What is Singapore's Shared Responsibility Framework to Combat Phishing

6 mins

Phishing scams are on the rise, posing a significant challenge to the safety of digital transactions and online security. To address this growing concern, Singapore is taking a proactive and innovative approach with the introduction of the Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF). This new initiative aims to create a safer digital environment by outlining specific responsibilities for financial institutions and telecommunication companies to combat phishing scams effectively. The SRF is set to be rolled out later in 2024, according to media reports.

The Singapore Police Force reported a significant surge of 49.6 per cent in scam and cybercrime cases in 2023, reaching 50,376 compared to 33,669 cases in 2022. Despite this increase, there was a slight dip of 1.3 per cent in the total amount lost, totaling $651.8 million in 2023 compared to $660.7 million in 2022.

The development and proposal of the SRF is a collaborative effort led by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). Together, these agencies are laying the groundwork for a system where both service providers and consumers share the responsibility of preventing scams. This collective approach is designed to strengthen the overall resilience of Singapore's digital landscape against the threats posed by cybercriminals.

Exploring the Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF)

Overview of the SRF

The Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF), as jointly proposed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), introduces a systematic approach to combating phishing scams. The core aim of the SRF is to:

  • Clearly define and assign responsibilities to financial institutions (FIs) and telecommunication companies (Telcos).
  • Ensure these entities actively participate in mitigating the risks and damages associated with phishing scams.

This initiative represents a strategic move to enhance digital security and trust within Singapore's financial and communication ecosystems, making it more difficult for scammers to exploit these platforms.

Building Upon Previous Frameworks

The SRF is not developed in isolation but rather as an evolution of existing efforts to secure digital transactions against fraud. Here’s how it builds on previous frameworks:

  • Expands the Scope of Responsibility: Unlike previous frameworks that primarily focused on FIs, the SRF brings Telcos into the fold, recognizing their role in enabling digital communications that could be exploited for scams.
  • Comprehensive Approach: It introduces a more detailed set of duties for both FIs and Telcos, aiming for a more thorough and nuanced approach to scam prevention.
  • Collaborative Effort: Encouraging a partnership between FIs, Telcos, and the regulatory authorities, the SRF fosters a more cohesive defense against phishing scams, making it a collective responsibility.

Through these enhancements, the SRF aims to create a more robust and resilient digital environment, safeguarding consumers and businesses alike from the evolving threats of cybercrime.

New call-to-action

Key Components of the Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF)

Duties Assigned to Financial Institutions (FIs) and Telecommunication Companies (Telcos)

Under the SRF, both FIs and Telcos are entrusted with specific duties to mitigate the impact of phishing scams:

  • Financial Institutions (FIs): Their responsibilities include implementing robust verification processes for transactions, ensuring timely alerts to customers on transaction activities, and maintaining stringent security measures to detect and prevent unauthorized transactions.
  • Telecommunication Companies (Telcos): Telcos are required to implement scam filters to block phishing messages and calls, manage the integrity of SMS sender IDs, and assist in the rapid dissemination of scam alerts to consumers.
  • Payouts to Victims: When these duties are breached, resulting in losses from phishing scams, the SRF mandates that the responsible party—whether FIs or Telcos—must compensate the affected scam victims. This component of the framework ensures that there is a tangible incentive for both FIs and Telcos to adhere strictly to their assigned responsibilities.

The "Waterfall Approach" to Determining Responsibility

The SRF introduces a "waterfall approach" for determining which entity is responsible for compensating victims of phishing scams:

  • Primary Responsibility with FIs: Given their role as custodians of consumer funds, FIs are placed at the forefront of the responsibility hierarchy. They are expected to bear the brunt of the losses if it is found that their preventive measures were inadequate.
  • Secondary Role of Telcos: Telcos are considered the second line of defense, responsible for ensuring that their infrastructure is not used as a medium for scams. They are held accountable if it is determined that a lack of adequate scam filters or SMS sender ID verification contributed to the scam.
  • Sequential Accountability: The approach prioritizes accountability, ensuring that the entity directly responsible for the breach of duty compensates the affected parties. Only if FIs and Telcos have fulfilled their respective duties and a scam still occurs will the framework explore other measures without necessarily requiring payouts to consumers.

This structured approach emphasizes the importance of both preventive measures and swift response to incidents, underlining the shared responsibility between FIs, Telcos, and consumers in combating phishing scams.

New call-to-action

Impact of the SRF on Financial Institutions and Telecommunication Companies

The Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF) significantly boosts the accountability of Financial Institutions (FIs) and Telecommunication Companies (Telcos) directly to their consumers. By clearly outlining their roles in preventing phishing scams, the SRF ensures that FIs and Telcos are not just passive participants but active guardians of consumer safety and trust. This heightened accountability is designed to motivate these entities to adopt and maintain rigorous anti-scam controls, ensuring a safer digital environment for all users.

To align with the requirements of the SRF, both FIs and Telcos may need to undergo substantial operational and regulatory transformations. For FIs, this could mean enhancing their transaction monitoring and verification processes, while for Telcos, it might involve upgrading their infrastructure to better filter and block scam communications. These changes not only represent a shift towards more proactive scam prevention strategies but also underscore a collaborative commitment to safeguarding consumers against the evolving threat of digital scams.

Challenges and Opportunities

Implementing the Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF) poses a set of challenges that span technological, operational, and regulatory domains. Technologically, both financial institutions (FIs) and telecommunication companies (Telcos) may face the need to overhaul existing systems to meet the stringent requirements of the SRF, a process that can be time-consuming and costly. 

Operationally, the shift to a more proactive scam prevention strategy demands significant training and process re-engineering to ensure all staff are aligned with the new protocols. From a regulatory perspective, ensuring compliance with the SRF while balancing privacy concerns and avoiding overregulation presents a delicate balancing act for both FIs and Telcos.

Despite these challenges, the SRF also opens up a wealth of opportunities for enhancing the security of the digital banking and payments ecosystem in Singapore. By fostering a culture of shared responsibility, the SRF encourages innovation in scam prevention technologies and strategies, potentially setting a global benchmark for digital financial security. 

Moreover, the collaborative effort between FIs, Telcos, and regulatory bodies can lead to the development of more robust standards and practices that not only protect consumers but also enhance their confidence in digital transactions. Ultimately, the successful implementation of the SRF could position Singapore as a leader in the fight against digital financial crimes, showcasing the potential for a more secure and trustworthy digital future.

Enhancing Scam Prevention through Collaboration and Innovation

In the quest to bolster scam prevention and secure digital transactions, Tookitaki stands out as a key player, offering cutting-edge solutions designed to combat fraud and money laundering. Through its innovative platforms, FinCense and the Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, Tookitaki is ideally positioned to support the objectives of Singapore's Shared Responsibility Framework (SRF). These platforms provide the technological backbone financial institutions need to enhance their scam prevention efforts, aligning perfectly with the SRF's call for heightened accountability and proactive measures in safeguarding consumer interests.

Tookitaki's technology is not just about meeting the current demands of the SRF; it's about future-proofing against evolving digital threats. By leveraging the collective intelligence and real-time data analytics capabilities of FinCense and the AFC Ecosystem, Tookitaki empowers FIs to not only comply with their duties under the SRF but to exceed them, creating a financial environment that is safer for consumers. Through partnerships with Tookitaki, institutions can make significant strides in transforming Singapore’s digital landscape into a bastion of security and trust for users worldwide.