Blog

Money Laundering via Cryptocurrencies: All You Need to Know

Site Logo
Tookitaki
04 November 2020
read
8 min

Money laundering via cryptocurrency has been going on for a while now. We’ve all heard of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin. Crypto is used by financial criminals globally but how are they getting away with it? It’s time we lifted the lid on this crime and decoded what often sounds complicated but doesn’t have to be.

This is everything you need to know. 

What is cryptocurrency?

Simply put, Cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that is protected by encryption, making counterfeiting and double-spending practically impossible. Many cryptocurrencies are built on blockchain technology, which is a distributed ledger enforced by a distributed network of computers. Cryptocurrencies are distinguished by the fact that they are not issued by any central authority, making them potentially resistant to government intervention or manipulation.

The biggest criticism Cryptocurrencies face is their use for illegal activities.

Technological advancements have given criminals faster and safer options to wash their ill-gotten money. There is no doubt that cryptocurrencies are a very useful technological innovation that helps individuals and institutions access financial products and services in a faster and cost-effective manner. However, their rise as alternative value transfer and investment tools raises money laundering concerns as well.

Banned in some countries

Cryptocurrencies are rapidly gaining popularity, but not everyone is on board, as many governments have outlawed dealing and trading in these digital tokens. While there are apparently over 5,000 known cryptocurrencies in the world today, analysts and experts are still anticipating a rapid rise in the value of Bitcoin, the world’s oldest and most valuable cryptocurrency, with only a few months left in 2021. However, while some nations, like India, are rapidly expanding their crypto markets, others, such as Russia, Morocco, Egypt and Bangladesh, are tightening down. Recently, China’s central bank has announced that all transactions of cryptocurrencies are illegal in the country.

Money laundering via crypto

While they may not be a competitor to the currency in terms of laundering volume at present, the ever-increasing use of cryptocurrency and their unregulated or less-regulated nature in many jurisdictions mean that the financial world has a lot to worry about. The same is echoed in the 2019 meeting of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in Japan. “While crypto-assets do not pose a threat to global financial stability at this point, we remain vigilant to risks, including those related to consumer and investor protection, anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism,” says a note from the meeting.

Crypto advisors often claim that laundering money with cryptocurrencies is highly complex and risky, making it an ineffective strategy compared to conventional techniques. They also argue that transactions in digital currencies are more transparent and accountable compared to fiat currencies. Another argument is: money laundering using cryptocurrencies is comparatively very small in terms of volume and mainstream media is focusing more on criminal activities related to digital currencies rather than technology and innovation. Albeit on a small scale, there is no doubt that cryptocurrencies are being used to facilitate money laundering.

Cryptocurrencies are slowly changing their stature as a mainstream medium of value exchange in the digital era. Many large companies now accept the digital currency for payments of products and services, and many banks consider the adoption of blockchain technology. This being said, cryptocurrency really has the potential to replace their paper and plastic variants. Therefore, it is important to analyse the loopholes enabling these currencies to be used for money laundering and to develop adequate counter technologies to combat the crime.

Some Noteworthy Numbers and Cases

According to the United Nations, between US$800 billion and US$2 trillion are being laundered every year across the globe, representing 2-5% of the global gross domestic product. Out of this, more than 90% goes undetected. The exact volume of crypto laundering is yet to be established. However, we found some indicative statistics on the Internet.

  • A report says that crypto thefts, hacks, and frauds totaled US$1.36 billion in the first five months of 2020, compared to 2019’s US$4.5 billion.
  • According to another report, criminals laundered US$2.8 billion in 2019 using crypto exchanges, compared to US$1 billion in 2018.
  • As of 2019, total bitcoin spending on the dark web was US$829 million, representing 0.5% of all bitcoin transactions.
  • A separate study, analysing more than 800 market maker exchanges, found that 56% of all crypto exchanges worldwide have weak KYC identification protocols — with exchanges in Europe, the US and the UK among the worst offenders.
  • The study noted that 60% of European Virtual Asset Service Providers have deficient KYC practices.

In October 2020, Europol announced that an unprecedented international law enforcement operation involving 16 countries had resulted in the arrest of 20 individuals who attempted to launder tens of millions of euros since 2016 on behalf of the world’s foremost cybercriminals. Operated by the notorious QQAAZZ network, the scheme involved the conversion of stolen funds into cryptocurrency using tumbling services that help hide the source of funds. In yet another incident, a man from New Zealand was arrested on money laundering, worth thousands of dollars, involving cryptocurrency.

How Do Criminals Use Cryptocurrencies for Money Laundering?

To conceal the illegitimate origin of payments, criminals use a variety of strategies involving cryptocurrency. All of these approaches rely on one or more of cryptocurrency’s flaws, such as their intrinsic pseudonymity, ease of cross-border transactions, and decentralised peer-to-peer payments. Money laundering with cryptos follows the same three-stage process as cash-based money laundering.

1. Placement

In this stage, illicit funds are brought into the financial system through intermediaries such as financial institutions, exchanges, shops and casinos. One type of cryptocurrency can be bought with cash or other cryptocurrencies. It can be done through online cryptocurrency exchanges. Criminals often use exchanges with less levels of compliance with AML regulations for this purpose.

2. Layering

In this phase, criminals obscure the illegal source of funds through structured transactions. This makes the trail of illegal funds difficult to decode. Using crypto exchanges, criminals can convert one cryptocurrency into another or can take part in an Initial Coin Offering where payment for one type of digital currency is done with another type. Criminals can also move their crypto holdings to another country.

3. Integration

Here, illegal money is put back into the economy with a clean status. One of the most common techniques of criminals is the use of over the counter (OTC) brokers who act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers of cryptocurrencies. Many OTC brokers specialise in providing money-laundering services and they get very high commission rates for this.

Crypto Mixing

Mixing services, also known as tumblers, help cryptocurrency users to conduct transactions by mixing their cryptos with other users. A typical mixing service takes cryptos from a client, sends them through a series of various addresses and then recombines them, resulting in ‘clean’ cryptos.

Peer-to-peer Crypto networks

Criminals use these decentralised networks to transmit funds to a different location, frequently in another country where there are crypto exchanges with lax anti-money laundering legislation. These exchanges assist individuals in converting cryptocurrency into fiat currency in order to purchase high-end items.

Crypto ATMs

These ATMs allow people to purchase bitcoin via credit or debit cards and in some cases by depositing cash. Some ATMs offer the facility to trade cryptocurrencies for cash as well. In many countries, the KYC measures for the use of these machines are poorly enforced.

Online Gambling

Many gambling sites accept payments in cryptocurrencies. Criminals can purchase chips with cryptos and cash them out after a few transactions.

AML Regulations Related to Cryptocurrency

To combat the use of cryptocurrency in money laundering, regulators around the world have issued laws and advice for businesses trading in digital currencies.

While some regulators have included crypto exchanges and wallet businesses in their existing anti-money laundering legislation, others have established new ones.

  • In June 2019, global AML watchdog the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) published its guidance for virtual assets and virtual asset service providers (VASP). “The FATF strengthened its standards to clarify the application of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing requirements on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. According to the FATF, countries must now examine and minimise the risks associated with virtual asset financial operations and providers, as well as licence or register providers and subject them to supervision or monitoring by competent national authorities.
  • The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)’s Payment Services Act mandated that crypto businesses operating in the country should obtain a license to comply with AML regulations. In July 2020, the MAS proposed another set of regulations to control the cryptocurrency industry in the country. The European Union (EU) has recently adopted the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD5) which require crypto exchanges and custodial service providers to register with their local regulator and be compliant with know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering AML procedures. In the US, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) regulates Money Services Businesses (MSBs) under the Bank Secrecy Act.
  • In 2013, FinCEN issued guidance that stated a virtual currency exchange and an administrator of a centralised repository of virtual currency with authority to issue and redeem the currency to be considered as MSBs.
  • Canada became the first country to approve regulation of cryptocurrency in the case of anti-money laundering in 2014, passed by the Parliament of Canada under Bill C-31. The bill aims to amend Canada’s Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act to include Canadian cryptocurrency exchange. It has laid out the framework for regulating entities dealing in digital currencies, treating the currencies as money service businesses (MSBs).

 

How Can Crypto MSBs Ensure AML Compliance?

While regulators can issue guidance and norms, the onus is on MSBs to implement them. They need to have a well-designed AML compliance programme. This should be a well-balanced combination of compliance personal and technology. Having an in-house compliance team may be feasible only for large MSBs. However, the same is usually very expensive and impractical for smaller firms. They would have to rely more on highly intelligent process automation tools and platforms to sift out illegitimate transactions from large data sets.

There should be proper tools to verify the identity of people who transact in cryptocurrencies. They should be able to match and relate blockchain transactions with real identities, creating an end-to-end trail to help with AML investigations. Transaction monitoring tools that dig out suspicious patterns for further investigations are also essential for the AML compliance programmes of crypto MSBs.

The Relevance of Tookitaki Typology Repository in the Crypto World

Tookitaki developed a first-of-its-kind Typology Repository Management (TRM) framework to effectively solve the shortcomings of the present AML transaction monitoring environment. Tookitaki is a provider of proven and in-deployment AML solutions for major and small financial institutions. Through collective intelligence and continual learning, TRM is a novel means of identifying money laundering. Financial institutions will be able to capture shifting customer behaviour and stop bad actors with high accuracy and speed using this advanced machine learning approach, enhancing returns and risk coverage. It detects suspicious cases and prioritises notifications with high accuracy without requiring any personal information.

Tookitaki used the technique to successfully combat money laundering related to cryptocurrencies. We built a TRM-based solution for bitcoin AML compliance as part of the G20TechSprint challenge, a hackathon-style competition jointly organised by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Saudi G20 Presidency. In the category of monitoring and surveillance, the same team came out on top. Our technology could detect money laundering cases employing cryptocurrency via crypto-exchanges or their connection with banks because TRM can be scaled to cover any type of typologies spanning products, places, tactics, and predicate crime for the purpose of locating cryptocurrency-related funds.

To discover our AML solution and its unique features, request a demo here. 

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
30 Jul 2025
5 min
read

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud

Fraud in Australia has moved beyond stolen credit cards, today’s threats are smarter, faster, and often one step ahead.

Australia is facing a new wave of financial fraud—complex scams, cyber-enabled deception, and social engineering techniques that prey on trust. From sophisticated investment frauds to deepfake impersonations, criminals are evolving rapidly. And so must our fraud prevention strategies.

This blog explores how fraud is impacting Australia, what new methods criminals are using, and how financial institutions, businesses, and individuals can stay ahead of the game. Whether you're in compliance, fintech, banking, or just a concerned citizen, fraud prevention is everyone’s business.

The Fraud Landscape in Australia: A Wake-Up Call

In 2024 alone, Australians lost over AUD 2.7 billion to scams, according to data from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The Scamwatch program reported an alarming rise in phishing, investment scams, identity theft, and fake billing.

A few alarming trends:

  • Investment scams accounted for over AUD 1.3 billion in losses.
  • Business email compromise (BEC) and invoice fraud targeted SMEs.
  • Romance and remote access scams exploited personal vulnerability.
  • Deepfake scams and AI-generated impersonations are on the rise, particularly targeting executives and finance teams.

The fraud threat has gone digital, cross-border, and real-time. Traditional controls alone are no longer enough.

Talk to an Expert

Why Fraud Prevention Is a National Priority

Fraud isn't just a financial issue—it’s a matter of public trust. When scams go undetected, victims don’t just lose money—they lose faith in financial institutions, government systems, and digital innovation.

Here’s why fraud prevention is now top of mind in Australia:

  • Real-time payments mean real-time risks: With the rise of the New Payments Platform (NPP), funds can move across banks instantly. This has increased the urgency to detect and prevent fraud in milliseconds—not days.
  • Rise in money mule networks: Criminal groups are exploiting students, gig workers, and the elderly to launder stolen funds.
  • Increased regulatory pressure: AUSTRAC and ASIC are putting more pressure on institutions to identify and report suspicious activities more proactively.

Common Fraud Techniques Seen in Australia

Understanding how fraud works is the first step to preventing it. Here are some of the most commonly observed fraud techniques:

a) Business Email Compromise (BEC)

Fraudsters impersonate vendors, CEOs, or finance officers to divert funds through fake invoices or urgent payment requests. This is especially dangerous for SMEs.

b) Investment Scams

Fake trading platforms, crypto Ponzi schemes, and fraudulent real estate investments have tricked thousands. Often, these scams use fake celebrity endorsements or “guaranteed returns” to lure victims.

c) Romance and Sextortion Scams

These scams manipulate victims emotionally, often over weeks or months, before asking for money. Some even involve blackmail using fake or stolen intimate content.

d) Deepfake Impersonation

Using AI-generated voice or video, scammers are impersonating real people to initiate fund transfers or manipulate staff into giving away sensitive information.

e) Synthetic Identity Fraud

Criminals use a blend of real and fake information to create a new, ‘clean’ identity that can bypass onboarding checks at banks and fintechs.

20250730_2107_Cybersecurity Precaution Scene_remix_01k1dzk8hwfd4t9rd8mkhzgr1w

Regulatory Push for Smarter Controls

Regulators in Australia are stepping up their efforts:

  • AUSTRAC has introduced updated guidance for transaction monitoring and suspicious matter reporting, pushing institutions to adopt more adaptive, risk-based approaches.
  • ASIC is cracking down on investment scams and calling for platforms to implement stricter identity and payment verification systems.
  • The ACCC’s National Anti-Scam Centre launched a multi-agency initiative to disrupt scam operations through intelligence sharing and faster response times.

But even regulators acknowledge: compliance alone won't stop fraud. Prevention needs smarter tools, better collaboration, and real-time intelligence.

A New Approach: Proactive, AI-Powered Fraud Prevention

The most forward-thinking banks and fintechs in Australia are moving from reactive to proactive fraud prevention. Here's what the shift looks like:

✅ Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Instead of relying on static rules, modern systems use machine learning to flag suspicious behaviour—like unusual payment patterns, high-risk geographies, or rapid account-to-account transfers.

✅ Behavioural Analytics

Understanding what ‘normal’ looks like for each user helps detect anomalies fast—like a customer suddenly logging in from a new country or making a large transfer outside business hours.

✅ AI Copilots for Investigators

Tools like AI-powered investigation assistants can help analysts triage alerts faster, recommend next steps, and even generate narrative summaries for suspicious activity reports.

✅ Community Intelligence

Fraudsters often reuse tactics across institutions. Platforms like Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem allow banks to share anonymised fraud scenarios and red flags—so everyone can learn and defend together.

✅ Federated Learning Models

These models allow banks to collaborate on fraud detection algorithms without sharing customer data—bringing the power of collective intelligence without compromising privacy.

Fraud Prevention Best Practices for Australian Institutions

Whether you're a Tier-1 bank or a growing fintech, these best practices are critical:

  1. Prioritise real-time fraud detection tools that work across payment channels and digital platforms.
  2. Train your teams—fraudsters are exploiting human error more than technical flaws.
  3. Invest in explainable AI to build trust with regulators and internal stakeholders.
  4. Use layered defences: Combine transaction monitoring, device fingerprinting, behavioural analytics, and biometric verification.
  5. Collaborate across the ecosystem—join industry platforms, share intel, and learn from others.

How Tookitaki Supports Fraud Prevention in Australia

Tookitaki is helping Australian institutions stay ahead of fraud by combining advanced AI with collective intelligence. Our FinCense platform offers:

  • End-to-end fraud and AML detection across transactions, customers, and devices.
  • Federated learning that enables risk detection with insights contributed by a global network of financial crime experts.
  • Smart investigation tools to reduce alert fatigue and speed up response times.

The Role of Public Awareness in Prevention

It’s not just institutions—customers play a key role too. Public campaigns like Scamwatch, educational content from banks, and media coverage of fraud trends all contribute to prevention.

Simple actions like verifying sender details, avoiding suspicious links, and reporting scam attempts can go a long way. In the fight against fraud, awareness is the first line of defence.

Conclusion: Staying Ahead in a Smarter Fraud Era

Fraud prevention in Australia can no longer be treated as an afterthought. The threats are too advanced, too fast, and too costly.

With the right mix of technology, collaboration, and education, Australia can stay ahead of financial criminals—and turn the tide in favour of consumers, businesses, and institutions alike.

Whether it’s adopting AI tools, sharing threat insights, or empowering individuals, fraud prevention is no longer optional. It’s the new frontline of trust.

Cracking Down Under: How Australia Is Fighting Back Against Fraud
Blogs
29 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam

In March 2025, a finance director at a multinational firm in Singapore authorised a US$499,000 payment during what appeared to be a Zoom call with the company’s senior leadership. There was just one problem: none of the people on the call were real.

What seemed like a routine virtual meeting turned out to be a highly orchestrated deepfake scam, where cybercriminals used artificial intelligence to impersonate the company’s Chief Financial Officer and other top executives. The finance director, believing the request was genuine, wired nearly half a million dollars to a fraudulent account.

The incident has sent shockwaves across the financial and corporate world, underscoring the fast-evolving threat of deepfake technology.

Background of the Scam

According to Singapore police reports, the finance executive received a message from someone posing as the company’s UK-based CFO. The message requested an urgent fund transfer to facilitate a confidential acquisition. To build credibility, the fraudster set up a Zoom call — featuring multiple senior executives, all appearing and sounding authentic.

But the entire video call was fabricated using deepfake technology.

These weren’t just stolen profile photos; they were AI-generated likenesses with synced facial movements and realistic voices, mimicking actual executives. The finance director, seeing what seemed like familiar faces and hearing familiar voices, followed through with the transfer.

Only later did the company realise that the actual executives had never been on the call.

What the Case Revealed

This wasn’t just another phishing email or spoofed WhatsApp message. This was next-level digital deception. Here’s what made it chillingly effective:

  • Multi-party deepfake execution – The fraud involved several synthetic identities, all rendered convincingly in real-time to simulate a legitimate boardroom environment.
  • High-level impersonation – Senior figures like the CFO were cloned with accurate visual and vocal characteristics, heightening the illusion of authority and urgency.
  • Deeply contextual manipulation – The scam leveraged business context (e.g. M&A activity, board-level communications) that suggested insider knowledge.

Singapore’s police reported this as one of the most convincing cases of AI-powered impersonation seen to date — and issued a national warning to corporations and finance professionals.

Impact on Financial Institutions and Corporates

While the fraud targeted one company, its implications ripple across the entire financial system:

Deepfake Fatigue and Trust Erosion

When even video calls are no longer trustworthy, confidence in digital communication takes a hit. This undermines both internal decision-making and external client relationships.

CFOs and Finance Teams in the Crosshairs

Finance and treasury teams are prime targets for scams like this. These professionals are expected to act fast, handle large sums, and follow instructions from the top — making them vulnerable to high-pressure frauds.

Breakdown of Traditional Verification

Emails, video calls, and even voice confirmations can be falsified. Without secondary verification protocols, companies remain dangerously exposed.

ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2025, 02_34_13 PM

Lessons Learned from the Scam

The Singapore deepfake case isn’t an outlier — it’s a glimpse into the future of financial crime. Key takeaways:

  1. Always Verify High-Value Requests
    Especially those involving new accounts or cross-border transfers. A secondary channel of verification — via phone or an encrypted app — is now a must.
  2. Educate Senior Leadership
    Executives need to be aware that their digital identities can be hijacked. Regular briefings on impersonation risks are essential.
  3. Adopt Real-Time Behavioural Monitoring
    Advanced analytics can flag abnormal transaction patterns — even when the request appears “approved” by an authority figure.
  4. Invest in Deepfake Detection Tools
    There are now software solutions that scan video content for artefacts, inconsistencies, or signs of AI manipulation.
  5. Strengthen Internal Protocols
    Critical payment workflows should always require multi-party authorisation, escalation logic, and documented rationale.

The Role of Technology in Prevention

Scams like this are designed to outsmart conventional defences. A new kind of defence is required — one that adapts in real-time and learns from emerging threats.

This is where Tookitaki’s compliance platform, FinCense, plays a vital role.

Powered by the AFC Ecosystem and Agentic AI:

  • Typology-Driven Detection: FinCense continuously updates its detection logic based on real-world scam scenarios contributed by financial crime experts worldwide.
  • AI-Powered Simulation: Institutions can simulate deepfake-driven fraud scenarios to test and refine their internal controls.
  • Federated Learning: Risk signals and red flags from across institutions are shared securely without compromising sensitive data.
  • Smart Case Disposition: Agentic AI reviews and narrates alerts, allowing compliance officers to respond faster and with greater clarity — even in complex scams like this.
Talk to an Expert

Moving Forward: Facing the Synthetic Threat Landscape

Deepfake technology has moved from the realm of novelty to real-world risk. The Singapore incident is a wake-up call for companies across ASEAN and beyond.

When identity can be faked in real-time, and fraudsters learn faster than regulators, the only defence is to stay ahead — with intelligence, collaboration, and next-generation tech.

Because next time, the CEO might not be real, but the money lost will be.

The CEO Wasn’t Real: Inside Singapore’s $499K Deepfake Video Scam
Blogs
28 Jul 2025
6 min
read

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance in Australia has never been more critical — or more expensive.

As regulatory scrutiny increases and financial crime becomes more complex, financial institutions are under pressure to spend more time, money, and resources just to keep up.

But is this sustainable? And is there a smarter way to stay compliant without letting costs spiral out of control?

Let’s take a closer look at why compliance costs are rising, what’s at stake for banks and fintechs in Australia, and how modern AML solutions, powered by AI and collaboration, are helping institutions future-proof their compliance programmes.

Talk to an Expert

Why Are AML Compliance Costs Rising in Australia?

Over the past few years, Australia has seen a surge in regulatory activity around financial crime. From high-profile casino investigations to AUSTRAC’s growing enforcement role, the message is clear: AML compliance is non-negotiable.

Here’s what’s driving the rising cost:

1. Tighter Regulatory Expectations

AUSTRAC expects more than just basic transaction monitoring. Institutions must demonstrate proactive risk assessments, tailored customer due diligence (CDD), and robust ongoing monitoring — all supported by detailed documentation and audit trails.

2. More Complex Financial Crime

Criminals are getting smarter. Whether it’s mule networks exploiting instant payments or layering funds across crypto and traditional channels, detecting illicit activity now requires more sophisticated tools and deeper data insights.

3. Manual Workflows and Legacy Systems

Many institutions still rely on outdated systems and siloed processes, which increase the burden on compliance teams and inflate operational costs. Manually reviewing false positives or investigating fragmented alerts takes time — and people.

4. Reputational Risk and Fines

In recent years, enforcement actions have brought AML failures into public view — from Crown and Star casinos to financial institutions under investigation. The reputational damage, legal risk, and remediation costs far outweigh the cost of modernising compliance infrastructure.

Australia skyline-1

What Do Rising AML Costs Look Like on the Ground?

According to industry estimates, large Australian banks are spending hundreds of millions annually on compliance-related activities. Mid-sized banks and fintechs may not face the same scale, but they often carry a disproportionate burden due to leaner teams and tighter budgets.

Here’s where the costs add up:

  • Hiring and retaining skilled AML staff
  • Managing alert fatigue from legacy monitoring systems
  • Frequent audits and remediation exercises
  • Technology upgrades and consultant fees
  • Delays in customer onboarding due to manual CDD reviews

These costs aren’t just financial — they also affect speed, agility, and customer experience.

Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?

The short answer: yes — but only if they’re the right tools.

Smarter AML compliance doesn't mean more tools. It means better tools that are purpose-built for modern financial crime risks. Here's what that looks like:

What Smarter AML Compliance Looks Like

1. Behavioural Transaction Monitoring

Modern systems go beyond rule-based monitoring to detect suspicious patterns based on behaviour. This reduces false positives and increases detection accuracy — freeing up analysts to focus on what matters.

2. Federated Learning and Shared Intelligence

Collaborative platforms enable institutions to share insights and typologies without sharing sensitive data. This reduces blind spots and helps detect new risks earlier — especially in cross-border and real-time payments.

3. Automation and AI Assistants

AI-powered investigation assistants can summarise alerts, prioritise high-risk cases, and auto-generate audit trails — helping compliance teams do more with less.

4. Dynamic Risk Scoring

Instead of static scoring, smarter systems update customer risk profiles in real-time based on behaviour, location, transaction type, and other dynamic inputs.

5. Plug-and-Play Integration

Modern AML solutions should integrate easily with core banking systems, customer onboarding tools, and case management platforms — reducing overhead and ensuring a seamless compliance workflow.

How Tookitaki’s FinCense Is Helping Australian Institutions Stay Ahead

At Tookitaki, we’ve designed FinCense to deliver smarter compliance — not just cheaper, but better.

Built on a modular, federated AI framework, FinCense empowers banks, fintechs, and payment platforms to stay ahead of financial crime risks without overburdening teams or budgets.

With FinCense, institutions get:

  • Up to 72% reduction in false positives
  • 3.5x faster case resolutions
  • Real-time, scenario-based monitoring tailored to local risks
  • Federated typology sharing via the AFC Ecosystem
  • Smart Disposition engine for audit-ready alert summaries

Whether you're dealing with domestic mule activity, complex layering, or regulatory audits — FinCense helps you detect, investigate, and respond with speed, accuracy, and confidence.

The Stakes Are Higher Than Ever

Financial crime is evolving rapidly, and so is the regulatory bar. But throwing more people, more tools, and more money at the problem isn’t the answer.

The future of AML compliance in Australia lies in smarter systems, collaborative intelligence, and scalable solutions that adapt as the threat landscape changes.

Final Thought

Rising AML compliance costs don’t have to mean rising pain.

With the right technology, institutions in Australia can reduce risk, improve efficiency, and build lasting trust with regulators and customers alike.

If you're ready to reduce the cost and complexity of compliance, without compromising on quality — Tookitaki is here to help.

The Rising Cost of AML Compliance in Australia: Can Smarter Tools Reduce the Burden?