental organisation responsible for setting international AML and CFT standards. South Africa became an observer in 2001 and a full member of the FATF in 2003, demonstrating its commitment to implementing the FATF's 40 Recommendations, which serve as a blueprint for effective AML and CFT systems.

Compliance with FATF Recommendations

As a member of the FATF, South Africa is required to undergo periodic mutual evaluations to assess its compliance with the FATF Recommendations. These evaluations help identify gaps and weaknesses in the country's AML and CFT systems and provide guidance on necessary improvements. South Africa has made significant progress in addressing the FATF's concerns, particularly regarding its legal and regulatory framework, and has demonstrated an ongoing commitment to strengthening its AML and CFT measures.

The role of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG)

In addition to its engagement with the FATF, South Africa is also an active member of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG). Established in 1999, the ESAAMLG is a regional body that aims to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by implementing the FATF Recommendations.

As a founding member, South Africa has played a pivotal role in promoting regional cooperation, sharing best practices, and providing technical assistance to other ESAAMLG member countries. This regional collaboration has been instrumental in enhancing the effectiveness of AML and CFT measures across the Eastern and Southern Africa region.

Amendments and enhancements to AML regulations

FICA Amendment Act 2017

South Africa has continued to refine and enhance its AML regulations to keep pace with evolving global standards and address emerging risks. A significant development in this regard was the enactment of the FICA Amendment Act in 2017. The key features of this amendment include:

  • Enhanced customer due diligence measures: The FICA Amendment Act introduced more stringent customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for accountable institutions. These measures include obtaining additional information on customers and beneficial owners, verifying the identity of clients and their representatives, and ongoing monitoring of customer relationships.
  • Risk-based approach to AML compliance: The Amendment Act also requires accountable institutions to adopt a risk-based approach to AML and CFT compliance. This involves assessing the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing associated with different types of customers, products, and services and tailoring compliance measures accordingly.
  • Politically exposed persons (PEPs): The FICA Amendment Act introduced specific provisions regarding politically exposed persons (PEPs), who are individuals holding prominent public positions that may make them more susceptible to corruption and money laundering. Accountable institutions are now required to implement enhanced due diligence measures for PEPs, including obtaining senior management approval and establishing the source of wealth and funds for such customers.

The Protection of Constitutional Democracy Against Terrorist and Related Activities Act (POCDATARA) 2004

In 2004, South Africa enacted the Protection of Constitutional Democracy Against Terrorist and Related Activities Act (POCDATARA) to strengthen its efforts in combating the financing of terrorism. This legislation criminalizes the financing of terrorism, imposes reporting obligations for suspicious transactions related to terrorism, and establishes measures to freeze the assets of individuals and entities involved in terrorist activities.

The Companies Amendment Act 2011

The Companies Amendment Act of 2011 introduced important changes to South Africa's company law, including provisions to enhance transparency and combat money laundering. The Act requires companies to maintain accurate and up-to-date information on their beneficial owners, making it more difficult for criminals to conceal their involvement in illicit activities through complex corporate structures. This amendment has played a crucial role in improving South Africa's ability to detect and investigate money laundering and financial crime cases.

South Africa-Know Your Country-1

Challenges and the Way Forward

Despite significant progress in developing a robust AML framework, South Africa still faces challenges in implementing and enforcing its regulations. Limited resources, capacity constraints, and the need for better coordination among regulators and law enforcement agencies have been identified as key obstacles to effective enforcement. Strengthening the capacity of relevant authorities, enhancing inter-agency cooperation, and promoting greater awareness of AML obligations among businesses and professionals will be crucial in addressing these challenges.

The rapid growth of virtual assets and cryptocurrencies has introduced new risks and challenges for AML regulators worldwide, and South Africa is no exception. As these digital assets become increasingly popular, regulators need to establish clear guidelines and oversight mechanisms to prevent their misuse for money laundering and terrorist financing. South Africa has recently introduced draft regulations that propose amendments to the FICA, aiming to bring virtual asset service providers under the scope of AML regulation.

The widespread adoption of online platforms and digital identity solutions has created new opportunities for criminals to exploit weaknesses in identity verification processes. Strengthening digital identity verification measures and implementing effective monitoring systems will be vital in mitigating these risks. South Africa should continue to engage with international partners and industry stakeholders to develop best practices and promote the adoption of innovative technologies that enhance AML compliance while preserving user privacy.

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) can play a crucial role in strengthening AML efforts by fostering greater information-sharing and collaboration between government agencies, financial institutions, and other stakeholders. South Africa has made strides in establishing PPPs for AML purposes, such as the establishment of the Anti-Money Laundering Integrated Task Force (AMLAIT). Further expanding and formalizing these partnerships can help enhance the detection, prevention, and prosecution of money laundering and related financial crimes. By leveraging the unique expertise and resources of both the public and private sectors, South Africa can continue to make progress in combating money laundering and safeguarding the integrity of its financial system.

{{cta-ebook}}

How Tookitaki's AML Solutions Can Help

Tookitaki's AML solutions are designed to help financial institutions combat money laundering effectively. The company's Anti-Money Laundering Suite (AMLS) and Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem combined help detect suspicious activities accurately and efficiently. They can also help institutions reduce false positives and optimize their AML programmes.

Tooktiaki’s approach starts with its AFC ecosystem, a community-based platform to share information and best practices in the fight against financial crime. The AFC ecosystem is powered through our Typology Repository, a live database of money laundering techniques and schemes called typologies. These typologies are contributed by financial institutions, regulatory bodies, risk consultants, etc., worldwide by sharing their own experiences and knowledge of money laundering. The repository includes many typologies, from traditional methods like shell companies and money mules to more recent developments such as digital currency and social media-based schemes.

The AMLS, on the other hand, is a software solution deployed at financial institutions, which collaborates with the AFC Ecosystem through federated machine learning. The AMLS extracts the new typologies from the AFC Ecosystem and executes them at the customers' end, ensuring that their AML programs stay ahead of the curve. 

The AMLS includes modules such as Transaction Monitoring, Smart Screening, Customer Risk Scoring, and Case Manager. These modules work together to provide a comprehensive compliance solution that covers all aspects of AML including detection, investigation, and reporting.

Embracing Innovation: Leverage Tookitaki's AML Solutions for a Safer Financial System

Throughout the years, South Africa has made significant strides in developing and enhancing its AML framework. From the early days of introducing the POCA in 1998 and the FICA in 2001, to the more recent amendments and collaboration with international bodies, South Africa has demonstrated a strong commitment to combating money laundering and terrorist financing. As the global landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for South Africa to remain vigilant and adaptive to emerging risks and challenges. By further strengthening its AML regulations, addressing new risks from emerging technologies, and fostering greater collaboration through public-private partnerships, South Africa can continue to play a pivotal role in the international fight against financial crime.

Financial institutions in South Africa must ensure they are well-equipped to comply with AML regulations and contribute to the broader fight against financial crime. We invite you to book a demo for Tookitaki's innovative AML solutions, designed to help you stay ahead of emerging risks and maintain compliance in an ever-changing regulatory environment. Experience how our cutting-edge technology can enhance your AML efforts, ensuring the safety and integrity of your institution and the financial system at large.


By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
19 Jun 2025
5 min
read

Australia on Alert: Why Financial Crime Prevention Needs a Smarter Playbook

From traditional banks to rising fintechs, Australia's financial sector is under siege—not from market volatility, but from the surging tide of financial crime. In recent years, the country has become a hotspot for tech-enabled fraud and cross-border money laundering.

A surge in scams, evolving typologies, and increasingly sophisticated actors are pressuring institutions to confront a hard truth: the current playbook is outdated. With fraudsters exploiting digital platforms and faster payments, financial institutions must now pivot from reactive defences to real-time, intelligence-led prevention strategies.

The Australian government has stepped up through initiatives like the National Anti-Scam Centre and legislative reforms—but the real battleground lies inside financial institutions. Their ability to adapt fast, collaborate widely, and think smarter will define who stays ahead.

{{cta-first}}

The Evolving Threat Landscape

Australia’s shift to instant payments via the New Payments Platform (NPP) has revolutionised financial convenience. However, it's also reduced the window for detecting fraud to mere seconds—exposing institutions to high-velocity, low-footprint crime.

In 2024, Australians lost over AUD 2 billion to scams, according to the ACCC’s Scamwatch report:

  • Investment scams accounted for the largest losses at AUD 945 million
  • Remote access scams followed with AUD 106 million
  • Other high-loss categories included payment redirection and phishing scams

Behind many of these frauds are organised crime groups that exploit vulnerabilities in onboarding systems, mule account networks, and compliance delays. These syndicates operate internationally, often laundering funds through unsuspecting victims or digital assets.

Recent alerts from AUSTRAC and ASIC also highlighted the misuse of cryptocurrency exchanges, online gaming wallets, and e-commerce platforms in money laundering schemes. The message is clear: financial crime is mutating faster than most defences can adapt.

Australia FC

Why Traditional Defences Are Falling Short

Despite growing threats, many financial institutions still rely on legacy systems that were designed for a static risk environment. These tools:

  • Depend on manual rule updates, which can take weeks or months to deploy
  • Trigger false positives at scale, overwhelming compliance teams
  • Operate in silos, with no shared visibility across institutions

For instance, a suspicious pattern flagged at one bank may go entirely undetected at another—simply because they don’t share learnings. This fragmented model gives criminals a huge advantage, allowing them to exploit gaps in coverage and coordination.

The consequences aren’t just operational—they’re strategic. As financial criminals embrace automation, phishing kits, and AI-generated deepfakes, institutions using static tools are increasingly being outpaced.

The Cost of Inaction

The financial and reputational fallout from poor detection systems can be severe.

1. Consumer Trust Erosion

Australians are increasingly vocal about scam experiences. Victims often turn to social media or regulators after being defrauded—especially if they feel the bank was slow to react or dismissive of their case.

2. Regulatory Enforcement

AUSTRAC has made headlines with its tough stance on non-compliance. High-profile penalties against Crown Resorts, Star Entertainment, and non-bank remittance services show that even giants are not immune to scrutiny.

3. Market Reputation Risk

Investors and partners view AML and fraud management as core risk factors. A single failure can trigger media attention, customer churn, and long-term brand damage.

The bottom line? Institutions can no longer afford to treat compliance as a cost centre. It’s a driver of brand trust and operational resilience.

Rethinking AML and Fraud Prevention in Australia

As criminal innovation continues to escalate, the defence strategy must be proactive, intelligent, and collaborative. The foundations of this smarter approach include:

✅ AI-Powered Detection Systems

These systems move beyond rule-based alerts to analyse behavioural patterns in real-time. By learning from past frauds and adapting dynamically, AI models can flag suspicious activity before it becomes systemic.

For example:

  • Unusual login behaviour combined with high-value NPP transfers
  • Layered payments through multiple prepaid cards and wallets
  • Transactions just under the reporting threshold from new accounts

These patterns may look innocuous in isolation, but form high-risk signals when viewed in context.

✅ Federated Intelligence Sharing

Australia’s siloed infrastructure has long limited inter-institutional learning. A federated model enables institutions to share insights without exposing sensitive data—helping detect emerging scams faster.

Shared typologies, red flags, and network patterns allow compliance teams to benefit from collective intelligence rather than fighting crime alone.

✅ Human-in-the-Loop Collaboration

Technology is only part of the answer. AI tools must be designed to empower investigators, not replace them. When AI surfaces the right alerts, compliance professionals can:

  • Reduce time-to-investigation
  • Make informed, contextual decisions
  • Focus on complex cases with real impact

This fusion of human judgement and machine precision is key to staying agile and accurate.

A Smarter Playbook in Action: How Tookitaki Helps

At Tookitaki, we’ve built an ecosystem that reflects this smarter, modern approach.

FinCense is an AI-native platform designed for real-time detection across fraud and AML. It automates threshold tuning, uses network analytics to detect mule activity, and continuously evolves with new typologies.

The AFC Ecosystem is our collaborative network of compliance professionals and institutions who contribute real-world risk scenarios and emerging fraud patterns. These scenarios are curated, validated, and available out-of-the-box for immediate deployment in FinCense.

Some examples already relevant to Australian institutions include:

  • QR code-enabled scams using fake invoice payments
  • Micro-laundering via e-wallet top-ups and fast NPP withdrawals
  • Cross-border layering involving crypto exchanges and shell businesses

Together, FinCense and the AFC Ecosystem enable institutions to:

Building a Future-Ready Framework

The question is no longer if financial crime will strike—it’s how well prepared your institution is when it does.

To be future-ready, institutions must:

  • Break silos through collaborative platforms
  • Invest in continuous learning systems that evolve with threats
  • Equip teams with intelligent tools, not more manual work

Those who act now will not only improve operational resilience, but also lead in restoring public trust.

As the financial landscape transforms, so too must the compliance infrastructure. Tomorrow’s threats demand a shared response, built on intelligence, speed, and community-led innovation.

Strengthening AML Compliance Through Technology and Collaboration

Conclusion: Trust Is the New Currency

Australia is at a turning point. The cost of reactive, siloed compliance is too high—and criminals are already exploiting the lag.

It’s time to adopt a smarter playbook. One where technology, collaboration, and shared intelligence replace outdated controls.

At Tookitaki, we’re proud to build the Trust Layer for Financial Services—empowering banks and fintechs to:

  • Stop fraud before it escalates
  • Reduce false positives and compliance fatigue
  • Strengthen transparency and accountability

Through FinCense and the AFC Ecosystem, our mission is simple: enable smarter decisions, faster actions, and safer financial systems.

Australia on Alert: Why Financial Crime Prevention Needs a Smarter Playbook
Blogs
23 Jun 2025
5 min
read

Behind the Compliance Curtain: The Future of AML in Australia

Australia’s sunny financial reputation has come under scrutiny—and this time, the spotlight is global.

From casino scandals to multi-billion-dollar remittance breaches, the country’s anti-money laundering (AML) framework is facing a pivotal moment. What was once seen as a gold standard in regional governance is now under pressure to catch up—and compliance officers across banks, fintechs, and regulatory bodies are watching closely.

So what lies behind the curtain of AML in Australia today—and what must the financial community do next?

Talk to an Expert

The AML Landscape in Australia: Where Things Stand

Australia’s AML/CFT regime has long been led by AUSTRAC, the nation’s financial intelligence unit and regulator. Over the past few years, AUSTRAC has made headlines with major enforcement actions:

  • Westpac (2020): A $1.3 billion penalty over 23 million breaches of AML laws.
  • Crown Resorts (2022): Systemic failure to monitor high-risk transactions, especially tied to junket operators and casinos.
  • Star Entertainment Group (2022): Similar failings in AML controls and customer due diligence.

These cases revealed a troubling pattern: AML risks were known, red flags existed, but institutions lacked either the technology, urgency, or capability to respond in real time.

More worryingly, Australia’s AML legal framework—particularly its coverage of non-financial sectors like lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and high-value dealers—remains incomplete. This gap in regulatory coverage continues to raise red flags with global watchdogs, especially the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

The Tranche 2 Reforms: Closing the Gaps or Buying Time?

For nearly two decades, Australia has delayed implementing the so-called Tranche 2 reforms, which would bring designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) into the AML regulatory net.

What Tranche 2 Proposes:

  • AML obligations for real estate professionals, lawyers, accountants, and company service providers.
  • Stronger beneficial ownership transparency.
  • Enhanced customer due diligence and reporting mechanisms across non-financial channels.

Yet, while successive governments have pledged action, progress has been sluggish. Industry bodies have raised concerns about cost, feasibility, and regulatory overreach. But international momentum is building, and patience is wearing thin.

In its 2023 follow-up review, FATF explicitly called out Australia’s delayed reforms. Without Tranche 2, the country faces increased scrutiny—and potential reputational damage that could affect correspondent banking relationships and investor trust.

AUS blog

The Tech Factor: How Modern AML Looks in 2025

Even where regulations exist, legacy compliance systems are struggling to keep up with today’s threats. Financial crime has evolved. So must the tools to fight it.

What’s Changed:

  • Speed: Real-time payments and digital wallets mean funds can be layered, split, and moved across jurisdictions in seconds.
  • Complexity: Fraudsters are using mules, shell companies, and social engineering to blend illicit flows with legitimate ones.
  • Volume: Transaction volumes are rising, making manual reviews and static rules increasingly unviable.

Modern AML compliance now demands real-time monitoring, behavioural analysis, and AI-driven detection engines that adapt to new patterns as they emerge. This is where advanced platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense come in—offering scenario-driven intelligence and federated learning capabilities tailored for high-risk markets like Australia.

Case Insight: Where Detection Failed—and Where Tech Could Have Helped

Consider the AUSTRAC case against Crown Resorts. Red flags—such as large, unexplained cash deposits, transactions linked to politically exposed persons (PEPs), and high-risk jurisdictions—were not acted upon for months, sometimes years.

The problem wasn’t a lack of data. It was a failure to connect the dots in real time.

With an adaptive AML system like FinCense in place, the scenario might have looked different:

  • Suspicious transaction patterns would have triggered real-time alerts.
  • Beneficiary risk scoring could have flagged high-risk links earlier.
  • AI-based learning could have surfaced anomalous activity invisible to static rule sets.

The outcome? Faster intervention, reduced institutional risk, and regulatory confidence.

Building the Future: Tookitaki’s Role in Strengthening Australia’s AML Defences

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is designed for the complexity of modern financial ecosystems—especially those navigating regulatory reform and reputational pressure, like Australia.

Key Features That Matter:

  • Federated Learning Engine: Enables institutions to learn from emerging typologies across the region—without sharing sensitive data.
  • Real-Time Transaction Monitoring: Uses AI to surface anomalous patterns and risk indicators at the speed of today’s financial crime.
  • Scenario-Based Approach: Combines regulatory intelligence with real-world cases to keep detection capabilities relevant and context-rich.
  • Audit-Ready Investigations: Helps compliance teams manage alerts, document findings, and demonstrate control effectiveness.

As Tranche 2 looms and regulatory expectations rise, FinCense can help banks and fintechs in Australia stay ahead of both criminal innovation and regulatory demand.

What Compliance Teams Must Do Now

✅ Prepare for Tranche 2 (Even If It’s Not Here Yet)

  • Map exposure to DNFBPs.
  • Engage with vendors and consultants to scope out necessary controls.

✅ Build for Agility and Resilience

  • Invest in dynamic risk-scoring engines and AI-powered analytics.
  • Integrate systems that can adapt, not just flag transactions.

✅ Collaborate and Learn

  • Participate in intelligence-sharing platforms like the AFC Ecosystem.
  • Use scenario libraries to anticipate typologies before they strike.

✅ Rethink ROI from an AML Lens

  • With regulators now tracking the effectiveness (not just existence) of AML systems, demonstrate real-time capability, reduced false positives, and improved investigation turnaround.
Strengthening AML Compliance Through Technology and Collaboration

Conclusion: The Curtain’s Up—What Will Australia Do Next?

Australia stands at a crossroads. Behind the curtain of its legacy AML system lies both risk and opportunity.

The risk is clear: continued global scrutiny, regulatory gaps, and potential grey listing if reforms stall.
But the opportunity is greater: to lead the region with tech-driven, intelligence-led compliance that’s faster, smarter, and more collaborative than ever.

As the regulatory environment evolves, so must the institutions within it. With the right partners, like Tookitaki, and a commitment to real-time defences, Australia can transform its AML posture from reactive to revolutionary.

Because in the fight against financial crime, detection is no longer enough. It’s time to defend.

Behind the Compliance Curtain: The Future of AML in Australia
Blogs
02 Jul 2025
4 min
read

Inside AUSTRAC: Navigating Australia’s AML/CTF Regulations in a High-Risk Era

As money laundering methods grow more sophisticated, the pressure on financial institutions to detect, report, and prevent financial crime is intensifying — and AUSTRAC is at the centre of it all.
In an era where financial ecosystems are rapidly digitising, AUSTRAC’s role in overseeing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) compliance has become mission-critical. For banks, fintechs, and other reporting entities, staying ahead of regulatory expectations is no longer just a compliance issue — it’s a matter of reputation, trust, and long-term viability.

In this blog, we explore:

  • AUSTRAC’s mandate and structure
  • Key AML/CTF obligations under Australian law
  • Landmark enforcement cases
  • Upcoming reforms, including Tranche 2
  • FATF scrutiny and global compliance pressures
  • How tech-forward compliance strategies are reshaping the future
Talk to an Expert


What is AUSTRAC and Why Does It Matter?

AUSTRAC — the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre — is the government body responsible for detecting and disrupting criminal abuse of Australia’s financial system.

AUSTRAC has a dual mandate:

  • Regulator: Supervises compliance with AML/CTF obligations.
  • Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU): Collects and analyses data to support law enforcement, national security, and international counterparts.

It works with over 17,000 reporting entities, ranging from traditional banks to digital wallets, remittance providers, gaming platforms, and more. As both a data collector and enforcer, AUSTRAC is uniquely positioned to uncover illicit financial activity at scale.

A Brief History of AML/CTF Regulation in Australia

Australia’s journey in strengthening its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing framework began in earnest with the passage of the AML/CTF Act in 2006. This legislation introduced foundational obligations such as KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting requirements for a wide range of financial institutions and service providers.

Over time, the regime has evolved significantly. In 2014, AUSTRAC formalised the risk-based approach, requiring entities to tailor their AML programs based on their specific exposure to financial crime risks.

The period between 2018 and 2020 marked a turning point in enforcement, with AUSTRAC taking decisive action against some of Australia’s largest institutions — including Tabcorp, the Commonwealth Bank, and Westpac — for major compliance failures.

In the years that followed, Tranche 2 reforms were proposed to expand AML/CTF obligations to include professions such as lawyers, accountants, and real estate agents, which are known to be exploited for laundering illicit funds.

As of 2024, these reforms remain under active discussion, with the Australian government under growing pressure from international bodies such as the FATF to close regulatory gaps. The expected passage of Tranche 2 in 2025 would significantly broaden AUSTRAC’s regulatory reach and bring Australia closer in line with global AML standards.

AUSTRAC


Understanding Your AML/CTF Obligations

If your institution provides “designated services” under the AML/CTF Act, here’s what you’re required to do:

🔹 AML/CTF Program (Part A and Part B)

  • Part A: Institutional risk assessments, governance, reporting, and training
  • Part B: Customer identification and verification procedures (KYC)

🔹 Reporting Requirements

  • Suspicious Matter Reports (SMRs)
    Must be submitted when the activity raises suspicion, regardless of the amount.
  • Threshold Transaction Reports (TTRs)
    For cash transactions of AUD 10,000 or more.
  • International Funds Transfer Instructions (IFTIs)
    Mandatory for cross-border fund movements.

🔹 Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

  • Verify customer identity at onboarding
  • Apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers or transactions
  • Conduct ongoing monitoring

🔹 Record Keeping

  • Maintain transaction and identity verification records for at least 7 years.

AUSTRAC’s Enforcement Power: Learning from Past Failures

AUSTRAC is not just a passive regulator. When institutions fall short, the consequences are severe and public.

The Crown Resorts Case

In 2022, Crown Melbourne and Crown Perth were found guilty of systemic AML/CTF program failures. AUSTRAC investigations revealed:

  • Inadequate risk assessments of high-risk customers and junket operators
  • Poor transaction monitoring
  • Weak governance and oversight

Penalty: AUD 450 million settlement
Impact: Major reputational damage and licence scrutiny

The Westpac Case

Arguably, the most consequential case in Australia’s AML history. In 2020, Westpac was fined AUD 1.3 billion — the largest civil penalty in Australian corporate history — for:

  • Failing to report over 23 million IFTIs
  • Inadequate transaction monitoring
  • Enabling transactions linked to child exploitation networks

These cases underscore the high expectations placed on financial institutions — not just to comply, but to detect, investigate, and prevent abuse of their services.

Australia’s AML Pain Points and What Tranche 2 Means

Unregulated Professions: The Tranche 2 Gap

Australia’s AML/CTF regime currently does not cover “gatekeeper” professions — lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and company service providers. This gap has drawn criticism from both the FATF and domestic watchdogs.

Tranche 2, expected to be legislated in 2025, will:

  • Extend AML obligations to these sectors
  • Close critical vulnerabilities exploited for shell companies, illicit property purchases, and tax evasion
  • Align Australia with global AML standards

For fintechs and financial institutions, this will mean greater scrutiny of third-party relationships and new customer categories.

FATF Evaluation: Australia Under the Global Lens

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) — the global AML watchdog — is expected to conduct its next mutual evaluation of Australia soon. In its last review, Australia was flagged for:

  • Delays in enacting Tranche 2 reforms
  • Over-reliance on self-regulation in some sectors
  • Inconsistent enforcement levels

AUSTRAC and the government are now under pressure to demonstrate tangible improvements, including:

  • Broader coverage of at-risk sectors
  • Better risk-based supervision
  • More tech-led compliance outcomes

How Fintechs Can Stay Ahead

For fintechs, the AML/CTF journey can seem overwhelming, especially when scaling across regions. Here are five key steps to staying ahead:

  1. Invest Early in AML Infrastructure
    Don’t wait until licensing or audits to build compliance controls.
  2. Use Technology to Monitor in Real-Time
    Especially for high-velocity, small-value transactions common in wallets or P2P services.
  3. Customise Risk Scoring
    A high-risk customer in lending may not be the same as one in gaming or cross-border remittances.
  4. Build for Scalability
    Choose AML platforms that can grow with you, not patchwork solutions.
  5. Stay Informed on Regional Variations
    AUSTRAC’s expectations differ from MAS (Singapore) or BSP (Philippines); know your market.

Why AML Tech Is No Longer Optional

In today’s landscape, manual reviews and static rules don’t cut it. Criminals move faster — and so must compliance teams.

Key advantages of modern AML platforms:

  • Machine learning-based transaction monitoring
  • Dynamic threshold calibration to reduce false positives
  • Real-time alerting and case triage
  • Behavioural profiling and pattern recognition
  • Audit-ready investigation trails

How Tookitaki Helps You Stay Ahead

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is purpose-built to tackle the real challenges banks and fintechs face in Australia and across APAC.

Key Modules:

🔹 Customer Onboarding Suite
Seamlessly integrates KYC, risk profiling, and watchlist screening

🔹 Transaction Monitoring
Scenario-based detection using patterns from the AFC Ecosystem

🔹 Smart Screening
Covers national ID, aliases, and local nuances — built to minimise false positives

🔹 FinMate (AI Copilot)
Assists investigators with summarised case narratives, red flags, and recommendations

Collaborative Advantage:

FinCense is powered by the AFC Ecosystem — a global community where financial institutions share typologies and red flags anonymously. This collective intelligence improves detection and reduces blind spots for all members.

For institutions facing rising risks from cross-border scams, shell company abuse, and real-time laundering, Tookitaki offers a smarter, community-driven alternative to traditional rule engines.

Strengthening AML Compliance Through Technology and Collaboration


Final Thoughts: A Smarter Future Starts Now

AUSTRAC’s expanding role and the upcoming Tranche 2 reforms signal a future where compliance will be more inclusive, tech-powered, and intelligence-driven.

For banks and fintechs, the opportunity lies not just in complying, but in leading. With the right tools, collaborative frameworks, and forward-thinking partners like Tookitaki, staying ahead of both regulation and risk is no longer an aspiration — it’s an expectation.

Inside AUSTRAC: Navigating Australia’s AML/CTF Regulations in a High-Risk Era