Compliance Hub

Why Do We Need Anti Money Laundering (AML) In the Insurance Sector?

Site Logo
Tookitaki
25 Mar 2021
8 min
read

Financial crime has been recorded in the insurance industry across the world. According to a research done by PWC in 2018, 62 percent of those surveyed have been victims of financial fraud in the preceding two years. Even if most insurance company products are not the primary target for money launderers/criminals, they are nonetheless at danger of being used as a vehicle for laundering money, according to the Financial Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental regulatory agency charged with combating money laundering.

Because of the large flows of funds into and out of their businesses, life insurance companies are particularly vulnerable to money laundering. Most life insurance companies offer highly flexible policies and investment products that allow customers to deposit and then withdraw large sums of money with only a minor loss in value.

Criminals, for example, utilise their illegal cash to purchase life insurance annuity contracts.

Alternatively, the opposite scenario occurs, when they remove money from life insurance contracts to support other unlawful operations. Insurance company agents/brokers are frequently ignorant of such bogus circumstances and hence fall prey to money laundering scams.

How do Governments and International organisations respond?

Governments and international organisations respond by enacting a variety of anti-money laundering life insurance legislation and issuing life insurance sanctions lists. With fines and jail sentences as part of the compliance penalty, life insurance companies should make sure they understand their duties and how to apply them as part of their AML strategy.

Insurance firms are classified as “companies/financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) of 1970. This implies they must design and enforce compliance requirements in the same way that other businesses and financial institutions do. The insurance industry’s compliance programme encompasses annuity contracts, life insurance, and other products. The statute mandates that insurance companies keep relevant documents and produce reports to aid law enforcement in the investigation of criminal conduct and other financial crimes such as tax fraud.

What Are The Regulations For AML Life Insurance?

The majority of financial authorities have risk-based transaction monitoring regulations in place for insurance firms operating inside their countries. The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) in the United States defines a set of “covered items” for which transaction monitoring is required:

  • Life insurance plans that are permanent (excluding group life insurance policies)
  • Contracts for annuities (excluding group annuity contracts)
  • Any insurance policy that has a cash value or investment component

Suspicious Activity Reports: Insurance companies are required under the BSA to send suspicious activity reports (SARs) to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) when they discover suspicious transactions involving one of the covered products. FinCEN creates a SAR form exclusively for insurance firms; when filling out the form, insurers must provide the following information:

FinCEN has established a $5,000 threshold for suspicious transactions that require SAR filing. Insurers should also be aware of a number of warning signs that might suggest money laundering or terrorism funding. The following are some of the red flags that should be looked out for during a transaction:

  • Excessive insurance
  • Excessive or unusual cash borrowing against policy/annuity
  • Proceeds sent to or received from unrelated third party
  • Suspicious life settlement sales insurance (e.g. STOLI’s, Viaticals)
  • Suspicious termination of policy or contract at the cost of the customer/ a third party
  • Unclear or no insurable interest (does not reflect customer’s needs)
  • Unusual payment methods (cash, or structured amounts)
  • Customer reluctance to provide identification

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an international organisation that develops anti-money laundering insurance sector advice for its member governments to follow (as a member state, the US enacts FATF requirements in the BSA). The FATF collaborates with private insurance firms to ensure that its laws are effective and current.

Financial authorities in Asia-Pacific are similarly concerned about the danger presented by life insurance products. Insurance sector rules in APAC, like those in other jurisdictions, are risk-based and include a variety of transaction monitoring requirements. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), for example, provides special regulations for insurers in Notice 314 on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing.

Insurance firms must comply with targeted financial sanctions imposed by international and governmental agencies on consumers, corporations, and persons. In practise, this implies that insurance companies are limited or forbidden from providing life insurance to consumers who appear on government sanction lists.

As a consequence, insurers must implement sanctions screening mechanisms in their anti-money laundering systems in order to identify customers who appear on these lists. When clients (policyholders or beneficiaries) are placed on sanctions lists, insurance firms must take steps to halt transactions or freeze assets, as well as notify the necessary authorities.

There may be overlap between multiple sanctions lists because numerous foreign authorities have the same AML/CFT goals. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions list, as well as the UN Security Council sanctions list, are implemented in the United States.
The following are important considerations for insurers when developing a sanctions compliance policy:

  • Continuous screening: Companies must make sure that its sanctions programme screens clients on a regular basis to keep up with changing risk profiles.
  • Risk based: Firms must choose sanctions watchlists based on the risk posed by their customers and the areas in which they do business.
  • Process of confirmation: When a client is matched to a sanctions list, companies should have a method in place to verify the customer’s identity and placement on the list.
  • Identification of mistakes: Sanctions programmes should have fail-safe features in place to discover staff mistakes or even purposeful attempts to evade the screening process.

 

How to Practice AML in Insurance Companies?

While enterprises and insurance companies are obligated to follow the AML compliance programme, they should also ensure that they are not responsible for any money laundering offences. Money laundering entails a series of steps that may or may not be as closely related with insurance businesses as they are with other financial industries.

In other situations, though, their involvement may be deemed a crime. For example, if an insurance business joins in or interacts in unlawful funds while knowing their real source, they are committing money laundering. Knowing the nature of the unlawful profits and yet deciding to conduct any transactions with the funds indicates that the individual or firm is unaware of the issue and decides to act without reporting or investigating the illicit funds case. If the corporation chooses to escalate the case, it will be regarded a crime if an individual is suspected of being involved in criminal activities or possesses money that are illicit proceeds.

Other than allowing transactions, if the company or an employee/agent chooses to allow payment with the illicit money while having full knowledge and not investigating the source of funds, then they will be held accountable. This means that the company should establish best practices of KYC compliance regulations, to prevent such scenarios and the integrity of the company from being harmed.

The employees should start with the basic knowledge of the client, such as their name, DOB, and home address. If the client is revealed to be a Politically Exposed Person (PEP), then they should be screened against available databases for any link to criminal activity or corruption. In case of a scenario where the employee is suspicious of the customer, then they can report the suspicious individual with their details to the senior management as well as the compliance officer of the firm, both of whom can further connect with regulatory agencies.

If there are any violations of the BSA regulations, then those involved (individual/company) will incur severe criminal or civil penalties and risk of reputation. There will be additional regulatory enforcement actions by the Treasury, FinCEN, and other regulatory bodies. In order to prevent such violations, the insurance companies must develop an effective BSA/AML compliance programme to mitigate any possible ML risks and protect the company from engaging in any criminal activity.

How To Build An Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance Programme for Insurance Companies

The insurance firm must follow the following rules in order to establish a complete, risk-based compliance programme with effective processes and procedures that meet with AML regulatory requirements:

  1. The insurance company should develop risk-based policies and processes along with internal controls in order to comply with BSA requirements for recordkeeping and reporting
  2. They should designate a compliance/BSA officer who ensures daily compliance, checks the effectiveness of the BSA programme, trains employees on an ongoing basis, and regularly updates the programme when required
  3. The ongoing training includes providing training about respective duties to the company’s agents, associates, and appropriate employees
  4. Independent testing of the BSA program is completed by the officer at regular intervals
  5. To get the customer’s required data that is necessary for the BSA/AML compliance programme
  6. To run regular risk assessments of the insurance company’s covered products

 

The Role of the Insurance Company when it comes to Anti-money Laundering (AML) Regulations

The following are the role and responsibilities of the insurance company to maintain AML/BSA compliance within the organisation:

Role and Responsibility of:

  • Board Members: The company’s board faculty will supervise the senior manager and guide them accordingly as to how to comply with the BSA regulatory requirements and establish the policies. The BSA officer will share the compliance reports, based on the results of independent testing and risk assessments, with the board members, who will review them on a regular basis. It is the board’s responsibility to assign necessary resources and funding for implementing the BSA compliance function in the company.
  • Senior Manager: The senior manager’s duty is to execute the compliance program efficiently, along with the appropriate policies and processes. The senior manager works above the BSA officer and overlooks the necessary procedures and internal controls that are being operated successfully. The manager will set the tone for the company to follow the guidelines. These are necessary for compliance and to maintain a compliance culture throughout the company.

 

The role of the BSA Officer in insurance and AML

It is the BSA officer’s responsibility to:

  1. Establish and implement the compliance programme in the company.
  2. They need to develop the BSA initiative and update the compliance programme when it is required and present the updated programme to the board for approval.
  3. They must review the risk assessment along with the internal controls that will be added to the programme
  4. They will assess the new requirements for compliance, along with standards and procedures, and make the necessary changes according to the existing programme.
  5. They will ensure compliance with the BSA/AML regulatory requirements for reporting cash transactions, cross-border shipping, and transferring currency or any other financial asset/instruments
  6. They need to investigate any suspicious activity and file the SARs when it is necessary. They also need to review the process for identifying any suspicious activity within the company
  7. They must ensure that compliance training is provided to the appropriate employees, board members, and senior management.
  8. They need to recommend the necessary resources and technology for maintaining compliance in the organisation.
  9. They must ensure that CDD processes include all the customer’s relevant data, along with the necessary documents, under the BSA compliance.

 

Why AML Compliance is Important for Insurers

Failure to comply with regulatory requirements can be disastrous for insurance companies. Breaches can lead to enforcement actions including fines, penalties and sanctions. In addition to the monetary losses, including a steep fall in stock prices in the case of a listed company, institutions would lose market reputation, which they took several years to build up.

Therefore, it is important for insurance companies to have proper compliance programmes and manage them effectively. AML compliance officers are indispensable staff for institutions as they help manage compliance programmes and mitigate compliance risk.

In the present times, when technological changes have significantly changed the financial crime landscape, institutions should make use of the services of skilled BSA officers and modern technology solutions. AML compliance software such as Tookitaki Anti-Money Laundering Suite, developed in line with changing criminal behaviour, makes the work of AML compliance officers easier and more secure. Our AML software helps mitigate emerging AML risks and improves the efficiency of compliance staff.

For more information about our AML solutions, speak to one of our experts.

 

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
28 Oct 2025
6 min
read

Beyond Compliance: How Next-Gen AML Technology Solutions Are Rewriting the Rules of Financial Crime Prevention

Financial institutions aren’t just fighting money laundering anymore — they’re racing to build systems smart enough to see it coming.

Introduction

Across the Philippines, financial crime is evolving faster than compliance teams can keep up. As digital payments, remittances, and cross-border transactions surge, new channels for laundering illicit funds are emerging. Money mule networks, online investment scams, and crypto-linked laundering are exploiting speed and scale — overwhelming traditional anti-money laundering (AML) systems.

The challenge isn’t just about staying compliant anymore. It’s about staying ahead.

Legacy systems built on static rules and limited visibility can’t cope with today’s dynamic risks. What’s needed now are next-generation AML technology solutions — intelligent, connected, and adaptable systems that learn from experience, detect context, and evolve with every investigation.

These aren’t futuristic ideas. They’re already reshaping compliance operations across Philippine banks and fintechs.

Talk to an Expert

The New Reality of Financial Crime

The Philippines has made significant progress in strengthening its AML and CFT (counter-financing of terrorism) framework. The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) and the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) have rolled out risk-based compliance requirements, urging financial institutions to implement smarter, data-driven monitoring.

But with innovation comes complexity.

  1. Digital payment adoption is skyrocketing, creating faster transaction flows — and faster opportunities for criminals.
  2. Cross-border crime syndicates are operating seamlessly across remittance and e-wallet platforms.
  3. New predicate crimes — from online fraud to crypto scams — are adding layers of sophistication.
  4. Regulatory expectations are evolving toward explainable AI and traceable risk management.

In this environment, compliance isn’t a checkbox. It’s a constant race against intelligent adversaries. And the institutions that thrive will be those that turn compliance into a strategic capability — powered by technology, collaboration, and trust.

What Defines a Modern AML Technology Solution

The term AML technology solutions has shifted from describing static compliance tools to encompassing a full spectrum of intelligent, integrated capabilities.

Today’s best AML systems share five defining traits:

1. Unified Intelligence Layer

They connect data across silos — customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, screening, and risk scoring — into a single, dynamic view. This eliminates blind spots and allows compliance teams to understand behaviour holistically.

2. AI-Driven Analytics

Modern AML systems leverage machine learning and behavioural analytics to identify subtle, previously unseen patterns. Instead of flagging rule breaches, they evaluate intent — learning what “normal” looks like for each customer and detecting deviations in real time.

3. Agentic AI Copilot

Next-generation AML tools include Agentic AI copilots that support investigators through reasoning, natural-language interaction, and context-driven insights. These copilots don’t just answer queries — they understand investigative goals.

4. Federated Learning Framework

To stay ahead of emerging threats, financial institutions need collective intelligence. Federated learning allows model training across institutions without data sharing, preserving privacy while expanding detection capabilities.

5. Explainability and Governance

Regulators and auditors demand transparency. Modern AML platforms must provide clear audit trails — explaining every decision, risk score, and alert with evidence and traceable logic.

Together, these principles redefine how compliance teams operate — from reactive detection to proactive prevention.

Why Legacy Systems Fall Short

Many Philippine institutions still rely on legacy AML systems designed over a decade ago. These systems, while once reliable, are now struggling under the demands of real-time payments, open finance, and cross-border ecosystems.

Key Limitations:

  • Rigid rules-based models: They can’t adapt to new typologies or behaviours.
  • High false positives: Excessive alerts dilute focus and consume investigator bandwidth.
  • Fragmented data sources: Payments, wallets, and remittances often sit in separate systems.
  • Manual reviews: Analysts spend hours reconciling incomplete data.
  • Lack of scalability: Growing transaction volumes strain system performance.

The result is predictable: operational inefficiency, regulatory exposure, and rising compliance costs. In today’s environment, doing more of the same — faster — isn’t enough. What’s needed is intelligence that evolves with the threat landscape.

The Tookitaki Model — A Holistic AML Technology Solution

Tookitaki’s FinCense represents the evolution of AML technology solutions. It’s an end-to-end, AI-driven compliance platform that connects monitoring, investigation, and intelligence sharing into a single ecosystem.

FinCense is built to serve as the Trust Layer for financial institutions — enabling them to detect, investigate, and prevent financial crime with accuracy, transparency, and speed.

Core Components of FinCense

  1. Transaction Monitoring: Real-time detection of suspicious behaviour with adaptive risk models.
  2. Name Screening: Accurate identification of sanctioned or high-risk entities with minimal false positives.
  3. Customer Risk Scoring: Dynamic profiling based on transaction behaviour and risk exposure.
  4. Smart Disposition Engine: Automated case summarisation and investigation narration.
  5. FinMate (Agentic AI Copilot): A virtual assistant that helps investigators interpret, summarise, and act faster.

Each module interacts seamlessly, supported by federated learning and continuous feedback loops. Together, they create a compliance environment that is not only reactive but self-improving.

Agentic AI — The Human-AI Alliance

Agentic AI marks a turning point in the evolution of AML systems. Unlike traditional AI, which passively analyses data, Agentic AI can reason, plan, and act in collaboration with human investigators.

How It Works in FinCense

  • Natural-Language Interaction: Investigators can ask the system questions like “Show all accounts linked to suspicious remittances in the last 30 days.”
  • Proactive Reasoning: The AI suggests potential connections or red flags before they are manually identified.
  • Summarisation and Guidance: Through FinMate, the AI generates draft narratives, summarises cases, and provides context for each alert.

This approach transforms how compliance teams work — reducing investigation time, improving accuracy, and building confidence in every decision.

Agentic AI isn’t replacing human expertise; it’s magnifying it. It brings intuition and efficiency together, ensuring compliance teams focus on judgment, not just data.

Collective Intelligence — The Power of the AFC Ecosystem

Compliance is most effective when knowledge is shared. That’s the philosophy behind the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem — Tookitaki’s collaborative platform that connects AML professionals, regulators, and financial institutions across Asia.

What It Offers

  • A library of typologies, red flags, and scenarios sourced from real-world cases.
  • Federated Insight Cards — system-generated reports summarising new typologies and detection indicators.
  • Regular contributions from AML experts, helping institutions stay updated with evolving risks.

By integrating the AFC Ecosystem into FinCense, Tookitaki ensures that AML models remain current and regionally relevant. Philippine banks, for instance, can immediately access typologies related to money mule networks, online scams, or remittance layering, and adapt their monitoring systems accordingly.

This collective intelligence model makes every member stronger — creating an industry-wide shield against financial crime.

Case in Focus: Philippine Bank’s Digital Transformation

When a major Philippine bank and wallet provider migrated from its legacy FICO system to Tookitaki’s FinCense Transaction Monitoring, the results were transformative.

Within months, the institution achieved:

  • >90% reduction in false positives
  • 10x faster deployment of new scenarios, improving regulatory readiness
  • >95% alert accuracy, ensuring high-quality investigations
  • >75% reduction in alert volume, while processing 1 billion transactions and screening over 40 million customers

These outcomes were achieved through FinCense’s adaptive AI models, seamless integration, and out-of-the-box scenarios from the AFC Ecosystem.

Tookitaki’s consultants also played a pivotal role — providing technical expertise, training client teams, and helping prioritise compliance-critical features. The result was a smooth transition that set a new benchmark for AML effectiveness in the Philippines.

ChatGPT Image Oct 27, 2025, 04_04_10 PM

Key Benefits of Tookitaki’s AML Technology Solutions

1. Smarter Detection

Advanced AI and federated learning identify subtle patterns and anomalies that traditional systems miss. The technology continuously evolves with new data, reducing blind spots and emerging risk exposure.

2. Operational Efficiency

By automating repetitive tasks and prioritising high-risk cases, compliance teams experience drastic improvements in productivity — freeing time for complex investigations.

3. Regulatory Readiness

FinCense ensures that every detection, decision, and alert is explainable and auditable. Built-in model governance allows institutions to meet regulatory scrutiny with confidence.

4. Collaborative Intelligence

The AFC Ecosystem keeps detection logic updated with typologies from across Asia, enabling Philippine institutions to anticipate risks before they strike locally.

5. Future-Proof Architecture

Cloud-ready and modular, FinCense scales effortlessly with transaction volumes. Its API-first design supports easy integration with existing systems and future innovations.

The Future of AML Technology

As the financial sector moves toward real-time, open, and interconnected systems, AML technology must evolve from reactive compliance to predictive intelligence.

Emerging Trends to Watch

  • Predictive AI: Systems that forecast suspicious activity before it occurs.
  • Blockchain Analytics Integration: Enhanced visibility into crypto-linked money flows.
  • Cross-Border Collaboration: Federated intelligence frameworks spanning regulators and private institutions.
  • AI Governance Standards: Alignment with explainability and fairness principles under global regulatory frameworks.

Agentic AI will be central to this future — enabling compliance teams to not only interpret data but reason with it, combining automation with accountability.

In the Philippines, this means financial institutions can leapfrog legacy systems and become regional leaders in compliance innovation.

Conclusion: Building a Smarter, Fairer Compliance Future

The definition of compliance is changing. No longer a back-office function, it has become a strategic differentiator — defining how financial institutions build trust and protect customers.

Next-generation AML technology solutions, powered by Agentic AI and collective intelligence, are helping institutions like those in the Philippines shift from reactive detection to proactive prevention.

Through Tookitaki’s FinCense and FinMate, compliance teams now have a complete ecosystem that connects human expertise with machine intelligence, real-time monitoring with explainability, and individual insights with industry collaboration.

The next era of AML won’t be measured by how well financial institutions catch crime — but by how effectively they prevent it.

Beyond Compliance: How Next-Gen AML Technology Solutions Are Rewriting the Rules of Financial Crime Prevention
Blogs
28 Oct 2025
6 min
read

Sustainable Compliance in Australian Banking: Balancing Innovation, Efficiency, and Trust

Australian banks are redefining compliance for a sustainable future — where innovation, ethics, and efficiency work together to build long-term trust.

Introduction

Sustainability has long been a priority in banking portfolios and lending practices. But now, the concept is expanding into a new domain — regulatory compliance.

In an era of rising financial crime risks, stringent AUSTRAC expectations, and growing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) accountability, banks in Australia are realising that sustainability is not just about green finance. It is also about sustaining compliance itself.

Sustainable compliance means designing AML and financial crime frameworks that are resilient, efficient, and ethical. It is about using technology responsibly to reduce waste — of time, resources, and human potential — while strengthening integrity across the financial ecosystem.

Talk to an Expert

Why Compliance Sustainability Matters Now

1. Rising Regulatory Complexity

AUSTRAC, APRA, and global bodies such as FATF continue to evolve AML and operational risk expectations. Banks must constantly adjust systems and controls, creating operational fatigue. Sustainable models reduce this burden through automation and adaptive AI.

2. Escalating Costs

Compliance costs in Australia have grown by more than 30 percent over the past five years. Institutions spend millions annually on monitoring, audits, and manual reviews. Sustainable compliance seeks long-term efficiency, not short-term fixes.

3. ESG and Corporate Responsibility

Sustainability now extends to governance. Boards are under pressure to ensure ethical use of data, responsible AI, and fair access to financial services. Sustainable compliance supports ESG goals by embedding transparency and accountability.

4. Human Capital Strain

Alert fatigue and repetitive reviews lead to burnout and turnover in compliance teams. Sustainable systems use AI to automate repetitive work, allowing experts to focus on strategic decisions.

5. Technology Overload

Fragmented systems, vendor sprawl, and duplicated infrastructure increase energy and resource consumption. Consolidated, intelligent platforms offer a greener, leaner alternative.

What Sustainable Compliance Means

Sustainable compliance is built on three interconnected principles: resilience, efficiency, and ethics.

  1. Resilience: Systems that adapt to evolving regulations and typologies without constant re-engineering.
  2. Efficiency: Smart automation that reduces manual effort, duplication, and false positives.
  3. Ethics: Transparent, fair, and explainable AI that supports responsible decision-making.

When these three principles align, compliance becomes a sustainable competitive advantage rather than an ongoing cost.

How AI Enables Sustainable Compliance

Artificial intelligence is the cornerstone of sustainable compliance. Unlike traditional systems that rely on rigid thresholds, AI learns continuously and makes context-aware decisions.

1. Intelligent Automation

AI streamlines repetitive tasks such as data aggregation, transaction screening, and report preparation. This reduces the human workload and energy consumed by manual reviews.

2. Dynamic Adaptation

Machine learning models evolve automatically as new typologies emerge. Banks no longer need to rebuild systems with every regulatory update.

3. Reduced False Positives

Smarter detection means fewer wasted investigations, lowering costs and conserving investigator time.

4. Explainable AI

AI systems must be transparent. Sustainable compliance relies on explainable models that regulators and auditors can understand and trust.

5. Ethical Governance

Responsible AI ensures fairness and avoids unintended bias in transaction or customer evaluations, aligning with ESG frameworks.

ChatGPT Image Oct 27, 2025, 02_35_25 PM

AUSTRAC and APRA: Driving Sustainable Practices

AUSTRAC’s Innovation Mindset

AUSTRAC actively encourages RegTech adoption that enhances both efficiency and accountability. Its collaboration with industry through the Fintel Alliance demonstrates a commitment to sustainable, intelligence-driven compliance.

APRA’s Operational Resilience Standards

The new CPS 230 standard emphasises resilience in critical systems and third-party risk management. This overlaps directly with the goals of sustainable compliance — continuous operation, minimal disruption, and robust governance.

Together, these frameworks are nudging financial institutions toward long-term sustainability in compliance operations.

Case Example: Regional Australia Bank

Regional Australia Bank, a community-owned institution, is a prime example of sustainable compliance in action. Through automation and intelligent monitoring, the bank has reduced manual reviews and strengthened reporting accuracy while maintaining transparency with AUSTRAC.

Its focus on efficiency and accountability shows how even mid-tier institutions can implement sustainable models that balance compliance and customer trust.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense — Building Sustainable Compliance

FinCense, Tookitaki’s end-to-end compliance platform, helps Australian banks achieve sustainability in their AML and fraud operations by combining AI innovation with responsible design.

  • Adaptive AI: Continuously learns from investigator feedback, eliminating repetitive manual adjustments.
  • Federated Intelligence: Collaborates with anonymised typologies from the AFC Ecosystem to strengthen collective learning.
  • Unified Architecture: Consolidates AML, fraud, and sanctions monitoring into a single efficient platform, reducing system duplication.
  • Agentic AI Copilot (FinMate): Assists investigators in triaging alerts and preparing reports, optimising human resources.
  • Explainable AI: Ensures transparency, fairness, and regulator confidence.
  • Sustainable by Design: Lowers computational load through efficient data processing, aligning with ESG-aligned technology use.

With FinCense, compliance evolves from a reactive burden to a sustainable capability that delivers long-term resilience and trust.

The Link Between ESG and Compliance

1. Governance as a Core ESG Pillar

Strong governance ensures fair decision-making and transparent processes. AI systems that support explainability reinforce governance standards.

2. Environmental Efficiency

Cloud-native compliance solutions consume less energy and reduce hardware dependency compared to legacy systems.

3. Social Responsibility

Preventing financial crime protects communities from fraud, exploitation, and organised criminal activity — reinforcing the “S” in ESG.

Incorporating these principles into compliance strategy strengthens both regulatory standing and corporate reputation.

The Human Element: Empowering People through Sustainability

Sustainable compliance is not just about technology. It is also about empowering people.

  • Reduced Burnout: Automation removes repetitive workloads, allowing staff to focus on analysis and strategic oversight.
  • Upskilling Opportunities: Teams learn to collaborate with AI systems and interpret insights effectively.
  • Stronger Morale: Investigators derive greater satisfaction when their work contributes meaningfully to prevention and protection.

In short, sustainability in compliance creates happier, more productive teams who are critical to long-term organisational success.

Challenges to Achieving Sustainable Compliance

  1. Legacy Infrastructure: Older systems are resource-intensive and difficult to modernise.
  2. Cultural Resistance: Shifting mindsets from short-term fixes to long-term sustainability requires leadership buy-in.
  3. Initial Investment: Sustainable systems demand upfront technology and training costs.
  4. Data Governance: Institutions must ensure ethical handling of sensitive financial data.
  5. Measurement Difficulty: Quantifying sustainability benefits beyond cost savings can be complex.

With a clear roadmap, however, these challenges can be overcome through incremental adoption and strong governance.

A Practical Roadmap for Australian Banks

  1. Evaluate Current State: Map compliance inefficiencies and identify areas for automation.
  2. Invest in Scalable Infrastructure: Move to cloud-native, modular systems that can evolve with regulations.
  3. Embed Explainability: Choose AI tools that document and justify their decisions.
  4. Foster Collaboration: Engage regulators, fintech partners, and peer institutions for collective learning.
  5. Measure Impact: Track not just costs, but also employee well-being, risk reduction, and energy efficiency.
  6. Cultivate a Sustainable Culture: Make sustainability a compliance KPI, not a side initiative.

Future Trends: The Next Decade of Sustainable Compliance

  1. AI Governance Frameworks: Regulators will introduce clearer guidelines on responsible AI use in compliance.
  2. Predictive Compliance Engines: Systems will forecast risks and self-optimise detection thresholds.
  3. Federated Learning Ecosystems: Secure collaboration between banks will become standard practice.
  4. Green IT in Compliance: Banks will measure and report on the carbon footprint of compliance operations.
  5. Human-AI Collaboration: Copilots like FinMate will become standard for investigators.

The convergence of technology, ethics, and efficiency will define the next era of compliance sustainability.

Conclusion

Sustainable compliance is not just a technological aspiration — it is an organisational mindset. Australian banks that balance innovation with responsibility will not only meet AUSTRAC’s and APRA’s standards but also build enduring trust with customers, regulators, and investors.

Regional Australia Bank illustrates how this balance can be achieved, showing that sustainability and compliance can reinforce each other.

With Tookitaki’s FinCense and FinMate, financial institutions can embrace AI that is not only powerful but also ethical, transparent, and sustainable.

Pro tip: The most advanced compliance programs of the future will not just protect institutions — they will protect the planet, the people, and the integrity of finance itself.

Sustainable Compliance in Australian Banking: Balancing Innovation, Efficiency, and Trust
Blogs
27 Oct 2025
6 min
read

Bank AML Compliance in Singapore: What It Takes to Stay Ahead in 2025

For banks in Singapore, AML compliance is more than just ticking regulatory boxes. It’s about protecting trust in one of the world’s most scrutinised financial systems.

As criminal tactics evolve and regulators sharpen their expectations, bank AML compliance has become a critical function. From onboarding and screening to real-time monitoring and STR filing, every touchpoint is under the microscope. And in Singapore, where the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) sets the pace for regional financial regulation, banks are expected to move fast, adapt constantly, and lead by example.

In this blog, we unpack what bank AML compliance really means in 2025, the challenges institutions face, and the tools helping them stay proactive.

Talk to an Expert

What Is Bank AML Compliance?

Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance refers to the policies, procedures, systems, and reporting obligations banks must follow to detect and prevent the movement of illicit funds.

In Singapore, bank AML compliance includes:

  • Know Your Customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD)
  • Ongoing transaction monitoring
  • Sanctions screening and PEP checks
  • Filing of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) via GoAML
  • Internal training, audit trails, and governance structures

Banks are expected to align with MAS regulations, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards, and evolving international norms.

Why AML Compliance Is a Top Priority for Singaporean Banks

Singapore’s role as a global financial hub makes it both a gatekeeper and a target. As funds move across borders at record speed, banks must defend against a range of risks including:

  • Mule accounts recruited through scam syndicates
  • Corporate structures used for trade-based money laundering
  • Digital wallets facilitating fund layering
  • Deepfake impersonation enabling fraudulent transfers
  • Shell firms used to obscure beneficial ownership

With MAS ramping up supervision and technology advancing rapidly, the margin for error is shrinking.

Key AML Requirements for Banks in Singapore

Let’s look at the core areas banks must cover to meet AML compliance standards in Singapore.

1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and KYC

Banks must identify and verify customers before account opening and on an ongoing basis. This includes:

  • Collecting valid identification and proof of address
  • Understanding the nature of the customer’s business
  • Conducting enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients
  • Ongoing risk reviews, especially after trigger events

Failure to maintain strong CDD can result in onboarding fraud, mule account creation, or exposure to sanctioned entities.

2. Sanctions and Watchlist Screening

Banks must screen clients and transactions against:

Screening must be:

  • Real-time and batch capable
  • Fuzzy-match enabled to detect name variations
  • Localised for multilingual searches

3. Transaction Monitoring

Banks must monitor customer activity to detect suspicious behaviour. This includes:

  • Identifying patterns like structuring or unusual frequency
  • Flagging cross-border payments with high-risk jurisdictions
  • Tracking transactions inconsistent with customer profile
  • Layering detection through remittance and payment platforms

Monitoring should be ongoing, risk-based, and adaptable to emerging threats.

4. Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR)

When suspicious activity is detected, banks must file an STR to the Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office (STRO) via GoAML.

Key requirements:

  • Timely filing upon detection
  • Clear, factual summaries of suspicious behaviour
  • Supporting documentation
  • Internal approval processes and audit logs

Delays or errors in STR submission can result in penalties and reputational damage.

5. Training and Governance

AML compliance is not just about technology — it’s about people and process. Banks must:

  • Train staff on identifying red flags
  • Assign clear AML responsibilities
  • Maintain audit trails for all compliance activities
  • Perform internal reviews and independent audits

MAS requires banks to demonstrate governance, accountability, and risk ownership at the senior management level.

Common Challenges in Bank AML Compliance

Even well-resourced institutions in Singapore face friction points:

❌ High False Positives

Traditional systems often flag benign transactions, creating alert fatigue and wasting analyst time.

❌ Slow Investigation Workflows

Manual investigation processes delay STRs and increase case backlogs.

❌ Disconnected Data

Siloed systems hinder holistic customer risk profiling.

❌ Outdated Typologies

Many banks rely on static rules that don’t reflect the latest laundering trends.

❌ Limited AI Explainability

Regulators demand clear reasoning behind AI-driven alerts. Black-box models don’t cut it.

These challenges impact operational efficiency and regulatory readiness.

How Technology Is Shaping AML Compliance in Singapore

Modern AML solutions help banks meet compliance requirements more effectively by:

✅ Automating Monitoring

Real-time detection of suspicious patterns reduces missed threats.

✅ Using AI to Reduce Noise

Machine learning models cut false positives and prioritise high-risk alerts.

✅ Integrating Case Management

Investigators get a unified view of customer behaviour, risk scores, and typology matches.

✅ Enabling STR Auto-Narration

AI-powered platforms now generate STR drafts based on alert data, improving speed and quality.

✅ Supporting Simulation

Before launching new rules or typologies, banks can simulate impact to optimise performance.

These capabilities free up teams to focus on decision-making, not admin work.

ChatGPT Image Oct 26, 2025, 08_49_02 PM

What Makes a Bank AML Solution Truly Effective in Singapore

To succeed in Singapore’s compliance environment, AML platforms must deliver:

1. MAS Alignment and GoAML Integration

Support for local regulation, including:

  • STR formatting and digital filing
  • Explainable decision paths for every alert
  • Regulatory reporting dashboards and logs

2. Typology-Based Detection

Instead of relying solely on thresholds, platforms should detect patterns based on actual laundering behaviour.

Examples include:

  • Investment scam layering through mule accounts
  • Shell firm payments with no economic rationale
  • Repeated use of new payment service providers

3. Access to Shared Intelligence

Platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense connect with the AFC Ecosystem, giving banks access to regional typologies contributed by peers.

This improves detection and keeps systems updated with emerging risks.

4. AI Copilot Support for Investigators

Tools like FinMate assist compliance teams by:

  • Highlighting high-risk activities
  • Mapping alerts to known typologies
  • Drafting STRs in natural language
  • Suggesting investigation paths

5. Simulation and Threshold Tuning

Banks should be able to test detection logic before deployment, avoiding alert floods and system overload.

How FinCense Helps Banks Elevate AML Compliance

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is purpose-built to support bank AML compliance across Asia, including Singapore.

Key features include:

  • Real-time transaction monitoring
  • Typology-based scenario detection
  • MAS-compliant STR automation
  • Explainable AI and audit trails
  • AI-powered alert triage and FinMate copilot
  • Access to the AFC Ecosystem for shared scenarios

The platform is modular, meaning banks can start with what they need and expand over time.

Results Achieved by Banks Using FinCense

Institutions using FinCense in Singapore report:

  • 60 to 70 percent fewer false positives
  • 3x faster investigation turnaround
  • Improved STR quality and regulator satisfaction
  • Lower operational burden on compliance teams
  • Stronger audit readiness with full traceability

These results demonstrate the value of combining AI, domain expertise, and regulatory alignment.

Checklist: Is Your Bank AML Compliance Ready for 2025?

Ask yourself:

  • Is your transaction monitoring real time and risk based?
  • Are alerts mapped to real-world typologies?
  • Can your team investigate and file an STR within one day?
  • Does your platform comply with MAS requirements?
  • Can you simulate detection rules before deploying them?
  • Do you have explainable AI and audit logs?
  • Are you collaborating with others to detect evolving threats?

If not, it may be time to consider a smarter approach.

Conclusion: Compliance Is a Responsibility and a Competitive Advantage

In a fast-changing landscape like Singapore’s, AML compliance is about more than avoiding penalties. It’s about protecting your institution, earning regulator trust, and staying resilient as financial crime evolves.

Banks that invest in smarter, faster, and more collaborative AML tools are not just staying compliant. They are setting the standard for the region.

Platforms like FinCense offer a clear path forward — one that combines regional insights, AI intelligence, and operational excellence.

If your compliance team is working harder than ever with limited results, it’s time to work smarter.

Bank AML Compliance in Singapore: What It Takes to Stay Ahead in 2025