Compliance Hub

JMLSG Guidance and Its Importance in the UK AML Regime

Site Logo
Tookitaki
16 Dec 2020
7 min
read

JMLSG stands for the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group. It’s a multi-disciplinary committee which was created to provide assistance in interpreting UK Money Laundering Regulations. The private-sector body regularly publishes guidance notes, known as JMLSG guidance, on the UK money laundering regulations.

The JMLSG guidance plays an important role in helping financial institutions and other key industries to ensure that they comply with the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) regulations. In this article, we will discuss JMLSG, the JMLSG guidance and its role in the UK AML regime.

 

Who Are the Members of JMLSG?

JMLSG consists of members from leading UK trade associations who are part of the financial service industry. It also includes representatives from the Building Societies Association, the British Bankers’ Association, and the Association of British Insurers. The following are the current members of JMLSG, according to their official website.

  • Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME)
  • The Association of British Credit Unions Limited (ABCUL)
  • Association of British Insurers (ABI)
  • Association of Foreign Banks (AFB)
  • British Venture Capital Association (BVCA)
  • Building Societies Association (BSA)
  • Electronic Money Association (EMA)
  • European Venues and Intermediaries Association (EVIA)
  • Finance & Leasing Association (FLA)
  • The Investment Association (IA)
  • Loan Market Association (LMA)
  • The Personal Investment Management and Financial Advice Association (PIMFA)
  • The Investing and Savings Alliance (TISA)
  • UK Finance (UKF)

 

What Is the Aim of JMLSG?

The JMLSG aims to assist financial institutions in the UK to adopt better practices in the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. Its guidance notes are to clarify the country’s AML regulations and to guide financial institutions on the implementation of proper AML processes and procedures.

 

What is the JMLSG Guidance?

The JMLSG has set forth AML guidelines to help assist the financial sector. These guidelines are neither legally binding nor punishable at an offence. However, they have HM Treasury’s approval. The JMLSG guidance helps financial institutions (FIs) to develop a compliance programme with policies and procedures that are fit to the organisation’s needs.

The guidance by JMLSG determines the necessary requirements that the financial entities need in order to detect, investigate, and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. It allows the FIs to apply the required regulations based on their personal experience, products and services, clients and transactions.

Although it’s not compulsory for FIs to follow the JMLSG guidance, the adoption, however, is a sign of having good AML compliance measures. The guidance is not over-prescriptive but provides a base from which an FI’s management can develop tailored policies and procedures that are appropriate for their business. It remains the responsibility of an FI to make its own judgement on individual cases, on a risk-based approach.

The purpose of the JMLSG guidance is to:

  • Outline the legal and regulatory framework for anti-money laundering/countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF) requirements and systems across the financial services sector
  • Interpret the requirements of the relevant law and regulations, and how they may be implemented in practice
  • Indicate good industry practice in AML/CTF procedures through a proportionate, risk-based approach
  • Assist firms in designing and implementing the systems and controls necessary to mitigate the risks of the firm being used in connection with money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

Read More: Financial Conduct Authority: Money Laundering in The UK

The Current JMLSG Guidance

The current JMLSG guidance is available in three parts:

  1. Generic guidance for the UK financial sector,
  2. Sectoral guidance
  3. Specialist guidance.

We give a quick rundown of the general guidance's content here.

 The Responsibility of Senior Management

According to the JMLSG, senior management in an FI has a responsibility to ensure that its policies, controls and procedures are appropriately designed, implemented and effectively operated.

The senior management needs to ensure that the Financial Conduct Authority makes written policies and procedures available to the FI’s employees. It is also the responsibility of management to consider any risk factors relating to clients, jurisdictions, the geographic location of the institute, transactions, products, and services, and so on.

The senior management should be engaged at every step of the decision-making processes while taking ownership of the risk-based approach. The management will be responsible in case the risk-based approach is inadequate.

Internal Controls

The JMLSG provides guidance on the internal controls that will help FIs meet their obligations in respect to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing.

It is recommended that FIs appoint a member of their board (or comparable management body) or senior management as the officer in charge of the firm's money laundering compliance.They also need to carry out screening of relevant employees and agents appointed by the firm, both before they are recruited, and at regular intervals during the course of their employment and establish an independent internal audit function.

The Nominated Officers/MLROs

FIs must appoint a Nominated Officer or Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) to ensure that the firm maintains compliance with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) regulatory systems.

The firm’s nominated officer will monitor the routine functions and money laundering policies. They will also give more information on any questioning related to the FCA or help in understanding the UK’s legislation better.

A Risk-based Approach

The risk-based approach is endorsed by the FATF recommendations 1 and 10 and the Basel Paper among others.

The JMLSG suggests the following actions to ensure a risk-based approach.

    • Carry out a formal, and regular, money laundering/terrorist financing risk assessment, including market changes, and changes in products, customers and the wider environment
    • Ensure internal policies, controls and procedures, including staff awareness, adequately reflect the risk assessment
    • Ensure customer identification and acceptance procedures reflect the risk characteristics of customers
    • Ensure arrangements for monitoring systems and controls are robust, and reflect the risk characteristics of customers

Customer Due Diligence

The group lists out the following Customer Due Diligence (CDD) measures for FIs in its guidance.

    • Must carry out prescribed CDD measures for all customers not covered by exemptions
    • Must have systems to deal with identification issues in relation to those who cannot produce the standard evidence
    • Must take a risk-based approach when applying enhanced due diligence to take account of the greater potential for money laundering in higher-risk cases, specifically with respect of PEPs and correspondent relationships
    • Some persons/entities must not be dealt with
    • Must have specific policies about the financially (and socially) excluded
    • If satisfactory evidence of identity is not obtained, the business relationship must not proceed further
    • Must have some system for keeping customer information up to date

Suspicious Activities, Reporting and Data Protection

The JMLSG suggests the following actions:

    • Enquiries made in respect to disclosures must be documented
    • The reasons why a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) was, or was not, submitted should be recorded
    • Any communications made with or received from the authorities, including the NCA, in relation to a SAR should be maintained on file
    • In cases where advance notice of a transaction or of arrangements is given, the need for prior consent before it is allowed to proceed should be considered

Staff Awareness, Training and Alertness

The JMLSG suggests the following actions:

    • Provide appropriate training to make relevant employees aware of money laundering and terrorist financing issues, including how these crimes operate and how they might take place through the firm
    • Ensure that relevant employees are provided with information on, and understand, the legal position of the firm and of individual members of staff, and of changes to these legal positions
    • Consider providing relevant employees with case studies and examples related to the firm’s business
    • Train relevant employees in how to operate a risk-based approach to AML/CTF

Record Keeping

According to the JMLSG, FIs have the following core obligations:

    • Firms must retain copies of, or references to, the evidence they obtained of a customer’s identity and details of customer transactions for five years after the end of the customer relationship or five years after the completion of an occasional transaction
    • Firms should retain details of actions taken in respect of internal and external suspicion reports and details of information considered by the nominated officer in respect of an internal report where no external report is made
    • Firms must delete any personal data relating to CDD and client transactions in accordance with Regulation 40

 

How Can Tookitaki Help Financial Institutions in the UK?

As a fast-growing Regtech company, Tookitaki has developed an end-to-end AML compliance platform called the Anti-Money Laundering Suite (AMLS). It offers multiple solutions catering to the core AML activities such as transaction monitoring, name screening, transaction screening and customer risk scoring. Powered by advanced machine learning, AMLS addresses the market needs and provides an effective and scalable AML compliance solution.

To learn more about our AML solution and its unique features that help financial institutions to enhance their risk-based AML compliance programmes, book a meeting with one of our experts today. 

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
18 Sep 2025
6 min
read

Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning in Banking: Malaysia’s Next Line of Defence

Fraudsters think fast, but machine learning thinks faster.

Malaysia’s Growing Fraud Challenge

Fraud has become one of the biggest threats facing Malaysia’s banking sector. The rise of instant payments, QR codes, and cross-border remittances has created new opportunities for consumers — and for criminals.

Money mule networks are expanding, account takeover fraud is becoming more common, and investment scams continue to claim victims across the country. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) has increased its scrutiny, aligning the country more closely with global standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

In this climate, banks need smarter systems. Traditional fraud detection methods are no longer enough. To stay ahead, Malaysian banks are turning to fraud detection using machine learning as their next line of defence.

Talk to an Expert

Why Traditional Fraud Detection Falls Short

For decades, banks relied on rule-based fraud detection systems. These systems flag suspicious activity based on pre-defined rules, such as:

  • Transactions above a certain amount
  • Transfers to high-risk jurisdictions
  • Multiple failed login attempts

While useful, rule-based systems have clear limitations:

  • They are static: Criminals quickly learn how to work around rules.
  • They create false positives: Too many legitimate transactions are flagged, overwhelming compliance teams.
  • They are reactive: Rules are only updated after a new fraud pattern is discovered.
  • They lack adaptability: In a fast-changing environment, rigid systems cannot keep pace.

The result is compliance fatigue, higher costs, and gaps that criminals exploit.

How Machine Learning Transforms Fraud Detection

Machine learning (ML) changes the game by allowing systems to learn from data and adapt over time. Instead of relying on static rules, ML models identify patterns and anomalies that may signal fraud.

How ML Works in Banking Fraud Detection

  1. Data Collection
    ML models analyse vast amounts of data, including transaction history, customer behaviour, device information, and geolocation.
  2. Feature Engineering
    Key attributes are extracted, such as transaction frequency, average values, and unusual login behaviour.
  3. Model Training
    Algorithms are trained on historical data, distinguishing between legitimate and fraudulent activity.
  4. Real-Time Detection
    As transactions occur, ML models assign risk scores and flag suspicious cases instantly.
  5. Continuous Learning
    Models evolve by incorporating feedback from confirmed fraud cases, improving accuracy over time.

Supervised vs Unsupervised Learning

  • Supervised learning: Models are trained using labelled data (fraud vs non-fraud).
  • Unsupervised learning: Models identify unusual patterns without prior labelling, useful for detecting new fraud types.

This adaptability is critical in Malaysia, where fraud typologies evolve quickly.

Key Benefits of Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning

The advantages of ML-driven fraud detection are clear:

1. Real-Time Detection

Transactions are analysed instantly, allowing banks to stop fraud before funds are withdrawn or transferred abroad.

2. Adaptive Learning

ML models continuously improve, detecting new scam typologies that rules alone would miss.

3. Improved Accuracy

By reducing false positives, banks save time and resources while improving customer experience.

4. Scalability

Machine learning can handle millions of transactions daily, essential in a high-volume market like Malaysia.

5. Holistic View of Risk

ML integrates multiple data points to create a comprehensive risk profile, spotting complex fraud networks.

Fraud Detection in Malaysia’s Banking Sector

Malaysia faces unique pressures that make ML adoption urgent:

  • Instant payments and QR adoption: DuitNow QR has become a national standard, but speed increases vulnerability.
  • Cross-border laundering risks: Remittance corridors expose banks to international mule networks.
  • Sophisticated scams: Criminals are using social engineering and even deepfakes to deceive customers.
  • BNM expectations: Regulators want financial institutions to adopt proactive, risk-based monitoring.

In short, fraud detection using machine learning is no longer optional. It is a strategic necessity for Malaysia’s banks.

ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 04_29_19 PM

Step-by-Step: How Banks Can Implement ML-Driven Fraud Detection

For Malaysian banks considering machine learning adoption, the path is practical and achievable:

Step 1: Define the Risk Landscape

Identify the most pressing fraud threats, such as mule accounts, phishing, or account takeover, and align with BNM priorities.

Step 2: Integrate Data Sources

Consolidate transaction, customer, device, and behavioural data into a single framework. ML models thrive on diverse datasets.

Step 3: Deploy Machine Learning Models

Use supervised models for known fraud patterns and unsupervised models for detecting new anomalies.

Step 4: Create Feedback Loops

Feed confirmed fraud cases back into the system to improve accuracy and reduce false positives.

Step 5: Ensure Explainability

Adopt systems that provide clear reasons for alerts. Regulators must understand how decisions are made.

Tookitaki’s FinCense: Machine Learning in Action

This is where Tookitaki’s FinCense makes a difference. Built as the trust layer to fight financial crime, FinCense is an advanced compliance platform powered by AI and machine learning.

Agentic AI Workflows

FinCense uses intelligent AI agents that automate alert triage, generate investigation narratives, and recommend next steps. Compliance teams save hours on each case.

Federated Learning with the AFC Ecosystem

Through the AFC Ecosystem, FinCense benefits from shared intelligence contributed by hundreds of institutions. Malaysian banks gain early visibility into fraud typologies emerging in ASEAN.

Explainable AI

Unlike black-box systems, FinCense provides full transparency. Every flagged transaction includes a clear rationale, making regulator engagement smoother.

End-to-End Fraud and AML Integration

FinCense unifies fraud detection and AML monitoring, offering a single view of risk. This reduces duplication and strengthens overall defences.

ASEAN Market Fit

Scenarios and typologies are tailored to Malaysia’s realities, from QR code misuse to remittance layering.

Scenario Walkthrough: Account Takeover Fraud

Imagine a Malaysian customer’s online banking credentials are stolen through phishing. Fraudsters attempt multiple transfers to mule accounts.

With traditional systems:

  • The activity may only be flagged after large sums are lost.
  • Manual review delays the response.

With FinCense’s ML-powered detection:

  • Unusual login behaviour is flagged immediately.
  • Transaction velocity analysis highlights the abnormal transfers.
  • Federated learning recognises the mule pattern from other ASEAN cases.
  • Agentic AI prioritises the alert, generates a narrative, and recommends blocking the transaction.

Result: The fraud attempt is stopped before funds leave the bank.

Impact on Banks and Customers

The benefits of fraud detection using machine learning extend across the ecosystem:

  • Banks reduce fraud losses and compliance costs.
  • Customers gain confidence in digital banking, encouraging adoption.
  • Regulators see stronger risk management and timely reporting.
  • The economy benefits from increased trust in financial services.

The Road Ahead for ML in Fraud Detection

Looking forward, machine learning will play an even larger role in banking fraud prevention:

  • Integration with open banking data will provide richer insights.
  • AI-powered scams will push banks to deploy equally intelligent defences.
  • Collaboration across borders will become critical, especially in ASEAN.
  • Hybrid AI-human models will balance efficiency with oversight.

Malaysia has the chance to position itself as a regional leader in adopting ML for financial crime prevention.

Conclusion

Fraud detection using machine learning in banking is no longer a futuristic concept. It is the practical, powerful response Malaysia’s banks need today. Traditional rule-based systems cannot keep up with evolving scams, instant payments, and cross-border laundering risks.

With Tookitaki’s FinCense, Malaysian banks gain an industry-leading trust layer that combines machine learning, explainability, and regional intelligence. The future of fraud prevention is here, and it starts with embracing smarter, adaptive technology.

Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning in Banking: Malaysia’s Next Line of Defence
Blogs
18 Sep 2025
6 min
read

Federated Learning in AML: A Smarter Way to Fight Financial Crime in Australia

Federated learning is transforming AML by enabling banks to share intelligence without sharing sensitive data.

Introduction

Financial crime is becoming more sophisticated every year. In Australia, criminals exploit the New Payments Platform (NPP), cross-border corridors, and emerging technologies to launder billions of dollars. Banks and fintechs are under immense pressure from AUSTRAC to detect and report suspicious activity in real time.

Yet no single institution has the complete picture. Criminals spread activity across multiple banks and channels, making it difficult to detect patterns when working in isolation. This is where federated learning in AML comes in. It allows institutions to collaborate on intelligence without exposing customer data, creating a collective shield against money laundering.

Talk to an Expert

What is Federated Learning in AML?

Federated learning is an artificial intelligence technique where multiple parties train a shared model without sharing their raw data. Each institution trains the model locally, and only the model updates — not the underlying data — are shared.

In AML, this means:

  • Banks contribute insights into suspicious patterns.
  • Sensitive customer data remains within each institution.
  • A shared model learns from multiple perspectives, strengthening detection.

It is compliance collaboration without compromising privacy.

Why Australia Needs Federated Learning

1. Fragmented Data

Each bank only sees part of the financial ecosystem. Criminals exploit these gaps by spreading transactions across multiple institutions.

2. Rising Compliance Costs

Institutions are spending billions annually on AML compliance. Shared learning reduces duplication of effort.

3. AUSTRAC’s Push for Innovation

AUSTRAC encourages industry collaboration to strengthen financial crime prevention. Federated learning aligns perfectly with this goal.

4. Real-Time Payment Risks

With NPP and PayTo, money moves instantly. Federated learning enables faster identification of emerging fraud typologies.

5. Protecting Privacy

Australia’s data protection regulations make raw data sharing complex. Federated learning solves this by keeping sensitive data local.

How Federated Learning Works in AML

  1. Local Training
    Each institution trains an AI model on its transaction and customer data.
  2. Model Updates Shared
    Only the learned patterns (model weights) are sent to a central aggregator.
  3. Global Model Improved
    The aggregator combines updates from all banks into a stronger model.
  4. Distribution Back to Banks
    The improved model is sent back to each bank for use in detection.

This cycle repeats, continually improving AML detection across the industry.

ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 04_00_31 PM

Use Cases of Federated Learning in AML

  1. Mule Account Detection
    Identifies networks of mule accounts across different banks.
  2. Cross-Border Laundering
    Tracks layering activity spread across institutions and jurisdictions.
  3. Fraud Typology Sharing
    Allows banks to learn from each other’s fraud cases without sharing customer data.
  4. Sanctions Screening Enhancement
    Improves detection of high-risk entities that use aliases or complex networks.
  5. Customer Risk Profiling
    Builds more accurate risk scores by learning from industry-wide patterns.

Benefits of Federated Learning in AML

  • Collective Intelligence: Stronger models built from multiple perspectives.
  • Privacy Protection: Raw customer data never leaves the institution.
  • Faster Adaptation: New fraud typologies shared quickly across banks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces duplication of AML technology spend.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Demonstrates proactive industry collaboration.

Challenges of Federated Learning

  • Data Quality: Poor-quality local data reduces model accuracy.
  • Technical Complexity: Requires strong IT infrastructure for secure collaboration.
  • Coordination Barriers: Banks must align on frameworks and standards.
  • Explainability: AI models must remain transparent for AUSTRAC compliance.
  • Adoption Costs: Initial investment can be high for smaller institutions.

Case Example: Community-Owned Banks Driving Innovation

Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank are early adopters of collaborative compliance models. By leveraging advanced platforms, they can access federated intelligence that strengthens their detection capabilities without requiring massive in-house teams.

Their success shows that federated learning is not only for Tier-1 institutions. Smaller banks can benefit just as much from this collaborative approach.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem and FinCense

Tookitaki has pioneered federated learning in AML through its AFC Ecosystem and FinCense platform.

  • AFC Ecosystem: A global community of compliance experts contributing real-world scenarios and typologies.
  • Federated Learning Engine: Allows banks to benefit from collective intelligence without sharing raw data.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Detects suspicious activity across NPP, PayTo, remittance corridors, and crypto.
  • FinMate AI Copilot: Assists investigators with summarised alerts and regulator-ready reports.
  • AUSTRAC-Ready: Generates SMRs, TTRs, and IFTIs with full audit trails.
  • Cross-Channel Coverage: Unifies detection across banking, wallets, cards, remittances, and crypto.

By combining federated learning with Agentic AI, FinCense delivers industry-leading AML capabilities tailored for the Australian market.

Best Practices for Adopting Federated Learning in AML

  1. Start with Partnerships: Collaborate with trusted peers to test federated models.
  2. Focus on Data Quality: Ensure local models are trained on clean, structured data.
  3. Adopt Explainable AI: Maintain regulator confidence by making outputs transparent.
  4. Engage Regulators Early: Keep AUSTRAC informed of federated learning initiatives.
  5. Invest in Infrastructure: Secure, scalable platforms are essential for success.

The Future of Federated Learning in AML

  1. Industry-Wide Collaboration: More banks will join federated networks to share intelligence.
  2. Real-Time Typology Sharing: Federated systems will distribute new fraud scenarios instantly.
  3. Cross-Sector Expansion: Insurers, payment firms, and fintechs will join federated AML networks.
  4. Global Interoperability: Federated learning models will connect across borders.
  5. AI-First Investigations: AI copilots will use federated intelligence to guide case investigations.

Conclusion

Federated learning in AML represents a breakthrough in the fight against financial crime. By combining intelligence from multiple banks without exposing customer data, it creates a collective defence that criminals cannot easily evade.

In Australia, where AUSTRAC demands stronger monitoring and fraudsters exploit instant payments, federated learning provides a powerful solution. Community-owned banks like Regional Australia Bank and Beyond Bank demonstrate that collaboration is possible for institutions of all sizes.

Platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense are making federated learning a reality, turning compliance from a siloed burden into a shared advantage.

Pro tip: The future of AML will be built on collaboration. Federated learning is the foundation that makes industry-wide intelligence sharing possible.

Federated Learning in AML: A Smarter Way to Fight Financial Crime in Australia
Blogs
17 Sep 2025
6 min
read

The Investigator’s Edge: Why AML Investigation Software Is a Must-Have for Singapore’s Banks

In the fight against financial crime, detection is only half the battle. The real work starts with the investigation.

Singapore’s financial institutions are facing unprecedented scrutiny when it comes to anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. As regulators raise the bar and criminals get smarter, the ability to investigate suspicious transactions swiftly and accurately is now a non-negotiable requirement. This is where AML investigation software plays a critical role.

In this blog, we explore why AML investigation software matters more than ever in Singapore, what features banks should look for, and how next-generation tools are transforming compliance teams from reactive units into proactive intelligence hubs.

Talk to an Expert

Why Investigation Capabilities Matter in AML Compliance

When a transaction monitoring system flags an alert, it kicks off an entire chain of actions. Analysts must determine whether it's a false positive or a genuine case of money laundering. This requires gathering context, cross-referencing multiple systems, documenting findings, and preparing reports for auditors or regulators.

Doing all of this manually is not only time-consuming, but also increases the risk of human error and compliance gaps. For banks operating in Singapore's high-stakes environment, where MAS expects prompt and well-documented responses, this is a risk few can afford.

Key Challenges Faced by AML Investigators in Singapore

1. Alert Overload

Analysts are often overwhelmed by a high volume of alerts, many of which turn out to be false positives. This slows down investigations and increases backlogs.

2. Fragmented Data Sources

Information needed for a single investigation is typically spread across customer databases, transaction logs, sanctions lists, and case notes, making it difficult to form a complete picture quickly.

3. Manual Documentation

Writing investigation summaries and preparing Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) can take hours, reducing the time available for deeper analysis.

4. Audit and Regulatory Pressure

MAS and other regulators expect detailed, traceable justifications for every action taken. Missing documentation or inconsistent processes can lead to penalties.

What AML Investigation Software Does

AML investigation software is designed to streamline, standardise, and enhance the process of investigating suspicious activities. It bridges the gap between alert and action.

Core Functions Include:

  • Case creation and automated alert ingestion
  • Intelligent data aggregation from multiple systems
  • Risk scoring and prioritisation
  • Investigation checklists and audit trails
  • Natural language summaries for STR filing
  • Collaborative case review and escalation tools

Must-Have Features in AML Investigation Software

When evaluating solutions, Singaporean banks should look for these critical capabilities:

1. Smart Alert Triage

The system should help investigators prioritise high-risk alerts by assigning risk scores based on factors such as transaction patterns, customer profile, and historical activity.

2. Contextual Data Aggregation

A strong tool pulls in data from across the bank — including core banking systems, transaction logs, KYC platforms, and screening tools — to provide investigators with a consolidated view.

3. Natural Language Summarisation

Leading software uses AI to generate readable, regulator-friendly narratives that summarise key findings, reducing manual work and improving consistency.

4. Audit-Ready Case Management

Every step taken during an investigation should be logged and traceable, including decision-making, reviewer notes, and attached evidence.

5. Integration with STR Reporting Systems

The software should support direct integration with platforms such as GoAML, used in Singapore for suspicious transaction reporting.

ChatGPT Image Sep 17, 2025, 11_47_45 AM

How Tookitaki's FinCense Platform Elevates AML Investigations

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is designed with Singapore’s regulatory expectations in mind and includes a specialised Smart Disposition Engine for AML investigations.

Key Features:

  • AI Copilot (FinMate)
    Acts as an intelligent assistant that helps compliance teams assess red flags, suggest investigative steps, and provide context for alerts.
  • Smart Narration Engine
    Automatically generates STR-ready summaries, saving hours of manual writing while ensuring consistency and auditability.
  • Unified View of Risk
    Investigators can see customer profiles, transaction history, typologies triggered, and sanction screening results in one interface.
  • Scenario-Based Insight
    Through integration with the AFC Ecosystem, the system maps alerts to real-world money laundering typologies relevant to the region.
  • Workflow Customisation
    Investigation steps, user roles, and escalation logic can be tailored to the bank’s internal policies and team structure.

Benefits for Compliance Teams

By implementing AML investigation software like FinCense, banks in Singapore can achieve:

  • Up to 50 percent reduction in investigation time
  • Enhanced quality and consistency of STRs
  • Faster closure of true positives
  • Lower regulatory risk and better audit outcomes
  • Improved collaboration across compliance, risk, and operations

Checklist: Is Your Investigation Process Ready for 2025?

Ask these questions to evaluate your current system:

  • Are investigators manually pulling data from multiple systems?
  • Is there a standard template for documenting cases?
  • How long does it take to prepare an STR?
  • Can you trace every decision made during an investigation?
  • Are your analysts spending more time writing than investigating?

If any of these answers raise red flags, it may be time to upgrade.

Conclusion: Better Tools Build Stronger Compliance

AML investigation software is no longer a nice-to-have. It is a strategic enabler for banks to stay ahead of financial crime while meeting the rising expectations of regulators, auditors, and customers.

In Singapore's rapidly evolving compliance landscape, banks that invest in smart, AI-powered investigation tools will not only keep up. They will lead the way.

Ready to take your AML investigations to the next level? The future is intelligent, integrated, and investigator-first.

The Investigator’s Edge: Why AML Investigation Software Is a Must-Have for Singapore’s Banks