Blog

E-Wallets and Anti-Money Laundering in the Philippines

Site Logo
Tookitaki
17 August 2022
read
5 min

The Philippines is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in Southeast Asia. Its relatively young population and broad mobile network penetration have boosted the country’s internet-based businesses. About 20 million Filipinos also use e-wallets, which is quite significant considering the country’s population of over 100 million. Due to the approximately 79 million mobile phone users in the nation, e-wallets are also becoming quite popular among citizens. This is due to the ownership of two of the top digital wallet companies in the nation, Maya and Gcash, by the two main SIM card companies, Smart Communications and Globe Telecommunications, respectively.

52% of Filipinos began shopping online for the first time at the start of the pandemic. By 2025, the Internet economy in the Philippines is projected to increase by 30% and reach $28 billion. One of the main causes of this rise is the rising acceptance of digital payments. Seven out of ten internet transactions were settled in cash prior to the outbreak (cash on delivery and over-the-counter). Only five out of ten payments were made in cash following the epidemic, signalling the country's shift toward digital payments.

E-Wallets and Financial Crime

The introduction of e-wallets and online financial services has sparked the creation of criminal tactics that take advantage of technologies to finance terrorism and launder money. Although programmers can utilise a variety of security techniques to shield customers from online thieves, e-wallets continue to be vulnerable because of some characteristics built into the technology.

{{ cta-first }}

Due to these dangers, e-wallet service providers are required to implement Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) controls to protect themselves from any criminal threats. Service providers need to be aware of the dangers they face and how to abide by the pertinent laws in their jurisdiction in order for those measures to be successful.

Risks Associated with Money Laundering and E-Wallets

The Philippines is severely vulnerable to the problem of money laundering, particularly because of its position along major trafficking routes. According to the country’s second National Risk Assessment (NRA) on Money Laundering (ML) and Terrorist Financing (TF), it faces a high money laundering threat arising from the predicate crimes of drug trafficking; graft and corruption; fraud; tax crimes; smuggling; Intellectual Property Law violations; illegal manufacture and possession of firearms, ammunition, and explosives; and environmental crimes.

The relative anonymity provided by online financial services, as well as other features of technology, such as the speed at which transactions can occur and a lack of regulation from national and international authorities, contribute to the money laundering risk associated with e-wallets and mobile money. More specifically, those dangers include:

Lack of supervision: Some nations lack the necessary regulations to effectively address AML e-wallet issues. Money launderers may be able to take advantage of regulatory gaps and inconsistencies in this situation, as well as a general ignorance of the criminal tactics linked to e-wallet technology. Similar to this, criminals may attempt to transfer illicit funds across e-wallets located in several nations, dodging reporting requirements and rules about reporting suspicious behaviour.

Speed: E-wallet transactions happen swiftly and, in some situations, in real time, like all other digital financial services. This means that those who engage in money laundering can shift illicit monies around quickly while avoiding oversight measures and inquiries. Criminals can structure their transactions with the aid of quick transaction times: using several transfers between different accounts.

Anonymity: When eWallet companies use insufficient user identity verification procedures, criminals may be able to use their services to covertly launder money. When applying for accounts, money launderers may present false information about their identities, open accounts through proxies, or open a variety of accounts as part of their illicit activity.

Transaction concealment: Criminals may use e-wallet services to conceal their attempts at money laundering. To hide users' identities, many e-wallet accounts can be accessed from a single mobile device. In a similar vein, fraudsters may try to perform a lot of minor transactions in order to hide a greater amount of money that has been moved. To avoid the notice of financial authorities, e-wallets can also swiftly ease the transfer of money from one nation to another.

Complying with AML Regulations

The country’s AML/CFT system is yet to catch up with the growth of the country’s digital payment usage, and criminals have been exploiting the country’s weaknesses to launder money. Consequently, the Philippines has been placed among the FATF grey list countries. It is working hard to bolster its AML/CFT regulatory framework on par with international standards and improve its global reputation. 

Given the context, it is critical for fintechs seeking a licence to have a formal anti-money laundering system of internal controls. Meanwhile, existing financial institutions should work towards enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of their AML compliance programmes. 

Member nations are required to enact the risk-based AML/CFT framework laid down by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) into domestic law. As a result, businesses, including e-wallet service providers, must evaluate the risk posed by their clients and accordingly modify their AML e-wallet response. The following steps should be included in anti-money laundering for eWallets in practise:

  • Customer due diligence: E-wallet firms should do customer due diligence (CDD) checks to confirm information such as names, addresses, and dates of birth in order to accurately establish customer identities. Higher-risk clients should be subject to enhanced due diligence (EDD) procedures under the risk-based approach.
  • Transaction monitoring: Providers of e-wallet services must keep an eye on customer transactions for any unusual behaviour that can point to money laundering. Businesses should have a suspicious activity report (SAR) protocol in place to promptly alert the authorities when suspicious activity is discovered.
  • Screening and monitoring: Customers of e-wallet companies must be thoroughly screened to make sure they are not the target of international sanctions or mentioned negatively in the media, both of which could increase their risk of money laundering. Similar to this, businesses ought to check whether their clients qualify as politically exposed persons (PEPs).

{{cta-casestudy}}

Use Tech to Stay Compliant

Many e-wallet providers are using anti-money laundering software to prevent money laundering. Although employing teams to monitor transactions and putting compliance programmes in place is important, it can be extremely time-consuming and labour intensive. It also opens up the margin for error, which then leads to fines and damages reputation. 

Designed on three C-principles – comprehensive, convenient and compliant – Tookitaki’s AML solution empowers financial institutions to strengthen their risk coverage and mitigate risks seamlessly in the ever-evolving world of regulatory compliance. Named Anti-Money Laundering Suite (AMLS), the solution has proven to be a game-changer owing its unique Hub and Spoke model for powerful transaction monitoring.

Through collective intelligence and continual learning, the solution helps e-wallet providers capture dynamic customer behaviour and stop bad actors with high accuracy and speed. This advanced machine learning approach enhances returns and risk coverage. It detects suspicious cases and prioritises high-accuracy notifications without requiring personal information.

Talk to our expert to learn more about our AML solution and its unique features.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
30 Jul 2025
5 min
read

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud

Fraud in Australia has moved beyond stolen credit cards, today’s threats are smarter, faster, and often one step ahead.

Australia is facing a new wave of financial fraud—complex scams, cyber-enabled deception, and social engineering techniques that prey on trust. From sophisticated investment frauds to deepfake impersonations, criminals are evolving rapidly. And so must our fraud prevention strategies.

This blog explores how fraud is impacting Australia, what new methods criminals are using, and how financial institutions, businesses, and individuals can stay ahead of the game. Whether you're in compliance, fintech, banking, or just a concerned citizen, fraud prevention is everyone’s business.

The Fraud Landscape in Australia: A Wake-Up Call

In 2024 alone, Australians lost over AUD 2.7 billion to scams, according to data from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The Scamwatch program reported an alarming rise in phishing, investment scams, identity theft, and fake billing.

A few alarming trends:

  • Investment scams accounted for over AUD 1.3 billion in losses.
  • Business email compromise (BEC) and invoice fraud targeted SMEs.
  • Romance and remote access scams exploited personal vulnerability.
  • Deepfake scams and AI-generated impersonations are on the rise, particularly targeting executives and finance teams.

The fraud threat has gone digital, cross-border, and real-time. Traditional controls alone are no longer enough.

Talk to an Expert

Why Fraud Prevention Is a National Priority

Fraud isn't just a financial issue—it’s a matter of public trust. When scams go undetected, victims don’t just lose money—they lose faith in financial institutions, government systems, and digital innovation.

Here’s why fraud prevention is now top of mind in Australia:

  • Real-time payments mean real-time risks: With the rise of the New Payments Platform (NPP), funds can move across banks instantly. This has increased the urgency to detect and prevent fraud in milliseconds—not days.
  • Rise in money mule networks: Criminal groups are exploiting students, gig workers, and the elderly to launder stolen funds.
  • Increased regulatory pressure: AUSTRAC and ASIC are putting more pressure on institutions to identify and report suspicious activities more proactively.

Common Fraud Techniques Seen in Australia

Understanding how fraud works is the first step to preventing it. Here are some of the most commonly observed fraud techniques:

a) Business Email Compromise (BEC)

Fraudsters impersonate vendors, CEOs, or finance officers to divert funds through fake invoices or urgent payment requests. This is especially dangerous for SMEs.

b) Investment Scams

Fake trading platforms, crypto Ponzi schemes, and fraudulent real estate investments have tricked thousands. Often, these scams use fake celebrity endorsements or “guaranteed returns” to lure victims.

c) Romance and Sextortion Scams

These scams manipulate victims emotionally, often over weeks or months, before asking for money. Some even involve blackmail using fake or stolen intimate content.

d) Deepfake Impersonation

Using AI-generated voice or video, scammers are impersonating real people to initiate fund transfers or manipulate staff into giving away sensitive information.

e) Synthetic Identity Fraud

Criminals use a blend of real and fake information to create a new, ‘clean’ identity that can bypass onboarding checks at banks and fintechs.

20250730_2107_Cybersecurity Precaution Scene_remix_01k1dzk8hwfd4t9rd8mkhzgr1w

Regulatory Push for Smarter Controls

Regulators in Australia are stepping up their efforts:

  • AUSTRAC has introduced updated guidance for transaction monitoring and suspicious matter reporting, pushing institutions to adopt more adaptive, risk-based approaches.
  • ASIC is cracking down on investment scams and calling for platforms to implement stricter identity and payment verification systems.
  • The ACCC’s National Anti-Scam Centre launched a multi-agency initiative to disrupt scam operations through intelligence sharing and faster response times.

But even regulators acknowledge: compliance alone won't stop fraud. Prevention needs smarter tools, better collaboration, and real-time intelligence.

A New Approach: Proactive, AI-Powered Fraud Prevention

The most forward-thinking banks and fintechs in Australia are moving from reactive to proactive fraud prevention. Here's what the shift looks like:

✅ Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Instead of relying on static rules, modern systems use machine learning to flag suspicious behaviour—like unusual payment patterns, high-risk geographies, or rapid account-to-account transfers.

✅ Behavioural Analytics

Understanding what ‘normal’ looks like for each user helps detect anomalies fast—like a customer suddenly logging in from a new country or making a large transfer outside business hours.

✅ AI Copilots for Investigators

Tools like AI-powered investigation assistants can help analysts triage alerts faster, recommend next steps, and even generate narrative summaries for suspicious activity reports.

✅ Community Intelligence

Fraudsters often reuse tactics across institutions. Platforms like Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem allow banks to share anonymised fraud scenarios and red flags—so everyone can learn and defend together.

✅ Federated Learning Models

These models allow banks to collaborate on fraud detection algorithms without sharing customer data—bringing the power of collective intelligence without compromising privacy.

Fraud Prevention Best Practices for Australian Institutions

Whether you're a Tier-1 bank or a growing fintech, these best practices are critical:

  1. Prioritise real-time fraud detection tools that work across payment channels and digital platforms.
  2. Train your teams—fraudsters are exploiting human error more than technical flaws.
  3. Invest in explainable AI to build trust with regulators and internal stakeholders.
  4. Use layered defences: Combine transaction monitoring, device fingerprinting, behavioural analytics, and biometric verification.
  5. Collaborate across the ecosystem—join industry platforms, share intel, and learn from others.

How Tookitaki Supports Fraud Prevention in Australia

Tookitaki is helping Australian institutions stay ahead of fraud by combining advanced AI with collective intelligence. Our FinCense platform offers:

  • End-to-end fraud and AML detection across transactions, customers, and devices.
  • Federated learning that enables risk detection with insights contributed by a global network of financial crime experts.
  • Smart investigation tools to reduce alert fatigue and speed up response times.

The Role of Public Awareness in Prevention

It’s not just institutions—customers play a key role too. Public campaigns like Scamwatch, educational content from banks, and media coverage of fraud trends all contribute to prevention.

Simple actions like verifying sender details, avoiding suspicious links, and reporting scam attempts can go a long way. In the fight against fraud, awareness is the first line of defence.

Conclusion: Staying Ahead in a Smarter Fraud Era

Fraud prevention in Australia can no longer be treated as an afterthought. The threats are too advanced, too fast, and too costly.

With the right mix of technology, collaboration, and education, Australia can stay ahead of financial criminals—and turn the tide in favour of consumers, businesses, and institutions alike.

Whether it’s adopting AI tools, sharing threat insights, or empowering individuals, fraud prevention is no longer optional. It’s the new frontline of trust.

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud
Blogs
29 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam

In March 2025, a finance director at a multinational firm in Singapore authorised a US$499,000 payment during what appeared to be a Zoom call with the company’s senior leadership. There was just one problem: none of the people on the call were real.

What seemed like a routine virtual meeting turned out to be a highly orchestrated deepfake scam, where cybercriminals used artificial intelligence to impersonate the company’s Chief Financial Officer and other top executives. The finance director, believing the request was genuine, wired nearly half a million dollars to a fraudulent account.

The incident has sent shockwaves across the financial and corporate world, underscoring the fast-evolving threat of deepfake technology.

Background of the Scam

According to Singapore police reports, the finance executive received a message from someone posing as the company’s UK-based CFO. The message requested an urgent fund transfer to facilitate a confidential acquisition. To build credibility, the fraudster set up a Zoom call — featuring multiple senior executives, all appearing and sounding authentic.

But the entire video call was fabricated using deepfake technology.

These weren’t just stolen profile photos; they were AI-generated likenesses with synced facial movements and realistic voices, mimicking actual executives. The finance director, seeing what seemed like familiar faces and hearing familiar voices, followed through with the transfer.

Only later did the company realise that the actual executives had never been on the call.

What the Case Revealed

This wasn’t just another phishing email or spoofed WhatsApp message. This was next-level digital deception. Here’s what made it chillingly effective:

  • Multi-party deepfake execution – The fraud involved several synthetic identities, all rendered convincingly in real-time to simulate a legitimate boardroom environment.
  • High-level impersonation – Senior figures like the CFO were cloned with accurate visual and vocal characteristics, heightening the illusion of authority and urgency.
  • Deeply contextual manipulation – The scam leveraged business context (e.g. M&A activity, board-level communications) that suggested insider knowledge.

Singapore’s police reported this as one of the most convincing cases of AI-powered impersonation seen to date — and issued a national warning to corporations and finance professionals.

Impact on Financial Institutions and Corporates

While the fraud targeted one company, its implications ripple across the entire financial system:

Deepfake Fatigue and Trust Erosion

When even video calls are no longer trustworthy, confidence in digital communication takes a hit. This undermines both internal decision-making and external client relationships.

CFOs and Finance Teams in the Crosshairs

Finance and treasury teams are prime targets for scams like this. These professionals are expected to act fast, handle large sums, and follow instructions from the top — making them vulnerable to high-pressure frauds.

Breakdown of Traditional Verification

Emails, video calls, and even voice confirmations can be falsified. Without secondary verification protocols, companies remain dangerously exposed.

ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2025, 02_34_13 PM

Lessons Learned from the Scam

The Singapore deepfake case isn’t an outlier — it’s a glimpse into the future of financial crime. Key takeaways:

  1. Always Verify High-Value Requests
    Especially those involving new accounts or cross-border transfers. A secondary channel of verification — via phone or an encrypted app — is now a must.
  2. Educate Senior Leadership
    Executives need to be aware that their digital identities can be hijacked. Regular briefings on impersonation risks are essential.
  3. Adopt Real-Time Behavioural Monitoring
    Advanced analytics can flag abnormal transaction patterns — even when the request appears “approved” by an authority figure.
  4. Invest in Deepfake Detection Tools
    There are now software solutions that scan video content for artefacts, inconsistencies, or signs of AI manipulation.
  5. Strengthen Internal Protocols
    Critical payment workflows should always require multi-party authorisation, escalation logic, and documented rationale.

The Role of Technology in Prevention

Scams like this are designed to outsmart conventional defences. A new kind of defence is required — one that adapts in real-time and learns from emerging threats.

This is where Tookitaki’s compliance platform, FinCense, plays a vital role.

Powered by the AFC Ecosystem and Agentic AI:

  • Typology-Driven Detection: FinCense continuously updates its detection logic based on real-world scam scenarios contributed by financial crime experts worldwide.
  • AI-Powered Simulation: Institutions can simulate deepfake-driven fraud scenarios to test and refine their internal controls.
  • Federated Learning: Risk signals and red flags from across institutions are shared securely without compromising sensitive data.
  • Smart Case Disposition: Agentic AI reviews and narrates alerts, allowing compliance officers to respond faster and with greater clarity — even in complex scams like this.
Talk to an Expert

Moving Forward: Facing the Synthetic Threat Landscape

Deepfake technology has moved from the realm of novelty to real-world risk. The Singapore incident is a wake-up call for companies across ASEAN and beyond.

When identity can be faked in real-time, and fraudsters learn faster than regulators, the only defence is to stay ahead — with intelligence, collaboration, and next-generation tech.

Because next time, the CEO might not be real, but the money lost will be.

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam
Blogs
28 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance in Australia has never been more critical — or more expensive.

As regulatory scrutiny increases and financial crime becomes more complex, financial institutions are under pressure to spend more time, money, and resources just to keep up.

But is this sustainable? And is there a smarter way to stay compliant without letting costs spiral out of control?

Let’s take a closer look at why compliance costs are rising, what’s at stake for banks and fintechs in Australia, and how modern AML solutions, powered by AI and collaboration, are helping institutions future-proof their compliance programmes.

Talk to an Expert

Why Are AML Compliance Costs Rising in Australia?

Over the past few years, Australia has seen a surge in regulatory activity around financial crime. From high-profile casino investigations to AUSTRAC’s growing enforcement role, the message is clear: AML compliance is non-negotiable.

Here’s what’s driving the rising cost:

1. Tighter Regulatory Expectations

AUSTRAC expects more than just basic transaction monitoring. Institutions must demonstrate proactive risk assessments, tailored customer due diligence (CDD), and robust ongoing monitoring — all supported by detailed documentation and audit trails.

2. More Complex Financial Crime

Criminals are getting smarter. Whether it’s mule networks exploiting instant payments or layering funds across crypto and traditional channels, detecting illicit activity now requires more sophisticated tools and deeper data insights.

3. Manual Workflows and Legacy Systems

Many institutions still rely on outdated systems and siloed processes, which increase the burden on compliance teams and inflate operational costs. Manually reviewing false positives or investigating fragmented alerts takes time — and people.

4. Reputational Risk and Fines

In recent years, enforcement actions have brought AML failures into public view — from Crown and Star casinos to financial institutions under investigation. The reputational damage, legal risk, and remediation costs far outweigh the cost of modernising compliance infrastructure.

Australia skyline-1

What Do Rising AML Costs Look Like on the Ground?

According to industry estimates, large Australian banks are spending hundreds of millions annually on compliance-related activities. Mid-sized banks and fintechs may not face the same scale, but they often carry a disproportionate burden due to leaner teams and tighter budgets.

Here’s where the costs add up:

  • Hiring and retaining skilled AML staff
  • Managing alert fatigue from legacy monitoring systems
  • Frequent audits and remediation exercises
  • Technology upgrades and consultant fees
  • Delays in customer onboarding due to manual CDD reviews

These costs aren’t just financial — they also affect speed, agility, and customer experience.

Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

The short answer: yes — but only if they’re the right tools.

Smarter AML compliance doesn't mean more tools. It means better tools that are purpose-built for modern financial crime risks. Here's what that looks like:

What Smarter AML Compliance Looks Like

1. Behavioural Transaction Monitoring

Modern systems go beyond rule-based monitoring to detect suspicious patterns based on behaviour. This reduces false positives and increases detection accuracy — freeing up analysts to focus on what matters.

2. Federated Learning and Shared Intelligence

Collaborative platforms enable institutions to share insights and typologies without sharing sensitive data. This reduces blind spots and helps detect new risks earlier — especially in cross-border and real-time payments.

3. Automation and AI Assistants

AI-powered investigation assistants can summarise alerts, prioritise high-risk cases, and auto-generate audit trails — helping compliance teams do more with less.

4. Dynamic Risk Scoring

Instead of static scoring, smarter systems update customer risk profiles in real-time based on behaviour, location, transaction type, and other dynamic inputs.

5. Plug-and-Play Integration

Modern AML solutions should integrate easily with core banking systems, customer onboarding tools, and case management platforms — reducing overhead and ensuring a seamless compliance workflow.

How Tookitaki’s FinCense Is Helping Australian Institutions Stay Ahead

At Tookitaki, we’ve designed FinCense to deliver smarter compliance — not just cheaper, but better.

Built on a modular, federated AI framework, FinCense empowers banks, fintechs, and payment platforms to stay ahead of financial crime risks without overburdening teams or budgets.

With FinCense, institutions get:

  • Up to 72% reduction in false positives
  • 3.5x faster case resolutions
  • Real-time, scenario-based monitoring tailored to local risks
  • Federated typology sharing via the AFC Ecosystem
  • Smart Disposition engine for audit-ready alert summaries

Whether you're dealing with domestic mule activity, complex layering, or regulatory audits — FinCense helps you detect, investigate, and respond with speed, accuracy, and confidence.

The Stakes Are Higher Than Ever

Financial crime is evolving rapidly, and so is the regulatory bar. But throwing more people, more tools, and more money at the problem isn’t the answer.

The future of AML compliance in Australia lies in smarter systems, collaborative intelligence, and scalable solutions that adapt as the threat landscape changes.

Final Thought

Rising AML compliance costs don’t have to mean rising pain.

With the right technology, institutions in Australia can reduce risk, improve efficiency, and build lasting trust with regulators and customers alike.

If you're ready to reduce the cost and complexity of compliance, without compromising on quality — Tookitaki is here to help.

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?