Blog

Digital Payments in the Philippines: All You Need to Know

Site Logo
Tookitaki
22 August 2022
read
7 min

The COVID-19 pandemic became a great catalyst that propelled digital payments in the Philippines to new heights. As Filipinos look for convenient, safe, and efficient means to receive and transfer funds, pay bills and shop for necessities during the pandemic, the country's use of electronic payment systems increased significantly. Of particular note, the country's Quick Response payment scheme (QR Ph) for person-to-person payments grew by over 5,000% in December 2020, just a year after its launch.

In response to this need, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) continues to provide an enabling environment that promotes financial innovation while safeguarding the integrity and stability of the financial system. BSP believes that online payments are an engine of financial inclusion and economic growth. The Philippines targets to become a digital-heavy, cash-light society, with 50% of all transactions going digital by 2023 and 70% of Filipino adults having formal bank accounts by 2023.

{{cta-first}}

The State of Digital Payments in the Philippines

Still cash-dominated, the Philippines is showing steady growth in digital payments. The value of digital payments, excluding business-to-business payments and payments at the point of sale with mobile card readers (terminals), is expected to reach US$28.54 billion in 2022, according to Statista. The digital commerce payments sector contributes the majority share with a total transaction value of US$24.36 billion in 2022. The total transaction value would be US$55.75bn by 2027, representing an annual growth rate (CAGR 2022-2027) of 14.33%.

Source: Statista

Bank transfers, QR Ph and digital wallets are experiencing rapid growth in the country. New-age payment schemes like Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) are also picking up steam.

Some statistics on these digital payment methods are below.

  • InstaPay (a digital payment system for smaller person-to-person transactions) volume and value reached 43.3 million and P284.2 billion, respectively, as of June 2022, compared to 37.1 million and P213.2 billion in June 2021, according to official statistics.
  • PESONet (a payment system that replaces cheque usage in governments and businesses) volume and value reached 7.3 million and P548.1 billion as of June 2022, compared with 4.3 million and P362.5 billion a year ago.
  • Person-to-person transactions via QR Ph stood at 527,800 worth P5.4 billion at the end of April 2022, growing by 171.7% in volume and 252.5% in value year on year.
  • The number of mobile wallet users in the Philippines is estimated to reach 75.5 million in 2025, compared to 24.6 million in 2020, according to Statista.
  • According to a survey, the Philippines' BNPL payment would grow by 109.7% yearly to $803.5 million in 2022. Between 2022 and 2028, the payment space would have a compound annual growth rate of 50.9%.

Digital Payment Transformation in Progress

The Philippine government is capitalising on its success with digital payments. It has launched several initiatives to significantly increase the adoption of digital payments over the next two years. These efforts align with its vision to be a cash-lite economy with high financial inclusion rates. The government believes digital payment innovations would lower transaction costs and eliminate the common barriers to owning a transaction account.

According to the central bank’s Digital Payments Transformation Roadmap 2020-2023, the country aims at creating an “efficient, inclusive, safe and secure digital payments ecosystem that supports the diverse needs and capabilities of individuals and firms”. The plan envisages:

  • The creation of innovative digital financial products and services
  • A national ID System supported by more modern payment services to facilitate real-time processing of financial transactions
  • More payment streams on top of the existing InstaPay instant payment stream and PESONet batched payment stream
  • Digital finance infrastructure to facilitate interoperability of payment services and seamless transaction processing
  • Extension of the National Quick Response Code Standard (QR Ph) to include person-to-merchant payments
  • Digital banks as a new bank classification for end-to-end processing of financial products and services through digital platforms and electronic channels

Aligning with the roadmap, the BSP launched an Open Finance Framework in June 2021 to enable portability, interoperability, and collaborative partnerships between BSP-supervised financial institutions and fintech players. It has opened opportunities for fintech companies within the country and abroad.

Licencing for Fintech Companies

Foreign and local businesses that want to establish a fintech firm in the Philippines should register with the appropriate regulators, such as the SEC and the BSP. There are various types of fintech companies in the Philippines operating in sectors such as digital payments, mobile wallets, digital remittance, blockchain and cryptocurrency and alternative finance.

Licencing for fintech companies includes the following:

  • Electronic Money Issuer (EMI): In May 2021, the BSP started to grant licenses for fintech companies to operate as an official EMI. The EMI licence authorises these companies to deliver e-wallet services through mobile apps. The companies can also convert consumers’ cash into electronic money, which they can use to transact online. The BSP imposed a two-year moratorium on the issuance of EMI licenses to non-banks starting 16 December 2021.
  • Operators of Payment Systems (OPS): OPS include firms such as cash-in service providers, bill payment providers, payment gateways, payment facilitators, and merchant acquirers that enable sellers of goods and services to accept payments, in cash or digital form. The BSP started issuing OPS licences in January 2020; there are 222 registered operators currently.
  • Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP): The BSP defines a VASP as any business that performs an exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets, the transfer of virtual assets and the safekeeping or administration of virtual assets. The central bank granted licences to 19 VASPs as of June 2022. On 12 August 2022, the BSP imposed a three-year moratorium on giving licences to new VASPs.
  • Digital Bank: Digital banks offer the same services as traditional banks without needing physical branches. In September 2021, the BSP stopped accepting digital bank licence applications as it decided to cap the number of players to seven.

Addressing Financial Crimes

Along with the rise of digital payments comes the threat of sophisticated financial crimes. While the country works hard to move out of the FATF grey list, players in the digital payments space are also facing intense regulatory scrutiny. The relative anonymity provided by online financial services and other features of technology, such as the speed at which transactions can occur and a lack of regulation from national and international authorities, contribute to the money laundering risk associated with e-wallets and mobile money.

The BSP is conscious of the financial crime risks within the country and is working with the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) to create strategies to create concrete anti-money laundering policies for new-age payments. The central bank had tightened requirements for licenses such as Electronic Money Issuer (EMI) and Operators of Payment Systems (OPS) to address Anti-money Laundering/Counter Terrorist Financing (AML/CTF) compliance. Fintech companies providing payment methods in the Philippines now require efficient and effective AML/CTF measures, apart from other corporate governance requirements.

Tookitaki Innovation for Digital Payment Companies in the Philippines

Today’s world of sophisticated cyber-enabled money launderers calls for cutting-edge technology and innovative solutions. Compliance departments rely on modern technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to fight financial crime.

Fighting financial crime needs to be a collective effort through centralised intelligence-gathering. The Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem includes a network of experts and provides a platform for the experts to create a knowledge base to share financial crime scenarios.

This collective intelligence is the ability of a large group of AFC experts to pool their knowledge, data, and skills in order to tackle complex problems related to financial crime and pursue innovative ideas.

The AFC ecosystem is a game changer since it helps remove the information vacuum created by siloed operations. Our network of experts includes risk advisers, legal firms, AFC specialists, consultancies, and financial institutions from across the globe.

Payments Case Study

Tookitaki’s FinCense covers the entire customer onboarding and ongoing processes through its Transaction Monitoring, Smart Screening, Customer Risk Scoring, and Case Manager. Together they provide holistic risk coverage, sharper detection, and significant effort reduction in managing false alerts.

The AFC Ecosystem and FinCense work in tandem and help our stakeholders widen their view of risk from an internal one to an industry-wide one across organizations and borders. Moreover, they can do so without compromising privacy and security.

Tookitaki recently announced its launch in the Philippines with partnerships with payment gateway company Paymongo and the country’s leading all-in-one money platform.

The Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Tookitaki, Abhishek Chatterjee said in an interview with BusinessWorld that the firm will offer FinCense to enable businesses to build comprehensive and customized risk-based AML compliance programs.

“Our goal in the next two years is to become the leader in AML software in the Philippine market, and when I say leader, I mean both building the network to fight and share knowledge so that the awareness in the industry is much more than what it is today,” Mr. Chatterjee said.

Talk to our expert to learn more about our AML solution and how Tookitaki can be your partner of choice for enhancing risk-based AML compliance programmes.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
30 Jul 2025
5 min
read

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud

Fraud in Australia has moved beyond stolen credit cards, today’s threats are smarter, faster, and often one step ahead.

Australia is facing a new wave of financial fraud—complex scams, cyber-enabled deception, and social engineering techniques that prey on trust. From sophisticated investment frauds to deepfake impersonations, criminals are evolving rapidly. And so must our fraud prevention strategies.

This blog explores how fraud is impacting Australia, what new methods criminals are using, and how financial institutions, businesses, and individuals can stay ahead of the game. Whether you're in compliance, fintech, banking, or just a concerned citizen, fraud prevention is everyone’s business.

The Fraud Landscape in Australia: A Wake-Up Call

In 2024 alone, Australians lost over AUD 2.7 billion to scams, according to data from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The Scamwatch program reported an alarming rise in phishing, investment scams, identity theft, and fake billing.

A few alarming trends:

  • Investment scams accounted for over AUD 1.3 billion in losses.
  • Business email compromise (BEC) and invoice fraud targeted SMEs.
  • Romance and remote access scams exploited personal vulnerability.
  • Deepfake scams and AI-generated impersonations are on the rise, particularly targeting executives and finance teams.

The fraud threat has gone digital, cross-border, and real-time. Traditional controls alone are no longer enough.

Talk to an Expert

Why Fraud Prevention Is a National Priority

Fraud isn't just a financial issue—it’s a matter of public trust. When scams go undetected, victims don’t just lose money—they lose faith in financial institutions, government systems, and digital innovation.

Here’s why fraud prevention is now top of mind in Australia:

  • Real-time payments mean real-time risks: With the rise of the New Payments Platform (NPP), funds can move across banks instantly. This has increased the urgency to detect and prevent fraud in milliseconds—not days.
  • Rise in money mule networks: Criminal groups are exploiting students, gig workers, and the elderly to launder stolen funds.
  • Increased regulatory pressure: AUSTRAC and ASIC are putting more pressure on institutions to identify and report suspicious activities more proactively.

Common Fraud Techniques Seen in Australia

Understanding how fraud works is the first step to preventing it. Here are some of the most commonly observed fraud techniques:

a) Business Email Compromise (BEC)

Fraudsters impersonate vendors, CEOs, or finance officers to divert funds through fake invoices or urgent payment requests. This is especially dangerous for SMEs.

b) Investment Scams

Fake trading platforms, crypto Ponzi schemes, and fraudulent real estate investments have tricked thousands. Often, these scams use fake celebrity endorsements or “guaranteed returns” to lure victims.

c) Romance and Sextortion Scams

These scams manipulate victims emotionally, often over weeks or months, before asking for money. Some even involve blackmail using fake or stolen intimate content.

d) Deepfake Impersonation

Using AI-generated voice or video, scammers are impersonating real people to initiate fund transfers or manipulate staff into giving away sensitive information.

e) Synthetic Identity Fraud

Criminals use a blend of real and fake information to create a new, ‘clean’ identity that can bypass onboarding checks at banks and fintechs.

20250730_2107_Cybersecurity Precaution Scene_remix_01k1dzk8hwfd4t9rd8mkhzgr1w

Regulatory Push for Smarter Controls

Regulators in Australia are stepping up their efforts:

  • AUSTRAC has introduced updated guidance for transaction monitoring and suspicious matter reporting, pushing institutions to adopt more adaptive, risk-based approaches.
  • ASIC is cracking down on investment scams and calling for platforms to implement stricter identity and payment verification systems.
  • The ACCC’s National Anti-Scam Centre launched a multi-agency initiative to disrupt scam operations through intelligence sharing and faster response times.

But even regulators acknowledge: compliance alone won't stop fraud. Prevention needs smarter tools, better collaboration, and real-time intelligence.

A New Approach: Proactive, AI-Powered Fraud Prevention

The most forward-thinking banks and fintechs in Australia are moving from reactive to proactive fraud prevention. Here's what the shift looks like:

✅ Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Instead of relying on static rules, modern systems use machine learning to flag suspicious behaviour—like unusual payment patterns, high-risk geographies, or rapid account-to-account transfers.

✅ Behavioural Analytics

Understanding what ‘normal’ looks like for each user helps detect anomalies fast—like a customer suddenly logging in from a new country or making a large transfer outside business hours.

✅ AI Copilots for Investigators

Tools like AI-powered investigation assistants can help analysts triage alerts faster, recommend next steps, and even generate narrative summaries for suspicious activity reports.

✅ Community Intelligence

Fraudsters often reuse tactics across institutions. Platforms like Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem allow banks to share anonymised fraud scenarios and red flags—so everyone can learn and defend together.

✅ Federated Learning Models

These models allow banks to collaborate on fraud detection algorithms without sharing customer data—bringing the power of collective intelligence without compromising privacy.

Fraud Prevention Best Practices for Australian Institutions

Whether you're a Tier-1 bank or a growing fintech, these best practices are critical:

  1. Prioritise real-time fraud detection tools that work across payment channels and digital platforms.
  2. Train your teams—fraudsters are exploiting human error more than technical flaws.
  3. Invest in explainable AI to build trust with regulators and internal stakeholders.
  4. Use layered defences: Combine transaction monitoring, device fingerprinting, behavioural analytics, and biometric verification.
  5. Collaborate across the ecosystem—join industry platforms, share intel, and learn from others.

How Tookitaki Supports Fraud Prevention in Australia

Tookitaki is helping Australian institutions stay ahead of fraud by combining advanced AI with collective intelligence. Our FinCense platform offers:

  • End-to-end fraud and AML detection across transactions, customers, and devices.
  • Federated learning that enables risk detection with insights contributed by a global network of financial crime experts.
  • Smart investigation tools to reduce alert fatigue and speed up response times.

The Role of Public Awareness in Prevention

It’s not just institutions—customers play a key role too. Public campaigns like Scamwatch, educational content from banks, and media coverage of fraud trends all contribute to prevention.

Simple actions like verifying sender details, avoiding suspicious links, and reporting scam attempts can go a long way. In the fight against fraud, awareness is the first line of defence.

Conclusion: Staying Ahead in a Smarter Fraud Era

Fraud prevention in Australia can no longer be treated as an afterthought. The threats are too advanced, too fast, and too costly.

With the right mix of technology, collaboration, and education, Australia can stay ahead of financial criminals—and turn the tide in favour of consumers, businesses, and institutions alike.

Whether it’s adopting AI tools, sharing threat insights, or empowering individuals, fraud prevention is no longer optional. It’s the new frontline of trust.

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud
Blogs
29 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam

In March 2025, a finance director at a multinational firm in Singapore authorised a US$499,000 payment during what appeared to be a Zoom call with the company’s senior leadership. There was just one problem: none of the people on the call were real.

What seemed like a routine virtual meeting turned out to be a highly orchestrated deepfake scam, where cybercriminals used artificial intelligence to impersonate the company’s Chief Financial Officer and other top executives. The finance director, believing the request was genuine, wired nearly half a million dollars to a fraudulent account.

The incident has sent shockwaves across the financial and corporate world, underscoring the fast-evolving threat of deepfake technology.

Background of the Scam

According to Singapore police reports, the finance executive received a message from someone posing as the company’s UK-based CFO. The message requested an urgent fund transfer to facilitate a confidential acquisition. To build credibility, the fraudster set up a Zoom call — featuring multiple senior executives, all appearing and sounding authentic.

But the entire video call was fabricated using deepfake technology.

These weren’t just stolen profile photos; they were AI-generated likenesses with synced facial movements and realistic voices, mimicking actual executives. The finance director, seeing what seemed like familiar faces and hearing familiar voices, followed through with the transfer.

Only later did the company realise that the actual executives had never been on the call.

What the Case Revealed

This wasn’t just another phishing email or spoofed WhatsApp message. This was next-level digital deception. Here’s what made it chillingly effective:

  • Multi-party deepfake execution – The fraud involved several synthetic identities, all rendered convincingly in real-time to simulate a legitimate boardroom environment.
  • High-level impersonation – Senior figures like the CFO were cloned with accurate visual and vocal characteristics, heightening the illusion of authority and urgency.
  • Deeply contextual manipulation – The scam leveraged business context (e.g. M&A activity, board-level communications) that suggested insider knowledge.

Singapore’s police reported this as one of the most convincing cases of AI-powered impersonation seen to date — and issued a national warning to corporations and finance professionals.

Impact on Financial Institutions and Corporates

While the fraud targeted one company, its implications ripple across the entire financial system:

Deepfake Fatigue and Trust Erosion

When even video calls are no longer trustworthy, confidence in digital communication takes a hit. This undermines both internal decision-making and external client relationships.

CFOs and Finance Teams in the Crosshairs

Finance and treasury teams are prime targets for scams like this. These professionals are expected to act fast, handle large sums, and follow instructions from the top — making them vulnerable to high-pressure frauds.

Breakdown of Traditional Verification

Emails, video calls, and even voice confirmations can be falsified. Without secondary verification protocols, companies remain dangerously exposed.

ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2025, 02_34_13 PM

Lessons Learned from the Scam

The Singapore deepfake case isn’t an outlier — it’s a glimpse into the future of financial crime. Key takeaways:

  1. Always Verify High-Value Requests
    Especially those involving new accounts or cross-border transfers. A secondary channel of verification — via phone or an encrypted app — is now a must.
  2. Educate Senior Leadership
    Executives need to be aware that their digital identities can be hijacked. Regular briefings on impersonation risks are essential.
  3. Adopt Real-Time Behavioural Monitoring
    Advanced analytics can flag abnormal transaction patterns — even when the request appears “approved” by an authority figure.
  4. Invest in Deepfake Detection Tools
    There are now software solutions that scan video content for artefacts, inconsistencies, or signs of AI manipulation.
  5. Strengthen Internal Protocols
    Critical payment workflows should always require multi-party authorisation, escalation logic, and documented rationale.

The Role of Technology in Prevention

Scams like this are designed to outsmart conventional defences. A new kind of defence is required — one that adapts in real-time and learns from emerging threats.

This is where Tookitaki’s compliance platform, FinCense, plays a vital role.

Powered by the AFC Ecosystem and Agentic AI:

  • Typology-Driven Detection: FinCense continuously updates its detection logic based on real-world scam scenarios contributed by financial crime experts worldwide.
  • AI-Powered Simulation: Institutions can simulate deepfake-driven fraud scenarios to test and refine their internal controls.
  • Federated Learning: Risk signals and red flags from across institutions are shared securely without compromising sensitive data.
  • Smart Case Disposition: Agentic AI reviews and narrates alerts, allowing compliance officers to respond faster and with greater clarity — even in complex scams like this.
Talk to an Expert

Moving Forward: Facing the Synthetic Threat Landscape

Deepfake technology has moved from the realm of novelty to real-world risk. The Singapore incident is a wake-up call for companies across ASEAN and beyond.

When identity can be faked in real-time, and fraudsters learn faster than regulators, the only defence is to stay ahead — with intelligence, collaboration, and next-generation tech.

Because next time, the CEO might not be real, but the money lost will be.

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam
Blogs
28 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance in Australia has never been more critical — or more expensive.

As regulatory scrutiny increases and financial crime becomes more complex, financial institutions are under pressure to spend more time, money, and resources just to keep up.

But is this sustainable? And is there a smarter way to stay compliant without letting costs spiral out of control?

Let’s take a closer look at why compliance costs are rising, what’s at stake for banks and fintechs in Australia, and how modern AML solutions, powered by AI and collaboration, are helping institutions future-proof their compliance programmes.

Talk to an Expert

Why Are AML Compliance Costs Rising in Australia?

Over the past few years, Australia has seen a surge in regulatory activity around financial crime. From high-profile casino investigations to AUSTRAC’s growing enforcement role, the message is clear: AML compliance is non-negotiable.

Here’s what’s driving the rising cost:

1. Tighter Regulatory Expectations

AUSTRAC expects more than just basic transaction monitoring. Institutions must demonstrate proactive risk assessments, tailored customer due diligence (CDD), and robust ongoing monitoring — all supported by detailed documentation and audit trails.

2. More Complex Financial Crime

Criminals are getting smarter. Whether it’s mule networks exploiting instant payments or layering funds across crypto and traditional channels, detecting illicit activity now requires more sophisticated tools and deeper data insights.

3. Manual Workflows and Legacy Systems

Many institutions still rely on outdated systems and siloed processes, which increase the burden on compliance teams and inflate operational costs. Manually reviewing false positives or investigating fragmented alerts takes time — and people.

4. Reputational Risk and Fines

In recent years, enforcement actions have brought AML failures into public view — from Crown and Star casinos to financial institutions under investigation. The reputational damage, legal risk, and remediation costs far outweigh the cost of modernising compliance infrastructure.

Australia skyline-1

What Do Rising AML Costs Look Like on the Ground?

According to industry estimates, large Australian banks are spending hundreds of millions annually on compliance-related activities. Mid-sized banks and fintechs may not face the same scale, but they often carry a disproportionate burden due to leaner teams and tighter budgets.

Here’s where the costs add up:

  • Hiring and retaining skilled AML staff
  • Managing alert fatigue from legacy monitoring systems
  • Frequent audits and remediation exercises
  • Technology upgrades and consultant fees
  • Delays in customer onboarding due to manual CDD reviews

These costs aren’t just financial — they also affect speed, agility, and customer experience.

Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

The short answer: yes — but only if they’re the right tools.

Smarter AML compliance doesn't mean more tools. It means better tools that are purpose-built for modern financial crime risks. Here's what that looks like:

What Smarter AML Compliance Looks Like

1. Behavioural Transaction Monitoring

Modern systems go beyond rule-based monitoring to detect suspicious patterns based on behaviour. This reduces false positives and increases detection accuracy — freeing up analysts to focus on what matters.

2. Federated Learning and Shared Intelligence

Collaborative platforms enable institutions to share insights and typologies without sharing sensitive data. This reduces blind spots and helps detect new risks earlier — especially in cross-border and real-time payments.

3. Automation and AI Assistants

AI-powered investigation assistants can summarise alerts, prioritise high-risk cases, and auto-generate audit trails — helping compliance teams do more with less.

4. Dynamic Risk Scoring

Instead of static scoring, smarter systems update customer risk profiles in real-time based on behaviour, location, transaction type, and other dynamic inputs.

5. Plug-and-Play Integration

Modern AML solutions should integrate easily with core banking systems, customer onboarding tools, and case management platforms — reducing overhead and ensuring a seamless compliance workflow.

How Tookitaki’s FinCense Is Helping Australian Institutions Stay Ahead

At Tookitaki, we’ve designed FinCense to deliver smarter compliance — not just cheaper, but better.

Built on a modular, federated AI framework, FinCense empowers banks, fintechs, and payment platforms to stay ahead of financial crime risks without overburdening teams or budgets.

With FinCense, institutions get:

  • Up to 72% reduction in false positives
  • 3.5x faster case resolutions
  • Real-time, scenario-based monitoring tailored to local risks
  • Federated typology sharing via the AFC Ecosystem
  • Smart Disposition engine for audit-ready alert summaries

Whether you're dealing with domestic mule activity, complex layering, or regulatory audits — FinCense helps you detect, investigate, and respond with speed, accuracy, and confidence.

The Stakes Are Higher Than Ever

Financial crime is evolving rapidly, and so is the regulatory bar. But throwing more people, more tools, and more money at the problem isn’t the answer.

The future of AML compliance in Australia lies in smarter systems, collaborative intelligence, and scalable solutions that adapt as the threat landscape changes.

Final Thought

Rising AML compliance costs don’t have to mean rising pain.

With the right technology, institutions in Australia can reduce risk, improve efficiency, and build lasting trust with regulators and customers alike.

If you're ready to reduce the cost and complexity of compliance, without compromising on quality — Tookitaki is here to help.

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?