Compliance Hub

The FATF Travel Rule: What You Need to Know

Site Logo
Tookitaki
4 min
read

Among the global anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog’s recommendations, the FATF Travel Rule received wider attention ever since it became applicable to the cryptocurrency sector. The Travel Rule requires businesses to collect and share the personal data of participants in transactions such as cross-border and domestic wire transfers.

Initially, the Travel Rule or the FATF Recommendation 16 was applicable only to banks. In 2019, the FATF amended the recommendation and brought in crypto companies under its purview. As of now, a small number of jurisdictions have started to incorporate the Travel Rule into their local AML laws. However, many FATF member countries have yet to adopt the recommendation.

It is important for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and other regulated entities to understand the Travel Rule and the AML compliance obligations involved in it. This article looks to clarify the Travel Rule requirements and suggest how businesses can ensure AML compliance with modern technology solutions.

What is the FATF Travel Rule?

The FATF Recommendation No. 16 on combating money laundering is commonly referred to as the Travel Rule. The rule requires both financial institutions and VASPs to collect personal data, such as names and account numbers, on participants in transactions exceeding US$/€1,000. As such, these firms need to collect the personal information of both senders and recipients in a transaction.

The data to be gathered under the rule are physical address, unique ID number, customer identification number, or date and place of birth. In addition, the rule requires firms to share the collected data on senders and recipients with each other while conducting transactions. Since the data of parties travels along with the transfers, this recommendation by the FATF came to be known as the Travel Rule.

FATF Travel Rule

Customer information requirements under the Travel Rule

As per the Travel Rule, originators of cryptocurrency transfers must submit the following information to beneficiaries:

  • Originator name
  • Account number
  • Physical address
  • Unique identity number
  • Date of birth and place of birth

Meanwhile, the beneficiaries in a transaction must submit the following information to originators:

  • Beneficiary name
  • Account number or virtual wallet number

 

Why is the Travel Rule significant for Crypto firms?

In June 2019, the FATF recommended crypto firms to follow the Travel Rule in an effort to curb the increasing abuse of crypto platforms for money laundering. As such, all  VASPs including cryptocurrency exchanges, digital wallet providers, and financial institutions that exchange, hold, safe keep, convert and sell virtual assets would need to disclose specific customer data when transacting crypto assets over a particular threshold.

While the transfer of personal data has been a standard practice for banks and credit unions, it is a new and challenging requirement for crypto companies. The challenge is to build a new communication network that connects various crypto platforms.

The FATF noted that it takes a “technology-neutral approach” and did not suggest a particular technology or software approach that providers should deploy to comply with the rule. “Any technology or software solution is acceptable, so long as it enables the ordering and beneficiary institution (where present in the transaction) to comply with its AML/CFT obligations”, it says in its updated guidance issued in October 2021.

 

The challenges for the crypto industry in Travel Rule implementation

While the Travel Rule will help enhance the audit trail for transfers within the crypto industry and reduce anonymity, the implementation of the rule faces many legal and technological challenges. They include:

  • Lack of regulatory frameworks regarding the Travel Rule and particularly information sharing in many jurisdictions.
  • High costs and significant efforts in building compliance programmes that take into account the rule.
  • Lack of global consensus on cross-border crypto transactions
  • Laying down clear processes on verifying information, securing information and safeguarding information travelling between specific parties.
  • Identification of counterparty VASPs and their registration status
  • It hinders the creation of interrelationships among numerous technologies and channels for crypto transactions such as virtual wallets, P2P exchanges, cryptocurrency kiosks, decentralized applications, ICOs, and internet casinos.

In its second 12-month review of the implementation of revised Standards on virtual assets and VASPs, released in June 2021, the FATF noted that most countries have not implemented the Travel Rule. The findings of the review are:

  • So far, 58 out of 128 reporting jurisdictions advised that they have now implemented the revised FATF Standards, with 52 of these regulating VASPs and six of these prohibiting the operation of VASPs.
  • The private sector has made progress in developing technological solutions to enable the implementation of the ‘travel rule’. However, the majority of jurisdictions have not yet implemented the FATF requirements, including the “travel rule”.
  • These gaps in implementation also mean that we do not yet have global safeguards to prevent the misuse of VASPs for money laundering or terrorist financing. The lack of regulation or implementation of regulation in jurisdictions can enable continued misuse of virtual assets through jurisdictional arbitrage.

 

The importance of Travel Rule in AML efforts

There is no doubt about the use of cryptocurrencies to facilitate money laundering and other financial crimes. The Travel Rule, by removing the obscurity in crypto transactions, looks to reduce financial crimes through the crypto industry.

Crypto firms that are not currently meeting the Travel Rule requirements will be required to do so in the near future. By complying with these rules, the cryptocurrency industry will transition to a new AML/CFT regime which will increase the goodwill for the industry in front of regulators and customers.

If you are a crypto business that is looking to set up an AML compliance programme, reach out to one of our experts. 

 

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
20 Jan 2026
6 min
read

What Makes the Best AML Software? A Singapore Perspective

“Best” isn’t about brand—it’s about fit, foresight, and future readiness.

When compliance teams search for the “best AML software,” they often face a sea of comparisons and vendor rankings. But in reality, what defines the best tool for one institution may fall short for another. In Singapore’s dynamic financial ecosystem, the definition of “best” is evolving.

This blog explores what truly makes AML software best-in-class—not by comparing products, but by unpacking the real-world needs, risks, and expectations shaping compliance today.

Talk to an Expert

The New AML Challenge: Scale, Speed, and Sophistication

Singapore’s status as a global financial hub brings increasing complexity:

  • More digital payments
  • More cross-border flows
  • More fintech integration
  • More complex money laundering typologies

Regulators like MAS are raising the bar on detection effectiveness, timeliness of reporting, and technological governance. Meanwhile, fraudsters continue to adapt faster than many internal systems.

In this environment, the best AML software is not the one with the longest feature list—it’s the one that evolves with your institution’s risk.

What “Best” Really Means in AML Software

1. Local Regulatory Fit

AML software must align with MAS regulations—from risk-based assessments to STR formats and AI auditability. A tool not tuned to Singapore’s AML Notices or thematic reviews will create gaps, even if it’s globally recognised.

2. Real-World Scenario Coverage

The best solutions include coverage for real, contextual typologies such as:

  • Shell company misuse
  • Utility-based layering scams
  • Dormant account mule networks
  • Round-tripping via fintech platforms

Bonus points if these scenarios come from a network of shared intelligence.

3. AI You Can Explain

The best AML platforms use AI that’s not just powerful—but also understandable. Compliance teams should be able to explain detection decisions to auditors, regulators, and internal stakeholders.

4. Unified View Across Risk

Modern compliance risk doesn't sit in silos. The best software unifies alerts, customer profiles, transactions, device intelligence, and behavioural risk signals—across both fraud and AML workflows.

5. Automation That Actually Works

From auto-generating STRs to summarising case narratives, top AML tools reduce manual work without sacrificing oversight. Automation should support investigators, not replace them.

6. Speed to Deploy, Speed to Detect

The best tools integrate quickly, scale with your transaction volume, and adapt fast to new typologies. In a live environment like Singapore, detection lag can mean regulatory risk.

The Danger of Chasing Global Rankings

Many institutions fall into the trap of selecting tools based on brand recognition or analyst reports. While useful, these often prioritise global market size over local relevance.

A top-ranked solution may not:

  • Support MAS-specific STR formats
  • Detect local mule account typologies
  • Allow configuration without vendor dependence
  • Offer support in your timezone or regulatory context

The best AML software for Singapore is one that understands Singapore.

The Role of Community and Collaboration

No tool can solve financial crime alone. The best AML platforms today are:

  • Collaborative: Sharing anonymised risk signals across institutions
  • Community-driven: Updated with new scenarios and typologies from peers
  • Connected: Integrated with ecosystems like MAS’ regulatory sandbox or industry groups

This allows banks to move faster on emerging threats like pig-butchering scams, cross-border laundering, or terror finance alerts.

ChatGPT Image Jan 20, 2026, 10_31_21 AM

Case in Point: A Smarter Approach to Typology Detection

Imagine your institution receives a surge in transactions through remittance corridors tied to high-risk jurisdictions. A traditional system may miss this if it’s below a certain threshold.

But a scenario-based system—especially one built from real cases—flags:

  • Round dollar amounts at unusual intervals
  • Back-to-back remittances to different names in the same region
  • Senders with low prior activity suddenly transacting at volume

The “best” software is the one that catches this before damage is done.

A Checklist for Singaporean Institutions

If you’re evaluating AML tools, ask:

  • Can this detect known local risks and unknown emerging ones?
  • Does it support real-time and batch monitoring across channels?
  • Can compliance teams tune thresholds without engineering help?
  • Does the vendor offer localised support and regulatory alignment?
  • How well does it integrate with fraud tools, case managers, and reporting systems?

If the answer isn’t a confident “yes” across these areas, it might not be your best choice—no matter its global rating.

Final Thoughts: Build for Your Risk, Not the Leaderboard

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform embodies these principles—offering MAS-aligned features, community-driven scenarios, explainable AI, and unified fraud and AML coverage tailored to Asia’s compliance landscape.

There’s no universal best AML software.

But for institutions in Singapore, the best choice will always be one that:

  • Supports your regulators
  • Reflects your risk
  • Grows with your customers
  • Learns from your industry
  • Protects your reputation

Because when it comes to financial crime, it’s not about the software that looks best on paper—it’s about the one that works best in practice.

What Makes the Best AML Software? A Singapore Perspective
Blogs
19 Jan 2026
5 min
read

AML Case Management Software: A Practical Guide for Banks and Fintechs

Financial institutions today face an uncomfortable reality. Detecting suspicious activity is no longer the hardest part of AML. Managing, investigating, documenting, and closing alerts at scale is. This is where AML case management software plays a critical role.

As alert volumes rise and regulatory expectations tighten, banks and fintechs need more than rule engines and dashboards. They need a structured, auditable, and efficient way to move from alert to closure. This guide explains what AML case management software is, why it matters, and how modern, AI-enabled platforms are reshaping investigations.

Talk to an Expert

What Is AML Case Management?

AML case management refers to the process and technology used to manage alerts, investigations, evidence, and regulatory outcomes once suspicious activity has been detected.

In simple terms:

  • Transaction monitoring flags alerts
  • Case management turns alerts into investigations
  • Investigations lead to decisions, documentation, and reporting

A case management system provides investigators with a central workspace to:

  • Review alerts
  • Gather and assess evidence
  • Collaborate with other teams
  • Document findings
  • Prepare regulatory reports such as STRs or SARs

Without a robust case management layer, even the best detection systems quickly become operational bottlenecks.

Why AML Case Management Matters More Than Ever

Alert volumes are increasing

Real-time payments, digital wallets, and cross-border transactions have dramatically increased alert volumes. Manual investigation processes simply do not scale.

Investigators are under pressure

Compliance teams face growing workloads, tight deadlines, and intense regulatory scrutiny. Inefficient workflows lead to:

  • Alert backlogs
  • Investigator fatigue
  • Inconsistent decision-making

Regulators expect stronger documentation

Supervisors increasingly expect:

  • Clear audit trails
  • Consistent investigation logic
  • Explainable decisions supported by evidence

AML case management software sits at the centre of these challenges, acting as the operational backbone of compliance teams.

Core Capabilities of AML Case Management Software

A modern AML case management platform typically includes the following capabilities:

Case creation and prioritisation

Alerts are automatically converted into cases, enriched with customer, transaction, and risk context. Risk-based prioritisation helps investigators focus on the most critical cases first.

Investigation workflows

Structured workflows guide investigators through each stage of the investigation, reducing variability and missed steps.

Evidence management

Documents, transaction records, screenshots, and notes are stored centrally within each case, ensuring nothing is lost or fragmented across systems.

Collaboration and escalation

Cases often require input from multiple teams. Case management software enables collaboration, escalation, and approvals within a controlled environment.

Audit trails and traceability

Every action taken on a case is logged, creating a defensible audit trail for internal reviews and regulatory examinations.

How AI Is Transforming AML Case Management

Traditional case management systems focused primarily on task tracking. Modern platforms are moving much further by embedding intelligence directly into investigations.

Assisted investigations

AI can surface relevant transactions, related parties, and historical patterns, reducing manual data gathering.

Smart workflows

Automation helps route cases, trigger actions, and apply consistent investigation steps based on risk level.

Faster alert closure

By reducing repetitive tasks and guiding investigators, AI-enabled case management significantly improves closure times without compromising quality.

The result is not fewer controls, but better, faster, and more consistent investigations.

Regulatory Expectations and Audit Readiness

From an examiner’s perspective, a strong AML programme is not just about detecting suspicious activity. It is about how decisions are made and documented.

AML case management software supports regulatory expectations by enabling:

  • Consistent investigation logic
  • Complete documentation of decisions
  • Easy retrieval of historical cases
  • Clear linkage between alerts, evidence, and outcomes

This is especially important during regulatory reviews, where institutions must demonstrate not only what decisions were made, but why.

ChatGPT Image Jan 17, 2026, 12_53_47 PM

How Banks and Fintechs Use AML Case Management in Practice

In a typical investigation flow:

  1. An alert is generated by the monitoring system
  2. A case is created and assigned automatically
  3. The investigator reviews contextual data and risk indicators
  4. Evidence is gathered and assessed within the case
  5. A decision is made, documented, and approved
  6. Regulatory reports are prepared if required
  7. The case is closed with a complete audit trail

Case management software ensures this process is repeatable, defensible, and scalable, even as volumes grow.

How Modern AML Platforms Approach Case Management

Modern AML platforms are increasingly embedding case management directly into their compliance architecture. Rather than treating investigations as a separate, manual process, leading solutions integrate case management with transaction monitoring and screening to create a continuous investigation workflow.

For example, Tookitaki’s FinCense platform integrates case management with transaction monitoring and screening, enabling investigators to move seamlessly from alert generation to investigation, documentation, and closure within a single workflow. This integrated approach helps institutions improve investigation efficiency while maintaining strong audit trails and regulatory readiness.

Choosing the Right AML Case Management Software

When evaluating AML case management solutions, institutions should look beyond basic task tracking.

Key considerations include:

  • Seamless integration with transaction monitoring and screening systems
  • Support for risk-based workflows
  • Strong audit and reporting capabilities
  • AI-assisted investigation features
  • Flexibility to adapt to local regulatory requirements

The goal is not just operational efficiency, but long-term compliance resilience.

Final Thoughts

AML case management software is no longer a supporting tool. It is a core pillar of modern AML operations.

As financial crime grows more complex, institutions that invest in intelligent, well-structured case management are better positioned to:

  • Reduce operational strain
  • Improve investigation quality
  • Meet regulatory expectations with confidence

In the broader AML ecosystem, case management is where detection becomes decision-making — and where compliance teams either struggle or succeed.

AML Case Management Software: A Practical Guide for Banks and Fintechs
Blogs
16 Jan 2026
5 min
read

From Firefighting to Foresight: Rethinking Transaction Fraud Prevention in Singapore

Fraudsters are playing a smarter game, shouldn’t your defences be smarter too?

Transaction fraud in Singapore is no longer just a security issue—it’s a strategic challenge. As payment ecosystems evolve, fraudsters are exploiting digital rails, behavioural loopholes, and siloed detection systems to slip through unnoticed.

In this blog, we explore why traditional fraud prevention methods are falling short, what a next-gen transaction fraud prevention framework looks like, and how Singapore’s financial institutions can future-proof their defences.

Talk to an Expert

Why Transaction Fraud is Escalating in Singapore

Singapore has one of the most advanced digital banking infrastructures in the world. But with innovation comes risk.

Key Drivers of Fraud Risk:

  • Real-time payments: PayNow and FAST leave little time for fraud detection.
  • Cross-border flows: Illicit funds are moved via remittance corridors and fintech platforms.
  • Proliferation of fintech apps: Fraudsters exploit weak KYC and transaction monitoring in niche apps.
  • Evolving scam tactics: Social engineering, deepfake impersonation, and phishing are on the rise.

The result? Singaporean banks are experiencing a surge in mule account activity, identity theft, and layered fraud involving multiple platforms.

What is Transaction Fraud Prevention?

Transaction fraud prevention refers to systems, strategies, and intelligence tools used by financial institutions to:

  • Detect fraudulent transactions
  • Stop or flag suspicious activity in real time
  • Reduce customer losses
  • Comply with regulatory expectations

The key is prevention, not just detection. This means acting before money is moved or damage is done.

Traditional Fraud Prevention: Where It Falls Short

Legacy fraud prevention frameworks often rely on:

  • Static rule-based thresholds
  • After-the-fact detection
  • Manual reviews for high-value alerts
  • Limited visibility across products or platforms

The problem? Fraud today is fast, adaptive, and complex. These outdated approaches miss subtle patterns, overwhelm investigators, and delay intervention.

A New Framework for Transaction Fraud Prevention

Next-gen fraud prevention combines speed, context, intelligence, and collaboration.

Core Elements:

1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Every transaction is assessed for risk as it happens—across all payment channels.

2. Behavioural Risk Models

Fraud detection engines compare current actions against baseline behaviour for each customer.

3. AI-Powered Risk Scoring

Advanced machine learning models assign dynamic risk scores that influence real-time decisions.

4. Federated Typology Sharing

Institutions access fraud scenarios shared by peer banks and regulators without exposing sensitive data.

5. Graph-Based Network Detection

Analysts visualise connections between mule accounts, devices, locations, and beneficiaries.

6. Integrated Case Management

Suspicious transactions are directly escalated into investigation pipelines with enriched context.

Real-World Examples of Preventable Fraud

✅ Utility Scam Layering

Scammers use stolen accounts to pay fake utility bills, then request chargebacks to mask laundering. These can be caught through layered transaction patterns.

✅ Deepfake CEO Voice Scam

A finance team almost transfers SGD 500,000 after receiving a video call from a “CFO.” Behavioural anomalies and device risk profiling can flag this in real-time.

✅ Organised Mule Account Chains

Funds pass through 8–10 sleeper accounts before exiting the system. Graph analytics expose these as coordinated rather than isolated events.

The Singapore Edge: Localising Fraud Prevention

Fraud patterns in Singapore have unique characteristics:

  • Local scam syndicates often use SingPass and SMS spoofing
  • Elderly victims targeted through impersonation scams
  • Fintech apps used for layering due to fewer controls

A good fraud prevention system should reflect:

  • MAS typologies and alerts
  • Red flags derived from real scam cases
  • Adaptability to local payment systems like FAST, PayNow, GIRO
ChatGPT Image Jan 16, 2026, 11_40_33 AM

How Tookitaki Enables Smart Transaction Fraud Prevention

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform offers an integrated fraud and AML prevention suite that:

  • Monitors transactions in real-time using adaptive AI and federated learning
  • Supports scenario-based detection built from 1,200+ community-contributed typologies
  • Surfaces network-level risk signals using graph analytics
  • Auto-generates case summaries for faster STR filing and reporting
  • Reduces false positives while increasing true fraud detection rates

With FinCense, banks are moving from passive alerts to proactive intervention.

Evaluating Transaction Fraud Prevention Software: Key Questions

  • Can it monitor all transaction types in real time?
  • Does it allow dynamic threshold tuning based on risk?
  • Can it integrate with existing AML or case management tools?
  • Does it use real-world scenarios, not just abstract rules?
  • Can it support regulatory audits with explainable decisions?

Best Practices for Proactive Fraud Prevention

  1. Combine fraud and AML views for holistic oversight
  2. Use shared typologies to learn from others’ incidents
  3. Deploy AI responsibly, ensuring interpretability
  4. Flag anomalies early, even if not yet confirmed as fraud
  5. Engage fraud operations teams in model tuning and validation

Looking Ahead: Future of Transaction Fraud Prevention

The future of fraud prevention is:

  • Predictive: Using AI to simulate fraud before it happens
  • Collaborative: Sharing signals across banks and fintechs
  • Contextual: Understanding customer intent, not just rules
  • Embedded: Integrated into every step of the payment journey

As Singapore’s financial sector continues to grow in scale and complexity, fraud prevention must keep pace—not just in technology, but in mindset.

Final Thoughts: Don’t Just Detect—Disrupt

Transaction fraud prevention is no longer just about stopping bad transactions. It’s about disrupting fraud networks, protecting customer trust, and reducing operational cost.

With the right strategy and systems in place, Singapore’s financial institutions can lead the region in smarter, safer finance.

Because when money moves fast, protection must move faster.

From Firefighting to Foresight: Rethinking Transaction Fraud Prevention in Singapore